The State of Qatar Promises Reforms to Its Airline Because It Needs a Friend

Qatar (the country) has been in a sticky situation for some time now. With many of its Arab neighbors accusing the country of meddling in their internal affairs as well as being a state sponsor of terrorism, those countries have cut off diplomatic relations. Qatar has been isolated, and the economic impact is large. For that reason, Qatar is desperate for friends, and the US just happens to be one of that remains. Recent negotiations have resulted in stronger ties between the two countries, and part of that includes an effort to reform how Qatar Airways operates. This is a step forward, though it’s hard to know if there will be any actual impact.

You’ll recall that the big US airlines have targeted Qatar (with Qatar Airways) and the United Arab Emirates (with Emirates and Etihad) in an effort to shut down what they consider unfair competition. The US carriers argue that the US government needs to take action, because these Middle Eastern airlines are emboldened by massive subsidies to expand beyond what’s commercially reasonable. Under the Obama Administration, the pleas were heard, but there wasn’t any resolution. Now under Trump, things have started moving. Some of this may be due to the Trump Administration’s interest in putting restrictions on trade, but it may also just be that opportunity knocked.

When Qatar ran into trouble with its neighbors last year, the US remained a friend and gained leverage in the process. This week, a lot more than just this aviation agreement was announced. There was an “Inaugural U.S.-Qatar Strategic Dialogue” this week that is to become an annual event. The US will also effectively turn the Al Udeid US military base into a larger, more permanent operation. This kind of love-fest is hugely valuable to Qatar, and the country’s Defense Minister Al-Atiyah is playing that up:

The state of Qatar has never waived its commitment to stand with friends and allies, especially when the – when they needed us the most. When other in the region were no longer able to accommodate U.S. present of their soil, Qatar eased restriction and expedited its offer to host its ally.

With this background, the time must have felt right to try to get some concessions on the aviation front, especially since it fits in well with the Trump Administration’s stance on trade. The discussions produced “a set of Understandings to address concerns that U.S. carriers have raised with respect to government support of Qatar’s flagship carrier, Qatar Airways.”

The end result is something squishy in the sense that it’s not a revised open skies agreement nor is it otherwise legally-enforceable. There are three main pieces here.

Qatar Airways “should” issue public annual reports with financial statements audited externally in accordance with internationally-recognized accounting standards.
This will certainly be nice to have, but it won’t alone stop any sort of subsidies. Emirates, an airline which puts out audited financial statements regularly, is still a main target of the US airlines in this campaign. So this alone improves transparency, which is good, but it doesn’t do more than that.

Within two years, Qatar Airways “should” make public any significant new money the airline takes from the State. It also should take steps to make sure those transactions are based on commercial terms.
In theory, if Qatar Airways can only take state money on commercial terms, then that should prevent any true subsidy, but I imagine there are a lot of holes here. What about, for example, the fact that Qatar Airways has the sole right to distribute alcohol for the whole country? Are those recurring revenues a problem?

More importantly, this isn’t enforceable anyway. I can’t imagine a world where Qatar Airways is able to operate subsidy-free within two years. So, what happens then? It’ll be up to the US to determine whether there should be additional enforcement action, but there are no teeth to this agreement if it’s not honored.

Qatar Airways has given assurances that it isn’t currently looking to fly any fifth freedom routes from Qatar to the US via an intermediate point (like Europe or Asia).
There’s no strict prohibition on fifth freedom flying in this deal from what I can tell. It’s just that Qatar Airways has said it isn’t planning on doing it. Well, yeah. Instead, Qatar is following the Etihad model and making large investments in foreign carriers. Qatar doesn’t need to fly from Europe to the US. It can just have Meridiana lease some airplanes and do the flying itself. While it may not have true voting control over the airline, it very clearly has strategic control from all early indications. If I were Qatar, I wouldn’t want to bother with fifth freedom flying either when I could just have a European airline do it for me with my airplanes.

So, does any of this matter? If you listen to the lobbying groups fighting on behalf of the US airlines, then this sounds like an amazing victory. In reality, it’s a step forward, but I don’t know that it has any real impact.

I know I sound somewhat negative on this, but that’s not entirely the case. It’s an improvement in transparency which is a move in the right direction. I just don’t have much faith that this is going to change anything about how Qatar Airways does business, mostly because I can’t see how the airline can function without subsidy in the near future.

What will be more interesting now is to see what happens with the UAE. That country has much more at stake — after all, Emirates is the airline that really likes the idea of fifth freedom flying — but the UAE is in a stronger negotiating position than Qatar. Not only does the UAE not have the same diplomatic issues as Qatar, but FedEx relies on fifth freedoms for its Dubai hub operation. This will be a much trickier negotiation.

(Visited 3,093 times, 1 visits today)

Get Posts via Email When They Go Live or in a Weekly Digest

25
Leave a Reply

avatar
8 Comment threads
17 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
16 Comment authors
CFDMKDarinNickTim Dunn Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Peter Morris
Guest
Peter Morris

One question- would you like to fly on Qatar Airways to the Middle East, or on a US carrier over Europe? Take your time…. Now I’ll mention business class.

Bick Rowen
Member
Bick Rowen

I would suggest you consider issues such as women’s rights, gay rights and western values such as due process and freedom of association before flying an ME3 airline.

Darin
Guest
Darin

You must travel to relatively few places in the world. Plus the US track record on some of the issues you mentioned are mixed at best.

thetrain
Member
thetrain

Darin- the US is among the best in all of these issues and pioneered many.

Darin
Guest
Darin

You’re not a white cisgendered middle aged middle class (or higher) man named John by chance? How close am I? Anyway, you are absolutely right, what was I thinking…

Peter
Guest
Peter

I don’t think that’s the point. If I am flying from US east coast to India, I can choose any of the ME3 or any other US or European based airlines. They mostly have 1 stops anyway.
Flying coach, I would rather have 9 abreast on a US 777 vs 10 abreast on a ME3 777 given the price being about the same. Even with flying Business class, I am not sure the service are that far off between them. I guess it really depends on what people is looking for in terms of services.

JAXBA
Guest

I’d wouldn’t mind the more direct, although I don’t care about journey time so much (I like creative routings – see my GRU-X/DOH-JNB routing I mention below…).

If time was precious: QR. If chasing miles/status points/EQM/etc., probably AA/BA.Price and novelty would come into the equation too.

Same answer for business class.

Jason H
Guest
Jason H

I and probably 90% of the flying public will probably go with whatever airline with the better prices and schedule…

Wild Bill
Guest

According to SkyTrax only 1 US carrier made any of the lists for top airlines to Europe. That was Delta and it ranked 10th for their amenity kit.
http://www.worldairlineawards.com/Awards/best_business_class_airlines.html

Itami
Guest

The really doesn’t seem like it changes things much for anyone, does it?

Doug Swalen
Guest

“This will be a much trickier negotiation.”

This presumes it even happens at all…which I find unlikely.

Tim Dunn
Member

The US3 have not done a great job of convincing the public or even some government officials of the cost to US airlines because of the very different set of rules that the ME3 play by. Of course airlines that are state supported can offer better products at lower prices- that is the nature of global trade complaints. Unlike other state owned airlines, including the Chinese, the ME3 do benefit from Open Skies agreements which allow those airlines access to every potential market a US carrier could also potentially serve. European governments have largely been willing to trade weaker airlines… Read more »

DMK
Guest
DMK

I am in agreement with Cranky. This is mostly a symbolic victory. As Cranky explained, other than fifth-freedom flights, other aspects are hard to enforce 100%. The US airlines and pilot unions came out and paid lip service to the US government. On paper, it’s definitely a win-win-win for all parties involved. ;-) The reality is fifth-freedom flights between Europe and US by the ME3 would cause minimal pains to the US3. The ME3 generate far, far more revenue between the US and Subcontinent, ie, India, and resulting in the US3 not being able to capture the growth in the… Read more »

Nick
Guest
Nick

The issue with ME3 5th freedom routes vs say most other 5th freedom routes is the idea of local vs connecting traffic. DL flies NRT/SIN. DL is mostly interested in taking people from the US through NRT to SIN because there hasn’t been a plane that will do it very efficiently from the US Mainland. DL is not really trying to capture local traffic between SIN and TYO. I’m sure some people do that, but it’s not really what DL is setting out to do. DL is just trying to have SIN connected to their market. EK flies MXP/JFK. That… Read more »

JAXBA
Guest

I’ve flown QR twice in longhaul Y (GRU-X/DOH-JNB[!]) and the service was good but the crew were obviously afraid and robotic (yet genuinely friendly).

If I were involved in the negotiations I’d bring up the human rights issues at the same time as the trade/openskies negotiations; as in “yes, the US will remain friendly to Qatar, but ease up on the modern day slavery or else.” I’d alos persuade AA to resume codeshares with QR once conditions improved.

southbay flier
Guest

After spending a few days in Dubai last year, it’s pretty obvious that the government is subsidizing anything in the hope that there will be a strong economy once the oil runs out within the next couple decades. The government is involved in building most of the major buildings in Dubai, EK, and just about everything that is going on in Dubai. It’s not too much of a stretch for the rest of the world to state the ME3 is heavily subsidized. The goal is for everything to become profitable, but who knows if this approach will work.