The First Quarter Was Bad for Many, But None Were Hit as Hard as Avelo


While I was gone on vacation, the first quarter DB1B data came out from government, so we can finally get a more granular look at what happened to the industry’s revenue at the beginning of this year. Overall, it was not good. But there were brightspots like Southwest and even Frontier. On the flip side? Avelo had the worst performance by far.

Let’s start by remembering that this is domestic data only. It would look different if we were talking about international here since we know that premium cabin demand on long-haul has held up better. Domestic has been the problem child this year, and it’s especially true in coach. With that in mind, let’s take a look at the numbers.

Q1 2025 Unit Revenue and Seat Capacity % Change by Airline

Data via Cirium, Unit Revenue adjusted to 1,000 miles

Let’s start at the top, shall we? Yes, that’s Southwest turning in an impressive performance. Sure, capacity was down which helps to boost unit revenue, but the airline’s yield was actually up more than 10 percent. It filled fewer seats with fares that high, but it still came out well ahead.

Keep in mind that for Southwest, none of the new revenue initiatives like extra legroom and assigned seating have gone into place. There’s also no baggage fee here. (Those would show as ancillaries anyway.) This is just good old-fashioned work to better manage fares and availability. I’m going to say that Southwest took its eye off the ball for awhile here, but it is now fixing things quickly. That is a strong result for the airline.

I looked in greater detail, and there were some surprises. In top markets, Denver lead the way with nearly a 6 percent increase. BWI was the only one that dropped in that top tier.

But the big gainers? Nashville came in with an impressive 10.7 percent jump despite a 7 percent increase in capacity. You can see why Southwest decided this was a better place to be than Atlanta. Orlando unit revenue was up a stunning 13.4 percent as the ULCCs pulled back. Austin was up 11.5 percent, but that’s because American walked away from its focus city.

Also doing well this quarter was Frontier. It saw unit revenue grow by just over 2 percent. That doesn’t sound impressive until you realize that it had seats spike more than 13 percent. That’s a lot of capacity for unit revenue to still be up. Then again, Frontier has had its problems before this, so it was an easier year-over-year comparison than non-ULCCs.

Alaska also turned in a strong performance with a slight uptick on unit revenue despite the big increase in capacity. Just note that this does not include Hawaiian. I thought that would be too much noise.

You may be surprised to see Spirit in the middle of the pack, but you shouldn’t be. After all, look at how much smaller the airline is with double digit decreases in seats. To see unit revenue be flat on such a big decline? That is very bad news.

After Spirit, we get into negative territory, but the big three are all in pretty decent position. American had the least growth so its unit revenue dropped the least. These all look to be within a range.

But below that, this is where it gets ugly.

You might think that Breeze’s 6.3 percent drop in unit revenue would scare me, but consider that the airline added nearly 50 percent more seats? That’s actually not a terrible result considering how many seats were added. I dug further on a route level and saw that on routes that flew in both years had an average fare decline of four percent. That’s not ideal, but it’s not catastrophic.

If we want to talk about catastrophic, it’s the two airlines at the bottom of the list. I’ll admit that Allegiant few under the radar for me, but this was a massive decline. Florida led the way with Punta Gorda down 25 percent, St Pete down more than 27 percent, and Sarasota off 29 percent. That’s… that’s pretty terrible.

But nothing is quite as terrible as Avelo which after having an 18.4 percent increase in capacity saw fare revenue just disappear, down nearly 28 percent. In returning markets, Avelo’s average fare was off by 24 percent. Fares were just so bad, yet load factor ticked up only one point to 72 percent.

I’ve already written about Avelo’s struggles as it closed the Santa Rosa base while pulling two other airplanes from the East Coast to do immigration charter work on behalf of the US government. But now, Avelo is pulling out of the West Coast entirely before the end of the year. This is not good news for the airline.

Q1 was an interesting quarter since it had such divergent performance across various airlines.

Edited 7/15 to add JetBlue to the chart

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

26 responses to “The First Quarter Was Bad for Many, But None Were Hit as Hard as Avelo”

  1. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Womp womp. So so sorry for Avelo…but what goes around comes around… the internet should come up with a catcher Acronym for that. Maybe a four letter one

    1. Eric Avatar
      Eric

      One hit wonder with HVN and giving throwing monkey excrement against the wall everywhere else.

      If they avoid Ch 7 they will morph back into XL Airways with different branding. Maybe merge with Eastern Link Express Connection or whatever its called this month.
      Or Codeshare with Global.

    2. Anthony Avatar
      Anthony

      Mess Around Find Out? No, that’s not it…

  2. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Avelo is going to be the star of todays CF show. We all know that it’s really advertising and credit card stuff that makes up everyone elses bread and butter. Selling seats is almost an afterthought “loss leader” for them. You yourself have written about this countless times. So no need to dwell on it.

    Anyway, getting back to Avelo. The glaring question is: Was taking on ICE flights and the subsequent public backlash the reason for their now “days are numbered” condition? Or were they already very seriously ill in spite of it? You think they’ll turn their fortunes around or have you already written their entry for the 2025 “airlines we lost” monologue?

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      Avelo announced the contract in April, which, unless you believe in time travel, presumably meant it had no impact on 1Q.

      We’ll have to wait until 2Q results to see an indication of whether the ICE contract controversy had an impact.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Matt D – As JT8D says, there was definitely not impact from ICE flying since that happened in Q2. But honestly, I would be surprised if there was much of an impact anyway. This I think is more about the economy and uncertainty and Avelo took it harder than anyone. Whether they can get beyond this or not is entirely dependent upon what kind of money they can raise. It certainly doesn’t look good now, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be a rabbit pulled out of a hat at some point.

  3. Billy L. Avatar
    Billy L.

    It makes me wonder how soon Avelo will declare bankruptcy (either 11 or 7).

  4. Michael Avatar
    Michael

    Where’s JetBlue in all this?????

    1. Brett Avatar

      Michael – Ok, so… I’m going to admit that I rushed this post. I had an eye doctor appt yesterday afternoon and they dilated my eyes so I couldn’t go back to do my usual second pass. That means… I totally missed JetBlue. Yikes. The chart has now been updated on the post. Sorry about that. As you can see, it was not good for JetBlue, having cut capacity but still seeing unit revenue drop by more than the big three.

  5. CraigTPA Avatar
    CraigTPA

    @CF, did you look at any of the Avelo data at the airport or route level? I’d love to know how Lakeland is doing – my instinct tells me that they have to be setting bales of cash on fire on some of those routes (ISP?) but my instincts have let me down before.

    Also, why no figures for JetBlue?

    And completely unrelated: any Dorkfest news soon? Tickets have been ticketed…

    1. Kenneth Avatar
      Kenneth

      According to DOT O&D status, stage length adjusted RASM (1,000 miles) for XP was $.049 for Q1. LAL came in at $.039. The corresponding T-100 load factor was 61.5% for LAL compared to a system average of 68.5%.

      As one of the fastest growing metros in the country, I’m actually a fan of LAL service, but time will tell if XP is the right carrier for it.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        LAL is a small city/metro/whatever. The first places you’d want to link to it would be the largest metros in the country – NYC, CHI, etc.

        Unfortunately, there’s no room at the NYC airports, but there are still at Chicago. But… you’d need to be one of the dominant airlines in Chicago so you can cheaply communicate to the people of Chicago that this opportunity exists (since, presumably, demand would be dominated by inbound to LAL rather than outbound). You need the interest of UA, AA or WN. But for them, there’s absolutely no reason to fly to LAL given their major investment in MCO, TPA and in some cases, SRQ.

        This is why small city to major leisure destination is a lot easier sell (small city media markets are cheap!) than large city to small leisure destination (unless you can get the attention of one of the dominant airlines in the large city).

        If LAL is among Avelo’s best ideas… ruh roh.

        1. Kenneth Avatar
          Kenneth

          The idea of sending a regional jet to do LAL-CLT/ATL isn’t to compete for the pax that’s going to drive to MCO/TPA for fare differential, it’s because you assume that X number of people in the Lakeland community work for companies that will allow them to buy the most convenient ticket, often in a premium cabin. If that number “X” is high enough to subsidize the additional traffic you pick up, then a regional route makes sense.

          1. CraigTPA Avatar
            CraigTPA

            And this is a problem, since the Lakeland-Winter Haven area doesn’t really have that many companies that generate big inbound business demand. The largest (by a healthy margin) is the corporate HQ for the grocery chain Publix, and they’re not big enough to generate that kind of traffic like Walmart does for XNA. (XNA also picks up traffic from having the University of Arkansas nearby, and LAL doesn’t have a counterpart for that either.)

            Seems to me the best possibility for LAL would be an airline that could offer higher-volume but still LTD service and offer connections by flying to major airports. Paging Frontier…

      2. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        It’s not just a question of the right carrier, but the right market to aim for. Avelo is trying to market it as an alternative for Orlando, or at least for Disney World, but even factoring in Orlando traffic it’s a net wash at best timewise, and actually worse for Universal. It falls right in that “an hour away” spot between two of the country’s best-served airports, MCO and TPA (which they serve). And LAL’s rental car prices are high compared to MCO unless there’s substantial off-airport alternatives to the one company at the airport, Budget (I just looked.) So all they really have to compete with for the Disney/Legoland crowd is fare.

        Now maybe there’s some bi-directional VFR traffic for the region, but that then depends on the airport at the other end too, which is why I really question Islip in particular.

      3. Billy L. Avatar
        Billy L.

        They weren’t for the right carrier for the short lived LAL-ATL route. A good bit of reasons for it as well: https://www.lkldnow.com/avelo-is-halting-flights-between-lakeland-and-atlanta-for-now/

        This route would’ve been better served by DL with their RJ’s, not XP.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Craig – Yes, LAL was not good. In Q1, it was the lowest unit revenue of any station with more than 300 daily departing seats EXCEPT for the awful Concord (USA). Concord SLA PRASM was 2.7. LAL was 3.8. Next was Santa Rosa at 4.3 (which is now gone) and then RDU at 4.5

      LAL has a fare problem for sure. Concord had an SLA yield of 5.1, so the problem was compounded by the dreadful 53% load factor. (LAL was at 66%.) It’s no surprise that Concord is shrinking. LAL had a 5.7 SLA yield. RDU was next at 6.

      And if you’re looking for other stinkers, Wilmington (NC) had a 3.7 SLA PRASM while Hartford had 2.9.

      FWIW, if there is a bright spot in LAL, it’s the San Juan flight which had SLA PRASM of 5.4 with a 70% load.

      As for Dorkfest, still waiting to see if LAX is going to get its act together and have the morning event. Hoping to post more details soon, but… waiting.

  6. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    The stage length adjustment helps clarify the data that was reported by the airlines in their earnings filings months ago. The biggest other piece is the markets that drove these changes – which I hope you address for other airlines as you do for WN.

    B6 appears to be notably absent from your chart.

    WN began to fly redeyes in the 1st quarter which also meant “trading in” a bunch of underperforming early morning and late night flights. They also are rationalizing Hawaii which has to have a significant impact on the bottom line.

    among the big 4, AA knows it will not be profitable in the 1st quarter and just doesn’t have the financial bandwidth to force anyone’s hand. DL and UA are both throwing plenty of capacity into the domestic market -UA more so – in hopes of limiting LCC growth. If WN is doing as well as they are in DEN, there has to be an impact on F9 and UA unless the market as a whole is stronger.

    while Breeze, Allegiant and Avelo are struggling esp. in off-peak quarters, the majority of the capacity in the industry is being flown by carriers that are either fixing their problems or have the financial strength to support their strategies.

  7. stogieguy7 Avatar
    stogieguy7

    Interesting to see how many commenters seem to think that Avelo taking on ICE flights led to this. You must live in a deep blue bubble to assume that this was the reason for these results. Fact is, the majority of people polled actually support the deportation of illegals. And, of those who don’t, a lot are very wealthy individuals who may fly a lot – but who would never fly an LCC like Avelo. No, Avelo’s issues have been coming for a long time. These concerns are exactly why they took on the ICE contract; as a life preserver. A questionable route network/scheduling, lack of ancillary income sources, and current weakness in budget vacation travel. Now, we’re finally seeing their performance softness come to a head.

    That’s why, not because of some popular uprising to work that the majority of Americans actually agree with.

    1. Brett Avatar

      stogieguy7 – I’m not sure where you see “many” commenters thinking that this was ICE-related. It obviously was not thanks to timing, but your quoted stats are flawed anyway. The airline’s best and biggest operation, New Haven, IS in a deep blue bubble. It doesn’t matter what the country thinks. It matters what people in Avelo’s markets think.

  8. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    Far be it for me to shill for Avelo, but this analysis leaves something to be desired.

    My understanding is PRASM is ticket-only data, right? DB1B does not include ancillaries. Ancillaries are now such a big part of airline revenue, if ticket revenue goes down and ancillary goes up (or even just doesn’t go down) it can change the numbers quite a bit.

    Avelo still stands out as terrible, but Allegiant looks quite a bit different. Allegiant in 1Q switched a decent amount of revenue from ticket to ancillary.

    https://ir.allegiantair.com/news/news-details/2025/ALLEGIANT-TRAVEL-COMPANY-FIRST-QUARTER-2025-FINANCIAL-RESULTS/default.aspx

    I think, at the least, an analysis like this needs to have caveats about the role of ancillary and how that can change the picture, because the Allegiant story, at least, changes quite a bit.

    If you do the work on TRASM (total, including ancillary) rather than PRASM, Allegiant looks a lot better, but Avelo still notably sucks. I would argue that comparison of one airline to another should be done on TRASM not PRASM.

    But in another way, this analysis was not harsh enough, or at least didn’t really drill into what’s happening.

    Avelo is in serious trouble, and it’s not just that unit revenues declined from 1Q24 to 1Q25, but that decline is coming from a much lower base than other airlines.

    In other words, Avelo’s revenue generation was already notably low relative to the industry, and from that low base it took a giant step further down in 1Q.

    They’re in trouble, no doubt. This PRASM analysis, however, doesn’t really get to grips with the specific nature of their trouble. They are uniquely bad at revenue generation. Stands out like a sore thumb bad.

    Breeze is far better at generating revenue – Breeze’s issue, however, is costs (a story for another day). Assuming you believe Breeze’s DOT financials, which is also a story for another day.

    1. Brett Avatar

      JT8D – Correct, PRASM is fare revenue. TRASM would show a lower decline from Allegiant, but it did still see a hefty fall off at around 7%.

  9. Bobby Avatar
    Bobby

    Cranky – do you like doing analysis of Form 41 data? It’s out there for 1Q, and it shows continued loses for XP, MX, and NK of <-10%.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Bobby – Yep, Form 41 was out there before DB1B, but I thought it was more fun to focus on the revenue side here. I do look at Form 41 though.

  10. dx Avatar
    dx

    I mean at first glance, it makes sense that Avelo and Allegiant would suffer the most in Q1. They almost exclusively serve price-sensitive leisure traffic from non-major markets.

    Q1 2025 and Q2 had significant economic concerns (whether ultimately real or not) that were generally expected to hit disproportionately at the lower end of the economic spectrum, and what is the first thing to go? Discretionary spending- I recall Allegiant and other ULCCs in the past saying that they were really competing with movie theaters and other potential entertainment for people’s discretionary spending, rather than the big 4 airlines.

  11. Yo Avatar
    Yo

    Zero tears shed for Avelo…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier