A Different Way to Look at the First Quarter


I know we’re well into Q2 earnings season, but I’m gonna go back a quarter one more time. I’ll admit it. I was kind of lazy. After the Department of Transportation (DOT) released Q1 2025 numbers, I created a post showing the airline changes in unit revenue and capacity in order to show how each airline was doing. As more than one of you pointed out to me, however, that doesn’t include ancillary revenues. So I’ve now gone back to do the slightly harder work to calculate total unit revenue (TRASM) numbers on my own. You may be surprised to see some differences.

As a reminder, here is how the chart looked based on stage length-adjusted unit revenue (SLA PRASM):

Q1 2025 Unit Revenue (PRASM) and Seat Capacity % Change by Airline

Data via Cirium, Unit Revenue adjusted to 1,000 miles

Avelo was by far the worst and winners were few and far between. But what happens when you take total operating revenue and divide it by available seat miles? You get that TRASM number which incorporates ancillaries and all the other stuff you can think of that would count as operating revenue. (And no, I did not stage-length-adjust this, so if an airline had huge changes in average stage year-over-year, then this is still not perfect.) This also gives us a look at the entire airline system instead of just domestic.

Here’s what the new TRASM chart looks like:

Q1 2025 TRASM and Seat Capacity % Change by Airline

Data via Cirium

Based on this, one thing is clear… Avelo is still by far the worst performer of the group. But move over Southwest, we have a new clubhouse leader in Alaska. Not only did it grow TRASM the most, but it also increased capacity a fair bit. I must give the caveat that this time I included Hawaiian, because I was worried about trusting Form 41 just for one entity in this comparison, so significant gains were made in that part of the network. But Alaska did well all around.

That being said, let’s not take away from Southwest. It still had a very good quarter compared to others.

This also changes the game for JetBlue and especially Breeze, both airlines that saw their PRASM decline year-over-year but now see their TRASM show improvements. Breeze in particular made a very large jump from where it was, and that’s thanks to increased ancillaries and anything else that falls into “transport related revenues.”

Looking at the big three, American actually improved a bit, but it was still barely negative. I’m assuming that’s thanks to a low floor for comparison purposes in the previous year. American did not have a good 2024. But Delta falls to the back of the pack as United surges ahead with increases in non-fare revenue. This can be misleading since if you’re Delta, you start a high point and have nowhere to go but down. (That’s entirely true, but you get the point.)

The ULCCs did not fare well in this comparison at all. Sun Country, Frontier, and Spirit all saw declines from their positions in the original chart. They join Allegiant which is still at the bottom next to Avelo, just not looking quite as dire.

Overall, this wasn’t a good quarter for most, but this gives a better sense of exactly what was going on during Q1.


This week’s episode of The Air Show goes live today, and Brian Sumers and I really dig into Delta’s announcement that it will be flying from LA to both Chicago and Hong Kong. Is this a commercial decision, as I start the discussion with? Well, Brian has other ideas. You’ll need to stay after the break to hear some of fiery discussion.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

9 responses to “A Different Way to Look at the First Quarter”

  1. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    Cranky,
    Would you attribute Delta’s numbers to flyers (like me) who are sick of Ed’s shenanigans and started to move some of their flying to others?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Angry Bob – I doubt it. My assumption is that it’s just a tougher year-over-year comparison. I don’t think there’s too much to read into here about problems in the business.

  2. Exit Row Seat Avatar
    Exit Row Seat

    Each of the LLC carriers plan to jump on the “Enhanced Revenue Bandwagon” with economy plus seating (WN, F9 & NK); 1st Class (B6); baggage fees (WN); and a hard push of C/Card and loyalty programs which will help, but not to the extent they crave.
    Eventually, the LLC will look and feel no better than the traditional trunk carriers (DL, UA, AA, & AS) which offer all the above plus lounges, frequency, & alliances.
    I foresee a hard grind for revenue growth in the North American market in the next few years. The 1Q charts above will not change much next year. More of the churning of the water as opposed to real growth.

    1. SANbagger Avatar
      SANbagger

      To be fair, WN has plenty of frequency. And in the case of some destinations, like SAN, much more than any of the other “traditional trunk carriers,” including their closest rival here, AS. After the awful changes they made last May, that may be the only thing they have left going for them. I will be very curious to see WN Q3 numbers for comparison.

  3. Emil Denamark Avatar
    Emil Denamark

    Brett,
    Why was Global Airlines left off of your analysis? :-)

  4. Eric C Avatar
    Eric C

    Is Alaska benefitting from their freighter ops adding revenue but not adding ASMs? I think since 1Q24 they added one B738F and most of the 10 Amazon CMI A333Fs.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Eric C – I believe you’re right that Alaska had one 738F enter service last June and Hawaiian took a lot of deliveries of A330Fs. Freight revenue was up nearly 9% year-over-year, but it’s still a very small part overall, just about 1.5% of total operating revenue. So it’s not likely to have an enormous impact.

  5. Mr. Eric Avatar
    Mr. Eric

    With the U.S. market tapped out, I wonder if DL is not putting enough emphasis on international markets.

    This seems to be the big differentiator lately between DL & UA.

  6. emav Avatar
    emav

    So… network and LCC (not ULCC) airlines made tons more via ancillaries in Q1? Really? It’s possible, but surprised we haven’t heard more about this. And how — bags, seats???

    (The F9 and NK numbers make sense, their fare revenue increased while TRASM with ancillaries decreased. And WN, with a small ancillaries base and no new ancillary revenue for Q1.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier