Spirit’s Survival Hopes Dim After Posting Awful Q2 Results


The roller coaster ride that has defined Spirit over the last five years appears to be coming to an end. After pioneering the ultra low cost carrier (ULCC) model in the US, the airline rose quickly and then fell hard. It was never able to turn a profit after the pandemic, and it filed for bankruptcy protection. It exited bankruptcy in March, and now that the airline is a public company again, it has very quietly posted its Q2 results. If you didn’t think it would be possible to go bankrupt, come out, and somehow post even worse results… well, you were wrong.

By the numbers, there wasn’t much to say that’s positive, though we can try. The airline’s total unit revenue (TRASM) rose 4.8 percent vs Q2 2024, and its revenue per passenger flight segment was up 7 percent from $108.46 to $116.05. That’s as close as we can get to having good news here.

Now, the bad news. Spirit’s capacity plunged 23.9 percent year-over-year on 22 percent fewer departures. If you’re going to shrink that much, you really need to boost revenue to keep up with cost creep. Here’s where things start to get wild.

Remember that the unit revenue rose 4.8 percent, right? Unit costs were up about double that. And it was only that good because there was a big fuel-price benefit. Unit costs excluding fuel and special items was up an eye-popping 19.2 percent.

The cost problem is very real when you shrink, and Spirit’s commercial plan makes that even worse. Spirit ended Q2 with 215 aircraft which is up from the 210 a year ago. There are always Pratt & Whitney issues to consider that may have grounded different numbers of aircraft in each quarter, but that hardly explains this. What really happened is Spirit just stopped flying airplanes at off-peak times. Its aircraft utilization tanked 26.4 percent to a miserable 7.8 hours per day. That’s good for revenue, but if revenue doesn’t climb more than costs do, you’re out of luck. And those costs… yikes.

Spirit says “The [cost] increase on a per-ASM basis was primarily due to increases in salaries, wages and benefits expense, other operating expense, aircraft rent expense, landing fees and other rents expense, and distribution expense.” It seems like it might have been easier to just list the things that were not up.

When we bring this all together, the airline posted a -18.1 percent operating margin which is significantly worse than last year’s -11.9 percent. Net margin was -24.1 percent. Cash and cash equivalents were down to just over $407 million after burning through almost $250 million in Q2 alone. All of this adds up to the airline being in very serious trouble.

It’s bad enough that Spirit has issued a so-called “going concern” warning in its 10-Q, which is what public companies put out if they think they might not make it through the next 12 months.

Spirit says overcapacity and weak leisure demand in the domestic market have caused big problems. It has been trying to counteract this in several ways, “including the implementation of network and product enhancements, including its Premium Economy travel option, consummation of sale-leaseback transactions related to certain of its owned spare engines, and other discretionary cost reduction strategies, including the pilot furloughs announced in July 2025.”

But then, Spirit says that’s not enough. It has done the math, and it is going to bust through the debt covenants and the requirements of the credit card processor agreement if it doesn’t do more. So it’s basically looking to do a fire sale. Airplanes, real estate, excess gates, cutting fixed costs, and trying to raise more money are all on the table. But if it can’t? Well, then it’s over.

Notably, the credit card processor deal ends at the end of this year, and to renew, the company wants a bigger holdback. In other words, the card company will hold more of Spirit’s money until after travel is complete so that it doesn’t get left holding the bag if Spirit fails. And that is often the death knell for a struggling airline. In conclusion, the airline coldly notes:

Because of the uncertainty of successfully completing the initiatives to comply with the minimum liquidity covenants and of the outcome of discussions with Company stakeholders, management has concluded there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within 12 months from the date these financial statements are issued.

Considering these results and the credit card processor deal expiring at year-end, I’d be amazed if the airline made it into 2026. In fact, I don’t see how it can even get that far with the cash burn that it has right now.

It’s hard not to feel for the people at the airline who have gone through so much in the last few years. But that’s the airline business. And there will be opportunity for many to go elsewhere. If Spirit fails, this will at least strengthen the position of other airlines like Frontier, Breeze, JetBlue, and maybe even United and Sun Country. But that’s all speculation. Right now, all we know is that Spirit is in critical condition.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

29 responses to “Spirit’s Survival Hopes Dim After Posting Awful Q2 Results”

  1. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    Tic toc, tic toc. Since travel demand is softening, it’s only a matter of time until liquidation.

  2. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Guns N Roses? Should have gone with Grave Digger by DMB…
    In all seriousness, if Spirit goes, I think you’ll see a massive focus on the “weak leisure demand in the domestic market”

    If thats really the cause of Spirits demise, then im not sure you will see a bolster to its competitors (maybe they’ll stand pat), but also weak travel demand seems like the worst support reason to other competitors vs “sudden incident impacting airline trust” (aka valujet). Either way Ill be curious to see what the public discourse of this will be if it all goes down the tubes.

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      If Spirit goes down, Frontier and others will enjoy a respite.

      That doesn’t mean Frontier and the others have a good model. Frontier has basically the same fundamental issue as Spirit – spill model in a time where the legacies are leaving less spill.

      Frontier’s network planners seem just as clueless as Spirit in that regard. Nothing F9 has done since Covid has addressed this weakness. Any return to health by Frontier in a post Spirit world won’t be because Frontier’s model is strong. It will just be because it outlasted Spirit.

  3. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    Spirit’s problem is that it hasn’t addressed its most fundamental issue.

    It’s a spill carrier. No one flies Spirit for choice. Pre Covid, the big airlines, American, etc, left enough demand on the table for Spirit to make good money.

    That doesn’t mean Spirit has a good business model. It’s always has a terrible model – the test of a model being is what happens when it is under pressure.

    Spirit has been under pressure since Covid. The legacies decided to let less demand spill over to Spirit. And the weakness of its model was suddenly revealed.

    And Spirit has done nothing to fix that. To be fair, it would be hard to shift to a model where it relies less on spill. But it hasn’t even tried. To me it appears they don’t even understand the problem they face.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      I’d even go one step further and say that Spirit (and Frontier, Breeze, etc.) can’t shift to a more stable model, because the US majors have successfully answered the challenge of the market splitting into “network” and “leisure” carriers (lower fares and point-to-point routes) to the extent it has in Europe, through different fare classes and, in Southwest’s case, becoming more like the Big Three.

      (The European Big Three – ILM, Lufthansa Group, and AF/KLM – have “leisure” brands within their ownership groups to challenge the likes of Ryanair and Easyjet, although part of this is also due to the strucrure of European labour agreements.)

      I’m not sure Frontier or Breeze has that much more of a grip on the challenge than Spirit has. Allegiant’s really unique model has a much better chance of survival in the long run.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        I think this is fundamentally untrue, or at least, unproven.

        There is a successful model in Europe – Ryanair. No one has ever tried that model in the US. Skybus in 2007/2008 billed itself as the US equivalent, but their main base was Columbus, OH. Whereas the base that was the foundation of Ryanair’s success was London. Columbus on the one side, London on the other. These things are obviously different.

        (Skybus did other stupid things, I’m just pointing out one very obvious way in which they were Not Ryanair).

        Ryanair dominates its markets – it is not a spill carrier.

        If you look back to the original Southwest (1980s/1990s), it too was not a spill carrier. It also dominated its markets.

        You’re looking at the troubles of Frontier and Spirit and saying “ULCCs don’t work in the US”. Except Frontier and Spirit are a very specific type of carrier – a spill carrier – and most successful LCC/ULCC models are not.

        (Allegiant, at least in its “original” small city markets, is not a spill carrier in a conventional sense – it’s by far the most stable US ULCC business model).

        Spill carriers don’t have control of their own fate. You rely “on the kindness of strangers”. Spirit and Frontier were always living on borrowed time. There’s nothing the legacies did post Covid they couldn’t have done pre-Covid to Spirit and Frontier. But in 2014 American implicitly told then DOT/DOJ they’d be kind to Spirit and Frontier as a condition of the US Airways merger. They said that these carriers were effective competition. So they needed to demonstrate that was true, at least for a time. And times were good, so the legacies didn’t mind spilling a little demand.

        Consider Sun Country. It’s a spill carrier – its scheduled passenger business depends on Delta not going after its markets at Minneapolis. It appears to have some kind of informal accommodation with Delta there. It’s still not a great business – in 2Q, its scheduled business actually shrank. But it’s better than Spirit or Frontier.

        However, Sun Country’s fortunes fundamentally depend on Delta in just the same way as Frontier and Spirit depended on the legacies pre-Covid. If Delta ever hits the gas at MSP, Sun Country is toast. Sun Country fundamentally relies on the kindness of Delta. It’s a bad business model. That doesn’t mean it can’t make money for a time – Spirit and Frontier did for a while. Terrible models can make money in the right environment.

        But the test of a model is what happens when you put it under pressure. If Delta ever puts pressure on Sun Country at MSP, it’s dead.

  4. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    This would mark the first time a *MAJOR* airline has ceased ops since 1991 were that to happen. And that was a pretty rough year with Pan Am, Eastern, and the original Midway all going down within that year.

    But I’m not sure that will happen. It seems like now, it will end one of two ways. Either someone will finally buy them out. Or they will announce a shutdown with at least a few weeks notice. I can’t imagine it being an “out of the blue” cessation like we saw in ’91 and earlier where thousands showed up for their flights only to be told the airline no longer exists.

    Can you imagine a repeat of that chaos?

    A magic rabbit can also always appear and they pull through just fine.

    But then again, what airline has ever succeeded with the ‘shrink to profitability’ strategy?

    And the (original) Braniff shutdown was something of a legend. Have you heard the story of the in flight 747 that was told to divert to DAL because the airline shut down? And they said “nope” and completed the flight to Hawaii. And there was a little champagne toast for everyone on board.

    1. MK03 Avatar
      MK03

      ATA and Aloha did not count as majors?

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        Not really, at least on a national-system level. They were major players in Hawaii at the time each shut down, so that magnified the impact.

  5. Anon Avatar
    Anon

    CF – I think you’ve omitted to mention the likely loss of confidence by passengers in buying tickets more than about two weeks ahead after a going concern warning gets publicised widely in news media. The revenues they might have been hoping for in the rest of 2025 and particularly around Thanksgiving and Xmas to use as working capital are likely destroyed. I imagine fuel suppliers will be rapidly tightening payment terms as well. Well into death spiral territory. Their only hope is to sell a significant number of aircraft and quickly.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Agreed. Besides when has shrinking to profitability ever worked? Another red flag was the leaseback of engines witch is something you do if one is strapped for cash & if you have been following the recent saga involving Kohl’s, then you would know the struggles they too are facing as PE encircles them like hungry sharks.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        Shrinking to profitability can work in a situation where you have control of markets. There are situations where the amount you gain in average revenue offsets whatever cost increases you might have. Continental in the mid 1990s was a lot smaller than it had been earlier, for instance. It dumped its Denver hub and that was a good thing because it had a poor position there (competing with United, which was larger). Whereas it had dominant position in Houston and Newark.

        In 2008, Allegiant shrank its position in many markets (while continuing to grow somewhat overall). Since it had pricing power in its little local leisure monopolies, prices in those markets went up. Increased RASM significantly helped to offset increased CASM from fuel prices (since oil went to $147/barrel). This allowed Allegiant to stay profitable in 2008 in a year when most airlines made very heavy losses.

        In the Spirit situation, as a spill carrier it’s basically a price taker – it has very little ability to move RASM significantly up. So shrinking results in CASM going up, but RASM doesn’t move nearly enough to offset. So in the Spirit situation, yes, shrinking is problematic.

        Fundamental issue remains the spill-carrier nature of its business model.

    2. Wany Avatar
      Wany

      This is so true, to some extend. I don’t think general public would remember this news when they saw their holiday flight is marketed at 1/2 of what other airlines are charging. On the other hand, I just booked my first flight on Spirit a few days before because how dirt cheap it was. Just this morning they posted a schedule change for my trip and I am seriously considering canceling for a refund.

  6. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    NK’s situation is the ROI on all of the money that US taxpayers dumped into the airline industry – and the rest of the economy for quarter after quarter during covid.
    That money REQUIRED airlines to keep employees on the payroll and not rationalize capacity.

    With weak business and higher value leisure demand, the big 4 had even more seats they could use to combat economy basic type fares.

    Without any network advantages, the ULCCs and B6 have been hardest hit in the post covid period.

    Yes, it is hard to believe that NK can survive if their credit card processor tightens the screws; and it is even harder to imagine what NK can do to further cut costs even in another chapter 11 given they just emerged and relisted the stock.

    The lesson is that government interference in an industry that is still treated as governed by the free enterprise system will bear consequences at some point. and we are now here.

    The only question is how many other US airlines will go through at least one form of bankruptcy reorganization.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      But I thought we were in an era of “TBTF?”/s

  7. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    I wonder why they were allowed to exit Chapter 11 protection in such terrible shape

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      So far the people in control of Spirit don’t appear to have much of a plan. Maybe they’re cooking up something that will stun us all (always possible) but nothing so far hints at that.

      A merger between Spirit and Frontier won’t, in and of itself, fix things (and might even take Frontier down – mergers are disruptive events that require a lot of finesse and care to make work, and Frontier’s management… well, do you associate “finesse” with those guys?)

      But if Spirit is actually so bereft of ideas, then in retrospect you have to wonder if it wasn’t the best idea for Spirit anyway. Not because the combination makes any more sense – it does not. But because if the alternative is “spin out of control” (which seems to be what is happening) then the alternative of handing the keys to someone else is nonetheless better.

    2. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      In a “prepackaged” Chapter 11, the major creditors – who have signed off on the plan – and any new investors injecting equity are seen as the ones taking the future risk, and they’ve already agreed to the new business plan as part of the overall process. So the actual business plan going forward gets relatively little scrutiny beyond what the major parties have already agreed to.

      It also presumes that unsecured creditors are now actually at less risk than they were before, as it’s presumed that the reorganized and recapitalized business will be more stable and more likely to be profitable. That hasn’t played out in this case, to say the least.

      1. emac Avatar
        emac

        CraigTPA this is a good point and good question. Which would’ve been better for Spirit and the creditors: the prepackaged bankruptcy that shuffled the debt a bit, or a real 18 month-plus bankruptcy where Spirit tears out everything that doesn’t work, cancels leases, tears up labor agreements (sorry) and emerges with a real shot.

        I don’t know much about what was achieved in the prepackaged bankruptcy for the creditors (someone else can chime in), but for the airline it clearly accomplished nothing.

  8. grichard Avatar
    grichard

    I wish I understood the financial arrangement between airlines and credit card issuers better. I guess I thought the credit card company just bought frequent flyer miles from the airline with the proceeds from its interest and fees.

    Is the credit card company just worried about being left holding worthless miles? Or is it more complicated?

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      It’s two separate things. This has nothing to do with frequent flyer miles and that kind of thing.

      What we’re talking about is credit card processing – the people who run the credit card to create a charge on your account and give proceeds to the airline.

      As you know, if an airline goes out of business, and you bought a ticket on your credit card but have yet to fly, you can go back to your credit card company and get a refund.

      So, that exposes a credit-card processor to risk. If the airline goes out of business, it will be stuck with all those bought-but-unflown tickets that were bought by credit card.

      Bought-but-unflown tickets are known in the industry as “air traffic liability” – they are a short-term liability on an airline’s balance sheet. It’s a very large amount and in theory, generates cash – because, in theory, the airline gets the cash in advance of actually flying the ticket.

      But what the credit card processor will do for very risky airlines is hold back part or all of the proceeds of the bought-but-unflown tickets until such time as it is flown. That obviously can deprive a risky airline of cash when it needs it most. There are processors which, in the past, have actually tried to hold back *more than 100%* of the proceeds, which means that air traffic liability is no longer a generator of cash, but actually sucks up cash.

      This is a very real effect. It caused the bankruptcy of Frontier Airlines in 2008 – the credit card processor said “we’re gonna hold back your proceeds”, Frontier said “we can’t afford that” and declared Chapter 11.

      1. grichard Avatar
        grichard

        Thanks. Obviously I thought this was something to do with cobranded cards rather than payments. Appreciate the explanation.

    2. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      deleted – JT8D beat me to it.

      The only thing I’d add is that a holdback increase is also likely to lead creditors, particularly fuel providers, to make terms more restrictive or even start requiring cash on delivery.

  9. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Spirit never seemed to be able to develop a market personality, one that would prompt genuine brand loyalty, the way a Ryan or SWA were able to do. Spirit’s obit will likely be written in the kind of clinical bizspeak seen here, rather than the warm and fuzzy remembrances of an Aloha or People’s Express. On the other hand, they could take a shot at flying Tump’s gulag routes, like Avelo has.

  10. Kenneth Avatar
    Kenneth

    I’ve often said in my red teaming of the airline industry that we’re not giving enough credence to the growing gap between haves and have nots in the U.S. For the same reason Wendy’s posted a loss simply because economicallly challenged folks have decided to skip breakfast, the ULCC segment is contining to struggle in a segment that will only see its discretionary spending drop with time.

  11. BadBob Avatar
    BadBob

    Very similar to what happened to us at Eastern.

  12. emac Avatar
    emac

    OK it’s time for the real av geeky fun: who are the vultures and what do they get? Who wants a bunch of A320/321/NEOs (probably all leased on crappy terms), a bunch of gates scattered across the country, and maybe some pilots?

    Does Frontier step in and complete the marriage of ultra low margin carriers? JetBlue decides it wants this glowing, toxic uranium in order to grab some extra capacity in Boston and FLL? Does United see more opportunity or risk here, grabs some assets at FLL and some Airbuses? Breeze or Sun Country? Hey, maybe American or Delta sees something here?

    1. Brian W Avatar
      Brian W

      I dont think Frontier or JetBlue have the cash burn to buy Spirit and sustain the cost of integration as they lose money already. Alaska has the funds and experience if it wants a Fort Lauderdale base.

      The planes are leased and will be sent back to their owners and released out. Adding 200 planes to the market probably depresses the l3ase market for a few quarters.

  13. John G Avatar
    John G

    This further illustrates how dumb the court ruling barring B6 from buying them was.

    The judge was like you can’t remove a low cost carrier.

    Except the market is removing it anyway.

Leave a Reply to Matt D Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier