Avelo Pivots Again, This Time Toward a Single Strategy


Avelo has been hard to pin down, as I’ve written in several previous posts. But now, flush with a new cash infusion, the airline has decided it is time to finally focus on one thing. Whether this will work or not remains unclear, but it is certainly heartening to see an actual, cohesive strategy coming into focus for the first time.

Back in November, I wrote about my understanding of the airline’s strategy:

The overarching network ideal is basically the opposite of Allegiant. At Allegiant, the airline has long focused on flying people from various small origin airports to big-city destinations with aircraft bases like Las Vegas or Orlando. Avelo, on the other hand, wants to fly people from a few, small origin aircraft base airports like New Haven or Charlotte/Concord to a variety of big destinations.

And to build on that, it wasn’t just about flying from small origins but small, secondary-airport origins near big cities. The problem with this idea was that it did a whole lot of things that did not fit that strategy at all, and that’s even after considering all of the former base flying that had been removed like Burbank and Orlando. So it was hard to reconcile this throughout the network. Now, however, Avelo has announced the change that will finally bring a cohesiveness to the company.

  • Raleigh/Durham will close as a base, that is not a secondary airport, nor is it small
  • Wilmington (NC) will close as a base, that is small but it is not a secondary airport in a large market
  • Phoenix/Mesa will close as a base, that was only for ICE deportation flying which is no longer needed as a cash grab
  • McKinney (TX) will open as a base later this year, that is the smallest of origins since it has no service today but it is a true secondary airport for the Metroplex
  • Avelo will return six B737-700s, leaving only two in the fleet in addition to the 14 B737-800s as it awaits delivery of the Embraer E2s

This is a big deal for the airline. It will now focus itself around five bases, all of which are small origin airports that can be considered secondary airports.

  • Concord, NC (Charlotte)
  • Lakeland, FL (Orlando and Tampa)
  • McKinney, TX (Dallas/Fort Worth) later this year
  • New Haven, CT (NYC/Westchester)
  • Wilmington, DE (Philly)

Of these, New Haven is far and away the one true rock star in the network. The others are works in progress. McKinney, however, should be fantastic. They are building the terminal in that fast-growing area, and Avelo will be the first one in. That’s a great opportunity, and Avelo just has to hope others don’t dive in as well.

With this, Avelo can get rid of most of the distractions that had prevented a singular strategy from existing over the years. Yes, one of those was deportation flying. I know protesters probably think that they won some victory by yelling loudly, but I can’t imagine that’s what happened. The ICE flying was a lifeline. The airline was low on cash, and that was a way to get cash. It was never strategic. Now that it has raised new funding, it doesn’t need that short-term money-grab and can instead focus on building its strategy.

Besides, now that the Department of Homeland Services is buying six B737-700s from Daedalus, the company that I believe holds the deportation flying contract, we can piece all of this together. I haven’t seen any officially confirmation that these are the Avelo airplanes going to the feds, but that would certainly make it easy for Avelo to just walk away from all of this.

So, now we have Avelo reboot number, well, I’m not sure what number to call this. Now the only routes that don’t touch one of the five bases are RDU – Rochester (NY) and Wilmington (NC) – Baltimore, Nashville, and Tampa. Those will now be funded through other bases, and they probably will actually help with aircraft flow and utilization between bases, especially New Haven which is so constrained.

Just look at how much has been shed in the last year. The West Coast network is gone. Hartford is gone. International is gone.

Avelo Route Map excluding HVN/ILG/USA/LAL bases generated by the Great Circle Mapper – copyright © Karl L. Swartz.
Green is still flying in Apr, Red was just canceled, Yellow was flying last Apr but since canceled

To me, this looks like Avelo’s sink-or-swim moment. It has new money, new airplanes on order, and a strategy. Now we get to see if it will actually work. All of those distractions over the years are gone, so there are no more excuses.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

16 responses to “Avelo Pivots Again, This Time Toward a Single Strategy”

  1. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Trust me Dan (as Im sure you agree) when I say that with all the horrors going on this week in Minneapolis and everywhere else in the US, none of us think we’ve won anything in terms of stopping ICE.

    As far as Avelo, they are still about 8 strategy pivots away from being a viable airline option for 95% of the flying populace, Im sure we’ll see a new strategy from them pretty soon.

  2. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    I just have one question. With Spirit and Avelo being essentially insolvent and almost everyone in unanimous agreement that one or both has their days numbered, who keeps throwing money at them and why?

    What are they seeing that everyone else is not?

    Okay, two questions.

  3. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    SRQ is missing from the route map. Current flying is to both New Haven and Wilmington, NC. The latter ends in April.

  4. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    We shall see if Avelo can keep their nose up & their wings straight, but most importantly they need to watch their stall speed.

  5. John G Avatar
    John G

    I am just not sold that TKI will be successful as a passenger airport. In the first place, it’s not really that far from the other airports. It’s 7:30 AM right now, and GoogleMaps shows TKI is 47 minutes from DFW (it’s 35 minutes when it’s not rush hour). Love Field is like 40 to 45 minutes. Plus it’s off the freeway grid.

    Compare that to HVN. Right now, HVN to LGA (also rush hour) is an hour and 52 minutes.

    Comparing DFW to LGA or HPN is a bit silly to me. LGA has lots of flights, but they are limited by the perimeter rule, and HPN is a boutique airport serving a wealthy area. American has almost a thousand flights out of DFW every day. And Southwest runs almost 200 flights a day out of DAL.

    Where is Avelo going to go from TKI that there aren’t already five flights a day from DFW on AA and one or two on WN out of Love?

    Plus there is also already a decent ULCC presence here. Frontier has 135 flights a week out of DFW during January, and Spirit still has 94. Sun County has a longstanding presence in the summer, flying to Cancun, Punta Cana, and other sun destinations, and they have a tie-in with a travel group as well.

    It seems like the only selling point they would have is location. They will have to convince some people that they should fly on an airline they don’t know, with only 2 or 3 flights a week, for what will be the same price they can fly 4X a day from DFW or 1X a day from DAL on AA or WN or even F9. AA is not DL at MSP, and they will aggressively protect DFW. As an example, Breeze flies to Provo out of DFW, and AA put on two daily flights there at a round trip basic econ price of $179.

    They will only be able to sell location, and TKI’s draw is pretty limited. It’s not that much farther for people to drive to DFW or DAL. They might get a few people from farther out that don’t like driving…but this is Texas. 77-year-old grandmothers drive 75 mph in the slow lane. We don’t mind it.

    1. Daniel Paulling Avatar
      Daniel Paulling

      There’s a huge population boom and a number of companies moving to Collin County (the county McKinney is in), with much more coming.

      1. Anthony Avatar
        Anthony

        The same argument made about growing PAE, but people are still willing to make the hellacious drive from the northern Seattle suburbs through I-5 downtown to SEA, as AS, UA, F9, and WN found out.

      2. John G Avatar
        John G

        Yes, but TKI is on the far east side of the growth in Collin County.

        Anyone west of there would just drive to DFW.

        Then again, you would be flying a crappy airline with flights only twice a week versus driving to DFW for five flights a day to the same place.

        I just don’t think it’s gonna work anywhere near like New Haven does.

  6. Daniel Paulling Avatar
    Daniel Paulling

    Wouldn’t McKinney be tertiary in the Metroplex?

  7. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    I lived in the DFW area for over 20 years – close to DFW airport – which was terrific for our travel.

    That said, TKI is not only located in one of the fastest growing areas of the Metroplex, it also has an interesting catchment area in East Texas. East Texas travelers that use TYR or TXK (requires connections through DFW or other airports) may opt for TKI if the destination offered is a good match.

    It’s also not just the travel time to the airport, it’s the time required to navigate the scale and complexity of both airports – especially DFW (i.e. parking, longer lines, security, etc.) vs. the convenience of a small airport. We now live close to SRQ. As terrific as TPA is, SRQ is a wonderful, simple airport to transit. We use it whenever we can. TKI should be a Breeze to use (pun intended – David are you listening?)

    The frequency and limited scope of destination(s) that will likely be offered at TKI are points well made versus what AA and WN offer at DFW and Love Field – plus there’s the strength of AAdvantage and Rapid Rewards. That will certainly make it challenging for Avelo to attract customers. Avelo’s positive experience at Lakeland Airport in Florida is likely one of the reasons TKI appears attractive.

    It will be interesting to see how this plays out. If TKI becomes successful, it will likely be just be a matter of time before AA does strategic flying from TKI as they did for a period of time from DAL. What may ultimately make a lot more sense at TKI is to offer frequent air taxi service to DFW on new electric/hybrid transports when available. AA is an equity investor ($25M) in Vertical Aerospace with purchase orders for 250 aircraft an options for another 100.

    1. Daniel Paulling Avatar
      Daniel Paulling

      With all of the corporate travel that will come out of McKinney/Collin County (as well as the passenger traffic), would it make sense for Delta to make a push there?

      1. Anthony Avatar
        Anthony

        Is there another example of Delta making a push at a tiny tertiary airport anywhere else?

      2. jd Avatar
        jd

        No. I could see Southwest growing at McKinney if Love Field stays maxed out and they don’t want to fight an uphill battle at DFW. But if Delta ever wants to grow its capacity in the metroplex I guess they would prefer doing so at DFW rather than TKI.

  8. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    Of course TKI will do well…. Visual Approach is based there. :)

  9. Secret Pol-ICE Avatar
    Secret Pol-ICE

    Maybe they’ll get into ICE’s next business opportunity – detention & deportation of American Citizens. Ya know, at least for those who survive their initial encounter with an ICE goon.

  10. ejwpj Avatar
    ejwpj

    I understand the importance of FF programs, the value of branded CC’s, etc. So if you buy your ticket for travel on a ULCC with your branded CC, you would get some miles/points based on the cost. Isn’t that better than getting no miles when you buy a basic economy on AA, which no longer gets you any miles?
    Just wondering what’s wrong with this picture…..??

Leave a Reply to Mark Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier