Avelo’s McKinney Plans Materialize


Avelo has made it clear that its newfound focus is on alternate airports in areas with good-sized population, and so far it has found New Haven, Lakeland (FL), Concord (NC), and Wilmington (DE). We had already learned number five would be McKinney (TX), and now schedules are loaded.

For those who don’t know how the Metroplex is structured, You have Fort Worth to the west and Dallas to the east. When it opened, Dallas/Fort Worth was planted in the middle as an airport to serve the whole region. This was supposed to shut down commercial service at all other airports in the area, but we all know the story of Southwest and Love Field.

So, DFW became the big monster in the middle while Love Field in Dallas remained a regional operation limited, at least on larger aircraft, to flights within Texas or surrounding states. Over time those restrictions went away. The only remaining restrictions are not having a customs/immigration facility and on the total number of gates, which keeps it small and limited almost entirely to Southwest. Some of the final other restrictions have now expired.

Over time, some airlines have occasionally tried to make a go of service in Fort Worth, but it never lasted. Mesa ran flights from Meacham (FTW) to Houston/Hobby in 1997 for a couple of months. I don’t think anyone has ever tried Alliance (AFW), though it is was home to an American Airlines maintenance base.

Over time, the Metroplex has grown, as Metroplexes do… and the bulk of that growth has gone north and east. While Fort Worth may have some attractiveness to someone, it’s the wrong direction compared to where the growth is. And so steps in McKinney. The only problem? Well, see that green dot for yourself…

That’s right. Godzilla opened up a human bbq joint right between those northeastern ‘burbs and the main airports, so it’s been a real problem for residents there. After all, those town are growing fast in that direction. In 2000, McKinney had fewer than 55,000 residents. That’s approaching 250,000 today. And that’s just McKinney itself. Collin County in total has risen from just shy of 500,000 people in 2000 to about 1.3 million today. Median household income in the county has risen from $77,000 in 2000 to about $125,000 in 2024.

In short, you have a large and growing population with some money to spend and a long, perilous drive to the nearest airports. And by “long,” I mean half an hour with no traffic… which means more than half an hour but not actually all that long for someone like me who lives in the LA area.

So, McKinney decided it wanted an airport terminal. Voters shot down a bond measure in 2023, but the city decided to budget for it. And now it’s getting ready to open. Avelo was the first one to take the bait. It will start service on November 11 with B737-800s as follows:

  • Fort Lauderdale and Orlando (Monday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday)
  • Fort Myers (Wednesday, Saturday)
  • Las Vegas and Tampa (Monday, Thursday, Friday, Sunday)

Yes, this is Avelo, so it is not flying every day on any of these, at least not to start. And Avelo is virtually unknown in the Metroplex, only having a twice weekly flight from New Haven to DFW today. Undoubtedly this is going to come with a lot of marketing money from McKinney and presumably a whole host of other incentives to be the first one in the door. Awareness and then changing behavior will be the biggest challenge.

This market does fit Avelo’s modus operandi well, but it’s just unclear if this will be enough to work. While there are similarities to what Avelo is doing in New Haven — closer to a wealthy population center where Avelo is the dominant airline — there are also real differences.

For example, from Bridgeport in Connecticut, you have to drive an hour in no traffic to get to the nearest big airport while New Haven is only 25 minutes. Traffic to the New York airports can be nightmarish with Google saying a Monday morning could be over 2 hours. From McKinney, DFW tops out at 45 minutes on a Monday morning commute.

You also don’t have the same kind of systemic delays as you do in places like JFK and LaGuardia. Sure, you get storms rolling through, but that’s different than just general congestion. It doesn’t feel like as much of a hassle when you’re looking to book a flight.

Then there’s the issue of flight frequency. People who want to go to Fort Myers will either have to take one of the twice weekly flights in each direction or they can fly American 4-5x daily. Orlando? Sure, Avelo has 5x weekly, but during peak times, American has more than 10x daily, Southwest has 8x daily, and even Frontier runs a couple daily. FRONTIER. Frequency matters.

That’s not to say this won’t work for Avelo. It clearly has looked for some of the biggest leisure markets. Though my regular data source doesn’t have the full DOT data which now includes segmenting by advance purchase, Courtney at Visual Approach keeps his own database and pulled this for me.

Dallas Metroplex % of Nonstop Tickets Purchased > 90 days in Advance

DOT O&D Data via Visual Approach, markets include all DAL/DFW > 150 PDEW in Q1 2026

What you’re looking at in the chart took all markets with more than 150 daily passengers each way in Q1 2026 and then ranked them by the percent of nonstop tickets purchased more than 90 days in advance. Tickets purchased that far out are almost entirely going to be for leisure travel, so a high percentage suggests it’s a leisure market.

As you can see, the purple markets are the new options from McKinney that Avelo will fly. San Juan probably isn’t on Avelo’s initial list because of how far it is. Miami is expensive, and Salt Lake, well, that might be an opportunity at some point but that is probably more about visiting friends and relatives and less about pure leisure vacationing. The ones Avelo chose are just big vacation markets.

As mentioned, it’s not clear to me whether these will work since we’ve never seen service in McKinney before. But there are a lot of people there, and they would probably really appreciate a shorter, less painful drive to start their family vacation if they can get it. Then again, if they don’t earn those AAdvantage miles or Rapid Rewards points, will those people survive?

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

61 responses to “Avelo’s McKinney Plans Materialize”

  1. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    No mention of GSW, that was just to the south of where DFW sits? Only a tiny sliver of one of the runways still remains.

    Also. Why do Phallus and Ft Worthless hate each other anyway?

    And we need someone to try and pump some life into VIS (Visalia, CA).

    1. Kenneth Avatar
      Kenneth

      I grew up in Dallas and visited Hawaii more than I did Fort Worth. Even in the 80s there wasn’t a lot of crossover, and now with traffic, there’s no great appeal in visiting one bland and cultureless city devoid of trees rather than staying in your own. Not so much hate as just a gap.

  2. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    This will an interesting one to watch. Having lived in the DFW area for over 20 years before leaving in 2019, I bet Avelo will do well and ultimately, more carriers may add service (DL to ATL, SLC?)

    Two additional points to consider. 1. Though it is only 45 minutes to DFW, there’s also the expense of parking and complexity of navigating the airport vs. the simplicity of McKinney’s terminal. A quick and inexpensive Uber/Lyft from homes in the area to McKinney airport vs to DFW or Love is a nice option. 2. There’s also the north and east Texas catchment area to consider. Denison and Sherman to the north and Greenville, Sulphur Springs and Mt. Pleasant along I30 to the east collectively add over another 100K residents.

  3. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    This is probably all WN needs to cement its plans to fly from Mckinney.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Sounds like all the little airports between Orlando, Tampa & Fort Myers as they have a few commercial flights a week between them Vs the big guys.

    2. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      I’d definitely put money against that happening in the next 5-10 years

  4. Desert Ghost Avatar
    Desert Ghost

    Where would Cranky Flier be without Godzilla?

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Oh, I don’t know… Tokyo?

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        Yes but HND or NRT? I haven’t seen that graphic in such a long time I forgot which one Godzilla blocked!

        1. Oliver Avatar
          Oliver

          NRT. That’s why everyone wants to fly to HND instead.

      2. Benjy Avatar
        Benjy

        The Godzilla drought is over!!

        1. Keith Avatar
          Keith

          And he opened his first Japanese BBQ restaurant over here! After 250 years, the US gets Godzilla!!

          1. Kilroy Avatar
            Kilroy

            I’m surprised there wasn’t a 7-Eleven joke with Godzilla, since the convenience store chain was started in the DFW area, before the chain became big in Japan and its parent company was (IIRC) bought by the Japanese.

  5. Chris from Plano Avatar
    Chris from Plano

    Cranky,
    First thank you for having Godzilla visit us. It’s been a long time! Second, what is the potential expandability of McKinney? I have a hunch that more airlines will put some flights down there.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Chris – I don’t imagine expansion would be tough if demand warranted. There seems to be plenty of room, though I don’t know who owns what land. I’m sure that’d be a problem they’d be thrilled to have to face.

  6. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    Avelo will probably do something similar once the passenger terminal opens at Manassas (HEF), freshly renamed “Washington Manassas Airport” despite being 40 miles from the nearest point of Washington DC. Speaking of names that need to be changed, they really need to look into that airport code!

    Seems like these other airports are just throwing spaghetti at different walls but maybe that’s their best alternative right now? I’m interested but I certainly won’t be a passenger.

    1. MNG Avatar
      MNG

      The main runway at HEF is only 100 feet wide versus the standard 150-foot runway width at airports served by Part 121 carriers. That may be a problem from the standpoint of FAA approval.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        Ft Collins (CO) has hosted commercial jet traffic with a 100 ft wide runway.

        What caused Allegiant to pull back, as I understand it, was lack of a staffed tower, not the width of the runway.

        1. Bill from DC Avatar
          Bill from DC

          Interesting comments from each of you, was not aware of these things.

          I know common sense is all too rare nowadays but l would think such issues (FAA approval, tower staffing) would be addressed prior to building a passenger terminal, right?!

  7. Grassy Noll Leon Avatar
    Grassy Noll Leon

    CF,
    Won’t the McKinney ATC STARs and SIDs interfere with traffic at DAL. And reliever airports such as Addison Airport, etc?

    1. Randy Avatar
      Randy

      They are already in place. There shouldn’t be any new ones that will need to be developed.

      1. Chris from Plano Avatar
        Chris from Plano

        Will there be a staffed tower?

        1. John G Avatar
          John G

          There already is. TKI is a pretty busy field with students and general.

  8. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
    O’Hare Is My Second Home

    when I’m looking for an airline, to quote Billy Bragg via Kirsty MacColl, I’m not looking for (a) New England. XP, MX, and especially B6 can all go pound salt. I’ve got AA (and my ExP status) at DFW to take me home. I’ve got WN at DAL to take me to the neighborhood I grew up in. I don’t need garbage Least Coast airlines flying out of a newbie airport.

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      I don’t get the anger. It’s like you want an exorcism.

    2. SandyCreek Avatar
      SandyCreek

      You may well not ever see the utility of DTX, and that is perfectly fair, given your needs and preferences; however, those closer to McKinney may well find the appeal of proximity and convenience worthwhile.

      Also, unrelated, but why “go pound salt” for B6? Granted their primary service area doesn’t include Texas, but I’ve flown AUS-JFK on it when I was based in Austin and a few more times since moving to NYC, and their service level has been overall satisfactory relative to their size.

  9. bruce c Avatar
    bruce c

    Sounds like a Breeze airport just waiting to happen.

  10. MarylandDavid Avatar
    MarylandDavid

    My first thought was why Avelo? As others have noted, this seems tailor made for Breeze.

    1. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
      O’Hare Is My Second Home

      Not evil enough yet for Neelzebub and his flaming garbage bag full of dog waste of an airline.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        I’m unconvinced about Breeze as a long-term thing, but I have no idea where this kind of vituperation comes from.

        1. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
          O’Hare Is My Second Home

          My hatred for Noo Yawk. See above.

          1. Common Sense Avatar
            Common Sense

            That’s a whole lot of people to hate.

  11. Dolphin Avatar
    Dolphin

    Interesting that they haven’t moved their existing HVN-DFW service over to DTX. I guess for now they think people in CT haven’t heard of McKinney, but it wouldn’t surprise me if they move down the line to consolidate ops, lower op costs, easier to move planes between bases etc.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Dolphin – Wouldn’t make sense. McKinney is an origin to serve the surrounding community. DFW is a destination to serve those in the New Haven area. It’s the same reason why the McKinney flight goes to Orlando and Tampa and not Lakeland.

      1. Bevvy Avatar
        Bevvy

        CF, Can you please explain in more detail. Us inexperienced flyers are having trouble with the explanation. Thank you

        1. Brett Avatar

          Bevvy – Avelo is all about serving the origin market in its bases. The people of New Haven don’t want to go to McKinney, they want to go to Dallas or Fort Worth. The people in McKinney don’t want to go to Lakeland. They want to go to Orlando or Tampa. Trying to connect two secondary airports wouldn’t really work when it’s supposed to be all about convenience for those who live in the origin markets.

  12. Jim Douglas Avatar
    Jim Douglas

    As a leisure traveler that lives West of the DFW metro area, but uses it as well as smaller regional airports I looked at my flights over the next year to see if it made sense as an alternative. The slight advantage would be using Highway 180 vs multiple turns and traffic crossing the metro area.
    1)I have West Coast US & Canada destinations but there are no direct flights so have eliminated these.
    2 I have Europe flights but lack of customs or routing through New York with customs/frequent connections eliminates these. Due to flight length and time zones there must be early morning and evening flights, such as DFW has, for this to work.
    3. I have Mexico flights, but lack of customs eliminates these.
    4. I have a Puerto Rico flight but lack of a direct flight eliminates this.
    5. I fly to FFL or Orlando once a year, and do have a trip planned to Orlando, so that would be the only possibility. It would be based on overall cost. I have free baggage on most of the major airlines. I understand this airline charges for carry on and checked luggage. At DFW I’ve been able to get some terrific hotel packages. For example I just returned to DFW from a 2 1/2 week Mexico trip and a night at a Best Western, parking for that period, and 24 hour shuttle cost under $100. No mention was made of parking cost, hotels near the new airport but if I were to consider it for flights I would need to see if they were still cost competitive after taking the above mentioned expenses into consideration. I just wanted to give some input from the viewpoint of non DFW area residents.

  13. Exit Row Seat Avatar
    Exit Row Seat

    Is this no different than:
    – St Pete – Clearwater (PTE) as the alternate to the Tampa area
    – Orlando Sanford (SFB) as the alternate to the Orlando area
    – Fort Lauderdale (FLL) was the back water of the Miami area
    – Midway (MDW) fell to second tier in the Chicago area

    All of the above survived and thrived because airlines and airport authorities were persistent in nurturing these facilities. Time and patience proved them correct. Unfortunately, the 90 day MBA mindset drives most airlines today; if we don’t have an immediate 500% return, we run like scared cats!!

    The best thing for McKinney (DTX) would be another airline or two besides Avelo. This would put the airport on the Metroplex radar scope as a valid option. The biggest issue is patience. Got to have more than the 10 day mentality (looking at you Breeze). This would involve social media, radio talk show visits, give aways, text and e-mail campaigns, local news coverage, even an ad in the local newspapers (yes, people still read them). Got to work the crowd.

    1. Exit Row Seat Avatar
      Exit Row Seat

      Just a follow up to above:
      With Spirit out of the picture at DFW, McKinney looks even better as an alternative.
      DTX could morph into the (U)LCC airport of the Metroplex just like London Stansted Airport.
      And no, I don’t consider WN to be LCC any more; their fares are no better than the Big Three.

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      Those are four airports that are all quite different from one another – even SFB is quite different from PIE.

      PIE, SFB, FLL – those are destination airports. DTX, to start with at least, will live or die based on origin traffic. So of the ones you mention, MDW is the most similar, though not very.

    3. Anthony Avatar
      Anthony

      It’s PIE, not PTE

  14. Alex Hill Avatar
    Alex Hill

    Doesn’t Salt Lake (SLC) have a significant amount of ski traffic in addition to VFR? On the surface, that would make it a good candidate for seasonal less-than-daily service.

    But of course the other reason for Avelo to avoid it is direct competition with a fortress hub. Another way to look at their destination choice is going for the top four continental US leisure destinations by this advance purchase metric which are not fortress hubs of competing airlines.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Alex – It does indeed, though I’m not sure how many go there from Texas when Colorado is closer. I feel like Park City and all that is more popular from the west where it’s closer and easier, but as someone who doesn’t ski… I might not actually know what I’m talking about.

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        If you could choose straight out, Colorado or Utah to ski? 99.9% would choose CO, and it’s a lot closer to Texas.

      2. Alex Hill Avatar
        Alex Hill

        I live near Kelowna (but don’t ski downhill either). I’ve been on a SEA-YLW flight with a seatmate who lives in Boulder and was flying to Kelowna to ski up here, so people do crazier things than fly from Texas to Utah to ski!

        I’d think the travel time by air from the Metroplex to Colorado is very similar to the time from the Metroplex to Utah. The block time on DFW-DEN is a whopping 40 minutes less than DFW-SLC. Not being a skier I have no idea how long it takes to get from the airports to the ski hills, but it seems likely that that would matter a lot more than the increased distance from Texas if you’re flying.

        1. John G Avatar
          John G

          It’s not so much the distance, just the quality of the skiing.

          Plus most Texans usually drive to CO anyway.

        2. Anthony Avatar
          Anthony

          DEN to the closest ski areas (Keystone, Breckenridge) is 2+ hours on a sketchy, icy section of I-70 which closes unpredictably in heavy snow. Aspen is closer to 4 hours.
          Park City, Brighton, Snowbird, Alta ski areas are about 45 minutes from SLC on a much less sketchy section of I-80

    2. Anthony Avatar
      Anthony

      Look at baggage claim at any airport for any arrival from SLC in the winter, and it will be full of ski bags.

  15. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    The advantages of HVN are overwhelming and Avelo has a near monopoly over it. So whatever business model Avelo has, it can make work at HVN. I think Avelo’s business model is not the right one to maximize the potential of DTX. To be clear, the Avelo business model isn’t remotely the one that best leverages HVN either, but it mostly doesn’t matter – they can be whatever they wannabe and it still works at HVN. That’s not true at DTX.

    Right now, as I write this, DTX to DFW is a 34 minute drive (41 minutes to DAL), whereas from HVN to LGA is two hours. So clearly the convenience aspect of HVN is far far greater than for DTX.

    Now, that doesn’t take into account the tolls, the extra hassle about getting thru the airport itself – DFW is a big unwieldy airport where even just parking is a big fricking deal (DAL much less so). But the point still remains.

    So on the one hand Avelo has price to offer, but on the other, the scheduling advantages of DAL and DFW are overwhelming, so is the greater choice. And the drive to DFW/DAL is not onerous.

    An airport like DTX is worth the most to someone whose time is most valuable, who lives/works near McKinney (or at least McKinney is between them and DFW/DAL) and can save most of an hour and suffer a lot less hassle from a DTX… BUT ONLY if the schedules at DTX are good. Someone looking to drive to a nearby airport, park, walk into a nearby terminal, go straight to the gate, etc, and maybe save an entire hour out of their day (between the drive, the ease of parking, ease of going to the gate, etc) vs going to DFW.

    When someone who has super valuable time can save a whole hour out of their day, that starts to become compelling. Oh, I can leave home an entire hour later and still get to where I am going on a convenient schedule? Sign me up. I can bill a client for a whole additional hour, I can see my kid’s event, etc

    The model for how to leverage the convenience of nearby airports was shown brilliantly by Southwest back in the day – and not only did Southwest have great prices, but they would come into an airport like DTX with a lot of frequency. Think about their entrance into OAK in the late 1980s. Or to go back to the OG Southwest, their entrance into DAL in 1971, where they flew the **** out of the market in terms of frequency to attract those 1970s Dallas business folk (with their wide lapels, cowboy boots, cigarettes, booze, etc – can you imagine what those flights smelled like?). They had like a dozen flights from DAL to (initially, before the switch to HOU) IAH.

    Maybe I’ll be wrong, but I think success of this version of Avelo at DTX is far from assured relative to HVN. If you want success at DTX, you need something that leans on convenience hard, where the whole experience at DTX is thought through to minimize hassle – how can we ensure that people get from the car to the gate in less than a half hour. That kind of thinking. And has the frequencies to match it.

    1. John G Avatar
      John G

      You hit on the problem. Avelo generally caters to people who don’t travel often. These are people who will show up at the gate 3 or 4 hours out from boarding.

      The whole quick convenience thought fails there. Quickly through the airport is not part of the intent of the average Avelo flier.

    2. Michael B Avatar
      Michael B

      A big problem with HVN is it’s 5600 foot runway which is barely adequate for the 737-700 and even tighter in the -800. With Avelo’s high density configuration, any contamination on the runway makes it almost impossible to carry much weight in or out. I fly to Burbank on the -800 and it’s tight but we can at least take off on the longer runway 15. Because it doesn’t rain that much in Burbank and doesn’t snow, operations run fairly well. At HVN, any weather must be a nightmare for a small airline like Avelo. I would imagine Florida is about the limit for HVN. Not sure how they make DFW work performance wise. The new E2’s will help with the runway issue but will the airline be around to actually fly the aircraft?

  16. George Romey Avatar
    George Romey

    Ok it might be a godsend to residents in that local FTW area wanting to go where Avelo goes. But DFW has a train. A plethora of daily weekly direct flights. Somewhat the same for Southwest at DAL for direct flights.

    Sure, Avelo can fill a plane full of $49 fares as they descend into bankruptcy and go join Spirit, Sky Bus, Independence Air and many others as a what might have been.

    1. Kilroy Avatar
      Kilroy

      For those being picked up or dropped off at the curb, DFW is convenient to get to the gates, as it was laid out during the “minimize distance from curb to gate” era when airport security was an afterthought. Get dropped off at the curb and see a long line at the security checkpoint? Walk 5 minutes and go through another security checkpoint in the same terminal.

      For those parking at the airport, DFW is (often) not very convenient, especially for those parking in the economy lots or those returning to a terminal away from the one that they parked near & departed out of. When I lived in Dallas over 15 years ago, a driver for one of the DFW airport shuttles (the ones that take people between the terminals and the on-airport parking) told me that even AFTER the drivers already had their commercial driver’s licenses and had proven that they could drive the bus safely, the training just to navigate the airport was 1 or 3 months long (I forget which)… Seriously.

  17. Peaver Avatar
    Peaver

    Any chance that JSX might go there?

  18. Jason Avatar
    Jason

    American and Southwest are very territorial. WN is maxed out on gate space at DAL they can easily shift like 2 AUS,2 BNA and 1 MCO flights from DAL to DTX to tank Avelo hopes while appealing to their MetroPlex customers base offering a new 2nd alternative in Dallas.
    Plus that would open up gate time at DAL so they can add more lucrative longer haul flights from DAL while still keeping the connectivity for its customers base via the other Hubs.
    WN has long been saying they want to add DFW service but seeing how unsuccessful they were at IAH & ORD makes me think since NK demise DFW has ample open gate space. But WN big talk didn’t pounce on the opportunity So the DFW plan may have been indefinitely scrapped and DTX may be pending once the official announcement of the certification of the MAX7 happens in the coming weeks.
    Avelo will not be alone at DTX the airport officials have confirmed another airline has committed its to serving the airport but is not ready to go public just yet.
    My guess it’s either gonna be WN, AA or UA jumping into the DTX party.

  19. 1990 Avatar
    1990

    Just sayin’… they should probably re-brand… more than half the country won’t fly them, even if it’s free, after what they did with ICE…

    1. stogieguy7@gmail.com Avatar
      stogieguy7@gmail.com

      Few care about that – especially not in the Dallas suburbs. Moving on…..

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        I think when people realize exactly what you (don’t) get with Avelo that will hurt them a lot more than the history with ICE.

        Collin County is not some dead red place…it’s pretty much 50-50 pink/light blue. But people here don’t carry a grudge due to the ICE thing.

        It’s Avelo itself. It’s twice a week to some leisure destination with zero service. No drink service, no snacks. And at DTX there aren’t likely to be much food choices after security.

        Will people go to DTX solely for the convenience? Hmm. No service, cramped old planes, going out of some little off the grid airfield way northeast?

        To places that there are already tons of seats to.

        Flights and seats, today, fromDFW/DAL

        FLL 10 flights 1800 seats
        MCO 21 flights 3700 seats
        TPA 12 flights 2100 seats
        RSW 4 flights 700 seats
        LAS 19 flgihts 3400 seats

        That’s just today.

        For next week, there are 157 nonstop flights from DAL/DFW to Orlando, with just less than 20,000 seats available.

        I have my doubts that this will work. A cheap cheap with zero service airline in a little bitty airport that isn’t any easier to get to for most folks…to destinations that have thousands of seats every day from better airlines and better airports. HVN this is not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.