Breeze Posts Its First Profit While Avelo Crawls Back From the Depths of Despair


The Department of Transportation (DOT) has released Q2 2025 financial statements, so this is our first chance to look at private airlines that don’t have to publicly release results on their own. In other words, we can finally see how Avelo and Breeze did during the peak Q2 of this year.

Both airlines made big strides, but Breeze made the biggest. It finally achieved a net profit for the first time. This was also the second time it made an operating profit after Q4 of last year. I’m told there weren’t any major special items buried in the data in Q2, so this looks to be an honest-to-goodness real profit. Congrats to Breeze for pulling that off in the face of continued torrid growth.

Breeze Profit and Revenue Over Time

Form 41 Data via Cirium

And then there’s Avelo which rebounded from its absolutely horrendous Q1 to something not as terribly frightening but still significantly worse than Q2 of last year. According to CEO Andrew Levy, there were $3.4 million in one-time expenses, so that would give it a -0.7 percent operating margin if we back that out. Still, it lost money and that is worse than what happened last year.

I’ve put the chart for Avelo together on the same scale as Breeze, so you can see just how different growth trajectories are. It should be easier to make a profit when you’re Avelo growing very slowly compared to Breeze, but that’s not what happened this quarter.

Avelo Profit and Revenue Over Time

Form 41 Data via Cirium, only shows quarters after Avelo switched from semi-annual reporting

This, of course, is top line data, and we still don’t have DB1B data out yet to see how things are going on a route-specific level. But we can do some math to make some assumptions here.

First of all, looking at stage length-adjusted unit revenue, I show Breeze with a massive 28 percent premium over Avelo. I excluded charter revenue for this, but it includes all reported ancillaries. That is just incredible, especially since Breeze is growing so fast and Avelo is not. How fast?

Avelo and Breeze ASMs by Quarter

Data via Cirium

Yes, Breeze has kept its foot on the gas with growth, and usually new routes do worse. So if Breeze is getting that kind of unit revenue premium over Avelo, either something is going very right for them or something is going terribly wrong for Avelo. (Or more likely, it’s some of both.) Right?

Well, not so fast. See, Breeze may be growing really fast, but Avelo is far less likely to stick it out in markets. Of Breeze’s capacity in Q2 2025, about 21 percent was on a route that did not operate in Q2 2024. For Avelo, however, it was 29 percent. Put another way, Breeze exited 14 of the 180 markets it flew in Q2 2024, just under 8 percent. Avelo, however, exited 18 of the 74 markets it flew in Q2 204, more than 24 percent.

In short, there is a lot of churn at Avelo whereas Breeze has a little, but it’s mostly just rapid growth for that airline. Breeze’s strategy is more sustainable in that it suggests it has found routes that work and keeps adding. Meanwhile, Avelo is still searching for what’s going to work. With the entire West Coast being dropped this year, that means it will once again have significant change by the time Q2 2026 rolls around.

But what about load factor, yous ay? Breeze had a 78.7 percent load factor versus Avelo’s 75.6 percent. But that is in no way enough to close the gap. Even with the same load factor, Breeze’s unit revenue would still be more than 20 percent higher. I guess all those extra legroom and First Class seats actually do make sense… go figure.

On the other side of the equation, Breeze does have a smaller airplane with the A220 versus Avelo’s mix of a few slightly larger B737-700s and more much larger B737-800s. You would expect Breeze’s unit costs to be higher, and I do show them stage length-adjusted at about 11 percent above Avelo. But that just doesn’t matter as much when your revenues are able to support those higher costs.

In the end, Breeze seems to be on a decent path. It is not going to light the world on fire with those margins, but it seems to be on to a consistent strategy that might actually deliver if the airline would just slow down its growth for a minute. Meanwhile, Avelo continues to search for a strategy beyond New Haven that will stick. Maybe it’s one of the Wilmingtons or perhaps Charlotte/Concord. Time will tell.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

55 responses to “Breeze Posts Its First Profit While Avelo Crawls Back From the Depths of Despair”

  1. MK03 Avatar
    MK03

    Why would Avelo’s mystery investor not want to name themselves? Do you have any ideas Brett why they would do that? As a layperson who’s admittedly not knowledgeable about the airline business, it seems weird. I can’t even remember of any recent examples of major airlines having mystery or anonymous investors. I get that Avelo being a private company is a factor, but still.

    1. Brett Avatar

      MK03 – Well they say they’ve never released names of their investors so this just continues that precedent. That being said, there could be several reasons that investors don’t want to be named. One could be that it’s Embraer or related to Embraer, so it all gets tied up somehow in the purchase agreement.

      1. MK03 Avatar
        MK03

        A follow-up question: is it common for airlines in the US, particularly private ones, to have unnamed investors or owners, or is Avelo’s case unusual?

  2. MK03 Avatar
    MK03

    Also Brett, in case you didn’t see my comment in the last Weekly Review: would it be possible to have some kind of hoi polloi-friendly summaries, perhaps in the comment section, for Potpourri entries that are paywalled? It might not be necessary for news that has been reported on in non-paywalled sites, but for updates and the like that are only reported on by Ch-aviation and other paid outlets, it can be tough to follow these developments.

    1. Brett Avatar

      MK03 – I’m afraid not, that requires a ch-aviation subscription. We can point people in that direction, but they have to subscribe to get the full news.

      1. MK03 Avatar
        MK03

        Oh that’s not what I mean, I mean if in the comments there could just be a one or two sentence mention of what the news is about. I wasn’t asking for a full summary or article. For example, there was a Potpourri mention of Bamboo Airways a while back, but the restructuring information wasn’t available anywhere else (at least in English) as far as I can tell, so maybe one or two sentences saying “Bamboo Airways announced that they will X”?

  3. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    “Meanwhile, Avelo is still searching for what’s going to work.”

    …and have decided that doing the current administration’s dirty work is the path to clear air…

    1. MNG Avatar
      MNG

      Gimme a break. They need the revenue desperately, and somebody’s going to receive it. Might as well be them.

    2. Peter Brezinski Avatar
      Peter Brezinski

      As long as it’s not illegal, why do you care what the source of their revenue is? Unless you suffer from an extreme case of TDS.

      1. Kenneth Avatar
        Kenneth

        Everyone take a drink! But seriously, I was just in Sonoma and when I mentioned that I worked in the airline industry, numerous people offered their unrequested opinions of Avelo. The fact that you make this political shows where the real DS is.

        1. IAM Avatar
          IAM

          Kevin made it political. A bunch of snowflakes around the country have made it political.
          So you are going to get answers relevant to your statements.
          Hope you and the rest of the TDS sufferers get better.

  4. John G Avatar
    John G

    I have flown all of the ULCCs at one time or other (Allegiant, Spirit, Frontier, Avelo, Breeze, and Sun Country).

    Breeze had the nicest experience (no pun intended) in terms of comfortable planes in decent condition, employees that don’t hate their jobs, and overall service. I mean it was still cheap-o air, but it was not terrible.

    Avelo is on the other end of the spectrum. They have old dirty planes that are not comfortable, zero in air service, and employees who probably go fired from the DMV.

    At the end of the day if the experience is terrible people will look elsewhere, no matter how cheap it is.

  5. Eric Morris Avatar
    Eric Morris

    Gooooolllly! I never thought my home airport of Concord would be so important.

    1. Kilroy Avatar
      Kilroy

      I’m just waiting for Breeze to offer a “Concord to Concord” flight, from Concord, NH (KCON) or Concord, MA (KBED, part of which is in Concord, MA) to Concord, NC.

      Not that it will happen, I just find airlines that serve two cities with the same name in different states amusing.

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        Nobody thought Wilmington to Wilmington would happen either but it did! Only at Avelo! Then call Alaska and encourage Portland to Portland service.

      2. Eric Avatar
        Eric

        Old timers from the original Piedmont say they invented calling CRW Charlie West and CHS Charleston; both were pretty large PI stations

  6. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    There’s a lot of variables at play but comparing these airline’s performance is a good proxy for the broader premium shift in air travel. My dad is one of the most frugal people I’ve ever met and even he’s debating buying up to an international premium economy product for an upcoming trip. The airlines have made the coach hard product and fares so unattractive that they are getting more people than they thought to pay up for better service

    1. Nicolas N Avatar
      Nicolas N

      I don’t think the economy product is pushing people to buy up. If anything, economy is better than it used to be one or two decades ago. Instead, I think that U.S. carriers are finally offering a broader cabin/product selection that never existed in the past, and that’s a huge market to serve. No wonder the first movers in this “middle” segment are outperforming.

      1. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        Eh the pitch has shrunk and the slimline seats of today are less comfortable, especially for long-haul travel. I mean, premium economy today is just business class 2 decades ago and business class today is First from 2 decades ago

        You have a good point though: Airlines have gotten smarter with the pricing/retailing and made the buy-ups between cabins less stark. They realized having a customer buy a premium seat at 30% discount to historical pricing (or whatever % it is…) is still better than giving it out for free as an upgrade

  7. Mr Eric Avatar
    Mr Eric

    I get the feeling that writing this story must have been a Breeze

  8. Bob Avatar
    Bob

    Avelo has (rightfully) earned a pretty bad reputation in taking revenue guarantees from airports to start new service and bailing as soon as possible. They haven’t done a great job in building any of these markets, and ultimately with that reputation, they’ve got to start running out of places that will throw money at them eventually (or now)……

    1. Kennetg Avatar
      Kennetg

      On the flip side, Breeze’s rate of committing to new launch markets has made airports/communities much more comfortable entering those agreements.

  9. Sam Avatar
    Sam

    I know its easy to look at Breeze and Avelo as an apples-to-apples ULCC comparison, but I’d argue they’re very different… and Breeze isn’t even really a ULCC because its selling-point is the strength of its premium offering. I live in a market that’s served by both and hands down would pick Breeze every time.

    Breeze’s “Nicer” and “Nicest” bundles are the best deals in the sky… basically premium economy & first class offerings for the price of a regular economy ticket on the Big 3. If you add up all the Avelo ancillaries (seat selection, extra leg room, carry-on / checked bags, etc.) its not nearly as good of a deal. Plus Breeze has a much larger network – our family is getting to the point where we pick vacation destinations based on where Breeze flies… and they don’t facilitate family-destroying-deportations, so that’s nice too.

    1. JHS Avatar
      JHS

      Totally agree. As a 3-gen family of six, we just booked an April 2026 trip on MX to VRB for that very reason. Picked the airline first, then the destination. Also, they make the no-cost family seating thing for the young family very easy and affordable.

    2. haolenate Avatar
      haolenate

      Breeze operates a lot of charters, they maybe just haven’t had it go public who their charter customers are. DHS uses a LOT of airlines… and I’ll bet you Breeze most certainly has flown ICE flights.

      Swift, Global X, World, ATA, Virgin America, Spirit, Southeast, Vision – all flew (or are flying) DHS/ICE flights. It just didn’t make front page news because it was under a democratic administration (for the most part).

      Avelo’s contract is just so large they are basing 4 aircraft now for the contract (instead of 3).

      1. DXer Avatar
        DXer

        Breeze had not flown any ICE flights. It would be public record if they did.

  10. Exit Row Seat Avatar
    Exit Row Seat

    “See, Breeze may be growing really fast, but Avelo is far less likely to stick it out in markets”

    Brett, this is where I have to disagree with you. As an example, Breeze service between MSY and PBI came and went in a flash which would have made a great alternative to MIA or FLL. Same for Breeze service between MSY and LAX as it came and went before I could make a reservation.

    The LAX service has now reappeared. However, it leave MSY at 8:35 pm for a 10:59 pm arrival. The return is a red-eye departure of 11:59 pm for a 5:34 am arrival at MSY. This seems weak as MSY is a Breeze focus city.

    I applaud Breeze for being quick on its feet like backfilling the Avelo departure from California. However, Breeze needs to mature in order to draw a consistent base of revenue. Right now, it draws the initial surge in PAX with new service, then retreats as soon as demand evens off. This format looks good on paper which is poised for an IPO, but the long term basics are missing.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Exit Row Seat – You can disagree all you want, but I’m just putting the facts out there. It has a LOT more markets that flew last year that are still there than Avelo does as a percent of network.

      1. Oliver Avatar
        Oliver

        Facts are still facts here :)

        (and anecdotes are fun, and we all have them, but I appreciate the data Cranky uses to back up his posts)

    2. ceejay Avatar
      ceejay

      Breeze has only pulled out of 3 markets completely since it started operations.

      1. Exit Row Seat Avatar
        Exit Row Seat

        @ceejay

        I think you are counting cities.
        I’m counting segments or legs.
        As in the PBI example, Breeze kept service at PBI to other locations; and it kept service at MSY to other locations .
        However, it dropped the link between MSY and PBI.
        As for the MSY – LAX segment, it dropped it, then re-established it. Two surges to cash flow.
        Don’t be surprised if it’s dropped again in the future.
        That’s my thesis; Breeze will hit and run when the initial crush of new PAX peters out.
        Dig a little deeper to understand the type, timing, and source of that cash flow.

  11. Rowdy Yates Avatar
    Rowdy Yates

    I’m a fan of Breeze but only having 2 flights a week to a city is not very convenient for many fliers.

    1. Wayne Avatar
      Wayne

      If the demand doesn’t justify more than that, why would the airline schedule more?

      1. John Robert Stone Avatar
        John Robert Stone

        I think Breeze has only around 54 planes but has orders for a lot more A220s, that affects how often they can have flights from certain cities.

  12. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    Compare the CEOs; the founder of JetBlue versus the founder of ValueJet. And you wonder why one is more successful than the other?

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      Founder of ValuJet? Are you on crack?

      Do you know how old Andrew Levy was when he was at ValuJet? He was a very young VP and was absolutely not among the founders.

      Good grief.

      1. Emil Avatar
        Emil

        JT8D, who are you, Tim Dunn in disguise? Chill out

    2. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
      O’Hare Is My Second Home

      Yeah, Bob, I am comparing them. Andrew Levy isn’t the epitome of evil that Neelzebub is.

      1. Common Sense Avatar
        Common Sense

        Woah… Let’s go easy on the drink, shall we?

  13. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    The most impressive thing is Breeze making a profit with almost 40% increase in Y/Y capacity. So presumably there are a lot of immature markets in there, yet it still made money – assuming there’s no funny business in the financials.

    On the Avelo side, the company has been given another chance with this latest investment, one that, on its merits, it probably doesn’t deserve.

    In four and a half years it has yet to show the world a coherent revenue model. Unsurprisingly, it’s been simply terrible at generating revenue.

    My guess is it has one more throw of the dice – it needs to make this one count.

  14. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    What I can not figure out is why Breeze has not started any service to/from BWI. Sure, they have a few flights from IAD where there are lots of United flights as competition. Meanwhile @ BWI Spirit is pulling back, JetBlue is gone and Southwest fares, especially with their added fees, are not competitive (in my opinion).

    Breeze could offer non stop service and a much more comfortable experience that Southwest or Spirit from BWI and fill the void being created by the other airlines.

    1. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      I agree that Breeze might get more of a foothold in the greater DMV area at BWI than IAD. A couple years ago BWI was a hotly contested low fare battleground with WN version 1.0 and a robust NK. Now? Not so much.

  15. Anthony Avatar
    Anthony

    How is Avelo performing in the high-traffic AZA-SAL market?

    1. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      Monopoly runs are always profitable

  16. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    More anecdata but perhaps Brett has a stat in the magic database that might prove/disprove this thesis…

    It seems Avelo goes all in on never before served routes and airports (e.g., LAL, HVN) while Breeze identified routes that might have existed before but not worked because of aircraft, frequency, etc. and secondary airports that were successful previously (e.g., CAK) that lost service.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      LAL’s not an entirely new idea, Direct Air served it for about ten months, albeit on some really bizzare routes (Myrtle Beach, Niagara Falls, Springfield.) It also had commuter connections to MCO at one point. (That used to be more common here, there were Cessnas running TPA-SRQ at one point too.)

      The problem with LAL is that unless you’re taking a VFR trip to Lakeland or Winter Haven, the only reason most people would ever consider LAL is as a cheap way to go to Orlando or Tampa Bay. There’s just nothing right there except Legoland, and most visitors who want theme parks will combine Legoland with either Busch Gardens or Disney/Universal. I-4 is a pain, but it’s not THAT bad.

      HVN was a great call – decent-sized market with people looking for alternatives to driving to Hartford. That’s why Breeze is muscling in. But Avelo hasn’t found another HVN.

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        I can’t imagine who is on those LAL planes (except for the crews, of course). I learned from Brett right here on this stellar website that when a new airline initiates service from a never before served airport, the other end ought to be someplace familiar. In other words, you don’t fly from HVN to SFB, you fly to MCO. Even Avelo figured that part out.

        However they seem bound and determined to prove him wrong elsewhere. Lakeland to Grand Rapids, Wilmington and Concord? Even an Allegiant route planner would say “good luck with that!”

        1. CraigTPA Avatar
          CraigTPA

          Even SFB is more logical than LAL – it’s a solid alternative to DAB, which tends to be pricey, and it’s more convenient to that part of the coast than JAX or MCO itself. It’s just as convenient as MCO for the coastal areas until you’re well down toward the south part of the Space Coast.

          I agree that MCO is still a better choice than SFB for Avelo, especially since they run HVN-DAB, but SFB makes perfect sense for Allegiant.

          But MCO and TPA are both well-seved with lots of competition (and Allegiant at SFB and PIE), and (except for Polk County VFR/snowbirds) LAL offers no meaningful convenience to anywhere. It’s perhaps a little faster to Disney itself, but not by that much. And yes, Polk County’s population is growing quickly, but at best that’s adding a little more VFR business.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Bill – That’s generally right. Avelo looks for secondary airports to serve as much as it can. Breeze is just trying to connect the dots on markets that haven’t worked on bigger airplanes.

  17. CraigTPA Avatar
    CraigTPA

    I have to admit I’m surprised by Breeze’s performance here. I’ve been skeptical of what seems to me to be their “drunk raccoon throwing darts at a map” route planning, but both the performance and (specifically) the lower market-departure rate suggests that whatever modeling they’re using to look for routes is working. Or that raccoon is lucky and Porter is going to want him back.

    Do we have any fleet utilization data for them? Breeze seems to be rolling out new routes which, even with less-than-daily schedules, suggests they’re getting a lot of use out of the A220s as they come into the fleet.

    I can’t wait to see the deeper data to see if it supports my (and a couple of friends’) speculation that the yields at LAL have to be garbage on most routes.

  18. Brett Avatar

    Craig – Well, in July it looks like there were 39 A220s in the fleet. Based on schedules, they would have been operating a little over 11 hours a day.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      Nice utilization rate, then. I’d bet a few hundred quatloos that that’s substantially better than Avelo’s (and a damn sight better than the last figure I saw for Spirit!)

      1. Brett Avatar

        Craig – Sure, but Avelo has a cheaper asset so it doesn’t need to utilize in the same way as Breeze does with those expensive A220s.

  19. Eric from Chicago Avatar
    Eric from Chicago

    If this is absent charter revenue/seat miles, I have to wonder if Avelo is at break-even with all the DHS charter work they’re taking heat over.

    It would certainly explain why they dedicated 15%+ of their aircraft to it.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Eric – It’s just that one chart that was excluding charter. The total results are all inclusive.

Leave a Reply to IAM Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier