Decoding Southwest’s Seat Assignment Pricing


July 29 marked the beginning of the end for Southwest’s bingo boarding system. That day, the airline started assigning seats, and yes, the plan appears to have changed yet again from the last update I wrote in April. This is a momentous occasion for the airline, and I thought it worthy of a deep dive into what this looks like in practice.

The date I gave you is a little misleading. Yes, seat assignments went live that day, but it’s not for travel until January 27, 2026 and beyond. Why? Southwest’s schedule was only selling through January 26, and it didn’t want to change models midstream. So, when the schedule extended from January 27 into early March, it was extended with the new model having seat assignments for all, right from the beginning.

With this, there are now four Southwest bundles with different seating options:

  • Basic – Standard seat assigned at check-in, or you can pay for one in the first five rows behind the wing (on B737-800s/-8s only) or Preferred or Extra Legroom (ELR) any time
  • Choice – Standard seat assigned at time of booking, or you can purchase Preferred or ELR
  • Choice Preferred – Standard or Preferred seat assigned at time of booking, or you can purchase ELR
  • Choice Extra – any seat on the plane can be assigned at booking, including ELR

The change from the last update is what you see in this screwy Basic plan. If you recall when Southwest removed extra legroom seating from behind the wing on the B737-800s and B737-8 MAXs, COO Andrew Watterson said “the [seats] that were formerly Extra Legroom behind the exit row, we’ll turn those into a form of Preferred seats. They will have a little bit extra legroom…”

But now they won’t. Instead, the first five rows behind the exit will be Standard seats that anyone Choice and above can assign for free, but they are Standard seats with a little extra legroom. So if you’re not buying Basic, try to grab one of the first five rows. (This does not exist on the B737-700s.) If you’re in Basic, you can pay to assign those or you can wait to get assigned something randomly at check-in for free. Of course, if you’re in Basic with the current pricing structure, you’re a fool for buying those seats because you’d be better off just paying up to Choice and paying roughly the same amount to get more benefits.

There is no doubt, however, that pricing will change over time. Overall, the pricing is fairly simple for everything at this moment. I fully expect that the airline will get more sophisticated with how it prices seating, especially once it has sales data to guide it. But it had to start somewhere.

There are now four different categories of paid seats with aisles/windows costing more than middles in each section. Pricing doesn’t vary by which fare category you buy. If the seat is included in that brand, you pay nothing. If it’s not, you pay the going rate. One category — the goofy Standard seats with more legroom that Basic people can buy — isn’t worth talking about here. So, let’s focus on ELR, Exit Rows (ELR but cheaper for some reason), and Preferred (sit closer to the front with normal legroom, or, uh, less legroom than you can get in the first five rows of Standard seats).

Base Southwest Seating Prices as Of August 6, 2025

*$10 surcharge for travel outside the Continental US

To the surprise of nobody, the further you fly, the more you pay. And ELR seating prices grow much faster than Preferred seating prices since ELR becomes more valuable the farther you fly.

To be clear, it is not strictly based on distance. Here are the exceptions:

  • There is a carve-out for interisland flying in Hawaiʻi that’s notably less expensive than the mileage-based system as shown in the chart
  • Travel outside the Continental US has a $10 premium for all flights over 500 miles. It looks like Caribbean under 500 miles is the same as flights within the Continental US, but the only ones I see in that range are Tampa – Havana and Orlando – Nassau
  • Southwest has put a $5 premium on all of these numbers for travel over the Presidents Day weekend

This seems like a perfectly reasonable way to start selling seats, but what’s weird is how it interacts with the cost of upgrading to a different fare bundle.

Other than some variation on international routes and interisland in Hawaiʻi, there is currently a universal $60 cost to go from Choice to Choice Preferred. This would include access to a Preferred seat without additional charge. It’s also a fully refundable fare that earns more Rapid Rewards points and comes with early boarding.

From Choice Preferred to Choice Extra, the upsell appears to be $50 or, oddly, only $40 for international flights. That comes with ELR seating, two checked bags, even more Rapid Rewards points, a free drink, free internet, and earlier boarding.

The fact that this doesn’t have an escalating price difference by mileage but individual seat prices do is strange, and it creates some odd opportunities. For example, if you’re traveling longer-haul international and want extra legroom, you better buy up to Choice Extra. After all, international flights over 1,500 miles will cost you $101 to get an ELR… but it’s only about $100 to get Choice Extra with all those other benefits.

I would go as far to say that if you are planning on buying an ELR seat, then you should just about always upgrade to Choice Extra on flights over 1,000 miles considering all the extra goodies you get. Under 1,000 miles, well, the difference in price gets steeper so it’s not as clear.

Right now, the Southwest schedule only goes through March 4, so there is just a little over a month out for sale under this plan. It’s a good test, but soon enough there will be extensions to the schedule and Southwest will learn to get more sophisticated. You have to start somewhere when you’re building up from scratch, and this isn’t a terrible way to do it. It just gets a little complex around the edges.


There’s a lot more going on at Southwest these days including Q2 earnings, forward guidance that analysts don’t believe, a new board chair, new service to St Thomas, and Peet’s Coffee onboard. I’m sure somebody cares about that last one, but it’s not me. Anyway, we tackle all of this on this week’s episode of The Air Show, so have a listen to what I think is actually one of our funnier episodes. Jon steals the show with talk about carrot sticks. Seriously.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

29 responses to “Decoding Southwest’s Seat Assignment Pricing”

  1. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    I will say this. Given these seat changes don’t take effect until January, buy tickets in flights before then means there’s no reason whatsoever to not fly basic. And until January the basic fares are kind of a steal.

    1. Brian W Avatar
      Brian W

      You have to live with a 6 month flight credit expiration and the lack of doing a same day confirmed change. There are still significant drawbacks with basic.

      1. Mac Avatar
        Mac

        That is the one of two drawbacks with basic. The other being no same day changes. But if you travel often enough to use the credit in six months and don’t need same day change (or you’re flying a route that just doesn’t offer good same day alternatives), then there are no drawbacks. Until the seat selections and new boarding process come into play, basic is the way to go

  2. Kathy Avatar
    Kathy

    Thia made me dizzy to read. I will not work tris hard to put my butt in a seat.

    1. Claire Avatar
      Claire

      Sad thing is, others will!!

      What will boarding be like? Have I missed that somehow?

      I would like to see boarding by rows, like the old days. It seemed to be easier.

      1. Brian W Avatar
        Brian W

        They wont do that because they can monetize boarding. They are selling “earlier” boarding with credit card sign ups and higher fares bundles. I am surprised that all the credit cards come with group 5 boarding. I would think WN/Chase would differentiate it’s “premium” credit cards with an earlier board group to generate higher annual fees for Chase and compensation for WN.

        1. GS in PDX Avatar
          GS in PDX

          Brian, totally agree with you. But, this is mirroring what other airlines are doing. I am now an AK Visa card holder, and the last time I flew on them in May, we were put in the ‘C’ boarding group. This after AK tells everyone that you get “priority boarding” as a card holder. C group is priority? Not so much….

      2. Brett Avatar

        Claire – There are going to be 8 groups. Scroll down on this link to see the details:
        https://www.southwest.com/customer-enhancements/assigned-seating/

        1. Bill from DC Avatar
          Bill from DC

          How many groups of “pre-boarding” will there be in addition to the 8 boarding groups? (Kidding, mostly.)

    2. Jim M Avatar
      Jim M

      Agreed. When you have three levels of “Choice” maybe their marketing department should have “chosen” more unique words.

  3. Austex Chili Avatar
    Austex Chili

    What are the seat pitches for “New SW” seating categories? I think “SW Classic” pitch was 32″. Maybe the back of the plane seats will be called “SW Zero”

    1. Brett Avatar

      Austex – Standard and Preferred will go down to 31″ but with the new seats legroom shouldn’t change much. It’s still better than most. The first five rows on the -8s/-800s will be a bit more, I’m guessing 32″.

  4. Phllax Avatar
    Phllax

    What’s your strategy for flying when they’re all on 700’s?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Phllax – Doesn’t really matter where you sit on those

  5. MetroCity Avatar
    MetroCity

    These categories were designed by the same people who write instructions for IKEA.

  6. haolenate Avatar
    haolenate

    Re: Peets Coffee.

    Does it really matter who roasted the coffee beans when hurling thru air at 500 mph in a pressurized tin can? I’m just not sure I understand all the hoopla & spin on who serves what coffee on board, and why its such a big deal; seems most of my friends who are coffee drinkers don’t say one thing or another. Except it typically sucks regardless of the airline one is flying.

    1. stogieguy7 Avatar
      stogieguy7

      The brand of beans can help to make the coffee more palatable; however, the limitation is the water. The water aboard any aircraft is lousy. And will thus make the coffee taste lousy as well. Not to mention that the dry, thin air kills your sense of taste. So, you really aren’t wrong here.

      1. Kilroy Avatar
        Kilroy

        Exactly. Big digression away from aviation here (and I am not an expert on this, only know things at a very high level, but find the topic fascinating)…

        Often people who get REALLY into brewing premium coffee (at home, or in high-end cafes) know and care about their water chemistry, in terms of trace minerals etc, to the point that they will tweak or re-create the water recipe (starting from RO or distilled water, and adding minerals) before they even start making coffee.

        It’s the same with some homebrewers and breweries.. Fun fact there: Certain historic styles of beer that became popular in their home regions (such as Guinness Stout, and Czech pilsners) came about in large part because of the local water chemistry. The water chemistry in areas where pilsners became popular 120+ years ago, for example, would make for bad-tasting stouts, and vice versa.

        Modern breweries can control for the water chemistry or alter their malt/grain/brewing recipes to accomodate those different styles if they want do, though often they may not care that that much, or may not nail the differences precisely. For example, I’ve met workers at Sam Adams who could taste different batches of Sam Adams’ Boston Lager from its different breweries blindfolded and correctly identify which of Sam Adams’ breweries produced each one, simply because of the different water chemistry and metals in the production machinery used at each brewery. That may not matter much for the average consumer (who would typically drink the same beer less often, with a less refined palate, and even then it would usually be produced by the same plant, so it would still have a similar taste from one beer to another. Fun stuff.

        For something you can try at home that SHOULD be obvious, taste 2 cups of plain yogurt with live & active cultures in it, one that is right at the expiration date and one that has an expiration date as far out into the future as possible. There will be a noticeable difference between the two, as yogurt with live cultures gets more sour over time.

        1. haolenate Avatar
          haolenate

          Didn’t think about the water on a plane having an effect on coffee, but you are right.

          One reason Alaskan Brewery Beer does so well – the water from Juneau, Alaska is pretty much 1000% free of any types of contaminates or additives.

  7. Mac Avatar
    Mac

    These prices seem in line with United. Cranky, would you say these seat prices are typical compared to other carriers? I don’t fly AA often but I feel like their seat prices are often more reasonable then United (for preferred or ELR).

    Despite the backlash SW is getting, they still have the friendliest “basic” ticket out there. Except at least with AA, you can purchase a seat with Basic. But the no penalty cancellation for a credit with SW is big

    1. Brett Avatar

      Mac – It doesn’t seem out of line by any stretch. But other airlines have it much more variable. Southwest will get to that point as well. It’s just not there yet.

  8. Gene Avatar
    Gene

    All I can say is that Herb is spinning in his grave.

    1. Jason Thompson Avatar
      Jason Thompson

      No he’s not. Post 9/11 Herb had his teams do extensive research and test on seat assignments they almost pulled the trigger since the TSA Forced them away from 1-30 plastic boarding cards. Instead they came up with the A B C boarding groups. Then it got reimagined to the A1-30 system. With the purchasing of AirTran they were leaning towards adding 8 big front seats to every aircraft to create a 2 class model. While Still keeping the open seating.
      But instead added the Failed A1-15 business select system that only accelerated the rise in Fake Preboarding passengers beating Southwest at its own game. If Herb was alive he’d be 110% behind evolving the company’s business model especially since the old one is no longer generating profits.
      Evolve or Die Herb always said.
      If you look at WN entire history it’s constantly changed from its original inception. The 10 min turn wasn’t invented because they wanted to be different from everyone else they did it because they needed to make money to survive. Same with the evolution to seat assignments.
      Otherwise they would have ended up in the grave yard with Braniff,Eastern and Pam Am!

      1. Tim Dunn Avatar
        Tim Dunn

        well said.

        and Herb never imagined that WN’s costs would grow to as high as they have become which is what happens with a mature airline that has compensated its employees well.

        WN’s current problems are as much cost related as it is revenue related. WN is cutting shorter haul capacity and adding longer haul capacity. They have not gotten costs out as fast as they have shifted revenue up.

        Herb understood business and the need to rework the business plan; this is the biggest transition WN has had to make but they have deep enough pockets to get it right.

        They are steadily progressing through far more transformation than any other airline has done in such a short period of time.

        I suspect there will be business cases written not too far down the pike about the rise and fall and then the rise again of WN.

        1. CraigTPA Avatar
          CraigTPA

          I suspect the “rise again” story will be much less compelling than the original “rise”. Some of this is inevitable, as costs have gone up the biggest part of their original growth story, the “Southwest Effect”, largely disappeared a while back. But all of the “transformation” has also changed them from something unique into Just Another Airline, and their brand has been devalued in the same way as, say, Target’s has, although the full effect on their brand hasn’t hit yet.

          I suspect that we’ll see them continue to grow in some markets, but that we’ll also see Frontier and Breeze continue to push into what you refer to below as their “strength markets”, and the Big Three (and AS) nibble away at market share in some places as well. It won’t be as dramatic as, say, their pre-“transformation” abject failure at Newark, but a few market share points here and there is already happening in places like FLL, where their market share has dropped to third behind Delta…and that’s before the full impact of the transformation.

          1. Tim Dunn Avatar
            Tim Dunn

            you are correct that the “rise again” of WN won’t be as dramatic because WN will be less distinctive from other airlines but few companies have made transformations as dramatic as what WN is doing now – even before the potential for adding a 2nd or 3rd fleet type, adding domestic first class and lounges, and even longhaul int’l flights on widebodies. and that’s before the potential for another merger or acquisition.

            Seat assignments and added fees were fairly ‘fast and dirty’ and could be a good metric if WN can transform itself w/o losing huge amounts of its passenger base.

            as for share movements, WN is the healthiest of a big bunch of airlines that are not sustainably profitable including AA and most of the US LCCs and ULCCs – representing more than half of US airline capacity.

            The US airline industry is probably at a bigger inflection point than it has collectively seen since deregulation. We are 5 years post-covid (at least the beginning) and there are few signs that any airline is going to significantly change their direction. WN seems to be trying the hardest.

            I believe the US airline industry will look very different 5 years from now and WN will have successfully transformed itself more than any other airline.

  9. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    Since WN began reserved seat sales just after their earnings call, it will be interesting to hear what they say about revenue from these seat fees when they next report quarterly earnings in October. They had over a month of bag fee sales when they reported 2nd quarter earnings and said those fees were coming in higher than expected.

    While many bemoan the loss of the product WN offered, they seem to be placing hope in their financial turnaround heavily on collecting fees that they previously included and which generate a couple billion dollars/year in revenue for each of the big 3.

    WN still has significant strength markets which mean many passengers are going to spend money on fees and higher fares on WN just as they do in strength markets for the big 3.

  10. David R. Miller Avatar
    David R. Miller

    Southwest has become Southworst. Their model used to be very simple to comprehend – now one needs a guidebook to make sense of all of the gouging changes. I have flown Southworst for over 40 years and am unable to make sense of their rip off paid seating stupidity. I will not being a customer after January , 2026. They have lost me (and millions of other long time customers) with their asinine, gouging actions. They will pay for this stupidity – don’t be surprised if they file for bankruptcy.

    1. Tom in Vegas Avatar
      Tom in Vegas

      I agree completely. Insanity. They will lose far more customers than they gain. I have had a SW card for 25 years, and fly monthly. Now, zero loyality. Idiots.

Leave a Reply to Mike Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier