RDU Got (Its Terminal) Knocked Down and Then Got Up Again


Let’s talk about another brief American hub adventure, this time it’s the one in Raleigh/Durham. The airport built its first terminal in 1955, and it has been like a yo-yo… growing, shrinking, and growing again over the many years since. But for a glorious minute, it was an important hub. Well, semi-important.

In 1955, what became Terminal B was built. That was the airport’s only terminal until it was expanded into a brand new Terminal A in 1982. At least, I think it was expanded into A from the beginning and not connected later, which makes it seem really strange that this wasn’t all just Terminal A… but I digress.

And then in 1985, American decided RDU would become a hub, so it built its own, fancy Terminal C on the other side of the central terminal roadway. It opened in 1987. Here’s what it looked like at its peak in the 1990s, including the southern extension of Terminal A.

But then, 1995 hit, and just as was the case in Nashville, American closed its RDU hub. The building was going to be empty until Midway Airlines was reincarnated and tried to create a profitable hub of its own. It succeeded in making a hub, but profitable? That’s a big ask. Midway limped through 9/11 and eventually went away. Then, the airport had to figure out what it was going to do.

RDU had problems. On one side, it had Terminals A and B which were built in pieces between 1955 and the 1990s. It was a small, mess of a facility. On the other side, it had a fairly-new Terminal C which had one glaring problem… it was built for a hub. That means it had plenty of gate space (though outdated and small) alongside a very undersized headhouse. With the hub gone, Terminal C would need to rely on local traffic, so something had to change to make it functional. Apparently, the end decision was that EVERYTHING had to change.

RDU decided it would scrap the AA hub building completely. In its place, it would build a nearly-identical-sized structure that would be built to function better for local traffic. The new terminal was built in phases with the first half opened in 2008 and the second in 2011. Done with the letter-naming convention, that new building became Terminal 2 while the A and B became a combined Terminal 1 as it always should have been.

With that facility open, the pressure was off Terminal 1. In the mid-2010s, a plan was put into place to shrink the footprint over there and update what was left. The new renovated Terminal 1 was opened in 2014. Within the next few years, both the southern gate extension and the original 1955-built Terminal B were gone.

Today, Terminal 1 has become the Southwest + ULCC terminal with Avelo, Breeze, and Sun Country all using it. (Oh, and Alaska too.) But as several airlines try to ratchet up their service at RDU, most notably Breeze, the airport is planning for what comes next.

In the near-term, there is a project to expand security and international arrival facilties. But in Vision 2040, the airport’s master plan expects to significantly increase the size of Terminal 2 with additional concourses. It will also rebuild a new southern extension on to Terminal 1.

It seems wild that Terminal 1 continues to play a role into the distant future, but that probably makes it easier to spread traffic between the two runways. But anyway, this plan is pretty far off at this point. When the time for growth comes, however, this is how the airport is going to make it happen… unless something changes between now and then.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

36 responses to “RDU Got (Its Terminal) Knocked Down and Then Got Up Again”

  1. shoeguy Avatar
    shoeguy

    RDU is actually a pretty nice airport and facility. It needs more room to accommodate its growing international network. The current set up is tight and not conducive to further growth, which will continue given the region’s wealth, diverse economy, and potential.

    1. Kenneth Avatar
      Kenneth

      I don’t know if I’d call the economy diverse – it’s heavily vested in biotech and IT. Biotech was hit hard by the cancellation of federal grants, and IT is increasingly subject to challenges related to AI. Higher ed and government are also large here, which are two additional sectors that have faced substantial resource reductions.

      1. Matt Avatar
        Matt

        I would definitely not say that cuts have not hurt every part of these sectors. But a lot of biotech in RTP is advanced manufacturing that is not dependent on Federal grants. In addition, financial companies and other advanced manufacturing are moving into the region. RDU serves a very large area with a fast growing population and economy. Being a resident of the area, I do like the airport and the careful, but stable growth of the airport is a marked difference from the 1990’s when there was no real need for a hub. The relative affordability, educational and medical institutions in the area are driving retirees as well. It has to keep up with growth, which continues to boom.

  2. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
    Mike (dontflymuch)

    Im glad Brett did not follow up with his threat to not cover RDU and MKE (you see what I did there Brett?) with his evolving Midwest hub series, as Ive really enjoyed these. I am mildly surprised someone didnt try and make a go of RDU as a hub after American but realize the period of rapid growth for NC and the research triangle happened more or less after the consolidation of the legacy airlines and each of the big 3 already had a hub in a nearby city by then.

    still Im surprised WN didnt take a stab at RDU as burgeoning mid-sized cities within an otherwise large metropolitan area seemed to be their main expansion priority in the mid 2000s

    1. Mike Avatar
      Mike

      Milwaukee and St Louis.. two worst airports in America right now?

      1. Southside Emil Avatar
        Southside Emil

        STL has to be the worst right now

        1. Mike Avatar
          Mike

          But they have a plan to fix it by 2040!

      2. Aer Dingus Avatar
        Aer Dingus

        The Southwest terminal at STL is fine, just too small for their current ops. The other terminal….not so much.

        1. Bill from DC Avatar
          Bill from DC

          that’s the STL irony. a huge albeit outdated facility sits nearly empty, adjacent to a smaller but newer facility that is completely overloaded.

          it’s like living in a brand new RV that’s sitting in the driveway of a falling down old house.

  3. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    I’m no airport design expert but I’m struggling with the proposed design on this one. Why would they build those mini concourses out toward the runway in the middle of T2? You gain ~6 gates but at the expense of ~2 existing gates for a net gain of 4. Wouldn’t it be better ROI to just extend further out on the tips? They have the room, particularly on the SW tip

    I realize passenger experience (i.e., walking distance) is probably the driver but with how expensive projects are, it seems a bit wasteful

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      “But anyway, this plan is pretty far off at this point. When the time for growth comes, however, this is how the airport is going to make it happen… unless something changes between now and then.”

      Something has changed… the rapid increase in the cost of jet fuel that will cause air travel demand to decrease & by extension a delay in terminal expansion plans.

    2. Slim Avatar
      Slim

      I bet if you look at it in a phase perspective, they would do the two linear extensions on either end first, and then if they still need more gates, they would do the mini concourses due to the space crunch.

      1. David M Avatar

        I’d think you’d have to do it that way. Unless demand is low enough that the airport can afford to lose those gates while the mini concourses are built (in which case, do they need to expand at all?), you’d have to build the linear extensions first as replacement gates, then you can close the gates that get replaced by the mini concourses.

  4. Hub RDU Again! Avatar
    Hub RDU Again!

    Great piece and thanks for giving RDU some attention. As someone who uses it as a semi-home airport for regular regional business travel, gotta say a couple things…

    1) Its a fantastic traveler experience. Modern terminals, big open spaces and views, lots of quality food/drink options and an observation/kids park (landside) for the kiddos to run around and become aero-philes themselves.

    2) The lack of hub makes it a maddening route network for regional business travel. Yes… they add another Europe/Caribbean/northeast destination every-other day… cool… You know what they don’t have? ANY flights within the Atlantic Southeast. There are only 4 airports in the Carolinas, Georgia, and Virginia with non-stop service from RDU (ATL, CLT, DCA, and IAD). Charlotte has 27(!!!) nonstop destinations within those 4 states. So, if you want to get to other mid-sized cities in the Atlantic Southeast (Charleston, Savannah, Asheville, Norfolk, Greenville, Columbia, etc.), you either gotta connect in CLT or ATL, which makes it a 5+ hour trip door-to-door, or drive the 3-6 hours each of those cities is from RDU by car. Really annoying that a city who is perceived to be crushing it on air service expansion is still an overnight trip for any ~300 mile radius city because there aren’t any regional non-stops.

    3) I’ll never fully understand why AA tried to hub BNA and RDU at the same time… feels like either one would have worked on its own if it hadn’t been competing with the other. Can anyone help me out with that?

    3b) Too late now, but I always thought JetBlue should have tried to hub RDU in the 2010s… could’ve created a lot of north/south connectivity, reduced reliance on slot/snow constrained NYC & BOS, give them a decent sized market where they’re the clear #1, etc.

    1. Wildcat Avatar
      Wildcat

      Hey Hub RDU – I worked at AA at the time, and here’s my recollection of how the “dual hub” strategy came to be. (IIRC, Wes Kaldahl, the self-appointed “Dean of Airline Planning”, claimed ownership of this plan).

      At the time, the CRS’s had only recently been separated from their owner airlines and were forced to stop biasing their travel agent displays toward their owner’s flights. Therefore, most of the major players (SABRE, Apollo, System One, and PARS) used total flight time when ranking flight displays. As AA considered how to add North-South service to their traditional East-West service pattern, they noticed that their were a few main travel patterns: Northeast to Florida, Northeast to Texas/Mid-south, and Midwest to Florida among them. After mapping out the traffic flows, they decided that it would be more optimal to flow this traffic over 2 hubs rather than consolidate it into one, betting that shorter flight times would put AA flights higher in their search order than DL’s over ATL or PI’s over CLT. (Recall that travel agents were booking 85%+ of all tickets at the time, and used “green screen” CRTs; research showed that they almost always booked flights off the first screen). Great idea, right?

      Well, the hubs were never profitable, for a few reasons. In the first place, each hub only had 6 banks – 3 north and 3 south – making the operation terribly inefficient from a manning perspective, with lots of downtime. Second, the schedules made for a hard sell to customers. Our Sales guy in BHM was trying to fill 3 flights to BNA while competing against DL’s 6 or 8 to ATL and PI’s 5 or 6 to CLT. What traveler wants fewer choices? Most are willing to take a slightly longer routing to give them more options and protect them in case of an irregular operation. And if there was a delay or missed connection, the traveler was stuck in a hub for ~6 hours until the next bank left. Combine that with being a “Yankee company” and you’ve made your sales person’s job in places like BHM, JAN, or MOB pretty tough. And finally, AA didn’t know how to yield manage Florida. I remember running 90+% load factors in peak season to markets like RSW and TPA (which was a lot in those days!) and still showing that the market was losing money. The Division office looked into how this could be happening and found that Yield Management wasn’t really even looking at the flights until 30 days before departure, when the vast majority of seats had already been booked into the lowest fare buckets. (Recall that almost all this work was still done manually). It took years for them to wake up to this fact. And by then the die was cast to abandon the hubs.

      1. Chris Avatar
        Chris

        This is AMAZING insight. Thank you for the history lesson. Contributions like yours are what make this blog so worthwhile.

      2. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        I was also wondering this. Create context – thanks for sharing!

      3. Hub RDU Again! Avatar
        Hub RDU Again!

        Fascinating – thanks for the insight!

      4. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        most insightful and interesting comment I’ve read here in quite some time! Brett, throw this guy or gal some cranky concierge credits for to write a guest piece or three!

        1. Common Sense Avatar
          Common Sense

          YES, please! Would love to hear more historical insight.

    2. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      Those flights from CLT are really not meant for locals in Charlotte. Those are all meant to feed connections. CLT is AA’s smaller version of DL’s ATL hub where DL has lots of flights to SAV, JAX, and other close in locations to feed their flights all over the world.

      1. SEAN Avatar
        SEAN

        True, but to be fare Atlanta has become a huge O/D market with a massive population boom over the past few decades. Charlotte has also grown, but not in the same way. It’s still primary a connecting hub as it has been since their US Air days.

        1. southbay flier Avatar
          southbay flier

          True. But, IIRC most traffic going through ATL is still connecting.

          No one who lives in ATL is going to fly from there to Chattanooga, Birmingham AL, Savannah, Albany GA, Huntsville or many other close in destinations.

      2. Hub RDU Again! Avatar
        Hub RDU Again!

        Yes yes – I understand the economics of a hub… thats why my comment was more a complaint that no airline is currently hubbing (or even seriously-focus-citying) RDU rather than a request that they start flying random one-off short haul flights. Although, I do think Southwest or Breeze could take a swing at RDU to some of the longer city pairs I mentioned within the Carolinas (SAV, CHS or even GSP)… would be curious to see how that goes. Those are all about the same stage length as WN’s intra-Texas flights.

  5. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    From what I remember reading and hearing at the time, the second Midway (JI) that you are referring was a pretty good airline as far as service, staff, and punctuality.

    Not surprisingly, management made some pretty questionable decisions. And the big one was being an airline their size and operating four…yes four different aircraft types (F-100’s, A320’s, 73G’s, and CRJ’s). If someone told me they had an Antonov as well, I would not have been surprised.

    So how about that Robert Ferguson? No wonder the airline went tits up.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      I remember a funny TV ad for Midway… pilot comes over the PA & announces they’re being delayed do to traffic ahead of them, crowd cheers loudly.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Matt D – To be fair, I don’t think the A320s and 737s overlapped for more than a bit. The 737s came in to replace the A320s. But yes, it was pretty silly. I flew Midway 3 times, once on the F100 and twice on the CRJ. It was a nice airline to fly.

  6. southbay flier Avatar
    southbay flier

    I was at RDU a week ago. I thought the airport (Terminal 1) was nice along with the smaller SkyClub, but it took forever to get a rental car shuttle to show up since each company has their own shuttle (which seems wasteful). For a city of its size to get as much service as it gets, it’s doing pretty well.

  7. southbay flier Avatar
    southbay flier

    Also, I saw that they are building what I think will be a third parallel runway that would go above the current runways in your picture.

    1. ChuckMO Avatar
      ChuckMO

      It’s actually the current north runway being moved away from the terminal area to allow for T2 expansion.

      1. SEAN Avatar
        SEAN

        Why can’t they just move it like you can in “Cities Skylines?”

  8. Steven Avatar
    Steven

    This series is great!

    A few of these posts like the STL and MEM posts are missing the “Former Hubs” tags.

    https://crankyflier.com/2026/02/24/stl-tries-to-finally-get-beyond-twa/
    https://crankyflier.com/2025/12/16/the-incredible-shrinking-mem/

    1. Brett Avatar

      Whoops, I created that tag later on and must have missed some when I went back. It’s fixed now.

  9. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    not a single Chumbawamba mention until now? keep thumping those tubs, Brett. even if you think nobody gets the reference, I probably will!

    1. 1990 Avatar
      1990

      You’re never gonna keep me down!

  10. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    During this fantastic airport then and now series, I’ve often compiled passenger numbers to see how the current airport stacks up against its peers.

    RDU had 15.6 million in 2025, putting it right around MSY, SMF, SJC, STL, etc., and larger than MCI, CLE, IND, PIT and CVG.

    This made me wonder why two separate terminals are necessary but maybe that was the best way to maximize existing facilities and minimize costs.

    I also wondered which are the largest airports that are not “dominated” by a major airline, i.e., 50% of the total passengers at the airport.

    I’m excluding the behemoths of LAX and MCO as they are their own animals.

    FYI that 40-50% range includes LAS (43.4% WN), LGA (41.1% DL), AUS (40.5% WN) and BNA (46.2% WN)

    Therefore RDU is the fourth largest US non-hub airport. It is the largest of these that does not have a significant tourism component which tends to flatten out market shares.

    Other comments that are likely only to be of interest to me are also included for those of you who would otherwise be watching paint dry:

    1) FLL – 32.2 mil (28.6% NK, 20.6% B6, 15% DL, 11.6% WN using calendar year 2025 numbers) – JetBlue has a long way to go / grow, NK was historically around 28-31% up to 17% but I think they’re at roughly zero point zero now. How B6 handles this will be the US aviation story of 2026.

    2) SAN – 25.2 mil (WN 34.5%, AS 19.1%) – AS has declared war here but they have a lot further to go than I thought. The market shares are much closer on departures, however.

    3) TPA – 24.5 mil (WN 23.5%, DL 18.5%, AA 16.7%)

    4) RDU – 15.6 mil (DL/AA each around 28%) – most likely the largest truly “up for grabs” airport in the country and the only one in which DL and AA are head to head. WN is 12.6% but watch out for Breeze (no, really) as they went from a 2.2% to 6.2% share in one year and continues to grow rapidly while also adding a crew base. Whose piece of the pie will they be eating?

    5) MSY – 14.2 mil (33% WN)

    6) RSW – 11.1 mil (21% DL, 18% WN, 15% AA/UA)

    6) SAT – 11 mil (35% WN, 24% AA)

    7) IND – 10.6 mil (30.8% WN, 24.6% AA) – interesting to see AA so high, I thought DL would be #2 from residual effects of the NWA heartland strategy. I guess that was a long time ago haha!

    8) CLE – 10.1 mil (25% UA, 21% F9) – former CO/UA hub, surprised UA wasn’t closer to 30-35%, WN and AA are each around 13%.

    9) PIT – 9.8 mil (27% WN, 22% AA) – former AL/US/AA hub, thought AA would have held into a bit more.

    10) CVG – 9 mil (35% DL, 20% AA) – former DL (really OH) hub, so where did AA come from? F9 and G4 combine for 24% almost equally between the two, that’s a big number when WN is only at 6%.

    Other airports Brett reviewed are well below this cutoff (MEM, MKE).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.