What Exactly Is Avelo’s Network Strategy?


There is admittedly much in the world that confuses me, but near the top of that list has been Avelo’s network strategy. What exactly is the plan? After several discussions and some research, I think I get where the airline is heading. Avelo’s recent announcement of flying from its small-city bases to the big cities of Atlanta and Chicago seems to fit this strategy, so that’s a good sign.

The overarching network ideal is basically the opposite of Allegiant. At Allegiant, the airline has long focused on flying people from various small origin airports to big-city destinations with aircraft bases like Las Vegas or Orlando. Avelo, on the other hand, wants to fly people from a few, small origin aircraft base airports like New Haven or Charlotte/Concord to a variety of big destinations.

These, of course, are not the same kind of small airports that Allegiant cares about. Allegiant wants those small airports with very limited service nearby. On top of that, it wants cities that don’t have nonstop service to the big destination it plans to serve. Instead, travelers get stuck with high fares and connections on regional jets until Allegiant steps in. Those kinds of cities don’t work for Avelo’s model.

Instead, Avelo needs secondary airports in bigger cities. It needs to serve airports that have access to a big population center — preferably in a way where those people find the secondary airport more convenient than the primary — but it needs to have a fair number of people around or it doesn’t work. And that is the core of Avelo’s market.

This is not readily apparent at all based on Avelo’s network and history, but it is slowly moving in this direction. Let’s just think about some of the airline’s plans that didn’t fit this strategy:

  • The first Avelo base was Burbank. Yes, it was a secondary airport in a big market, but it had a ton of competition to good-sized cities. So, Avelo had to serve the tiny cities like Pasco and Salem. It abandoned the airport last month.
  • In 2022, Avelo opened an aircraft base at Orlando’s main airport. That seems weird, but it acted more like an Allegiant-style operation there. Now in March it’s down to just other base flying from Orlando to New Haven and the two Wilmingtons.
  • Meanwhile in 2023, Avelo decided to put a base in Las Vegas. Again, that’s weird. It made it until 2025 before being shut down.
  • There was briefly a base in Santa Rosa for about a year starting in 2024. That is actually the kind of airport that would make sense except… it had nonstops to a lot of the most important cities already and Avelo was primarily serving small places, as it did from Burbank. It’s gone now too.
  • Avelo went into Hartford, the primary airport closest to its base in New Haven. That didn’t last long.

All of those are gone now, or appropriately shrunk, but two outliers remain:

  • Avelo opened a base at Raleigh/Durham in 2023. This is no secondary airport, and it still exists today in the system. If we look at March of next year, RDU has flights to smaller cities of Albany, Grand Rapids, and Rochester. It also connects to the big base in New Haven and there is still a Punta Cana leisure flight. So many strategies in one place.
  • March of next year has Wilmington, NC as the airline’s second largest base behind New Haven. This may be a smaller city, but it is not a secondary airport. It is just a market that apparently lacked service to some cities, so Avelo stepped in. It must be pretty happy considering the volume of flights there.

Both of these can help to fuel the New Haven operation by having aircraft that fly up at the right time when space is available since there isn’t room for any more based aircraft there. But you don’t keep these operations just for that. They have to work in some form or another on their own.

So, you can see my confusion here. But the airline is making some progress in this regard. Its only major base is New Haven and that fits this plan perfectly. It’s a secondary airport in a big metro area where the airport is very convenient to a lot of people, and it will serve 27 destinations during spring break next year (as of now). Then there’s Wilmington, Delaware which fits the bill next to Philly and will hit 16 destinations when its third based aircraft arrives in March. The same sort of goes for Concord outside Charlotte, though I don’t think that’s as convenient to as big a swath of the population. It will get its second based aircraft and rise to 10 destinations in March.

Even Lakeland fits this mold. But wait, you say, it’s Florida. That’s a destination. It is, but there is a pretty large population in Polk County which would find Lakeland more convenient, and only some of them live in a swamp. I am not surprised to see a San Juan flight. That should do well. If Lakeland is about the origin, it has a whole lot better chance of success than if it’s trying to be a key destination. (The one exception to that is the announcement of flights from Detroit starting in February. Lakeland is the spring training home of the Detroit Tigers.)

Slowly but surely, those bases are starting to trend more toward big cities. We have the addition of flights to both Atlanta and Chicago/O’Hare from Concord and Wilmington (DE) with Lakeland getting an Atlanta flight too. That is where we should expect to see growth in the future, because it’s really the only thing that might possibly make sense. You can’t connect a small city to another small city and expect success.

With all that in mind, Avelo’s network still looks like quite the hodgepodge of ideas. My sense is that all of these routes exist because the airline went on tangents before. As long as they work, they stay. But if they don’t, I’d expect we will see more of this “secondary airport to big destination growth” in the future. That is where Avelo wants to be, and it’s really the only thing that makes sense.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

35 responses to “What Exactly Is Avelo’s Network Strategy?”

  1. Soraya McDonald-Cartier Avatar
    Soraya McDonald-Cartier

    Doesn’t Avelo exist as an extension of ICE for the sole purpose of rounding up and deporting immigrants in order to do the Trump regime’s bidding? Disgusting government. Even worse airline.

    1. Kevin Avatar
      Kevin

      Sorta. They aren’t government owned, but have shifted a lot of their assets toward operating deportation flights on behalf of ICE.

    2. Eric Morris Avatar
      Eric Morris

      I definitely come to an airline blog to hear caterwauling about topics having nothing to do with the article. Thanks for fulfilling my needs. Get over it.

      On topic, I think it is fascinating what Avelo is trying to accomplish from these smaller cities. But TBD on its success.

      1. David C Avatar
        David C

        You got that right!

      2. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        It’s so tiring

        1. lindalovesherlace Avatar
          lindalovesherlace

          Yes, it’s so tiring to be unable to pay electricity bills, thanks to skyrocketing energy bills due to the Billionaire-fueled greed that is the AI fantasy (hint: it will come crashing down like the dot-com bubble of 2000), or not able to pay for food, due to SNAP benefits being revoked and used as a political football, or to separate parents from children illegally thanks to a warped vision of America should be. Another hint: America is on a downward spiral. But yes, so tiring for you Maggots.

          1. See_Bee Avatar
            See_Bee

            No, it’s tiring that people have to make EVERYTHING about politics. This article was about network strategy in an aviation blog, but you’re trying to talk about SNAP benefits and using name-calling. You’re hijacking the blog for your agenda, which is pretty selfish and disrespectful

            @Cranky – I realize manually policing this is probably a hassle but commentors like the 2 above are a distraction for the community, especially when they are the first or second comment on the blog. Not sure if you can (ironically to lindalovesherlace’s point) get AI to kill political comments?

  2. David C Avatar
    David C

    I’m curious what other potential airports similar to New Haven, Wilmington and Conciord are out there?

    McKinney TX (DFW)
    Katy TX area (Houston West)
    Fort Collins/Boulder (Denver)
    Paine Field (seattle)
    Carlsbad CA (san diego)
    What would be Chicago?

    I’m sure more knowledgeable folks can generate a reasonable list.
    Interesting strategy that could have legs if they can keep operational integrity intact.

    1. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
      Angry Bob Crandall

      I’d like to add Gary/Chicago. Also why the big Orlando airport instead of Sanford?

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        They aren’t trying to build up a major outbound traffic base at MCO like Brett is theorizing they are at LAL. And for much of the market SFB is inconvenient, and Allegiant is well-entrenched there.

    2. SandyCreek Avatar
      SandyCreek

      McKinney can be a promising contender once the airport opens – for a good part of the northern suburbs of Dallas, MKI is not a time disadvantage to DFW, and likely comes with cheaper and easier parking, plus Allegiant isn’t in the Dallas market.

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        True, but I can’t help but think that if McKinney has that much potential Southwest is likely to move in, and probably Allegiant as well. At best, Avelo might get a few routes.

        The lack of Allegiant in the Dallas Metroplex is a legacy of the Wright Amendment and the infamous Five Party Agreement (https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/a2ca4f3a-548d-4b22-8137-c152c714611c/Five%20Party%20Agreement.pdf), which limited (and still does, at least for now) the number of gates at Love and formerly bound the City of Fort Worth to oppose efforts to add passenger service at Meacham or Alliance. And DFW is expensive to operate out of.

        As soon as someplace becomes available other than DFW – new terminals (McKinney, maybe Denton, or Fort Worth going ahead with Meacham or Alliance, which seems unlikely) or Dallas being able to add new gates at Love – I suspect Allegiant will come into the market.

        1. John G Avatar
          John G

          DFW isn’t in Allegiant’s wheelhouse.

          They specialize in taking people from smaller cities to vacation spot.

          DFW is neither of those things.

      2. jd Avatar
        jd

        Last year Avelo purportedly signed a letter of intent to operate three flights per day out of McKinney when its commercial facilities open.

    3. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
      O’Hare Is My Second Home

      As said, GYY could be one Chicago substitute. Go the other way from Chicago and you have RFD, which has Allegiant flights. You could serve both with no cannibalization. Both airports have pretty big catchment areas.

    4. Kilroy Avatar
      Kilroy

      I doubt it would ever be allowed simply because of the politics and NIMBY factions (I’m surprised the airport still exists, given that it’s tough to buy a home in communities around it for much less than $1 million), but I’d add KBED (Hanscom Field) in the Boston suburbs to that list. That’s a solid hour from Boston Logan much of the time with traffic, convenient to major highways, and has a lot of population nearby with disposable incomes.

    5. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      Alaska will defend Paine Field strongly. I could theoretically see Avelo adding LTD service from…somewhere…to Paine once they get the E195-E2s, but even then I’m not sure they’d be interested in flights over three hours, doesn’t seem to fit their model from New Haven so far.

      Boulder has small runways, college teams using larger aircraft have to use DEN because WBU simply can’t handle the planes. Not sure if the City would want to spend the money?

      The next alternative for Chicago would either be Gary or Rockford. Allegiant is already at RFD. GYY has been tried before, but it’s poorly positioned for much of the catchment area and both the city and Lake County are below-average income areas, limiting the local outbound potential. But they are improving the passenger terminal facilities and actively seeking tenants, so there’s a possibility there.

    6. Steve Betzner Avatar
      Steve Betzner

      Gary-Chicago Airport.

    7. jd Avatar
      jd

      New Haven has a catchment of several million people for whom it’s a genuine PITA to reach the nearest major airports (in NYC). Most of these other places just aren’t comparable.

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        It’s about an hour to BDL from New Haven with no bridges or other NYC-adjacent hassles, so that’s also a limiting factor on HVN’s ability to draw new service.

        Even with that, though, I’m surprised someone hasn’t at least added service from HVN to a hub.

  3. John G Avatar
    John G

    You left out their strategy of flying to small cities in Venezuela and Central America.

    But at least the passengers on those flights are not in a position to care that there is no in flight service.

  4. CraigTPA Avatar
    CraigTPA

    The “mirror universe Allegiant” theory makes sense, but there are limits to it. There aren’t a lot of cities like New Haven out there, and even in New Haven Breeze has stepped in to snap up several of the “flights to big cities” markets with a better product and the right airplane, the A220. And there’s an inherent limit in growth in those markets in that if the market is stimulated enough one of the majors will step in and at least offer some hub connectivity. If they weren’t concerned about cannibalization of BDL JetBlue might already be looking at seasonal service to a couple of Florida destinations.

    (Yes, Avelo has ordered the E195-E2 but at the current delivery rate they’re not going to see any for a while, and the addition to the fleet is going to be expensive, even if Avelo can swing the financing.)

    As for LAL, there is a potential seasonal market for visitors, but it’s pretty much limited to VFR and snowbirds who have bought in Polk County as the markets that are less swamp-adjacent have gotten more expensive. They get some Orlando traffic, but it’s limited, and even more so to Tam[a or the beaches. As for outbound traffic, there is some but again there’s a natural limit to growth in that how many cities can support even 2-3x/week from LAL given that MCO and TPA have service to just about everywhere. They’re going to be a bottom-feeder, plain and simple.

    Honestly, if they hadn’t chosen New Haven they’d probably have folded already. The Wilmingtons might pan out as well, but then you run into limits. Breeze’s model seems to work better, and Breeze chose the right plane from the start.

    1. v1_rotate Avatar
      v1_rotate

      What big cities has Breeze “stepped in to snap up’ from HVN? Aside from VRB, ORF, and RIC, none of which are big cities, everything they serve from HVN was already served by Avelo. And according to the various blogs that post the revenue data, it doesn’t seem like they are doing particularly well in HVN.

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        Fair point, I think I was lookiong at the wrong airport flight listings and not HVN when I said this. Apologies.

        But that still leaves the question of whether or not Avelo and Breeze can both serve major cities from the same airport (in this case HVN to MCO being the example), given that Breeze has a superior product and Avelo has to compete on price (and, perhaps, punctuality.) At the least, this could limit both airlines’ ability to add frequencies to cities that have the potential to go daily (or even more), at least seasonally.

        Of course, MCO could be a one-off exception, and frankly if the market apperared ready to support a daily (or more) service, given its strategy in the NYC-area airports I’d expect JetBlue to step in, putting Avelo in the bottom-feeder role.

  5. Emil Avatar
    Emil

    Someone mentioned Gary. That would be great for us Southsiders.

    1. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      MDW is plenty Southside, no?

      1. Emil Avatar
        Emil

        Not for the Southeastsiders! Plus MDW is almost all SWA.

        1. Bill from DC Avatar
          Bill from DC

          You’re right Emil, I should have known better, my father grew up on Avenue C and 112th!

          1. Emil Avatar
            Emil

            108th and Avenue N. Long live the Calumet Beach Inn on 109th and Yukon Moose Cholak!!!

    2. Chris Avatar
      Chris

      Can NW Indiana make Gary work for the airline, though? Allegiant tried and pulled out in 2013. I know NW Indiana has experienced a lot of strong growth over the past few years but I’m curious if they are at the point where they can support Avelo service. Gary’s always confounded me as the airport’s pretty conveniently located, has sufficient runway length, etc. But the Wikipedia page on Gary’s PAX service reads like a who’s who of failed airlines – Pan Am, Southeast Airlines, SkyValue Airlines, Skybus Airlines and Hooters Air.

  6. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    Doesn’t Breeze utilize a similar strategy albeit more successfully and with a better overall product?

  7. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    For cities needing service at an alternate airport, how about Atlanta? I know it would piss off the widget something fierce but there are 6,000 foot runways at two airports that could easily slap another 2k feet on them.

    – Cobb County International Airport – McCollum Field (RYY): 6,295 ft.

    – Gwinnett County Airport – Briscoe Field (LZU): 6,000 ft

    ATL is south of downtown. Each of these counties is north of the city, home to a wealthy suburban population and at the far end of the county (Kennesaw and Lawrenceville, respectively). At the best of times, each airport is at least 45 minutes from ATL, probably more like an hour to 90 minutes with traffic.

    No I didn’t mention PDK because it’s not far enough outside the city, it’s actually inside the main Atlanta beltway.

    I’ll also mention Manassas Virginia (MNZ) because I know they are contemplating building a px terminal. This doesn’t make any sense to me primarily because IAD is 25 miles north, they have a nearly identical catchment area and IAD is not capacity restricted in any way.

    Nevertheless this is a go with area governments and Avports spending up to $125 million with px service able to commence in early 2027. So like it or not, they’re on this list too!

    1. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      Missed my edit window but the MNZ passenger project is no longer just being considered, it’s definitely a go, to the tune of $75-125 million including a px terminal, new tower, runway and infrastructure improvements, etc.

      1. abcdefg Avatar
        abcdefg

        What a waste of money that should just be invested in IAD.

  8. Ken Velten Avatar
    Ken Velten

    Avelo’s biggest problem is that in most markets it does not fly daily and only once a day. If your flight is cancelled you are stuck for 3 or 4 days or you have to book an alternate carrier. You will probably get a refund from Avelo but the alternate is much more expensive. So if service twice a week works for you, Avelo is a good alternate.

Leave a Reply to Emil Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier