You know that I love watching the drama between United and American in Chicago, but get ready for a new favorite battle: San Diego. Both Alaska and Southwest appear ready to fight as the new terminal prepares to open. Alaska fired its most recent shot by adding three new routes and increasing frequencies on others.
San Diego is a good market. And, importantly, it’s a constrained one. Yes, it has a single runway, but it also has only one and a half terminals. I say “half” because if you’ve ever been on Southwest flying out of Terminal 1, you know it is barely functional. It is old, and it is woefully undersized. It is very hard to run an operation out of that place.
But at the end of this summer, the new Terminal 1 opens. Not only is it modern with properly-sized holdrooms and all that, but the initial phase will open with 19 gates compared to the 14 in operation today. Once the old Terminal 1 is knocked down, another 11 gates will be built on that footprint to open by 2028. There are also taxiway improvements coming to help increase the flow of aircraft around the small footprint of the airfield. And this means the time has come for airline to step up if they want to be in a good position.

Historically, San Diego has been Southwest’s turf. (Ok, if we go far enough back, it was PSA’s turf, but that’s a little further than I was looking to go in this post.) Southwest is the king of intra-California and has been for decades. That’s why it’s no surprise that for the 12 months ending July 2025, the airline will have 60 percent of its seats in San Diego on flights of less than 500 miles.
That’s not all Southwest does, of course. Here’s the July route map for Southwest.

Southwest San Diego Map via Cirium
As usual, Southwest does a lot on the midcons. It also extends further east to its hubs in Baltimore, Orlando, and even Tampa. But this is a very Southwest way of serving the city. (Note that it is down to only Honolulu in the islands during peak summer.)
Alaska, meanwhile, has been sneaky, working its way around Southwest’s key markets. Here’s Alaska’s July map, including Hawaiian:

Alaska/Hawaiian San Diego Map via Cirium
Alaska has only 24 percent of its seats in markets of less than 500 miles. Sure it has the usual markets where it competes with Southwest, but it also has Fresno, Monterrey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Rosa… you get the point.
Then it has skipped almost entirely over the middle of the country and focused on the Pacific Northwest at its home base as well as the east coast. Yes, there’s that Florida overlap, but Alaska is largely serving the big cities in the east that matter. But what about the middle? That’s what its partnership with American is for. People can fly American to Phoenix, Chicago, or DFW and connect all over from there.
This strategy has kept San Diego as a place where both airlines can coexist. It certainly helps that the legacy carriers have ignored the market. Here’s a look at San Diego seat share over time:

Map via Cirium
Since 2004, the Big 3 and their joint venture partners have grown seats in San Diego by a mere 2.2 percent to just shy of 6 million seats combined in 2024. Southwest, however, has grown 25 percent, topping 5 million on its own. And Alaska has grown an incredible 259 percent (off an admittedly smaller base) to reach more than 2.8 million seats. The rest of the growth has come from ultra low cost operators which all together account for 1.3 million seats.
So, Southwest has about a third of the market while Alaska is around 18 percent, but Alaska has big plans for San Diego. It’s tired of the old Virgin America network and keeps pulling back on longer-haul flying both Los Angeles and San Francisco. (Just last week it canceled Washington/Dulles from both airports as well as SFO – Chicago/O’Hare and Los Angeles – Nassau.) In California, Alaska seems largely focused on making San Diego its own now.
The airline added three new routes this week, and they are all notable.
- Chicago/O’Hare 3x daily starting Oct 4
- Denver 3x daily starting Oct 4
- Phoenix 3x daily starting Aug 20
It is also jacking up frequencies in important markets starting October 26:
- Las Vegas from 4x to 6x daily
- Sacramento from 4x to 6x daily
- Salt Lake City from 1x to 3x daily
- San Jose (CA) from 4x to 6x daily
This is no small expansion, and it shows how much progress has been made in becoming competitive. It has now easily surpassed Southwest on the number of destinations from San Diego.
Destinations Served from San Diego by Month (including merger partners)

Data via Cirium
But it’s not just about serving more destinations. It’s about serving the right ones and with the right service pattern.
Chicago is significant in that Alaska already has partner American flying the route. But it’s important for Alaska to fly it so it can control capacity and fares and have better connectivity off its own flight to American’s beyond options. Just note, however, that this comes as Alaska pulls out of the San Francisco – Chicago route. It hasn’t flown there from LA in awhile. San Diego is different. It matters more to Alaska right now.
Phoenix is another American hub that Alaska wants to feed, but this is a much tougher market. You have American with 5x daily, Southwest with 9x daily, and even Frontier with 11x weekly. This is a very busy market, but it’s also a key destination for San Diego with more than 1,000 daily passengers each way (PDEW), so Alaska wants to be there.
And then there’s Denver which is actually the largest market from San Diego that Alaska doesn’t serve with more than 1,200 PDEW. So, now it will.
If you exclude Oakland, Alaska will now serve all of the top 13 markets from San Diego. Of the top 21 airports, Alaska will only not serve Oakland, DFW, and Minneapolis/St Paul.
Southwest, meanwhile, doesn’t serve Seattle, New York City, Boston, or MSP. It has secondary airports in some markets as well, like Washington, DC. Alaska is making a play that with its partnership with American, it can better serve the people of San Diego. Southwest will absolutely not go down with a fight, so get ready to rumble.
Congratuations to the people of San Diego, things are about to get fun.
15 comments on “With the New Terminal Opening in San Diego, Alaska and Southwest Prepare for Battle”
So is there that much unmet demand in the San Diego originating market or do you think empty seats and lower fares are ahead?
Oh, this is largely a market share play by AS – they smell Elliott-tainted Southwest blood in the water and are making their move.
There’ll be downward pressure on fares, to be sure, unless we go into a significant recession and one or both airlines blink.
Stock up on popcorn!
I really am curious to see how a wounded Southwest reacts to network carriers going after a few of its mid-city jewels. Austin should be safe for a while without new gates for 5+ years even though WN yields will likely be hit some. But SAN should be interesting to watch.
That said, It is always impressive how large OneWorld is on the West Coast.
So, do you think AA is ok with these adds?
I realize this was directed at Cranky, not me. But my personal opinion is that I doubt AA cares and probably loves it.
AA’s OneWorld JVs are the only ones in SAN that go across the Pacific and the Atlantic. Alaska’s membership in OneWorld only strengthens those JV positions for AA even though it isn’t AA metal.
AA never showed any desire to grow in SAN. To the extent that customers that care about a first class upgrade are moving from DL and UA to Alaska frequent flier programs, that would also help AA since AS is never going to get a SAN-based passenger to MIA nonstop (most likely since AA flies it or if AS did, it would be to connect on to AA MIA metal) or PWM/MGM/MDT, but now that passenger is more likely to fly AA vs DL/UA on their other SAN-based travel since their Alaska loyalty is rewarded on AA.
There is probably some pull from AA to AS but on the whole, the AA-AS relationship is likely helping AA since you have to imagine the bulk of frequent flier switchers in SAN would be from DL, UA, and WN. AA loyalists that were in SAN can already be rewarded for their loyalty on every Alaska SAN flight today so it seems unlikely AA loyalists would be the big credit card movers to AS compared to DL/UA/WN.
But just my unsolicited three cents.
cranky,
How many of those routes are served less than daily? I know PDX at least Southwest only flies it twice a week (Sat/Sun). Also curious how winter seasonal markets compare, I believe Southwest just announced OMA service for next winter while Alaska has EGE or some other ski-type markets
Let’s get ready to RUMBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What is PDEW?
passengers daily each way
Quick correction: Monterrey (with two r’s) is MTY in Mexico. Monterey (with one r) is MRY—the one in California that Alaska flies to from SAN.
With the new SAN-ORD service, I wonder how Alaska is going to work their schedule by having only one gate soon at ORD T2/E? Unless this replaces the soon to be discontinued SFO-ORD service? Just thought I’d throw these recent gates changes at ORD out there since Crain’s Chicago Business recently had an article;
*UA gains 6 gates – Location(s) TBD
*AA loses 6 gates – Location(s) TBD
*DL loses 3 of 10 gates – T5/M
*WN gains 3 Preferential Gates vs Common Use Gates – Location(s) TBD – >IMO T5/M 3 DL Gates<
*AC loses 1 of 2 gates in T2/E
*AS loses 1 of 2 gates in T2/E
Changes effective Oct 1st – Locations officially announced around June 1st
ORD gate reallocation numbers are not final. Airlines have until April 30th to accept or reject.
Correction: AA according to Crain’s Article might lose about 4 gates
These changes make AS’s purchase of VX look like a worse idea by the day.
The VX purchase still served one of its purposes: it kept JetBlue from getting the VX operations at SFO and LAX and made it more difficult for B6 to get free of the gradually but inexorably tightening noose of LGB. A VX-B6 tieup might have made JetBlue more competitive in the West Coast markets instead of the West now being nothing more than spokes coming out of JFK, BOS, and FLL.
So what does any of these have to do with the new terminal? Are they fighting for gate space or what?