American Takes a “Rare Opportunity” to Shuffle the Deck


I’m back from vacation, and as tempting as it was to write up my trip report straight away thanks to a 14-hour delay to kick things off, there was news from while I was gone that I want to talk about first. American, now finally trying to fix itself, made some moves in the management ranks while I was on the beach. On the surface, it looks like an airline trying to take some actual action, but going just a little bit deeper, I don’t feel nearly as positive. Instead, this still looks like an airline that can’t make the big, bold moves it needs to make.

Having reviewed both a letter from Chief Executive Officer Robert Isom to his officers and one from Chief Operating Officer David Seymour to his leadership, this is what I believe to be happening:

  • Chief Communications Officer Ron DeFeo is out after 11 years with his fiefdom being divided into three different areas:
    • SVP Comms and Chief Marketing Officer Caroline Clayton takes over comms and now reports to Robert
    • Caroline loses marketing to the commercial group which now goes with brand, advertising, and partnership to someone who will be hired under Chief Commercial Officer Nat Pieper
    • Director Team Member Engagement Beril McManus will now report to Chief People Officer Cole Brown
  • EVP American Eagle, Corporate Real Estate, and Government Affairs Nate Gatten is leaving for Apple, and his work is being divvied up three ways as well:
    • Steve Neuman, Senior Vice President, Global Head of Government Affairs, will be in charge of government affairs and will now report to Robert
    • VP Corporate Real Estate Amanda Zhang will now report to Chief Financial Officer Devon May
    • SVP Regionals and Business Transformation Brandon Kahle will now report to David in ops
  • SVP Technical Operations Kevin Brickner is leaving and will be replaced by John “Bendo” Bendoraitis who was COO at Spirit until, well, you know
  • SVP Airport Operations Julie Rath and SVP Operations Planning, Analytics, and Product Management Anne Moroni will now both report to SVP Flight Ops and IOC JC Gulbranson instead of directly to David
  • Chief Customer Officer Heather Garboden will stop reporting to both David and Nat and will now only report to Nat… she also gains reservations, contact centers, service recovery, and catering with VP Global Contact Centers and Service Recovery Kim Cisek moving to her group from ops where she reported to Julie Rath before

That was tough to keep straight, but on the surface, it makes sense. What is being stripped out of the communications group absolutely should not have been there in the first place. And why would regionals be combined with corporate real estate and government affairs? These are all just quirks of a structure that was put in place to fit with the people who held the leadership roles at the time (or to keep them away from people who held other leadership roles where the groups belonged). So, fine. But let’s go under the surface here to analyze this further.

Robert’s note acts like this is a tidal wave of change at a unique time. Specifically, the note starts off with this:

American Airlines is entering a defining moment.

In our centennial year, we have a rare opportunity: to build on the progress we’ve made, address the gaps that remain and position this airline for long-term success. We reflected on the importance of this moment at Journey earlier this year – and previewed a bold strategy to carry us forward into our next 100 years.

What are we even talking about here? The defining moment was more like a defining last decade when American defined itself as an underperforming, cost-focused network carrier. Maybe this is a re-defining moment, but this move isn’t a bold one that redefines the airline.

But according to Robert’s letter, it’s not just a defining moment. This is a “rare opportunity.” How so?

American has had the same opportunity for years, but it has been slow to act, or even to re-act. Maybe it’s rare because it’s Robert’s last chance before the board actually does something more dramatic? This all just sounds like worthless fluff to me. But that’s just the tone of the letter. It doesn’t mean there isn’t any substance.

The big winner here is Heather Garboden, and that is the most promising part of these moves. She was given the hardest job in the company, having to serve two masters in both ops and commercial, while representing the customer that American didn’t really care much about before. Now, she is firmly part of the commercial team, and she is controlling more of the pieces that should fall under the customer group. On top of that, she is now joining the senior leadership team which means *gasp* the person advocating for the customer actually has a seat at the table. Finally.

While Heather’s gain is also a gain for the traveler, the three other lesser winners are wins mostly for their own benefit. JC Gulbranson (who takes over a bigger chunk of the ops world under his fiefdom), Caroline Clayton (who takes comms over but loses marketing), and Steve Neuman (who moves up the ladder) also all join the senior leadership team.

That winners list should also include Bendo who obviously gains since he went from unemployed at Spirit to being gainfully employed. He joins Matt Klein who according to his LinkedIn profile has very quietly moved down from his Chief Commercial Officer job at Spirit to VP of Pricing at Southwest. But while I am very wary about putting anyone who was in charge of Spirit’s failed commercial strategy into another important commercial role, I don’t feel the same way about Bendo who by all accounts can run an operation.

So why aren’t these ops moves also big winners in my book? It’s because the people at the top of the operation are still there. Robert and David own American’s operation and have for years. You can move people around under them, but without change at the top, well, it’s incomplete. Then again, being incomplete inexplicably appears to be by design.

American never seems done acting like it’s trying to reinvent itself, but the airline doesn’t usually telegraph the fluidity of its organization as clearly as it did in Robert’s memo:

The changes I’ve outlined here are important, but they are just the first step in a series of actions designed to strengthen our team, foster greater alignment and act with greater urgency across the enterprise.

You would think that death by a million cuts wouldn’t be ideal here, but well, that’s how I read this.

So maybe David Seymour’s time is running short, and his retirement is coming. In this move, we see him lose his partial control over the customer group which has also taken reservations away from him. Further, two of his direct reports are now under JC Gulbranson, and there’s a new former airline COO to run tech ops. It sounds like JC and Bendo will be competing to succeed David at some point.

If that happens, I’ll have to think about this differently, but for now, this group remains under David’s control, and finance remains under Devon May. Devon’s organization was barely touched in this move, but he has been one of the strongest champions of cost control which would seem to go against the direction Robert wants this airline to go. You have to spend money to improve revenue.

All of this meaty change, however, is speculation. What has been announced just feels like another reorg. A spokesperson tried to make it clear to me that all of these people leaving the company are doing so on their own. I know that’s how things work in a company when you’re at a certain level, but it makes it seem like these moves are just Robert reacting to decisions the people under him are making to flee the company.

If Robert was serious about sending a message that things are going to be different, he should have made it clear that he is driving this change, and some other heads should have rolled. Then again, that should have happened years ago. He should have made all the big changes at once, and then he should have put serious effort into calming the frayed nerves of the long-suffering employee groups. We didn’t see any of that. Instead, we’ll just have to sit and wait to see what’ the next move at the airline will be’s next.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox for Free

How often do you want to receive emails?
Brett Avatar

35 responses to “American Takes a “Rare Opportunity” to Shuffle the Deck”

  1. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    The kind of jobs invented by people who otherwise serve no useful purpose for other people who otherwise serve no purpose.

    An example: “Director of the department of sustainability”.

    Huh? WTF does someone like that do?

    If their job description and day to day duties cannot be succinctly summed up in easy to understand laymens terms in five sentences or less, it’s probably a job that doesn’t need to exist in the first place.

    I’m pretty sure the airlines ran just fine before all of that fluff was conjured up and would continue to do so in their absence.

    Now take pilots, mechanics, and tug operators out of the picture…..

    Oh and happy 20th!

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Fluff it is. I have one better, chair… meet Titanic. Speaking of fluff, what does a chief people officer even do?

      1. Jim M Avatar
        Jim M

        Head of HR and personnel budget for the entire organization. How we’ve gotten to everyone needs a “C” title someway somehow to feel important is beyond me.

        The sustainability head at a large organization like American can be a cost saver. Sure there will be some green initiatives that are warm and fuzzy (but IMO right thing to do), but typically these roles look at all material inputs to the company and attempt to cut down on them. Obviously if your organization is burning $6b a year in Jet A, a 0.1% reduction just there is real money.

        1. See_Bee Avatar
          See_Bee

          That’s basic analysis for a sourcing & procurement manager… You don’t need a C-level title to get people to do that

          I think of the C-suite sustainability officer as just another Chief Marketing Officer. They spend time and money getting PR for the airline. “Oh look at our cool SAF commitment”, except there is no SAF supply out there to buy so the commitment is essentially meaningless. And then now they get to sit on panels at sustainability trade shows like they know what they’re doing

    2. RemingtonSteeleDoessier Avatar
      RemingtonSteeleDoessier

      I get your broader point about bloat in the org chart, but I have to take exception with your example. Many companies have sustainability departments now and that work requires leadership that has the ear of the C Suite. Far too many of these sustainability departments do little more than provide greenwashing content for the marketing team. But plenty of companies are serious about sustainability both for environmental considerations and for long-term value creation.

      1. Kilroy Avatar
        Kilroy

        I’d largely agree with this assessment.

        I would add that it also depends on the industry and on companies’ PERCEPTIONS about how much their customers value sustainability, companies’ PERCEPTIONS of how much legitimate work their competitors are doing on sustainability, and on each company’s relative position within the industry.

        To use two (admittedly extreme) examples to compare, an established company selling higher quality and higher priced (relative to its competitors) supplies and hardware to researchers in academia/government/pharma is FAR more likely to have a robust/legitimate sustainability effort than a new/small company making generic, low-priced/low-margin products for the “alphabet soup” brands to sell on Amazon or Temu.

        Scientists and PhDs buying 6-figure pieces of lab equipment are likely to be PERCEIVED to care much more about sustainability than a consumer looking to buy a $10 golf shirt or a $5 plastic novelty toy.

  2. Eric R Avatar
    Eric R

    Swapping out management won’t change a damn thing at American Airlines.

    They’ve backed themselves into such a whole both financially and operationally (constraints at airports that they want to expand in, aircraft retirements, etc.) that swapping out management just puts lipstick on a pig.

  3. David C Avatar
    David C

    The best line references they’ve had ‘years to do this’.
    The end summary being spot on.
    They haven’t been serious about IRROPS in years.
    Totally unrealistic schedule in out stations where the boarding time frequently matches the inbound aircraft’s arrival time.
    An app that lags the other two.

    The list of mediocrity continues…

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      If someone wanted to update the film “Office Space,” they could look at American Airlines & call it “Mediocracy.”

  4. bruce Avatar
    bruce

    Bendo is the only real addition or change that will make a meaningful impact. I worked with him briefly at Frontier and always knew it was a mistake that F9 ket him go.Smart guy, knows operations well and is great with people and getting the most from them.

    1. NedsKid Avatar
      NedsKid

      Completely agree. Bendo is a great guy and a straight shooter. It was a pleasure working for him.

      1. Airbii Steerer Avatar
        Airbii Steerer

        This has to be satire. As a former NKer, this has to be satire.

  5. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    The CEO is the “vibes guy” at the company. They are there to “rally the troops” and get employees excited about a shared vision to go execute. Richard & Ed at DL and Scott at UA have done an excellent job of that. Isom has the personality of a beige wall

    1. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      that’s really insulting to most shades of beige.

  6. John Selden Avatar
    John Selden

    Is the Board still sitting on its hands? What are they waiting for? Meantime, let’s blame the lady in charge of real estate. Before retirement (different industry), they always blamed the real estate guy. Always.

  7. Juan Forero Avatar
    Juan Forero

    as long as their fortresses are their fortresses, AA will survive and eventually thrive: DFW, MIA, CLT, PHL, PHX are not going to be challenged by anyone… there they make money… sit and relax: leadership is doing just that.

    1. SandyCreek Avatar
      SandyCreek

      This is how a national airline recedes into a regional one, self-denied the relevance outside of select fortresses. If AA isn’t relevant where the credit card businesses are (big cities, ie NYC, LA, Chicagoland), it has a lot more money to bleed. It will still exist as a strong regional airline, but it will be subpar to a true national carrier.

    2. Mark Avatar
      Mark

      So where are they losing money? And the smaller hubs and line stations where they compete are causing them to lose more than they make in the fortress hubs?

  8. George Nathan Romey Avatar
    George Nathan Romey

    Executive management still sees coach passengers nothing more than passengers taking the E train to their office in the morning. In other words, expectation of very little.

    Case in point last Saturday the flight arrives 15 minutes late at MIA due to reroutes in air. We actually left PHL nearly 10 minutes before schedule. So suddenly people are trying to make possibly the last connection of the night. Get to the gate and someone has put a piece of equipment right in the path to the gate. So we sit there another 10 minutes waiting for a ramper to come out and move the equipment. And there goes the chance of making some of those connections, particularly if you’re in one of the last rows.

  9. DesertGhost Avatar
    DesertGhost

    Who needs Alitalia/ITA when one can kick American when it’s down? LOL!!

    That’s not to say that American doesn’t deserve much of the criticism it gets.

  10. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    They can pass any savings on to the purchase of additional flight numbers, so they wont have to use the same ones for different flights.
    https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/2-planes-same-flight-number-avoid-disaster-quick-135659078

    1. Kilroy Avatar
      Kilroy

      VAS Aviation (no affiliation) had a good video on that, showing the captioned ATC conversation on top of the radar imagery… Scary, especially as the planes cross paths. Before that happened, however, the ATC realized the situation, took a few seconds to regain his composure, and immediately started using the the suffixes “departure” and “arrival” on the flight numbers to differentiate the planes. The pilots also did the same, and after a minute or two it seemed like a normal day at the office for them.

      Great job by the pilots and ATC in that situation, one that is far more dangerous than similar sounding flight numbers / callsigns (such as two airlines using the same flight numbers in the same airspace, or two flights from the same airline using similar flight numbers)..

      https://youtu.be/Bb8uYlc_ATo?si=FbzFPTu3H77vNUfD

    2. Brett Avatar

      Dan – They don’t even need different flight numbers. It’s pretty common practice to alter the callsign by changing the actual flight number to something slightly different or with a letter if there are going to be two similar flight numbers operating. It’s not like this kind of set up has never happened before. The fact that AA filed them with the same callsign is just ridiculous. ATC did a fantastic job of guiding through this situation, but they never should have been put in that position.

    3. Brad Avatar
      Brad

      Look at AA’s schedule, they use the same flight number on both ways of flights all the time. I was picking up a colleague at an airport in FLA earlier this year and was checking flight stAAtus and noted that the outbound and return both used the same number. Had a little time to kill, found that this is common with AA, most often it is HUB—->Outstation—->HUB and what happened with this fight simply can’t happen as it is the same tail both ways with little to no chance of an equipment change. But in this case it was Hub to Hub and the inbound was a couple hours late so they pulled a plane to send the return flight out less late than they would have been if they waited to use the inbound tail. They both ended up in the air, in the same area, at the same time. OOPS

      I’ve seen continuation flights such as DEN—->IAH—->MSY on UA that continue a flight number (sometimes same tail, sometimes not) that can both be in the air at the same time and they’ll append a letter to the end of one of the flight numbers, like United 405 and United 405T. Generally these are not in the same ATC sector at the same time though. Appending the letter makes the flight number unique and solves the problem.

  11. AlanZ Avatar
    AlanZ

    What really gets me are bloggers who continually wax poetic about the high quality of some of their lounges and this and that mileage program. All of it is totally worthless if you can’t run an airline.

    1. 1990 Avatar
      1990

      Hi AlanZ, eh, you know, do they say ‘comparison is the thief of joy’ in Valletta or Helsinki? The Big 3 in the US are basically like comparing Coke vs. Pepsi (or Dr. Pepper). Some days, American is the ‘cleanest dirty shirt in the laundry bin’; other days it’s Delta or United. Sure, one Admirals Club (like DCA or LGA) can make you feel wonderful (yum, chicken cacciatore!); another, (say, JFK T8 far-side) can have you wondering why they don’t offer any actual food in this lounge (no, random ‘cheesy soup’ doesn’t count.) Then, in terms of IROPS, if it’s merely a light drizzle in NYC, all them can blame the weather and let you down (even if its not a really ‘safety’ issue, more so, a convenient excuse to save money and not operate, when fuel and labor costs are weighing down their quarterly profits; sorry, I’m now being told it’s merely ‘FAA staffing.’ Ok, well, time to then staff-up, folks!) I digress; what I really want is just a duty-of-care and compensation scheme like EU261, and the occasional seasonal roast goose, please.

  12. Jason H Avatar
    Jason H

    Is the bigger part of the story about the individual people in those roles (none of whom I have heard of outside of this website) or the roles themselves?

    If you didn’t explain what was going on, there would be nothing obvious to me on whether these changes were important or not, why they might be good or bad, or remarkable in any way. Maybe I don’t read enough corporate press releases to make sense of this type of writing (typically 0 per year).

    1. Brett Avatar

      Jason H – I think it’s more the roles themselves as opposed to the people in them. At least, that’s true for many of these, but for the highest level execs, it’s the people in the role that matter most.

  13. Emilio Vigil-Vazquez Avatar
    Emilio Vigil-Vazquez

    I am bewildered that David Seymour still has a job. Those who listened to his appearance on Airlines Confidential will know what I mean.

  14. David Wood Avatar
    David Wood

    I believe the most significant non-departure was that of Robert Isom. It all starts from the top and he MUST go, although I don’t know anyone that can save them from their massive debt load. They will continue to sink into mediocrity as Delta and United get stronger. After 900,000 miles on American, it’s time to say goodbye. The question arises now: Delta or United?

    1. W Scott Moyer Avatar
      W Scott Moyer

      If you live in an AA hub, you’ll continue to fly American if you like direct flights!

  15. eolesen Avatar
    eolesen

    Sheesh. I know I’ve been gone from AA a long time the moment I don’t recognize a single name in a leadership re-org…

    Not one single LegAAcy name as far as I can tell…

    So glad to be at another carrier.

  16. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Maybe I’m not reading this right, but there will be a Chief Commercial Officer and a Chief Operating Officer?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Mike – That’s pretty standard for airlines now. What’s perhaps not as normal is there is a Chief Customer Officer who reports to the Chief Commercial Officer.

  17. Exit Row Seat Avatar
    Exit Row Seat

    AA has more VPs and SVPs than my regional bank!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.