JetZero Media Day Was Delightfully Boring


Though my focus is usually on airlines, I do occasionally dive into the world of aircraft manufacturing. And there is no manufacturer I find more fun to follow than JetZero. Sure, it helps that the company is based right here in Long Beach, but it’s a large aircraft concept that has promise, something I can’t say about much else outside of Boeing and Airbus. Recently, the company held its annual media day, and I was there to see what’s new. The answer? Surprisingly little.

When airlines put on media days, they are always focused on making sure there’s some flash. They need to make news, announce new routes or aircraft configurations or… something that’ll get coverage. Visuals? Oh yeah, they need those too. But JetZero? None of that. Oh there could have been some good visuals, but photography is strictly forbidden. Even beyond that, I had to put a cover on my phone camera when I entered the facility. At least they did provide some renderings which you’ll see below.

Instead of announcing something new and exciting, JetZero announced nothing except that it is meeting milestones and moving forward on time and under budget. As someone who doesn’t cover manufacturers as much, I had to turn to those who do to confirm that this mundane presentation was actually a good thing. Indeed, people seemed to agree.

JetZero met its goals last year, and it even had a pleasant surprise. It was moved from the AIR-600 certification group at the FAA which is more for innovation and experimental aircraft to AIR-500 which is for Part 25 aircraft meant for Part 121 airlines. That’s where you find Boeing, and it’s a big deal for JetZero to be categorized that way as it prepares to apply for its type certificate.

The company set forth four main goals for this year.

  • It will do a Series C funding round that will exceed the recent $195 million Series B round
  • It will open its first office building and begin manufacturing testing at the new North Carolina factory
  • It will submit its type certification application to the feds
  • It will finish building the Jet1 demonstrator aircraft in partnership with the US military

These are all pretty big milestones in their own right, but I want to focus on that last one. See, JetZero is going down two parallel paths right now. First, it continues to work on its Z4 commercial aircraft which will fit in the middle of the market between the largest B737/A321 and the smallest widebody, refining the design and preparing to apply for the type certificate. Second, it is actively building the Jet1 demontrator which was part of a military contract to prove that this entire blended wing concept works. (Think, B-2 stealth bomber on serious steroids.)

When I heard they were building a demonstrator, I figured this was something like Boom building an irrelevant small aircraft with different engines and no real relation to the production aircraft. That is not what’s happening here. They already have Pathfinder remote control aircraft to help test a variety of things including wind tunnel performance and more. The Jet1 demonstrator is an enormous aircraft that is nearly the size of the Z4. Let me try to help frame this. Here is what the Z4 was going to look like as of last year.

Image via JetZero

There are no updated renders yet, but we do have a new look at the Jet1 demonstrator, now with a fancy v-tail and cool little engine fins on top. (This design change will allow takeoff with one engine out. It’s a safety change that will help the Z4 get certified.)

Image via JetZero

The problem with this rendering is that it doesn’t really show the scale. It also doesn’t help explain just how far along things are in the process. So, to show us that this wasn’t just some paper dream, they rolled up a 40-year old Saab 340A to the hangar where media day was being held and flew us out to Mojave. There, Scaled Composites is building the demonstrator right now.

If you thought JetZero was strict on photographs, well, think again. I’m pretty sure the PR person out there at Scaled was thinking about tackling people if they even touched their phones. I wish I could show you photos of the two assembled cockpit sections (one for testing, the other for flight) or the massive join where those sections will be affixed to the blended wing, but all I have is some pre-approved images directly from JetZero that aren’t as recent. Here is one of the cockpits not ready for primetime:

Image via JetZero

What you can’t see here is that this airplane will take up the entire hangar. It was hard to fathom how big this airplane will be before seeing the early build in person. But now? It’s even harder to believe. It is not very long, but it is incredibly wide. I cannot wait to see this fly. I’ll put this image to try to help give you a sense of scale, but it still doesn’t do it justice. If the cockpit sits where that bulbous structure is, the wing will stretch almost all the way to the far wall.

Image via JetZero

The demonstrator will just have a pressurized cockpit section. Everything behind is just to show the characteristics of blended wing flying. When the testing is done, JetZero will get to keep the airframe to use for other testing purposes, but then it can focus manufacturing efforts in North Carolina on the Z4.

Right now, the Z4 progress is focused on some of the known bottlenecks in manufacturing. Apparently landing gear has a really long lead-time and is remarkably complicated, so that is well underway. Structures are also in progress, and engine selection is being reviewed. And yes, seats have started to be settled on, knowing how hard it has been to get those certified and flying.

I hate that I can only describe this and not show photos, but the amount of progress in the last year is encouraging. In-service dates are pegged in the early-2030s. That sounds quick, but as CEO Tom O’Leary said on stage, he is in the business of the “art of the possible.” This is possible if everything goes as hoped, but of course it might extend further out. That seems reasonable to me.

I look forward to doing this again next year, and I hope it is again a boring presentation simply repeating the same story over and over again.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

37 responses to “JetZero Media Day Was Delightfully Boring”

  1. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    Isn’t Airbus already looking at a blended wing body? What will the fuselage be made out of? Has any carrier expressed an interest in this?

    1. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      since the demonstrater is being built at a place called Scaled Composites, I’m going to guess the fuselage will be some type of, you guessed it, composite.

      FYI Scaled is owned by Northrop Grumman.

    2. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      “What will the fuselage be made out of?” Chopped liver!

    3. Brett Avatar

      Angry Bob – Airbus was toying with the idea, but I don’t think anything has been even remotely discussed in 5+ years. It’s a distant dream at this point for them. It was really McDonnell Douglas which was pushing on this before, but that program ended when Boeing killed it more than a decade ago. I believe some of the people who worked on that and maybe even some of the owned patents are involved at JetZero.

      As for materials, it will be a mix of metal and composites but they haven’t revealed specifics.

      And airlines? Yes, as mentioned by See_Bee, both United and Alaska are in. Delta is also partnering with them. While you can’t order an airplane that doesn’t exist yet, some of these airlines have put real money into the company. There are also regular airline working groups. I spoke with someone at the event who is with Air France but spends a lot of time at JetZero’s headquarters working with them on refining the airplane.

  2. LT_DT Avatar
    LT_DT

    I’m an aerospace engineer with a background in aircraft design so I’m all for new concepts, but I’m skeptical of its adoption for passenger service. Did they address passenger and airport integration for the commercial variant? Will passengers be able to evacuate in the required time? Will it work with existing airport ground service equipment? Will it work with existing jetways? Is engine maintenance at the gate feasible? Airports made expensive infrastructure modifications for the A380 and they didn’t all pan out. I would be curious whether JetZero addressed those aspects of their concept at all.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      All those things are issues, but I just want to know if they’ve done anything about the previously-identified possible issue with BWB passenger planes where the further off the center line passengers are, the more they move duing banking…and are thus more likely to get airsick.

      1. Brett Avatar

        CraigTPA – This didn’t come up this year, but I do remember talking to them about it last year. They do have some kind of plan about this, though I can’t remember details at this point.

    2. abcdefg Avatar
      abcdefg

      Would love to hear how it will integrate without causing every airport it operates to rebuild concourses and gates.
      What’s that sound? The IAD people mover concept of delivering to the plane is back?

      Bus gates would seem to be the easiest way to handle this thing though if it becomes real.

      The air sickness issue is quite interesting, never consider that in a blended wing but likely a big issue.

    3. Jpom Avatar
      Jpom

      Airport integration has already been addressed in their design. The body fits inside the wingspan of existing aircraft and they have said it will not require any modification to existing airports. They are fully aware of the issues stemming from the A380

      https://b.capital/why-we-invested/why-we-invested-in-jetzero/

      1. Francois Avatar
        Francois

        They are also expecting way shorter turnaround time due to configuration, e.g, one central galley (about 30 minutes). Even if it had to use class V gates, this could mitigate the extra cost.

  3. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    If we thought airport facility constraints were a problem for the A380, well…. It just goes to highlight how unimaginative the world is when building/updating airports.

    1. Jason H Avatar
      Jason H

      Is “imaginative” really a desirable thing when it comes to designing basic infrastructure like jet bridges?

      Rather then use a reliable system that works with basically every existing passenger aircraft, instead just make up a design for an aircraft that doesn’t exist yet.

  4. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    I had never heard of them until a couple weeks ago when the news here in North Carolina showed the ground-breaking in Greensboro (and cited it as another win for NC over CA thanks to a more business-friendly environment). It is quite the complex and you actually can see it on Google Maps satellite view just north of GSO across I-73. I have seen the massive overpass under construction that will house a taxiway passing over the interstate connecting the facility to the rest of the airport.

    Quite a lot going on at GSO these days. There is a Boom facility right across 73 from this site… though I’m not sure anything has been done there other than building a large structure.

    Lots of good high paying jobs and aviation innovation… happy my very, very reasonable taxes are helping with this.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      “I had never heard of them until a couple weeks ago when the news here in North Carolina showed the ground-breaking in Greensboro (and cited it as another win for NC over CA thanks to a more business-friendly environment).”

      Never herd of them until today either. That said, the pot shot at California was typical nonsense coming from the press these days.

    2. Common Sense Avatar
      Common Sense

      Lots of stuff going on inside the Boom building in GSO. Just check X where the CEO posts progress updates. Excited about both these projects and hope they both pan out.

      1. NedsKid Avatar
        NedsKid

        Will check out what Boom posts… been more familiar with what they’re doing in Colorado.

        Either way, glad to have the state live up to the First in Flight on the license plate. (Though I have the Piedmont Airlines state-issued plate)

  5. Brett Avatar

    LT_DT – Oh yeah, they’ve been thinking about this since the beginning. They are building the airplane to work with conventional gating. Length isn’t an issue for existing parking spots, but it could require closing another gate to make sure there’s enough width. They have all sorts of modeling and plans which help this to fit into the airport infrastructure. I have no idea what will need to change, but they are at least addressing this early and comprehensively. They know it’s a huge concern.

    1. LT_DT Avatar
      LT_DT

      That’s great to hear. So often, these companies are laser-focused on the technical challenges and the in-service operability becomes an afterthought. We often point to the 777 development as an example of how to involve user and regulatory stakeholders early and the benefits that result.

      1. Brett Avatar

        LT_DT – Yeah they spent a fair bit of time talking about how important it is to engage with the users. They’ve already made modifications to improve maintenance access and ease of servicing. The airline reps were very, very happy (at least publicly to us) about what it’s like to work with them. So at least they are taking that into account.

        1. NedsKid Avatar
          NedsKid

          That is great to hear on the level of thought beyond just the aircraft design itself that has gone into it. I’m sure much smarter people than I are well into the thought on how things like different turning radius, sight lines, etc., will play into airfield geometry. Envisioning something of a completely new design type in a familiar environment is always the tough part for most people.

  6. 1990 Avatar
    1990

    Boring is good. Moving from AIR-600 to AIR-500 is a good sign for them, too. Refreshing to see an aerospace startup just focus on the engineering and not the fluff/flash/hype (like Boom, which, didn’t they give-up on the engine, and pretend to be doing AI data centers now? Buncha jokers.)

    1. Common Sense Avatar
      Common Sense

      You know, you could just take a second to actually read what they write and not just take cheap shots at them. I don’t see you trying to develop your own supersonic engine.

      1. 1990 Avatar
        1990

        Common Sense, I recall you’re one of the few folks that seems to often repeatedly, consistently defend Boom, whenever they come up. Are you involved, directly or indirectly, investor, etc., or just merely a fan of supersonic aviation (as am I)? I just wish it was less hype, more reality.

        1. Common Sense Avatar
          Common Sense

          That is just to you in response to constantly denigrating them without taking the time to actually read up on their progress.

          I don’t currently have the kind of money to be a VC investor lol.

    2. Brett Avatar

      1990 – I’m with you on this. It’s not a cheap shot at Boom. They are trying to do something much, much harder and I believe have less ability to make it happen.

      1. 1990 Avatar
        1990

        I missed out on the Concorde era, so I’d love to see supersonic flight return. The FAA’s very recent move to a 0.11 psf overpressure standard is a helpful step. But, realistically, managing atmospheric volatility to maintain that ‘thump’ (not ‘boom’), and the heightened environmental sensitivity of stratospheric flight, the engineering hurdles are a real bottleneck. That said, mid-2030s would be nice.

        1. Brett Avatar

          1990 – I can’t imagine they’ll carry passengers by then. Boom doesn’t have an engine. This is going to take years and billions of dollars. If someone figures it out, it’ll be whoever buys Boom’s assets after they go bankrupt some day. I’m with you on wanting to see it return, but I’m not convinced it’ll ever happen. We might just skip ahead to going into space or skipping off the atmosphere by the time they figure this out.

          1. 1990 Avatar
            1990

            That would be wild. (Sorry, 1990, we can’t get you a new Concorde… best we can do is.. make you an astronaut, sorta.) Probably a lot better ways to spend a few billion dollars, but I guess that’s above my pay grade.

  7. John G Avatar
    John G

    Something a bit off here. When you spend a bunch of money bringing the media in (flying them out to Mojave no less), wouldn’t you want photos and other stuff out there?

    Pics and videos are all of it in 2026.

    Seems like they missed an opportunity. One would at this stage of development positive publicity would be far more important than secrecy. Unless something of the secrecy is for the military.

    1. Brett Avatar

      John G – They didn’t spend much money on bringing media in. This was a pretty small group, and it didn’t require paying for an external space. It was actually pretty cheap for them in the scheme of things, I’d say. But photos, yeah, manufacturers are just a lot more protective about this stuff, especially when they have government contracts. Meanwhile, Scaled Composites is VERY locked down. There was an airplane out front that they allowed us to look at but would tell us absolutely nothing about. It was wild.

      Basically, I think JetZero wanted to give an update to media to show that things are still happening and relatively quickly. But ultimately they are already engaged with the airlines so they just need to get more investors interested. Photos probably don’t matter in either of those cases, because they can just bring them out to see it for themselves. They really don’t care about rallying the general public with photos.

  8. John G Avatar
    John G

    Side note for Brett: maybe 15 years ago my (now ex) wife bought me a SuperCar challenge package…they closed Mojave’s runway for a few hours and we got to drive souped cars on it.

    They had a washed up F1 driver with you. You would drive the length of the runway, then turn and floor it. They would tell you…off the gas…brake…brake hard.

    I got a Lambo to 205 mph on that day. Gave me some plaque for breaking 200. What a blast.

  9. Oliver Avatar
    Oliver

    Is their plan to actually become a full-fledged commercial aircraft manufacturer with all that it takes (e.g., global support), or is their (secret) plan to ultimately sell this/themselves to Boeing as their NMA solution?

    No matter what, though, it is exciting to see someone make progress on something that isn’t just another slightly modified 1950s or 1970s aluminum tube.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Oliver – Beats me. But I know I would love to make this work and sell for a ton of money to a big boy if I owned shares! But you can never count on that, so you have to plan on making this a standalone thing.

  10. Reader Avatar
    Reader

    Just curious since you were highlighting it: is it normal for company media days to forbid any photography like this, or are companies usually not this strict about it? I imagine that stuff like factory tours do tend to have restrictions, but the way you talked about it suggests this was quite unusual even for you, even for companies that tend to work in stealth or otherwise are keeping progress secret.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Reader – I don’t really do a lot of aerospace media days, but I get the feeling it’s pretty normal for them. It would be very abnormal for airlines to do it that way.

  11. John G Avatar
    John G

    Thanks for this one Brett. Just wanted to give you props for continuing to come up with different and interesting content. Not as easy as a lot of folks think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.