Hawaiian Leans Toward the B737 for Interisland


The Air Current reported last week after Jon Ostrower talked to new Alaska/Hawaiian President Shane Tackett that the airline is likely leaning toward the B737-800 as a replacement for the B717 for interisland flying when the time comes to replace that airplane. This has always been the most likely option, though it does create some challenges.

But first, let’s forget about those challenges and bask in the glow of AI. Gemini put this bad boy together for me.

Sure, it’s not perfect. The flower in Pualani’s hair looks rather suspect, but come on, still fun to envision this in the 1980s-era livery. Not feeling it? Ok, let’s update it with the airline’s current look.

That looks great on this airplane. But enough fluff, let’s talk about what really matters here. This is going to be a change in how Hawaiian operates.

Today, the B717 has 8 seats up front and 120 in coach. These airplanes work very hard. With a fleet of 18, Hawaiian puts together a schedule with up to about 150 daily departures within the islands. Yes, that’s more than 8 flights per aircraft per day on those peak days, and often not every airplane is flying. (Two of them haven’t flown in a couple months.)

These airplanes are uniquely good at doing this work. The old Douglas-designed airplanes are tanks that could technically fly forever, and the unique Rolls/BMW jointly-designed engines are excellent at quick turnarounds. For newer engines, that isn’t the case. They take longer to spool up and cool down, and there needs to be more time in between flights. The B717 is just the ultimate rock star in this very specific use case.

But alas, that airplane hasn’t been built in 20 years, and while they can keep these going for a few more years, the end is near. Of the 156 B717 aircraft built between 1998 and 2006, 95 are still active. Hawaiian has 18 while Delta has 77. That’s it. Now, could Hawaiian try to acquire some airframes from Delta to extend the life? Yeah, since those Delta airframes undoubtedly have fewer cycles than the Hawaiian ones do. But that would just be a bandage. The airline will need a replacement sometime, so it might as well rip that bandage off when its current fleet hits its limits.

Now, the B737-800 is a much bigger airplane. Today, Alaska has 16 seats up front, 30 in premium class, and 115 in the back for a total of 161 on its retrofitted airplanes. It has just shy of 60 airplanes in the fleet built between 2005 and 2012. These aren’t spring chickens, but they certainly do not have the huge number of cycles that the Hawaiian B717s have. This feels like it would be an interim replacement instead of a long-term solution, but maybe that’s ok. After all, Alaska already has these airplanes, and it is rapidly taking delivery of new MAX aircraft. These airplanes will be easy enough to slide into the interisland market by the time the B717s are done.

But how exactly will Alaska do this? Will it follow the Southwest model of flowing airplanes from the mainland? Or will it use a dedicated fleet as it does with the B717 today? Shane has opinions on this as well.

They’ll be branded Hawaiian, they’ll be based in the islands. It could take us five years to get there, but that would be my expectation.

Well I’m not surprised they would be branded Hawaiian, of course. And based in the islands? Yes, that makes sense as well. But this doesn’t tell us whether or not the airplanes will ever leave the islands. Several things will probably go into that decision.

Most importantly, what does Hawaiian want to do with that interior? The flights within the islands are very, very short with no flight taking more than 45 minutes in the air. They do need a small first class cabin, but they don’t need a lot of extra legroom seats. They also can go with lower pitch in regular coach. From that perspective, it would make a lot of sense to outfit these airplanes in a dense configuration that would work better in the interisland market.

On the other hand, does Hawaiian really need more than 161 seats when it has far less today? Flight frequency is really important in the islands. There might be an opportunity to trim some flying but with no other option to get between cities, frequency can’t go dramatically lower. So maybe Hawaiian would be ok keeping airplanes in a more generous configuration. If they did that, they could rotate them to mainland destinations as well.

That might be nice to have a smaller airplane then the current Hawaiian A321neo fleet going to the mainland, but there is a downside. These are older airplanes, and they don’t have the legs of the MAX fleet which can handle this with ease. Yes, the -800s fly to the islands today, but as they age even more, this is likely going to become less attractive. Maintenance will also be an issue on aging aircraft, but you’d want a small airplane like this to go to an outstation like Burbank, not a hub where maintenance is easier.

To really understand this better, I have been looking at the way Southwest routes its airplanes between the mainland and the the interisland market. I’ll look at that tomorrow. But suffice it to say that I’m skeptical these airplanes would leave the islands once they get that Hawaiian coat of paint on them.

That, of course, is if this actually comes to fruition. Shane was clear this was not a done deal.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

84 responses to “Hawaiian Leans Toward the B737 for Interisland”

  1. 1990 Avatar
    1990

    2-3 seat configuration is nice for couples and families, alike. a220 would’ve been a good replacement, had the P&W fiasco not occurred. As long as Hawaiian keeps providing those tasty little guava juices, 738 is just fine for a +1 hour island-hopper between Oahu and Maui or Kauai or Kona.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      But, but, but, do they serve steak or fish on those flights?

      1. Matt D Avatar
        Matt D

        Lasagne

        IYKYK

      2. 1990 Avatar
        1990

        Yes, yes, I remember. I had lasagna.

        1. Bill from DC Avatar
          Bill from DC

          I just wanted to wish you both good luck. We’re all counting on you.

    2. Jeffrey Magnet Avatar
      Jeffrey Magnet

      What about the Max -7?

      1. 1990 Avatar
        1990

        It’s been so delayed. I thought MAX 7 is still waiting FAA certification (engine anti-ice issues; so, maybe operating by 2027?) *sigh*

    3. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
      O’Hare Is My Second Home

      2-3 is garbage and should die with the last 717s (Boeing aircraft do not get a B in front of their numbers). Why is it garbage? Who has the biggest quantity of aircraft with 2-3 layouts? The most evil, disgusting airline in the world.

      1. 1990 Avatar
        1990

        Are you whining about Delta, jetBlue, or both, like usual?

        1. Anthony Avatar
          Anthony

          I hope he tells us the story of how he got fired from JetBlue someday.

          1. 1990 Avatar
            1990

            Oooh lala. Had no idea. O’Hare… O’Hare…. do tell!

  2. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    CF, What about the A220. A better airplane than the antiquated 737 and a favorite of many flyers (including me).

    1. LT_DT Avatar
      LT_DT

      I was also wondering about the A220. Or maybe the E2. Although if they’re equipped with GTF engines, I think those require longer warm-up times which wouldn’t be great in this type of operation.

      1. 1990 Avatar
        1990

        It’s not just that; it’s the whole P&W (contaminated powdered metal) debacle. It’s been a nightmare for airlines like B6 and Swiss. Delta’s been handling it better, but it’s still a lingering supply-chain issue for the engines.

    2. Hov Avatar
      Hov

      I’m curious how much of the decision between 737 vs A220 is cargo capacity? Lots of cargo flying inter island?

      1. Angus Parnell Avatar
        Angus Parnell

        A220 is 28 sm compared to the E2 21sm

    3. Brett Avatar

      LT_DT has it right. The engines are worse for quick turns, no better than a 737 MAX. So why bother getting a new fleet type just for this narrow purpose when it adds no value? The 2-3 seating doesn’t matter. These are short flights. Nobody cares. There is value in having fleet commonality here, especially when it comes to building flying lines for crews.

      And cargo capacity is going to be fine on any of these airplanes, shouldn’t be a problem.

    4. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
      O’Hare Is My Second Home

      Death to Franco-Canadian Spaghetti-Os.

      1. stormcrash Avatar
        stormcrash

        How boorish

  3. stogieinmypocket Avatar
    stogieinmypocket

    The 737 isn’t the right airplane for the high-frequency, streneous operation that inter-island flying is. Yes the 717 is ideally suited, and a workhorse, but they are aging, and their cycles are up there even with meticulous maintenance. The market needs a frame with 2-3 seating, quick boarding and deplaning. The E195 or the A220 feel like the obvious choice here, or maybe even the E-175.

    1. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
      O’Hare Is My Second Home

      You cite 2-3 seating in your requirements, yet your examples include the superior E195-E2 and the hopefully-will-be-produced E175, both of which are 2-2 and as said superior because of it. 2-3 must die.

  4. Arubaman Avatar
    Arubaman

    Are all Alaska B-737-800NG aircraft ETOPS-equipped? I seem to remember that Southwest has a subset of -800NG ETOPS aircraft (29ish hulls?) they used in the beginning of their Hawaii service before the MAX-8 came online. And, of course, during the MAX-8 grounding. If an NG burns 14% more fuel than a MAX, that must have killed them.

  5. Jeffrey Magnet Avatar
    Jeffrey Magnet

    Have they considered the Max -7?

    1. Southside Emil Avatar
      Southside Emil

      Why consider Boeing at all? Boeing’s dug a deep self-inflicted hole. The two 737 MAX crashes in 2018–19 (346 deaths, the January 2024 Alaska Airlines door-plug blowout exposed a manufacturing culture problem, not just a one-off defect. The FAA’s audit showed that Boeing failed 33 of 89 product audits with 97 instances of alleged noncompliance. That’s a quality system that wasn’t catching its own mistakes.

      1. Big Mike Avatar
        Big Mike

        The A220 has not experienced the quality problems that affect the Boeing 737 MAX. The A220 has a strong safety record and now about 99% operational reliability.

        And the MAX 7 variant that would actually compete with the A220 isn’t even certified yet!

    2. Brett Avatar

      Jeffrey – Any MAX has those same problems as any other MAX, the engines just aren’t built for this kind of work

  6. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    Southwest is the winner in this decision. They added 737s to the intra-Hawaii market and HA had an advantage because of more frequent flights. HA/AS will have to pull back some flights which will give WN better schedule share.

    the 737 eliminates the 717 pilot category and parts supply which helps AS get costs down.

    DL is apparently moving to start retiring the 717 as frames come up for overhauls so their fleet will shrink. WIth a larger fleet and many more fleet types, they will also benefit from getting rid of the 717 and using existing types.

    The DC9 contributed much to global aviation but its family’s run is coming to an end.

    1. Bevvy Avatar
      Bevvy

      Delta’s A220 rock. Hopefully more are on their way.

    2. Jeffrey Magnet Avatar
      Jeffrey Magnet

      Well said. Delta is happy with their A220s.

    3. Ferd Avatar
      Ferd

      Wasn’t Delta planning on sticking the Mad Dogs in the desert a while ago? I know that many are old AirTran planes. They have to be at their end-of-life.

      1. stormcrash Avatar
        stormcrash

        The only ones left are the 171s that AirTran purchased brand new in the 2000s so not terribly old and not as in need of replacement as the high cycle Hawaiian ones, but still the writing is on the wall eventually. The 88s and 95s were retired during covid

    4. 1990 Avatar
      1990

      Huge fan of the a220 (though, some First Class passengers find the seats too narrow). Everything else is great about it, except the engine issues.

  7. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Unfortunately, the 717 is an evolutionary dead-end and so a direct drop-in replacement is something that simply doesn’t exist.

    So whatever AS/HA goes with, some compromises and trade-offs are going to have to be made.

    But I concur that the A220 might be the strongest contender. The 737 MAX’s just can’t do the frequent turn-and-burns the -300 was once able to. Otherwise my vote would go for that. If the “7” ever gets certified, which I am still not holding my breath on. But as others have said, it would be introducing another type from another manufacturer. Can’t blame them for not wanting to do that if they don’t have to.

    And as an aside, I made a few “fantasy” Southwest Airlines pictures. Too bad we can’t post pics here. You might get a chuckle out of them.

  8. RK Avatar
    RK

    The a220 is “heavy” and, although similar size to the 717, isn’t really efficient on super short stage length flights.

    The E175 could make sense but it’s too premium-heavy for that sort of market

    The AvGeek in me says BRING BACK THE Q400! Ultra efficient for short island-hopper routes, unfortunately maintenance is atrocious and Horizon no longer flies then

    Ultimately I think the right move would be Hawaiian 737s that flow through the rest of the network. Per Tim Dunn’s point you sacrifice a little on schedule frequency but some of those markets already operate like 20x daily so you’d still have a strong pattern, and with more mainland flights in the combined AS/HA network you have fewer pax that need to connect in HNL to get to the mainland

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      How about the ATR-72? Yes, it would be a new type for the Alaska group, but it seems a better choice than shoehorning in a compromise.

      1. David M Avatar

        Given a choice, many locals will choose a jet aircraft. They’ll take the prop if it’s cheaper enough, but it feels like going with a turboprop would be handing too much marketshare to Southwest. Back in the day when Hawaiian has the Dash-7, Aloha Airlines would advertise they had an all-jet fleet (since their DHC-6 Twin Otter turboprop operation was separately branded as Aloha IslandAir). Cargo capacity is also a concern with the large turboprops like the Q400 and ATR 72.

        Back when Embraer was talking about the new large “E3” turboprop and Hawaiian had an interisland monopoly, I thought the E3 sounded ideal for Hawaiian. But then Southwest started Hawaii flying, bringing back the jet vs prop issue, and then became moot when Embraer set the E3 project aside.

    2. tb Avatar
      tb

      I think the -175 really is a strong choice here. And interiors can be configured however they want. The real issue is Scope. Because they could absolutely go all Y and get as high as 88 pax in a high-density config, but as soon as you pass 76 seats it becomes a mainline airplane (or has to go through all sorts of contract wrangling – not sure what the sitch is with AS/HA/QX in this regard). And if you’re going to go to all that trouble, then why not just go to the -195 and get the benefit of a nearly 1 to 1 seat replacement. Will be fascinating to see how this plays out.

      Of course the 220 makes a ton of sense too, but given the near impossibility of getting delivery slots and the fact that the Angle Lake Squad seems to be physically allergic to buying from Airbus, I’d have to say it’s a darkhorse. But stranger things have definitely happened.

      1. Brett Avatar

        tb – Only mainline can fly these routes per the Hawaiian union contract, and I would be very surprised if they let that go.

  9. George Romey Avatar
    George Romey

    Theoretically they could turn this over to Horizon for E170/175 flying but presumably they would be an issue with the pilots that are now flying a mainline plane.

    1. Brett Avatar

      George – That’s correct, this can’t go to a regional partner.

  10. Eric R Avatar
    Eric R

    Still shocked that the old history of no island ferries is still alive. At some point if this goes the way of the dinosaur, then so will some of these flights.

    1. John G Avatar
      John G

      If you follow the logic, it makes sense why there are no ferries.

      The problem is that the distance is between the islands are too long to make a ferry, a realistic alternative. As an example, if you were going to have a ferry from Oahu to Kawai, you would have it depart from the North Shore of Oahu… But that’s still over 80 miles to Lihue.

      On a typical car ferry, that’s a five hour trip. Plus an hour to drive from Honolulu to the North Shore. Six hours each way and it wouldn’t be cheap.

      If you went with a fast ferry like the lake express ferry across Lake Michigan, you could cut that time down to about 2 1/2 hours… But the price would be pretty equivalent to flying.

      And a ferry from Honolulu to Kona would take all day. That’s 160 miles across the ocean.

      1. Eric R Avatar
        Eric R

        Right, that’s why I said some of these flights and not all of them. Some of the island hops are clearly doable by ferry.

        1. John G Avatar
          John G

          Which ones?

          On a regular ferry, Kauai is at least five hours from Honolulu probably more in total travel time.

          Maui he is going to be about five. Kona going to be at least 10 hours.

          Most enter island travel is people going to Honolulu for shopping, Dr appointments and similar things.

          Flying is not expensive relatively, and they can easily do a round-trip in a day.

          You almost can’t do a ferry round-trip in a day.

      2. Oliver Avatar
        Oliver

        Works for the Greek islands :)

        Personally I think AS should just get a few gently used A380s and do three trips each way on each route. Morning, mid day, evening. ;)

        1. Kilroy Avatar
          Kilroy

          Might as grab some extra A380s to run multiple flights per day on MKE-ORD & LAX-SAN as well, in an all-coach, max density configuration, with something like 27″ pitch. :-)

          That way, for those in the back of basic economy the combined time to board & deboard the plane would be only slightly less than the time it would take for the pax to drive between the airports without traffic. ;-)

    2. Hawaii visitor Avatar
      Hawaii visitor

      The answer is that the surf / water conditions are too rough for ferry service. It’s choppy waters and rocky beaches. There’s some limited inter island, such as Maui to Lanai, but that’s about it. Flying between the islands is a lot easier to accomplish.

      1. Oliver Avatar
        Oliver

        It worked in the days before affordable jet service.. and more recently an attempt was made…

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Superferry

  11. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    They’ll eventually supplement this with a few RJ’s to make up the scheduling difference. They already have regional capacity and a fairly easy mainline CBA to work with.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Mike – Hawaiian does not allow these to be flown by regional pilots. I can’t imagine that’s something they’ll give up in a negotiation.

      1. Oliver Avatar
        Oliver

        Didn’t they have Ohana by Hawaiian as a regional carrier on some inter island routes for a little while? ATRs if I recall correctly…

        1. Brett Avatar

          Oliver – Yes, and those were only allowed to fly to the runways that couldn’t accommodate the jets, so Kapalua, Molokai, and L?na?i. They also required mainline interisland hours to be kept at a certain level. During the pandemic, they were in violation of that so they ended up just shutting the whole ?Ohana operation down.

  12. Exit Row Seat Avatar
    Exit Row Seat

    More spare parts to keep the Delta B717 fleet flying another 20 years!! ;-)

  13. John g Avatar
    John g

    Brett or anyone else, I have a question. Back in the day, Southwest would do 10 minute turnaround. What was the difference in the engines at that time that made that feasible while it’s not now?

    I’m not talking about the number of passengers just the engines. When I read that it takes too much time to spoil them up and down… How did they do it then?

    1. GM Avatar
      GM

      It has a lot to do with modern jet engines being more efficient with tighter tolerances and being designed for flight profiles with time at altitude that allows the engine components to cool naturally in -50F air. That just doesn’t happen on a short flight. The end result is accelerated engine wear which leads to less time on the wing and higher maintenance that the old ineffective jet engines of yesteryear.

    2. Arubaman Avatar
      Arubaman

      John G……The engines on the MAX are much slower to start than NG or Classic engines. So that’s about 90 seconds to 2 minutes per engine. So that’s 3-4 minutes wasted just starting the engines compared to the NG. Once started, I believe Southwest has a limitation requiring at least 3 minutes of warmup before takeoff thrust can be applied. So that means a slower-than-normal taxi to the runway unless the runway is distant from the gate. Some operators also recommend a 5-minute warmup of the engines on the first flight of the day. After landing, the engines must also be cooled at least three minutes prior to shutdown. This is a delay at small airports where gates are usually close to the runway, with little traffic. So a MAX (operated under Southwest policy) loses about 5 minutes per flight on engine warmup/cool down compared to the NG and Classic engines. On a long flight, 5 minutes is nothing. But on inter-island/intra-state short hops, 5 extra minutes is significant block time. I bet Southwest has to pad the times to account for this. I don’t know if United, American and Allegiant have the required warm-up and cool-down periods that Southwest requires.

    3. Brett Avatar

      John G – Back in those days, Southwest was flying the 737-200 using those Pratt & Whitney JT8Ds. Those things were dinosaurs with very low bypass and little complexity. Flip ’em on, burn that fuel and push it straight out the pipe. It was a much simpler engine that didn’t need much time to get going. But it was also dramatically less efficient than what we have today.

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        Thanks for info Brett and others. Makes sense.

  14. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    When PSA was still around and doing those 10-15 minute turns, it was not unusual for them to not even shut the engines off at some stops. Especially the smaller ones that used airstairs instead of jetways like FAT or ONT (at the time).

    They would pull up, chock, cut the engines to idle, leave them running, offload, reload, and off they went. Yeah, the fuel burn was a bit higher but the tradeoff was of course fewer starts and stops. So I’d think that less engine cycles and the associated servicing (not to mention the higher utilization) probably more than offset that.

    Of course that worked on a T-tailed plane such as the 727 and MD-80. But anything wing mounted, which appears to be all of the only remaining choices, I don’t see that as a practical or even safe option. Because….pax and ground handlers and the ingestion risk.

  15. Arubaman Avatar
    Arubaman

    A larger concern is whether all Alaska’s 737NG fleet is ETOPS-certified. If they are all ETOPS, then Alaska can flow any ship they have to or within the islands. However, if some of their 737NG fleet is non-ETOPS, then either they must be flown strictly inter-island/intra-state and either maintained in HNL or ferried back and forth to the mainland for maintenance OR kept on the mainland. So the question is: Is there a subset of Alaska 737-800NGs that are non-ETOPS certified? If the answer is yes, then Alaska’s task becomes more complex. Of course, they could also solve that detail by bringing their entire 737-800NG fleet up to ETOPS standards. Again, this assumes that their entire 737-800NG fleet is not already ETOPS certified.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Arubaman – I don’t think the current state of affairs is what matters. I would assume that when the time comes, it wouldn’t be that hard to put only ETOPS aircraft in the HNL base. This will be a subfleet painted in Hawaiian colors and based in HNL, and for the flexibility even if it not planned to run to the mainland, it’s easier to have only ETOPS airplanes there.

      1. Arubaman Avatar
        Arubaman

        That makes sense at face value. But the aircraft selected must be ETOPS certified if they are going to be flown to the mainland. The frames selected must be their lowest-cycle -800NGs, because the cycles will accumulate quickly. With over 200 MAX-8s constantly cycling in, out, and within Hawaii, Southwest can better “amortize” those landings (and resulting maintenance costs) than Alaska.
        What do you think about others’ comments here about cannibalizing Delta’s 77 soon-to-be-parked 717s and keeping the 717s on property another XX years? Yes, they will be kicking the can down the road, but that’s not unheard of in the annals of airline management.

        1. Brett Avatar

          Arubaman – There comes a time for every airframe where the costs involved are just not worth it. I think we?re going to get to that point in the next few years.

  16. Arubaman Avatar
    Arubaman

    Southwest has a subset of 737-800NG planes that are ETOPS certified. I believe just less than 30 ships. They used these planes to start their Hawaii service before the MAX-8 came online and also during the MAX-8 grounding. If it’s true that an NG aircraft burns 14% more fuel than a MAX, Southwest was really getting burned on fuel costs during those times.

  17. Eric C Avatar
    Eric C

    The ease of doing this from a labor standpoint is a huge argument in its favor. They can staff HNL 737s from any base at any time and in any numbers, so they don’t have to force people into or out of HNL. That’s a much better option than adding a new fourth and lowest paying fleet that exists only in HNL and must be spooled up in parallel with the 717s spooling down.

    Given the aggressive Max10 delivery schedule, it would make a lot of sense for 737s of all flavors to take over for the 717s and 321s over the next four or five years, and once the fleet is simplified like that it’s much easier to add a new, dedicated interisland plane.

    Once you have NGs based there it’s easy to add some freighters, too.

    Of course we all know the best answer… COMBIS!

  18. cactusneedle Avatar
    cactusneedle

    I’m genuinely curious: why wouldn’t Hawaiian just keep using the 717’s for decades, if possible? If Delta has the vast majority of 717’s still in operation, and Delta will be eliminating those in an upgrade cycle, it seems there will be plenty of spare parts harvesting available for years to come. Am I completely off-base?

    1. Brett Avatar

      cactusneedle – It gets tougher and tougher. They could try to cannibalize, but even things like crew training become more difficult. The airplanes would need a costly makeover to get them into Hawaiian’s standard. And I’m not sure when maintenance requirements start to hit. At some point, it is no longer worth it to keep the fleet going.

    2. David M Avatar

      Not everything can be cannibalized, some parts need an ongoing supply chain. Delta’s fleet is beg enough to keep that going, but once they’re done with the 717, Hawaiian’s operation isn’t enough to sustain it.

  19. bzcat Avatar
    bzcat

    The choice for AS is as follows:

    1. Provide more seats but schedule less frequency – this will require the sub-fleet of 737-800 to be dedicated to interisland flying only, and a lot of spare engines to swap out/replace as they will prematurely age out from the intense cycles.

    2. Provide same frequency but go with less dense configuration – this will allow the 737-800 to rotate out mainland to save engine life after several rotations of interisland flight, which is what WN does with their 737.

    I don’t know which makes more sense financially but either way, it will cost more to operate than the 717.

  20. GS Avatar
    GS

    Cranky, as a hypothetical for you- how many 737 tails would it take to replace the full 717 and a321 fleets, in addition to Alaska’s current Hawaiian island flying? They’ve said they want everything touching the islands to be Hawaiian livery… if that’s a common 737 fleet in HA colors, is that 50 planes? 60? Seems pretty efficient but also a lot of metal

    1. Eric C Avatar
      Eric C

      Hawaiian has 18 A321s and 19 B717s. Their Max 10 deliveries are planned around 25 per year, so they could retire those two fleets and their -700s by the end of 2030 pretty easily.

    2. Brett Avatar

      GS – It’s really hard to know if they do decide they want to flow airplanes between interisland and the mainland. But Eric C is in the right neighborhood for a split operation unless they decide to start changing frequency. There are 737s today, so it could be higher than the 37 combined current fleet if they want to standardize, but we would really have to know the network plan.

  21. DesertGhost Avatar
    DesertGhost

    I’m going to be extraordinarily facetious, and stupidly suggest that Alaska look into a stretched version of the Comac C909 as a replacement for its 717s. It’s essentially an updated clone of the DC-9/MD-80/90/95/B717, etc. with CFM engines. Given all the issues involved, which are many and varied, I would give this suggestion a less than .0000000001% chance of being considered – but I just had to throw it out there. The current C909 is quite a bit shorter that the B717 which indicates that it would need to be stretched – almost as much as this silly suggestion. Please feel free to criticize and make fun of me. LOL

    1. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
      O’Hare Is My Second Home

      Honestly, why not? It’s a proven plane from its ARJ-21 days. A stretch on it is only as ridiculous as all of the fanboys’ wet dreams of a stretch of Franco-Canadian Spaghetti-Os that they keep drooling about. And if the CFMs can hold up on the heavy cycle count, maybe it can be a solution, especially at a lesser cost. Who knows, it may be type compliant with a 717.

      Anything’s better than Franco-Canadian Spaghetti-Os, pieces of flaming garbage that they are.

    2. Nick Bax Avatar

      But it’s the CFMs that are the issue. So why go with a different airframe?

      If you’re thinking crazy ideas, hire someone to make an STC to get some Rolls/BMW engines strapped to some 737s….

    3. 1990 Avatar
      1990

      Saw some Comacs in-person recently and did a doubletake because they’re basically 717s.

    4. David M Avatar

      The C909 uses GE CF-34 engines like the CRJ and E-Jets, not the CFM-56 used on the 737.

  22. David C Avatar
    David C

    I don’t see the big deal.
    All of those extra seats to sell. Big wings, light load…will be rocket ships to get to cruise (to help cool engines).
    Commonality.
    What is 5 or 10 extra minutes across 8 trips? 40 minutes?
    Too much pearl clutching.

  23. Jason Avatar
    Jason

    AS/HA also said they have to decide either to go all in on the A321 and grow the fleet for Hawaiian operations or Replace them with new MAX aircraft to simplify the crewing and MX cost of both airlines.
    I think by 2030 you’re going to see All of HA current aircraft be sent to scraper.
    HA longer A330 routes like Hawaii-PHX/LAS will be flown by new MAX aircraft down the line. All the big lift HA international flights will simply become AS 787 routes and the HA flying will All become 737 equipment.
    In the short term NG737-800 ETOPS aircraft will be the short term solution.
    It’s no industry secret AlaskaAir is in its final evolution stages on the MAX7. Once the Aircraft is Certified AlaskaAir will join WN on the Party train since it checks all the boxes for its Hawaii operational needs.
    Before we know it the newly combined Pilot group will again be in CBA negotiations and they will throw the smaller Subset of HA pilots under the bus as AlaskaAir continues to grow its 787 operations. You gonna see them allow Horizon to add E175 for inter island flying as a bargaining chip for better work rule and pay rates in the widebody aircraft.

    1. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      I really hope they don’t go all MAX. I much rather take a NEO over a MAX.

  24. southbay flier Avatar
    southbay flier

    I think it’s the best choice of what they have available for these short routes.

    I remember taking a few Aloha 737s when we flew HNL-KOA, KOA-OGG, and OGG-LIH in 1991. I think they were 737-200s and they seemed well suited for that type of flying. The only worry was if the roof would come off of one of them. My memory was that we showed up at the airport 1.5 hours before our flight and they just put us on an earlier flight out since there was room and IIRC, it was open seating in Y.

  25. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    One nice thing about flowing mainland planes through interisland is the ability to sell direct (same plane) routes to other islands. Curious if any of the pros think that could provide a revenue bump.

  26. Jim King Avatar
    Jim King

    When I was at Aloha we had much the same problem, so I am familiar with it. I certainly don’t see the 737-800 as the best answer. It’s way too much airplane for interisland, but there is another serious problem. The CFM engine has a reputation of staying on wing for an extraordinary number of hours, but in interisland service it is cycle limited which drives frequent engine overhauls. This had a lot to do with why Aloha stayed with the 737-200. I don’t know much about the GTF, but seems like the A-220 might be a more suitable aircraft. That’s if you insist on having a jet. But the truth is, the interisland service would be the most economic with a turboprop like the Dash 8 that Alaska used to operate. Sure, there will be some people who refuse to get on a prop plane, but that could be could be assuaged by flowing some mainland aircraft between islands at peak times.

  27. CaptOZA Avatar
    CaptOZA

    ….just get some DC3’s out of the Boneyard. LOL!! Those were a workhorse and took a beating and kept on ticking

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.