Avelo Pivots Again, This Time Toward a Single Strategy


Avelo has been hard to pin down, as I’ve written in several previous posts. But now, flush with a new cash infusion, the airline has decided it is time to finally focus on one thing. Whether this will work or not remains unclear, but it is certainly heartening to see an actual, cohesive strategy coming into focus for the first time.

Back in November, I wrote about my understanding of the airline’s strategy:

The overarching network ideal is basically the opposite of Allegiant. At Allegiant, the airline has long focused on flying people from various small origin airports to big-city destinations with aircraft bases like Las Vegas or Orlando. Avelo, on the other hand, wants to fly people from a few, small origin aircraft base airports like New Haven or Charlotte/Concord to a variety of big destinations.

And to build on that, it wasn’t just about flying from small origins but small, secondary-airport origins near big cities. The problem with this idea was that it did a whole lot of things that did not fit that strategy at all, and that’s even after considering all of the former base flying that had been removed like Burbank and Orlando. So it was hard to reconcile this throughout the network. Now, however, Avelo has announced the change that will finally bring a cohesiveness to the company.

  • Raleigh/Durham will close as a base, that is not a secondary airport, nor is it small
  • Wilmington (NC) will close as a base, that is small but it is not a secondary airport in a large market
  • Phoenix/Mesa will close as a base, that was only for ICE deportation flying which is no longer needed as a cash grab
  • McKinney (TX) will open as a base later this year, that is the smallest of origins since it has no service today but it is a true secondary airport for the Metroplex
  • Avelo will return six B737-700s, leaving only two in the fleet in addition to the 14 B737-800s as it awaits delivery of the Embraer E2s

This is a big deal for the airline. It will now focus itself around five bases, all of which are small origin airports that can be considered secondary airports.

  • Concord, NC (Charlotte)
  • Lakeland, FL (Orlando and Tampa)
  • McKinney, TX (Dallas/Fort Worth) later this year
  • New Haven, CT (NYC/Westchester)
  • Wilmington, DE (Philly)

Of these, New Haven is far and away the one true rock star in the network. The others are works in progress. McKinney, however, should be fantastic. They are building the terminal in that fast-growing area, and Avelo will be the first one in. That’s a great opportunity, and Avelo just has to hope others don’t dive in as well.

With this, Avelo can get rid of most of the distractions that had prevented a singular strategy from existing over the years. Yes, one of those was deportation flying. I know protesters probably think that they won some victory by yelling loudly, but I can’t imagine that’s what happened. The ICE flying was a lifeline. The airline was low on cash, and that was a way to get cash. It was never strategic. Now that it has raised new funding, it doesn’t need that short-term money-grab and can instead focus on building its strategy.

Besides, now that the Department of Homeland Services is buying six B737-700s from Daedalus, the company that I believe holds the deportation flying contract, we can piece all of this together. I haven’t seen any officially confirmation that these are the Avelo airplanes going to the feds, but that would certainly make it easy for Avelo to just walk away from all of this.

So, now we have Avelo reboot number, well, I’m not sure what number to call this. Now the only routes that don’t touch one of the five bases are RDU – Rochester (NY) and Wilmington (NC) – Baltimore, Nashville, and Tampa. Those will now be funded through other bases, and they probably will actually help with aircraft flow and utilization between bases, especially New Haven which is so constrained.

Just look at how much has been shed in the last year. The West Coast network is gone. Hartford is gone. International is gone.

Avelo Route Map excluding HVN/ILG/USA/LAL bases generated by the Great Circle Mapper – copyright © Karl L. Swartz.
Green is still flying in Apr, Red was just canceled, Yellow was flying last Apr but since canceled

To me, this looks like Avelo’s sink-or-swim moment. It has new money, new airplanes on order, and a strategy. Now we get to see if it will actually work. All of those distractions over the years are gone, so there are no more excuses.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

35 responses to “Avelo Pivots Again, This Time Toward a Single Strategy”

  1. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Trust me Dan (as Im sure you agree) when I say that with all the horrors going on this week in Minneapolis and everywhere else in the US, none of us think we’ve won anything in terms of stopping ICE.

    As far as Avelo, they are still about 8 strategy pivots away from being a viable airline option for 95% of the flying populace, Im sure we’ll see a new strategy from them pretty soon.

  2. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    I just have one question. With Spirit and Avelo being essentially insolvent and almost everyone in unanimous agreement that one or both has their days numbered, who keeps throwing money at them and why?

    What are they seeing that everyone else is not?

    Okay, two questions.

    1. GRT Avatar
      GRT

      Avelo has the lowest unit costs in the industry. As the other ULCCs and LCCs creep slightly more upmarket, that creates an opportunity for a raw core ULCC to slide in at the bottom. The other fundamental thing is what Cranky pointed out re secondary airports in big cities. That was their strategy during the genesis of the business; parts of it failed (eg Burbank), but overall, as noted in the article, they slipped away from that original mission. So, with low costs, they should be able to offer low fares and the price sensitive leisure market in the US is enormous as you know. PS I think McKinney will be a massive hit.

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        Why would TKI be a massive hit?

        Who is coming to McKinney for tourism? No one. It’s all outgoing traffic. Competing with 1200 daily AA and WN flights less than 45 minutes away.

        1. JT8D Avatar
          JT8D

          Who is coming to HVN for tourism? Who is coming to ILG for tourism? Who is going to Concord, NC for tourism? All those are Avelo bases as well.

          Those airports are originators. I assume Avelo views TKI as the same.

          For the right airline, TKI should work. You seem very focused on the 45 minute drive, but right now, even with traffic, DAL is a 25 minute drive from DFW yet for some reason, people historically still used DAL. Strange that, because according to you, at least one of DFW or DAL should have failed.

          Yes, I realize the situation is a lot more nuanced, that’s the point. 45 minutes, per se, isn’t at all a reason for failure.

          I think for the right airline, TKI will work. I’m not convinced Avelo is optimal for TKI.

          Avelo is currently on its 10th of 9 lives. It’s f***ed around for five years. It really needs this next year to work.

          Hopefully, for them, they do not yet have the stink of a loser about them, because right now, for the few people paying attention, Avelo is not exactly a name you associate with success.

  3. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    SRQ is missing from the route map. Current flying is to both New Haven and Wilmington, NC. The latter ends in April.

  4. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    We shall see if Avelo can keep their nose up & their wings straight, but most importantly they need to watch their stall speed.

  5. John G Avatar
    John G

    I am just not sold that TKI will be successful as a passenger airport. In the first place, it’s not really that far from the other airports. It’s 7:30 AM right now, and GoogleMaps shows TKI is 47 minutes from DFW (it’s 35 minutes when it’s not rush hour). Love Field is like 40 to 45 minutes. Plus it’s off the freeway grid.

    Compare that to HVN. Right now, HVN to LGA (also rush hour) is an hour and 52 minutes.

    Comparing DFW to LGA or HPN is a bit silly to me. LGA has lots of flights, but they are limited by the perimeter rule, and HPN is a boutique airport serving a wealthy area. American has almost a thousand flights out of DFW every day. And Southwest runs almost 200 flights a day out of DAL.

    Where is Avelo going to go from TKI that there aren’t already five flights a day from DFW on AA and one or two on WN out of Love?

    Plus there is also already a decent ULCC presence here. Frontier has 135 flights a week out of DFW during January, and Spirit still has 94. Sun County has a longstanding presence in the summer, flying to Cancun, Punta Cana, and other sun destinations, and they have a tie-in with a travel group as well.

    It seems like the only selling point they would have is location. They will have to convince some people that they should fly on an airline they don’t know, with only 2 or 3 flights a week, for what will be the same price they can fly 4X a day from DFW or 1X a day from DAL on AA or WN or even F9. AA is not DL at MSP, and they will aggressively protect DFW. As an example, Breeze flies to Provo out of DFW, and AA put on two daily flights there at a round trip basic econ price of $179.

    They will only be able to sell location, and TKI’s draw is pretty limited. It’s not that much farther for people to drive to DFW or DAL. They might get a few people from farther out that don’t like driving…but this is Texas. 77-year-old grandmothers drive 75 mph in the slow lane. We don’t mind it.

    1. Daniel Paulling Avatar
      Daniel Paulling

      There’s a huge population boom and a number of companies moving to Collin County (the county McKinney is in), with much more coming.

      1. Anthony Avatar
        Anthony

        The same argument made about growing PAE, but people are still willing to make the hellacious drive from the northern Seattle suburbs through I-5 downtown to SEA, as AS, UA, F9, and WN found out.

        1. JT8D Avatar
          JT8D

          Alaska grabbed almost all the (relatively few) slots at PAE and put in place a schedule that doesn’t work except for leisure. It’s a good strategy on its part as it wants nothing to distract from SEA.

          PAE needed e.g. six flights a day to SFO or whatever. A decent business schedule to somewhere useful. It never got it. Alaska did a good job in that regard. “Hey we’re serving PAE!” – except not in any way that would divert attention from SEA.

          1. Anthony Avatar
            Anthony

            That’s completely wrong. The initial strategy was fully based on business day trips. Multiple trips to SFO, LAX, BOI, GEG, PDX but it was awful. It has changed strategy multiple times until settling on its current leisure strategy.

            1. JT8D Avatar
              JT8D

              Alaska is quite satisfied with the outcome.

            2. CraigTPA Avatar
              CraigTPA

              True, although I do wish AS would add at least a little more service to SAN for connections – I have family in northern Washington, and right now if I wanted to fly TPA-SAN-PAE I’d have a 6 1/2 hour layover. Being able to use PAE would shave an hour each way off my driving, on top of being able to avoid the general mess, specific construction mess, and that wretched bus to the rental car center at SEA. (That bus alone makes me want to punch a kitten. And I like kittens.)

      2. John G Avatar
        John G

        Yes, but TKI is on the far east side of the growth in Collin County.

        Anyone west of there would just drive to DFW.

        Then again, you would be flying a crappy airline with flights only twice a week versus driving to DFW for five flights a day to the same place.

        I just don’t think it’s gonna work anywhere near like New Haven does.

        1. Oliver Avatar
          Oliver

          And if you book far enough in advance, you will be wondering if the airline is actually going to be around to operating your flight, as many folks with tickets on the west coast found out …

        2. JT8D Avatar
          JT8D

          The drive to DFW is only the start of the nightmare with that airport.

          There’s a reason so many travelers historically preferred not to drive from Dallas to DFW, even though that drive was also pretty short.

          The FAA collects stats for DAL and DFW for such things as taxi times. I’ve never looked at them for DFW and DAL, but I have for ORD and MDW – for the Chicago airports, the average savings in taxi time for aircraft was something like 15 minutes. If you integrate that over the Southwest fleet, you find out that the benefit to them of using MDW just from saved taxi time was something like a few aircraft in reduced capital cost. I bet the same is true for DFW and DAL.

          And that’s not even counting the reduced hassle on the landside for travelers. MDW and DAL being far easier to deal with than ORD and DFW.

          However, as I mentioned elsewhere, I don’t Avelo, as currently configured, is the best airline to make a success of TKI.

  6. Daniel Paulling Avatar
    Daniel Paulling

    Wouldn’t McKinney be tertiary in the Metroplex?

  7. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    I lived in the DFW area for over 20 years – close to DFW airport – which was terrific for our travel.

    That said, TKI is not only located in one of the fastest growing areas of the Metroplex, it also has an interesting catchment area in East Texas. East Texas travelers that use TYR or TXK (requires connections through DFW or other airports) may opt for TKI if the destination offered is a good match.

    It’s also not just the travel time to the airport, it’s the time required to navigate the scale and complexity of both airports – especially DFW (i.e. parking, longer lines, security, etc.) vs. the convenience of a small airport. We now live close to SRQ. As terrific as TPA is, SRQ is a wonderful, simple airport to transit. We use it whenever we can. TKI should be a Breeze to use (pun intended – David are you listening?)

    The frequency and limited scope of destination(s) that will likely be offered at TKI are points well made versus what AA and WN offer at DFW and Love Field – plus there’s the strength of AAdvantage and Rapid Rewards. That will certainly make it challenging for Avelo to attract customers. Avelo’s positive experience at Lakeland Airport in Florida is likely one of the reasons TKI appears attractive.

    It will be interesting to see how this plays out. If TKI becomes successful, it will likely be just be a matter of time before AA does strategic flying from TKI as they did for a period of time from DAL. What may ultimately make a lot more sense at TKI is to offer frequent air taxi service to DFW on new electric/hybrid transports when available. AA is an equity investor ($25M) in Vertical Aerospace with purchase orders for 250 aircraft an options for another 100.

    1. Daniel Paulling Avatar
      Daniel Paulling

      With all of the corporate travel that will come out of McKinney/Collin County (as well as the passenger traffic), would it make sense for Delta to make a push there?

      1. Anthony Avatar
        Anthony

        Is there another example of Delta making a push at a tiny tertiary airport anywhere else?

      2. jd Avatar
        jd

        No. I could see Southwest growing at McKinney if Love Field stays maxed out and they don’t want to fight an uphill battle at DFW. But if Delta ever wants to grow its capacity in the metroplex I guess they would prefer doing so at DFW rather than TKI.

        1. Matt D Avatar
          Matt D

          Delta once had a sizeable hub operation at DFW. Then they decided to dismantle it.

          Why on earth would they be interested in trying to rebuild what they once had and chose to abandon?

          1. Anthony Avatar
            Anthony

            And at a less desirable location!

    2. John G Avatar
      John G

      TKI is not going to pull much if anything from Tyler, Longview, etc. To get to TKI from there means you have to drive into Dallas and then up 75. It’s easier just to go to DAL or DFW. And there is a lot more population along I-20 than I-30.

      Comparing it to SRQ, there is a huge difference. First, SRQ is a destination in itself. Ain’t nobody going to McKinney for tourism. Second, there are about a million people in the Sarasota/Bradenton area, and for them it’s easier than TPA. That’s not the case with TKI. Same with New Haven. There are lots of people for which HVN is just much more convenient.

      Where TKI is located, there just aren’t that many people for which it’s “much more convenient” than DFW or DAL.

      And just like aint nobody going to McKinney for tourism, nobody is flying corporate on Avelo. Not if they would like their employees not to quit.

      1. Mark Avatar
        Mark

        John. I think you misunderstood my reference to SRQ. I wasn’t comparing TKI to SRQ as a destination, I was making the point that smaller airports like TKI and SRQ are much easier to navigate for originating passengers than major hub airports like DFW which can be compelling.

        I can arrive at SRQ parking an hour before departure time and will be at the gate in 15-20 minutes. I expect the same will be true at TKI if not better. Can’t do that at DFW or even TPA.

        1. John G Avatar
          John G

          I do that at DFW every single time.

          You can park T the terminal and easily be at the gate in 20.

          I have a flight out in 3 hours. I’m at the gym and then will stop and get dinner.

  8. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    Of course TKI will do well…. Visual Approach is based there. :)

  9. Secret Pol-ICE Avatar
    Secret Pol-ICE

    Maybe they’ll get into ICE’s next business opportunity – detention & deportation of American Citizens. Ya know, at least for those who survive their initial encounter with an ICE goon.

  10. ejwpj Avatar
    ejwpj

    I understand the importance of FF programs, the value of branded CC’s, etc. So if you buy your ticket for travel on a ULCC with your branded CC, you would get some miles/points based on the cost. Isn’t that better than getting no miles when you buy a basic economy on AA, which no longer gets you any miles?
    Just wondering what’s wrong with this picture…..??

    1. --- Avatar

      On AA, you’d still earn points on the spend from your credit card; you’re just losing the points from the ticket itself (for flying). This is exactly the same situation as Avelo, where you’d earn on the spend from the card but not from the ticket.

  11. CraigTPA Avatar
    CraigTPA

    The strategy is cohesive, but is it rational? I have my doubts.

    New Haven works, and from what I understand the operational limitations of the airport mean that unless Breeze pulls out no one else can go in. So far, so good, but we already knew that.

    So now we get to the other four bases, and it becomes a mixed bag. (I’m presuming that they keep the current destinations from the bases.)

    LAL can perhaps be considered a secondary airport for Tampa for inbound traffic, but locals aren’t going to consider it over TPA the moment you get west of I-75 (and even Brandon is a stretch)…unless you offer garbage fares. And there’s also Allegiant at PIE. Same for MCO – maybe Celebration and possibly Kissimmee would consider LAL an alternative.

    So LAL has to live or die on the Lakeland-Winter Haven market, which is really going to limit the number of destinations they can offer. They’ve already had to scale back at LAL. Now admittedly you’re only having to fill an -800 a couple of times a week, but there’s still only a finite, relatively small, number of people who want to go from LAL to other places.

    ILG makes more sense – it’s a straight “we’re gonna take you to Florida (and San Juan)” play. It’s close enough to PHL to still be attractive to a decent chunk of the Philly market, and has its own local area too. So not bad here, although one has to question it in that if there’s enough demand to Florida why didn’t Allegiant come in before them?

    Concord (NC) – I had to look at a map for this one, the only thing I know about Charlotte is that CLT is an immense pain in the butt. Annoying code notwithstanding, USA is actually in a decent position for a good chunk of Charlotte itself, although the population thins out fast as soon as you go east, and because of that there aren’t a lot of people for whom this is significantly more convenient than CLT, so that again suggests low yields.

    As for McKinney, until they announce destinations it’s hard to say. Fast-growing area, so there’s that.

    As for future growth from these bases, it’d really help if some of the E195-E2s were on the property already, but the first ones don’t arrive until next year. There’s only a finite number of cities these small origin bases can support, and a limited number of potential new bases using this model, so I really have my doubts about this business model being scalable, or profitable at this level. And 50 E195-E2s is a LOT of Embraers, especially with Breeze still having 40 more A220s on the way.

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      LAL makes little sense. Think of all the low cost alternatives nearby that are better located.

      Great location for a freight airport, someone should tell Amazon… ;-)

      Concord is like TKI – convenience is most valuable to those whose time is expensive and the current Avelo model isn’t pitched to such people. I like Concord generically but I don’t think Avelo’s model is the right one to make the most of it.

  12. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    I like TKI, the only thing that gives me pause is it’s halfway across the country from its other bases. Which is better than all the way across country (hello BUR!), but ideally they would have found another base close to the others.\

    OK, Iied. The other thing that gives me pause is it’s the Metroplex which for American and Southwest might as well be Jerusalem.

    So you gotta figure that even if they can’t ram a bill through Congress to prevent this (or hamstring it), those two airlines are going to be very very attentive to what’s going on.

    Also, I don’t think Avelo’s business model is the highest and best use for TKI. The selling point is convenience, which is most valuable to those whose time is expensive and Avelo isn’t going after those customers.

  13. George Romey Avatar
    George Romey

    Few Americans have ever heard of this airline (and that’s their problem) leave alone they did ICE deportation flights. It’s an airline desperately looking for routes that can work 2-3 times a week without drawling backlash from the legacies. Allegiant does tour/casino work and that’s the money maker there.

Leave a Reply to Anthony Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier