The Two Airlines That Had the Best Q1


I’ve been so focused on Spirit lately, I’ve been neglecting some of the broader industry stories. With Frontier having finally reported its Q1 earnings last week, I decided to take a closer look at revenue and profit performance since all airlines have been crowing about just how great demand has been. While everyone did better compared to last year, there were two who really deserve the gold star for their performance.

Let’s start with a look at adjusted unit revenue in Q1 2026 compared to Q2 2025. This excludes special items.

Now, we can look at this and see there are some airlines that clearly did better than others. But before we do make any judgments, we need to do some work on these numbers. First, I want to normalize for any changes in average stage length. The longer the stage length, the lower your unit revenue. Fares just don’t climb in step with the number of miles flown.

This primarily impacts the airline at the top, Frontier, which saw its average stage drop by nearly 3 points year-over-year. That’s going to artificially boost the number you see there. Allegiant also dropped by 1.7 points. At the other end of the spectrum, American saw its avearge stage climb 1.8 points, so what it looks lower than it should look in a comparison.

So, let’s normalize to a 1,000 mile average stage length to get us looking at apples to apples.

Ok, so now Frontier and Allegiant come down a little while American goes up. We now have a much more complete picture, but… there’s still one piece missing. What we don’t have here is any indication of how much capacity changed for each airline year-over-year. If capacity goes up, that should put a damper on unit revenue. If capacity goes down, that will help bolster unit revenue.

I’m not adjusting the numbers for this, but instead I’m just putting the capacity change on the chart in a separate series to help put things into perspective. Here is what the final picture looks like:

What does this tell us? The ULCCs had a very good quarter. Both Allegiant and Frontier saw massive gains in unit revenue, though it’s not quite as impressive once you see the decline in capacity. That’s especially true for Allegiant which operated nearly 6 percent less capacity year-over-year. But then again, you could adjust for that, and you’d be hard-pressed to say it wasn’t a good quarter.

Southwest, however, is a different story. It was the only airline to increase capacity and have double-digit unit revenue increases. Yes, it has changed its business model and that makes a huge difference. But these gains are very good, and Q2 is expected to see even greater growth. Of course, we don’t know if the model change will cause more problems for Southwest in the long run, but for now, the revenue news is all good news for the airline.

Below that, we have the big three. American saw the most impressive gains of that group, but the differences are relatively minimal. At the back, we have JetBlue and Alaska which definitely underperformed. Alaska is still digesting its merger with Hawaiian and making its big strategic shifts. JetBlue is just fighting in tougher markets.

Of course, revenue increases don’t translate directly into profit, so let’s go a little deeper here. Take a look at the operating margin for each of these airlines in the same order they were shown above.

Well that does change things, doesn’t it? Frontier may have had good revenue performance, but its profitability is… not good. Allegiant absolutely crushed it once again. But look at Southwest which quietly tied Delta for the best operating margin outside of Allegiant after losing money last year in the same quarter. That is a huge change.

With all that data, what do we learn? There are some smaller takeaways, but the key here is that both Allegiant and Southwest are sitting at the top of the heap.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

43 responses to “The Two Airlines That Had the Best Q1”

  1. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Interesting. That Southwest reinvented its proverbial wheel, a business strategy that’s always a roll of the dice (sometimes what looks good on paper is a disaster in the real world. And sometimes it does work), and it’s been paying off.

    Just goes to show you that people no longer collectively put their money where their mouth is. This subject in a broader sense could probably be the subject of an essay all on its own. So if you ever want a topic sure to get a discussion going, well….here you are. You’re welcome.

    No matter how loud they have a fit, how many TicTac videos they make, or otherwise bellyache, the truth is that people still make their decisions based on price and/or convenience. Nobody can be taken seriously when they say things like “Southwest eliminated Jetway Jesus’! I aint gunna fly them no mo’!”

    Come on pal. Yes you will. You aren’t fooling anyone.

    Principle and actually practicing what you preach is definitely something that’s fallen by the wayside.

    But I digress. I’ve said on this page before that I’ll bet I’m a lot crankier than the head Cranky!

    And the bottom line results such as this analysis prove it.

    1. Imogene D Avatar
      Imogene D

      Cranky, I don’t get it. I have read where many long-term Southwest fliers have gone elsewhere. Others write about half empty planes. So how can their revenue be as solid as is reported?

      1. Brett Avatar

        Imogene D – What people say and what they actual do are two very different things. People can complain all they want, but where are they going to go? Nobody else has open seating or checked bags included in the fare, so it’s not like there’s a better option. People just like to complain.

        As for empty flights, Southwest’s load factor was pretty steady at 74.1% while last year it was 73.9%. There is opportunity to fill more seats, but they’ve been more focused on getting more money in the door by per ticket.

        1. ArubaMan Avatar
          ArubaMan

          If I may, certainly there is tremendous room for substantial summer profits with a 74% load factor now. Since the new Southwest procedures have been enacted, I have flown 6 flights on them. For some reason, I was assigned a front-row aisle on 4 of those 6 flights. Every time, I heard businessmen boarding asking if the Flight Attendant could hang up their jackets in the coat closet. I heard this at least 4 times on each of those flights. Anyone who knows anything about Southwest knows they have no coat closet. So that means SWA is stealing business travellers from the others. I watched closely and each time, the FA asked the businessmen if they could hold their jackets in their laps until boarding was finished. And each time, the FA made a point of going to each one and carefully laying the jacket on top of the other items in the overhead bin. Everyone in the first 10 rows saw it. A silent point was made. …. Now, can you imagine where SWA would be right now if Elliott hadn’t forced them to spend their fuel hedging money on more stock buybacks so they could pump the stock price???

    2. MNG Avatar
      MNG

      Jetway Jesus . . . a/k/a The 35,000 Foot Miracle. (Ask Allegiant.) Passengers insisting on a wheelchair to get early boarding undergo a miraculous return of vitality and practically knock people down to get off the plane in Vegas.

  2. SandyCreek Avatar
    SandyCreek

    It seems to be a recurring theme that AA commands less profit than DL or UA, although the gap shrank for this quarter. Do we have a way to numerically deduce which parts of each commonly cited factor (weak in big cities, less premium, less long haul, inferior product offerings, etc) contributes to how much of that gap?

    P.S. is JetBlue still on a path to viable profit? As a New York flyer, it’d be a gross shame to lose it :(

    1. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      That would be a post I would like to read. I still can’t figure out why AA can’t make money like DL and UA. They seem so similar.

  3. Southside Emil Avatar
    Southside Emil

    I wonder what Delta’s numbers would have been if Ed didn’t chase away a lot of the Diamond and Platinum Medallions with his shenanigans from a few years back?

    1. Eric R Avatar
      Eric R

      The results probably would have been worse. There is a cost / hit to margin by keeping FF programs the same as they were 5, 10, 20 years ago. The airline market has changed considerably over the decades and FF programs have changed accordingly.

      No airlines FF program improved over the years. They’ve all deteriorated.

    2. AP Avatar
      AP

      Now that Delta is taking away food and drinks on some of their flights while still charging for a “premium” experience should affect their numbers.

      1. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        Your comment is a great example of the media spinning stories and uninformed consumers taking the bait and misinterpreting:

        -Delta will no longer have any inflight service on flights of up to 349 miles
        -Delta will have a full beverage service on flights of 350+ miles
        -This means we’ll see 600 daily flights gain a full beverage service, and around 450 daily flights lose inflight service altogether. Essentially what’s happening here is that Delta is changing its distance “bands” when it comes to service.
        -Put as simply as possible, flights of 251-349 miles are losing out, while flights of 350-499 miles are gaining a full service.

        https://onemileatatime.com/news/delta-adjusts-inflight-service-short-flights/

        The media latched on to the piece about some flights losing service while magically failing to highlight that others would be gaining service. Additionally, this is really an ops complexity play, not a drastic cost savings measure

        1. Bill from DC Avatar
          Bill from DC

          Using 350 as the cutoff was a bit piggish. They should have selected 300. There’s plenty of time for a full beverage service on LAX-SFO, as their competitors will prove multiple times every day. Weak. Certainly the opposite of premium.

          1. See_Bee Avatar
            See_Bee

            Agreed it’s not premium, but I would argue it isn’t important on that route. Remember the “LAXSFO shuttle” from the mid-2010s? https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/delta-launches-los-angeles-to-san-francisco-shuttle-217938911.html

            Luvo wraps, dedicated check-ins, alcohol for everyone, etc. But then it was killed a few years later because customers on LAXSFO only care about 1 thing – price of their fare. DL couldn’t get people to pay more

            1. Bill from DC Avatar
              Bill from DC

              I do remember that, they wanted to make it like the lga-bos-dca shuttle. But to not even get a Coke? sheesh.

    3. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      I think it’s the same as with Southwest, you can complain online all you want, but where else are you going to go? I’m a million miler with DL. Unless they become way worse than their competitors, I’ll fly them. The only exception are flights to Hawaii or San Diego and I’ll fly AS because they have nonstops from my home airport.

  4. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Hey Brett. You think you can slip something in about ValuJet, AirTran, and LCC’s and cost cutting in general, since today is the 30th anniversary of ValuJet #592?

    The 30th anniversary of anything is a milestone and should be remembered.

  5. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    does this analysis account for extraordinary charges such as those for mass staff buyouts, fleet retirements or other large one time type expenses that could significantly impact bottom line profitability?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Bill – No, these are adjusted number excluding special charges

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        So actually yes, your analysis does account for that! I should have known, you da man!

  6. Paper Boarding Pass Avatar
    Paper Boarding Pass

    With Spirit out of the way, there is hope that B6 can improve its operating numbers; should show up in 3Q 2026.
    B6 would pop if United & Lufthansa would grant membership to Star alliance.
    Lots of incremental revenue handling the domestic leg for the Asian & Euro Star carriers; especially JFK.

    1. Bevvy Avatar
      Bevvy

      Cranky, Spirit was a ULCC and jetBlue is a “normal” airline. So they would not be targeting Spirits old passengers correct? A different tier of flyer.

      1. Brett Avatar

        Bevvy – It’s never that simple. Every airline carries all types of passengers. It’s not like people who flew Spirit are just going to stop traveling. JetBlue is absolutely interested in capturing those passengers, especially in FLL.

      2. George Romey Avatar
        George Romey

        JetBlue will go after the customer base that can afford to pay a higher fare. Most notably those flying in Spirit’s Big Front Seat. Assuming jet fuel prices remain elevated the person that can only pay $50 for a fare won’t be flying anymore. No airline can afford to carry that customer.

        Will there will be enough profitable flyers coming over from Spirit is the big question.

        And it always amazes me the people on travel sites like this that think the answer to profitability is to lower fares, pay employees more and provide more personalized customer service. They of course wouldn’t last 24 hours in airline management.

  7. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    Q… if so many people are struggling financially, where are they getting the money to fly & fill all the planes? The YouTube channel “Vaush” did a video on this last week.

    1. Brian w Avatar
      Brian w

      Unemployment is 4.3% and the economy is growing 2%. There are a lot of people with jobs and income to spending.

      1. SEAN Avatar
        SEAN

        4.3 % Brian? That’s only those who are actually looking for work not everyone who is unemployed. GDP at 2% is irrelevant.

        1. CraigTPA Avatar
          CraigTPA

          It’s the “K-shaped” economy at work. Some people are doing very well, and they’re still traveling. Others are doing poorly, job creation is basically flat, barely absorbing most of the layoffs outside of manufacturing. The middle is being hollowed out.

    2. Paper Boarding Pass Avatar
      Paper Boarding Pass

      They are borrowing money like crazy in the last few months of 2026:

      – Alaska just floated $1B in debt: one half for general purposes, one half based on its frequent flier program
      – JetBlue floated $500M of financing backed by 22 jets
      – American floated $1.14B of financing backed by 32 jets.

      This eats up your free cash flow.

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        paper – great point, those are some big numbers, future earnings will certainly decrease with these types of borrowing costs and additional interest expenses.

    3. Alex B. Avatar
      Alex B.

      1. there aren’t nearly as many people struggling financially as it may seem from social media. This is the ‘vibecession’ conundrum – people’s stated satisfaction with the economy used to track econonmic indicators well, and since 2021 it hasn’t, and nobody is exactly sure why.

      2. Even if there are tons of people struggling, the median American takes zero flights per year. See data from A4A here: 55% of American adults haven’t flown in the last 12 months; 35% haven’t flown in the last five years: https://www.airlines.org/dataset/air-travelers-in-america-annual-survey/

  8. Eric R Avatar
    Eric R

    I realize Alaska is still “integrating” Hawaiian, but I can’t help but wonder how much the battle in Seattle and very competitive west coast markets pressures margins for Alaska longer term.

    They do not have any easy paths to expand outside of their west coast foothold outside of acquiring someone like JetBlue.

    1. Kris Avatar
      Kris

      Alaska’s been battling Delta in Seattle for a long time. Their core markets are surely performing just fine… BUT they added an entire unprofitable airline (HA) into the mix they need to subsidize, in addition to the one-off costs of digesting said airline and the distraction it brings (management is focused on that integration rather than the fundamentals of running an airline). After they bought VX, their margins were bad for a year or two and then rebounded. It’ll likely be the same this time

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        All of the new international service will run at a loss for quite some time. Adding new markets, new onboard products, refurbishing planes, etc. is expensive. Especially when DL squats on what would have been a monopoly nonstop like FCO as that will remove the opportunity to charge a premium and the extra capacity will likely lead to both lower fares and lower load factors… which is a bad combination.

    2. EasyMoney Avatar
      EasyMoney

      Alaska has no pressure to expand its network beyond the West Coast as long as it maintains its lead there. AA onward connections are sufficient for most Alaska flyers traveling domestically, and it has more nonstop destinations out of SEA/PDX/SAN/HNL/ANC than any competitor. The losses are because 1) west coast and Singapore fuel prices spiked hardest, 2) Hawaii experienced severe storms around spring break, and 3) Alaska revenue is always lowest in Q1. The rest of the year looks bleak as well, but the problems are related to fuel, not fundamental to the airline.

  9. Pulush Avatar
    Pulush

    Does F9 have a serious cost problem? To increase unit revenue over 15% and still lose MORE money than last year…

    1. Brett Avatar

      Pulush – Fuel may have only hit one month of the quarter, but it still has a real impact.

    2. Jason Avatar
      Jason

      F9 reported a large charge in Q1 related to early retirement of aircraft. I dont normally look at their adjusted numbers in a financial filing, but it is instructive here. Absent that, their numbers werent as bad.

  10. Jessup H Avatar
    Jessup H

    Cranky,

    Since Allegiant is moving to Boeing won’t that hurt their numbers? The Airbus A321neo seats significantly more passengers than the Boeing 737 MAX 8. The A321neo can be configured to hold up to 244 passengers in high-density layouts, whereas the 737 MAX 8 has a maximum capacity of approximately 210 passengers. Please explain. Thank you

    1. Ian L Avatar
      Ian L

      Allegiant runs A319/320ceo (mostly 320) not neo. The MAXes have a bit more capacity (190 vs. 180) when configured similarly; Allegiant has a significant number of extra and regular-legroom seats on their aircraft now. I think part of that is that for routes where there’s only enough demand for 2x/wk mainline service it’s a lot harder to sell 190+ seats, so trying to revenue-manage fares on the same flight versus either putting planes elsewhere or even bumping to 3x/wk on the route doesn’t fit Allegiant’s model.

      Frontier’s 320/321 fleet is likewise tricky to manage because, while unit costs are low on the 321s, if you can’t get folks to spill to you you’re going to wish you had less plane. Which is why Breeze’s use of the A220 is interesting for carving out nonstop demand at roughly the size of an A319 but with better comfort and lower running costs.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Jessup H – Just because a plane is big with low unit costs doesn’t mean it’s the best option. Frontier and Spirit have learned that if you can’t fill all those seats, it’s not useful. By all accounts, Allegiant got a great deal on those 737s from Boeing, so low ownership costs make a big difference. And in the types of markets where Allegiant flies, it doesn’t need more than 190 seats it puts on the -8s.

      1. David C Avatar
        David C

        Allegiant certainly proves quarter after quarter a well managed LCC can thrive.

        Wonder why the others haven’t gone after trying to couple with hotel stays/packages more aggressively?

      2. GRT Avatar
        GRT

        Agree re the lessons learned for Frontier on A321s. But I’ll play devils advocate and argue that the size of that jet actually gives Frontier a lot of scope and physical wiggle room to insert and play with more premium seating options in the future, beyond the current planned first-class seating configuration. Challenge for them is their limited ecosystem and soft product around a premium offering. But the A321 is big enough to do a chunkier premium product selection while still allowing enough cabin for commodity price-sensitive passenger seats.

  11. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    American and Southwest prove that you can generate good revenue when you focus on higher value passengers and less on being mass transportation.

    However, as fuel prices look like they will remain elevated well into the 2nd half of 2026 and into 2027, airlines will all have to push up revenues in order to cover costs as more and more new bookings are taken even as demand falls off into the late summer.

    Non-fuel cost control will be more and more important and not all airlines will do as good of a job at that.

    There will be some serious financial pain late in 2026 and beyond for some airlines and not just in the US

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.