The CRJ450 Shows Off United’s Aggressive Creativity


United made it easy for me this week. The airline held its big media day right in my background at United’s hangar at LAX, and it was quite an event filled with a ton of news. We talk about the general themes on The Air Show podcast this week, but today I want to focus on my favorite announcement of them all, the creation of the CRJ450.

United rolled out a lot of hard product changes this week. We had the chance to walk through the new premium-heavy B787-9 (the so-called Elevated interior) which goes into service in less than a month. We were told about the new Coastliner A321neo which will become the transcon airplane of choice. And yes, there was more detail about the A321XLR configuration, including the new flat beds that we could sit in. We were told about the new Relax Row (Air New Zealand’s Skycouch), and there were a bunch of soft product changes as well.

Overall, it shows an airline that is making serious, firm, expensive investments, and it’s nothing short of impressive to watch. But in the corner of the hangar, in the shadow of that B787-9, sat a shiny CRJ200 — I didn’t even know they could be polished up enough to look shiny anymore — that to me held the most interesting change of all. Say hello to the CRJ450.

Does it just look like a CRJ200? That’s because it is. And in fact, this doesn’t require a new type certificate or anything like that. The CRJ450 is a marketing name for what is ultimately a vastly improved product that will breathe life into this airframe.

Instead of 50 regular coach seats, these SkyWest-operated airplanes will now have seven First Class seats, 16 Economy Plus, and 18 regular Economy seats onboard. For those who aren’t great at math, this means there will now be only 41 seats onboard the airplane. If you’ve ever seen the CRJ550 which is a CRJ700 with 50 seats onboard, then you’ll get the idea.

United has also said it is growing its CRJ550 fleet, but the world is running out of CRJ700s that can be converted. With a still substantial fleet of CRJ200s flying around, it had to make some decisions on what to do with those. United has seen what a true dual-class operation can do for revenues, and this math works. I spoke with someone at United who said he would have laughed this off a few years ago, but seeing what revenues do when there’s a true dual-class airplane over the last few years, he is now a true believer.

So what is it like on the inside? Well, take a look at this sweet ride.

It’s a big improvement from the old interiors, but the way this has been designed is pretty slick in several ways. Up at the front left of that photo above, you’ll see a cabinet. Here is the full view:

There are seven compartments, one for each First Class seat to store a full-size rollerbag. It’s not shown here, but the cabinet is pretty deep, so you can push your bag back and have room for coats or small items as well. Then up top, the closed cabinet you see is also available for extra items if needed. This allowed United to remove the overhead bins entirely in First Class, making for a much different feel than the usual CRJ200 cramped cabin. (The bigger CRJ700/900/1000s have lower floors, so they don’t feel nearly as cramped.)

In the back, there is a near 50-50 split between Economy Plus and regular coach seating. But with only 34 total seats back there, all of a sudden there is room for most rollerbags to be stored sideways in the bins.

Sure, you still have to hunch over to look out the window, but overall it is a much better experience for everyone onboard. This doesn’t even take into account the fact that United will install Starlink on all these airplanes.

I think we can agree the experience looks great, but it’s what this enables that really makes me interested in this plan. The CRJ450 will fly from the Denver and Chicago hubs. (I was told eventually it may very well fly to Houston too in some form.) But the idea here is to connect small and mid-size cities to United’s big domestic hubs, so people can connect beyond.

I dove into Cirium data and found that from Denver and Chicago, this coming July has 84 routes scheduled on the CRJ200. Now, 50 of these markets are only on the CRJ200 for all flights, but that means 34 of them have mixed flying. Here are those markets:

Data via Cirium, Maps generated by the Great Circle Mapper® – copyright © Karl L. Swartz.

This is a really bad experience for the local customer who gets very different offerings on different flights. This will now go away completely with the CRJ450.

Think of this in another way, in a competitive sense. There are 79 cities that are scheduled to receive CRJ200 service in July 2026, and 44 of those also have service from American, Delta, or Alaska on dual-class airplanes. United is less competitive in those markets, and now that issue will go away.

I would argue that even in the other cities without competition, this becomes quite attractive. Of course, many of the cities that get CRJ200 service today are markets that are funded by Essential Air Service subsidy. Offering a dual-class airplane in those bids will undoubtedly give SkyWest an even greater leg up than it already has in winning those bids.

SVP Global Network and Alliances Patrick Quayle pointed out on stage at media day that United serves more cities than any other airline on earth — he even challenged me from the stage to look it up. Sure enough, the airline has 393 airports on the route map in 2026, 24 more than second-place Air France-KLM. (I took the definition of “airline” generously and included whole airline groups.) I would imagine that this might help up that count even further with such an attractive offering to EAS communities.

The cherry on top of all this is that you know a ton of these flights don’t even get over the 82 percent seat factor required to make the loss of 9 seats onboard even matter. That’s especially true in EAS markets where passenger loads tend to be lower.

I can’t see loads by flight, but looking at all of 2025, United flew the CRJ200 in 94 markets (excluding random one-offs). Of those, 59 markets had a lower than 82 percent load overall. The CRJ200 had a systemwide 75 percent seat factor. Again, that’s not flight-specific, but it shows there is slack there in many cases.

In the end, this is a creative move that just improves United’s relevance and competitivness in small to mid-size markets. Now it needs to figure out what to do with the remaining ERJ-145s, the only single-class airplanes left in United’s future fleet. Today, those fly out of Houston and Washington/Dulles, but they are too narrow to do the same conversion. United will once again have to get creative, but that really doesn’t seem like an issue for the airline.


This is just one small piece of what United announced this week, but Jon and I get into so much more, including higher-level discussion, on this week’s episode of The Air Show which will be up later Thursday afternoon.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

35 responses to “The CRJ450 Shows Off United’s Aggressive Creativity”

  1. Kenneth Avatar
    Kenneth

    The most important element here is the customer who pays big money for a business class international – forcing them into an economy seat on a leg of that trip has always been a paint point of the CR2, as has been the gate checking of carry on bags. If you only had one or two business class seats (and storage) for these folks it would make a considerable difference. I like this tactic.

  2. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    I like this. I’m sure the usual people will wail about CASM, but (on paper, at least) the good will outweigh the bad. Time’ll tell if this works or not, but kudos to UA for again trying something new.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      I agree – it makes financial sense. 18% less seats will help push fares up. Plus more premium seats means higher yielding pax. A quick example assuming 100% LF:

      Old:
      50 coach seats x $125 fare = $6,200

      New:
      18 coach seats x $138 (fares rise with less capacity) = $2,500
      16 Economy Plus seats x $165 (20% premium to coach) = $2,600
      7 First seats x $410 (3x coach price) = $2,900
      Total revenue = $8,000, +28% higher than the old LOPA

      As long as the premium demand remains, UA should come out ahead on revenue

  3. Brad Avatar
    Brad

    Never thought I’d be interested an even trying another flight on a -200, but maybe?

    Last year I had a project in AMA that required two trips with nothing but -200s DEN-AMA and back. Awful experience! Hated the flights. Thought seriously about driving instead. (have driven that trip several times as well) One of four flights I had an open seat next to me in the exit row, but the other three were 100% loads.

    My chances of getting stuck on a -200 are way better than taking the high-J Dreamliner in Polaris anytime soon, so this really has the potential to help. While I wouldn’t desire to fly this over mainline, it would make an hour long flight palatable enough to not dread it like I did last year. If they price the F reasonably, I’d think about that but E+ alone is a HUGE win on this jet.

    Well done, UA, if you can’t fly the 175s into some small fields, this is clearly the next best thing and a great attempt to improve the worse experience in the fleet.

  4. Outer Space Guy Avatar
    Outer Space Guy

    Why would the 145s need creativity? JetSuiteX has a 1 + 1 layout right now on their 145s. Just do something like grab 7 seats on the 2-seat side and do something like what JSX did? For photos:

    https://seatmaps.com/airlines/xe-jsx-air/embraer-erj145/

    But dont do the entire plane. Just do what you need.
    7 rows by 36″ seat pitch = 252″ of linear cabin space. / 31″ of Econ- seat pitch == 8 rows of coach seats go away.

    So they lose 16 (8 rows x 2) E- seats, but gain (7 rows of 1 x F seats): 50(started at) -16 (loss of E seats-) +7(gain of F seats) = 41, same as the CRJ450.

    Am I wrong?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Outer Space – Yeah, the problem is more than just that. Remember, United’s goal here is not only to create a dual-class airplane but also to enable travelers to bring their rollerbags onboard. So the airline needs closet space, but the narrow width of the aircraft makes that tougher to get enough room. That’s also probably too much F, and they’d need E+. But they are working on something, they said. It’s just not as straightforward to make that work.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        Wouldn’t it just be easier to get more CRJ200s?

        There must be some that can be dragged out of deserts or wherever else they’re languishing. Over 1000 CRJ100/200s were made. I would guess the price of CRJ200s is almost identical to the value of their engines which in turn depends on how many cycles are left on the engines.

        This is a short-term fix for certain competitive markets and that’s great – I’m sure they can do their sums at UA HQ so this makes financial sense. But what’s the plan for 5-10 years from now?

        UA faces a mini version of what airlines like REX (in Australia) face – the end of the lifetime of an aircraft class that is no longer manufactured (REX relied on SF340s – there is no 30-seat turboprop made anymore). So what then?

        1. Brett Avatar

          JT8D – It would not shock me in the slightest to see that happen. But Commute Air is ERJ-only right now, so it’s not as simple as just buying airplanes. Still, that is probably the most clear solution in the long run.

    2. SandyCreek Avatar
      SandyCreek

      If I recalled from my experience flying United ERJ145s last year, the overhead cabin is too small to fit carry-ons regardless of the orientation you put them in, so without significant creativity, they won’t fix the overhead space problem, at least not for the economy passengers.

  5. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    Thank you for covering this specifically – and for looking at it with the positivity it deserves! As someone who does 25-30 flights a year on United CRJ-200s, I love it.

    Anyway, Skywest only allows 46 seats sold anyway on most of those flights since the last increase in FAA average passenger weights (look at any seat map – row 2 is either blocked or is missing entirely until day of departure when final load/weight is better known).

    Other than some routes like a LAX-SBP or SFO-MRY where they are using the CRJ to run an extra frequency, you’re right – they are often not full.

    Plus add Starlink to this which is wonderful when you’re flying into some places where cell phone reception is next to nothing at the airport!

  6. southbay flier Avatar
    southbay flier

    United has been on a good innovation streak lately. I like how they are trying to make improvements to their product.

  7. DesertGhost Avatar
    DesertGhost

    Maybe Air Wisconsin has a future.

  8. SandyCreek Avatar
    SandyCreek

    It seems like the US market clearly still has demands for regional jets – yet the 50-seat class has been out of production for a while. Who will be their successors? JSX seems to be experimenting with ATR72, but it doesn’t seem to be a widely adopted approach if you exclude the now-gone Silver.

    1. Jason H Avatar
      Jason H

      There is demand for 50 seat jets at the price of already-owned or used CRJs. If an airline has to buy them at new prices, probably not. If they didn’t already have CRJ200s, It would likely make more sense in most markets to remove a frequency and use an E175.

  9. Emilio Vigil-Vazquez Avatar
    Emilio Vigil-Vazquez

    Does this mean we’ll have to stop calling the CRJ-200 “The Devil’s Chariot”?

    1. Erik Avatar

      7 people on a flight will cease calling it that.

  10. Doug Swalen Avatar
    Doug Swalen

    Well United will still have mixed fleet flying on some routes. On DEN-OKC United has either a 737-800, E175, or CRJ-550 (or some combination of those three) flying any given day depending on the day/time of day. I, unfortunately, will be flying the 550 back to DEN. The other options were either a bad departure time or the cost of the ticket was double selecting that 550 for the whole SFO-DEN-OKC roundtrip (upwards of $1,000). And this was before the oil spike. I just hope my May itinerary stays intact and doesn’t get caught up in that 5% cutback that’s coming and I have to find new timings out and back.

    1. SandyCreek Avatar
      SandyCreek

      I checked fr24 and have to admit I find it surprising that there is 3x daily e175 to LAX and 1x daily 739 to SEA, yet nothing to the bay – even Tulsa has more destinations with SAN on top (albeit less capacity). Perhaps UA or WN should cook up something…

      But circling to your original point, it is probably because of uneven demand. Business travelers going to the west coast, for example, will probably prefer flights that get them to the big cities by 9am rather than 12pm if an option exist, and that’ll probably render midday departures less popular, hence served with less capacity.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Doug – Yes, it is a mixed fleet, but it’s not a mixed product. All airplanes will be dual-class.

      But why is it unfortunate? The 550 is a great ride, and I was told gets some of the best customer satisfaction ratings in the fleet.

  11. Mike P Avatar
    Mike P

    Cranky, I was looking at the route map. Do you think these will also come to the new RST-ORD service starting in April?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Mike P – These will come to every route from Chicago and Denver operated by a CRJ-200 today. Just a matter of when.

  12. mike Avatar
    mike

    Cranky, your ciruim data is off for DEN. Missing alot of -200 routes, off the top of my head are most of Wyoming, GCC, RKS, RIV, CYS, LAR and even DVL in ND.

    1. dfw88 Avatar
      dfw88

      You didn’t read his comment very closely:

      “Now, 50 of these markets are only on the CRJ200 for all flights, but that means 34 of them have mixed flying. Here are those markets:”

      These are the 34 markets that have a mixture of equipment types flying. He purposefully left off the -200 only routes, such as the ones you listed. The point was to talk about markets where the current -200 has competition and is, therefore, not very competitive. On the routes where it’s the only equipment the change to the -450 will be nice, but not as impactful since customers don’t have a choice.

  13. Emilio Vigil-Vazquez Avatar
    Emilio Vigil-Vazquez

    Anyone else notice the beige seat covers in first class?

  14. David SF eastbay Avatar
    David SF eastbay

    I think doing away with overhead bins in First class and having those cubbies is a creative idea.

  15. Stormcrash Avatar
    Stormcrash

    One thing I noticed too in the press release link in the “all customers” section was “screens at every seat”. This sounds like United is reversing on the course they had followed with American a few years back about not putting screens on domestic narrowbody aircraft. That plus the performant wifi will make a big dent in customer experience on longer domestic flights.

    As for the 450 it’s kind of nuts how much premium demand has made things like this viable, especially the notion that thanks to lower load factors such a plane despite fewer seats can be more profitable thanks to capturing untaped premium demand

    Someone is going to have to figure out a replacement for the CRJ or a way to restart manufacturing at some point, these aircraft just keep on chugging along slotted in under the larger Embraer E jets

    1. Brett Avatar

      Stormcrash – United reversed that stance long ago. The United Next interior with seatback screens is now on 70% of the fleet with the rest largely finishing up next year.

  16. Carl Avatar
    Carl

    I sure hope SGU gets this aircraft on SGU-DEN and SGU-LAX

  17. Carl Avatar
    Carl

    Does a 41-seat aircraft give UA more flexibility from pilot scope clauses or are 41 and 50 seat aircraft in the same category? I think one motivation for the CRJ550 was that they a counted as 50 seat aircraft, and UA can replace that aircraft with a 76 seat E175 for purposes of the scope clause.

    In my opinion, scope clauses don’t truly serve the pilots well. UA is not going to operate 76 seat aircraft in lieu of 150 seat aircraft if they can fill a 150 seat aircraft profitably – the 150 seat aircraft has lower CASM even with mainline pilots in the cockpit. And it’s not cheaper to fly two 76 seat aircraft instead for one 150+ seat aircraft. What the scope limitations does is to prevent UA from operating more thin markets to feed mainline and also to make UA less competitive with AA, AS and DL. AA and AS in particular have much more flexible scope clauses so they can operate more comfortable RJs than UA.

    At best it is negotiating leverage for pilots. But it also limits growth of mainline flying.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Carl – No difference in flex. As far as I know, 50 seats and under are treated the same.

  18. Eric C Avatar
    Eric C

    The youngest Deuce in the world is still 20, and it’s not like they’ve been treated gently over those years. This can’t be more than a very short term solution. These planes weren’t really designed to make 30. They were old at 10!

    I like it though. The Barbie Fun Jet was always extremely nose heavy. It balances at row 11, so there are typically 40 seats forward of the CG balanced by 6 and cargo behind. That just didn’t work often. We forever were forcing the premium forward passengers to relocate to the empty seats by the lav for balance, or sometimes denying boarding entirely. Thinning out the front half will help a lot.

    This would shed nearly a ton of passenger weight. That poor plane is badly under-winged and could barely climb when hot and heavy. It also marginally helps the air conditioning keep up – it always struggles trying to cool 51 bodies in the cabin.

  19. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    It is hard to believe a company that talks about the value it gets from upgauging its mainline fleet even as it downgauges its regional jet fleet. The CRJ550 has the worst per seat economics in the US carrier fleet and the 450 will be even worse. Pilot salaries aren’t going down 20% to account for the 20% fewer passengers and revenue is not going up by 20%.

    and let’s also not forget that UA has the need for SMALL 2 class RJs because it has the most restrictive large RJ clause of the four US airlines that have RJs in their marketed fleet – and yet UA had the same RJ scope clause as DL for years. DL went first with the 717 as a small mainline aircraft and then the A220 and not only opened up dozens more large RJs but also allowed them to eliminate 50 seat RJs from their CPAs.
    AA rammed through a pilot contract which allows many more large RJs. Considering that an E175 carries 85% more passengers than a CRJ450, it is hard to believe that the economics will ever work out for UA and the onboard experience is at best on par with larger RJs or small mainline aircraft but certainly not superior.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      “Pilot salaries aren’t going down 20% to account for the 20% fewer passengers and revenue is not going up by 20%.”

      While the former is true, the latter can be real. Reposting my example from above (assumes 100% LF):

      Old:
      50 coach seats x $125 fare = $6,200

      New:
      18 coach seats x $138 (fares rise with less capacity) = $2,500
      16 Economy Plus seats x $165 (20% premium to coach) = $2,600
      7 First seats x $410 (3x coach price) = $2,900
      Total revenue = $8,000, +28% higher than the old LOPA

      1. Derek Avatar
        Derek

        First class is not going to be 3x economy. These CRJ450 flights are likely going to have the infamous $30-$40 dollar upgrade offers.

  20. Nick Avatar
    Nick

    I agree that the CRJ-450 was the most interesting announcement from United this week.

    I like that United isn’t forgetting about the smallest planes it has but this closet feature isn’t new at all.

    I used to fly Northwest Airlines often, connecting in MEM. Pinnacle had a 44 all economy seating configuration, but with a great closet in the front for some carry on bags, so the closet in the CRJ-200 isn’t a new idea, just likely improved. It was sad when the scope clause changed and they removed the closets and added back the 6 seats.

Leave a Reply to Eric C Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier