Spirit’s Survival Hopes Dim After Posting Awful Q2 Results


The roller coaster ride that has defined Spirit over the last five years appears to be coming to an end. After pioneering the ultra low cost carrier (ULCC) model in the US, the airline rose quickly and then fell hard. It was never able to turn a profit after the pandemic, and it filed for bankruptcy protection. It exited bankruptcy in March, and now that the airline is a public company again, it has very quietly posted its Q2 results. If you didn’t think it would be possible to go bankrupt, come out, and somehow post even worse results… well, you were wrong.

By the numbers, there wasn’t much to say that’s positive, though we can try. The airline’s total unit revenue (TRASM) rose 4.8 percent vs Q2 2024, and its revenue per passenger flight segment was up 7 percent from $108.46 to $116.05. That’s as close as we can get to having good news here.

Now, the bad news. Spirit’s capacity plunged 23.9 percent year-over-year on 22 percent fewer departures. If you’re going to shrink that much, you really need to boost revenue to keep up with cost creep. Here’s where things start to get wild.

Remember that the unit revenue rose 4.8 percent, right? Unit costs were up about double that. And it was only that good because there was a big fuel-price benefit. Unit costs excluding fuel and special items was up an eye-popping 19.2 percent.

The cost problem is very real when you shrink, and Spirit’s commercial plan makes that even worse. Spirit ended Q2 with 215 aircraft which is up from the 210 a year ago. There are always Pratt & Whitney issues to consider that may have grounded different numbers of aircraft in each quarter, but that hardly explains this. What really happened is Spirit just stopped flying airplanes at off-peak times. Its aircraft utilization tanked 26.4 percent to a miserable 7.8 hours per day. That’s good for revenue, but if revenue doesn’t climb more than costs do, you’re out of luck. And those costs… yikes.

Spirit says “The [cost] increase on a per-ASM basis was primarily due to increases in salaries, wages and benefits expense, other operating expense, aircraft rent expense, landing fees and other rents expense, and distribution expense.” It seems like it might have been easier to just list the things that were not up.

When we bring this all together, the airline posted a -18.1 percent operating margin which is significantly worse than last year’s -11.9 percent. Net margin was -24.1 percent. Cash and cash equivalents were down to just over $407 million after burning through almost $250 million in Q2 alone. All of this adds up to the airline being in very serious trouble.

It’s bad enough that Spirit has issued a so-called “going concern” warning in its 10-Q, which is what public companies put out if they think they might not make it through the next 12 months.

Spirit says overcapacity and weak leisure demand in the domestic market have caused big problems. It has been trying to counteract this in several ways, “including the implementation of network and product enhancements, including its Premium Economy travel option, consummation of sale-leaseback transactions related to certain of its owned spare engines, and other discretionary cost reduction strategies, including the pilot furloughs announced in July 2025.”

But then, Spirit says that’s not enough. It has done the math, and it is going to bust through the debt covenants and the requirements of the credit card processor agreement if it doesn’t do more. So it’s basically looking to do a fire sale. Airplanes, real estate, excess gates, cutting fixed costs, and trying to raise more money are all on the table. But if it can’t? Well, then it’s over.

Notably, the credit card processor deal ends at the end of this year, and to renew, the company wants a bigger holdback. In other words, the card company will hold more of Spirit’s money until after travel is complete so that it doesn’t get left holding the bag if Spirit fails. And that is often the death knell for a struggling airline. In conclusion, the airline coldly notes:

Because of the uncertainty of successfully completing the initiatives to comply with the minimum liquidity covenants and of the outcome of discussions with Company stakeholders, management has concluded there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within 12 months from the date these financial statements are issued.

Considering these results and the credit card processor deal expiring at year-end, I’d be amazed if the airline made it into 2026. In fact, I don’t see how it can even get that far with the cash burn that it has right now.

It’s hard not to feel for the people at the airline who have gone through so much in the last few years. But that’s the airline business. And there will be opportunity for many to go elsewhere. If Spirit fails, this will at least strengthen the position of other airlines like Frontier, Breeze, JetBlue, and maybe even United and Sun Country. But that’s all speculation. Right now, all we know is that Spirit is in critical condition.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

14 responses to “Spirit’s Survival Hopes Dim After Posting Awful Q2 Results”

  1. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    Tic toc, tic toc. Since travel demand is softening, it’s only a matter of time until liquidation.

  2. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Guns N Roses? Should have gone with Grave Digger by DMB…
    In all seriousness, if Spirit goes, I think you’ll see a massive focus on the “weak leisure demand in the domestic market”

    If thats really the cause of Spirits demise, then im not sure you will see a bolster to its competitors (maybe they’ll stand pat), but also weak travel demand seems like the worst support reason to other competitors vs “sudden incident impacting airline trust” (aka valujet). Either way Ill be curious to see what the public discourse of this will be if it all goes down the tubes.

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      If Spirit goes down, Frontier and others will enjoy a respite.

      That doesn’t mean Frontier and the others have a good model. Frontier has basically the same fundamental issue as Spirit – spill model in a time where the legacies are leaving less spill.

      Frontier’s network planners seem just as clueless as Spirit in that regard. Nothing F9 has done since Covid has addressed this weakness. Any return to health by Frontier in a post Spirit world won’t be because Frontier’s model is strong. It will just be because it outlasted Spirit.

  3. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    Spirit’s problem is that it hasn’t addressed its most fundamental issue.

    It’s a spill carrier. No one flies Spirit for choice. Pre Covid, the big airlines, American, etc, left enough demand on the table for Spirit to make good money.

    That doesn’t mean Spirit has a good business model. It’s always has a terrible model – the test of a model being is what happens when it is under pressure.

    Spirit has been under pressure since Covid. The legacies decided to let less demand spill over to Spirit. And the weakness of its model was suddenly revealed.

    And Spirit has done nothing to fix that. To be fair, it would be hard to shift to a model where it relies less on spill. But it hasn’t even tried. To me it appears they don’t even understand the problem they face.

  4. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    This would mark the first time a *MAJOR* airline has ceased ops since 1991 were that to happen. And that was a pretty rough year with Pan Am, Eastern, and the original Midway all going down within that year.

    But I’m not sure that will happen. It seems like now, it will end one of two ways. Either someone will finally buy them out. Or they will announce a shutdown with at least a few weeks notice. I can’t imagine it being an “out of the blue” cessation like we saw in ’91 and earlier where thousands showed up for their flights only to be told the airline no longer exists.

    Can you imagine a repeat of that chaos?

    A magic rabbit can also always appear and they pull through just fine.

    But then again, what airline has ever succeeded with the ‘shrink to profitability’ strategy?

    And the (original) Braniff shutdown was something of a legend. Have you heard the story of the in flight 747 that was told to divert to DAL because the airline shut down? And they said “nope” and completed the flight to Hawaii. And there was a little champagne toast for everyone on board.

  5. Anon Avatar
    Anon

    CF – I think you’ve omitted to mention the likely loss of confidence by passengers in buying tickets more than about two weeks ahead after a going concern warning gets publicised widely in news media. The revenues they might have been hoping for in the rest of 2025 and particularly around Thanksgiving and Xmas to use as working capital are likely destroyed. I imagine fuel suppliers will be rapidly tightening payment terms as well. Well into death spiral territory. Their only hope is to sell a significant number of aircraft and quickly.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Agreed. Besides when has shrinking to profitability ever worked? Another red flag was the leaseback of engines witch is something you do if one is strapped for cash & if you have been following the recent saga involving Kohl’s, then you would know the struggles they too are facing as PE encircles them like hungry sharks.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        Shrinking to profitability can work in a situation where you have control of markets. There are situations where the amount you gain in average revenue offsets whatever cost increases you might have. Continental in the mid 1990s was a lot smaller than it had been earlier, for instance. It dumped its Denver hub and that was a good thing because it had a poor position there (competing with United, which was larger). Whereas it had dominant position in Houston and Newark.

        In 2008, Allegiant shrank its position in many markets (while continuing to grow somewhat overall). Since it had pricing power in its little local leisure monopolies, prices in those markets went up. Increased RASM significantly helped to offset increased CASM from fuel prices (since oil went to $147/barrel). This allowed Allegiant to stay profitable in 2008 in a year when most airlines made very heavy losses.

        In the Spirit situation, as a spill carrier it’s basically a price taker – it has very little ability to move RASM significantly up. So shrinking results in CASM going up, but RASM doesn’t move nearly enough to offset. So in the Spirit situation, yes, shrinking is problematic.

        Fundamental issue remains the spill-carrier nature of its business model.

    2. Wany Avatar
      Wany

      This is so true, to some extend. I don’t think general public would remember this news when they saw their holiday flight is marketed at 1/2 of what other airlines are charging. On the other hand, I just booked my first flight on Spirit a few days before because how dirt cheap it was. Just this morning they posted a schedule change for my trip and I am seriously considering canceling for a refund.

  6. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    NK’s situation is the ROI on all of the money that US taxpayers dumped into the airline industry – and the rest of the economy for quarter after quarter during covid.
    That money REQUIRED airlines to keep employees on the payroll and not rationalize capacity.

    With weak business and higher value leisure demand, the big 4 had even more seats they could use to combat economy basic type fares.

    Without any network advantages, the ULCCs and B6 have been hardest hit in the post covid period.

    Yes, it is hard to believe that NK can survive if their credit card processor tightens the screws; and it is even harder to imagine what NK can do to further cut costs even in another chapter 11 given they just emerged and relisted the stock.

    The lesson is that government interference in an industry that is still treated as governed by the free enterprise system will bear consequences at some point. and we are now here.

    The only question is how many other US airlines will go through at least one form of bankruptcy reorganization.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      But I thought we were in an era of “TBTF?”/s

  7. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    I wonder why they were allowed to exit Chapter 11 protection in such terrible shape

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      So far the people in control of Spirit don’t appear to have much of a plan. Maybe they’re cooking up something that will stun us all (always possible) but nothing so far hints at that.

      A merger between Spirit and Frontier won’t, in and of itself, fix things (and might even take Frontier down – mergers are disruptive events that require a lot of finesse and care to make work, and Frontier’s management… well, do you associate “finesse” with those guys?)

      But if Spirit is actually so bereft of ideas, then in retrospect you have to wonder if it wasn’t the best idea for Spirit anyway. Not because the combination makes any more sense – it does not. But because if the alternative is “spin out of control” (which seems to be what is happening) then the alternative of handing the keys to someone else is nonetheless better.

  8. grichard Avatar
    grichard

    I wish I understood the financial arrangement between airlines and credit card issuers better. I guess I thought the credit card company just bought frequent flyer miles from the airline with the proceeds from its interest and fees.

    Is the credit card company just worried about being left holding worthless miles? Or is it more complicated?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier