For Delta, Slow and Steady Wins the Race


Let’s tackle the third leg of this tripod with a look at Delta’s positioning in its hubs. United has made big gains, American has been trying to get back some of what it lost, and Delta… well, Delta just keeps on truckin’. Yes, it has made gains in some areas where it needed to make gains, but elsewhere it’s been largely a matter of preventing erosion. Let’s take a tour of the hubs, but first, my usual disclaimer in this series:

To do this work, I pulled annual passenger share for United and the next largest airlines using the Department of Transportation’s Origin & Destination Survey data (DB1B/C) via Cirium. This looked only for passengers that weren’t connecting through the hub. The problem with this, however, is that the data that’s public is only domestic. So, I’ll present that here and then talk how international would likely change the results.

Again, we’ll go in alphabetical order, and that means starting with the biggest hub of ’em all, Atlanta.

Atlanta Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

I find Atlanta fascinating. It’s obviously Delta’s biggest and most important hub, but the airline has not seen any real significant shift in local share at all over the last few years. It’s really just smaller airlines shifting share between each other while Delta continues to do its thing.

Southwest has pulled down Atlanta significantly, shifting resources to Nashville. So of course, you do see that decline in the numbers. But Frontier is now on the cusp of being Atlanta’s number two airline as it has grown dramatically there. Delta is just doing Delta things.

Next up, I’m going to cheat a little. This isn’t a hub for Delta, but it’s a growing focus city, so I threw it in anyway. Hello, Austin.

Austin Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

With American having built a hub post-pandemic, it’s easy to overlook that the number one airline in Austin is and always will be Southwest. Southwest has actually strengthened its position in the market since the pandemic. But Delta has slowly and strategically built up Austin to become the number two airline. It has designs on more growth when Austin finally gets new gates in a few years, and I expect it will cement its position then. But it is highly unlikely we’ll ever see Delta become number one in this market.

That is the opposite of what has happened in Boston.

Boston Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

This was JetBlue’s one dominant market, but after years of mismanagement by the previous management team, Delta surged ahead and became the easy number one. It certainly didn’t hurt that American also failed to defend its historical position. International certainly has an impact here as well, but it’s not in the way you think. JetBlue actually has more international than Delta, so it narrows the gap again. But Delta is still number one, it’s just busy fighting a resurgent JetBlue in the market.

That couldn’t be further from what’s happening in Detroit.

Detroit Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

There is nothing to talk about in Detroit. Spirit is number two, but it’s a declining number two and Delta continues to do Delta things there. But this is Detroit, nobody else is trying to win there. That’s different than our next chart, one you’ve seen before.

Yes, that’s right, for the third time we’ll look at the LA Basin since all three big airlines hub there. There’s not much else I can say here.

Los Angeles Basin Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

At LAX, Delta has become the number one airline, but we aren’t just talking about LAX. We’re still talking about the LA Basin, and Southwest’s dominance at the other airports can’t be overcome. But when you look at LAX, it really is a three-horse race, and they are all quite similar. But Delta does come out on top for now.

Let’s flip back to the frozen tundra of the upper Midwest.

Minneapolis/St Paul Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

Does this look a lot like Detroit to you? Of course it does, because it’s the same setup. Delta is the dominant airline by far, but it allows Sun Country to survive as the leisure carrier who can soak up all the unwanted traffic. It looks almost exactly the same as Detroit, and it’s a model that works well for Delta.

That’s not the case in New York which, yes, we have to look at for the third time as well.

New York City Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

As mentioned in the United post, Delta and United are neck and neck once you include international, since United is more international-heavy. This is a fight between those two, and there won’t be a winner unless something major changes. Of course, since United has eyes on both American and JetBlue, there could in theory be a major change. But even if there was, divestment would be likely. So, just consider this a victory for both Delta and United at this point, and then… stay tuned.

Let’s head back west and look at Delta’s hub in not Denver Salt Lake City.

Salt Lake City Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

Wait, does this look a lot like Detroit and Minneapolis? Yes it does, because well, it works. This is the secret to Delta’s success. A massive dominance and coexistence with a much lesser competitor creates a base of fantastic hub dominance. Nobody else has this kind of stability.

Where isn’t Delta a stable number one? How about Seattle, our final hub.

Seattle/Tacoma Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

This is like Boston if JetBlue hadn’t completely dropped the ball. Ok, that’s not true. Seattle is its own animal where Alaska is beloved, and the airline has fought aggressively to maintain its position. Not only has it maintained, but it has grown. It’s Delta that sits way down there in second place.

You can slice this however you’d like, but Delta is nothing compared to Alaska. And with Alaska’s planned growth into long-haul now happening, the gap isn’t going to close soon. Seattle to me is the oddest of oddballs in the Delta network. Even as a Pacific hub, it gets bypassed with Delta recently adding Hong Kong from LAX instead. I don’t get why Delta continues this fight, quite honestly. But it continues.


For Delta, the secret is having these dominant hubs where it can make a killing. It then invests that into trying to win in contested hubs. It has made remarkable strides over many years in LA, New York, and most recently Boston. But Seattle continues to be a vexxing situation.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

20 responses to “For Delta, Slow and Steady Wins the Race”

  1. Ernie R. Avatar
    Ernie R.

    I’m a former 7 year Diamond. The “Hub Penalty” routinely pay a premium that analysts call the “hub penalty.” Delta’s strategy (hub dominance + MQD credit card spending requirements + AI dynamic pricing) is working financially for Delta, but it is creating measurable friction. Travelers at captive hubs pay a real premium with little recourse.

    Delta betrayed their most loyal customers. They redefined what “loyalty” means. Delta scrapped flying requirements entirely and replaced them with pure spending thresholds, increasing requirements as much as 66% for Silver and 40% for Diamond. The new system means someone who drops $28,000 on a Delta credit card from their couch qualifies as a “Diamond” alongside someone who logs 150,000 actual flight miles. For road warriors like me who built their travel plans around Delta, that’s a profound devaluation of what my loyalty actually had meant.

    Also, the upgrade benefit was the crown jewel of elite status for business travelers like me, and it has been gutted. Delta is actively pricing and marketing them to paying customers. Now there’s a shrinking pool of upgrade inventory, and the era when status alone could reliably secure a First Class seat is effectively over.

    1. 1990 Avatar
      1990

      It’s still wild that HQ ATL doesn’t have a DeltaOne lounge. (No, no… I get it… it takes time to find the real estate… psh). For real, it’s a captive hub. Hence why AAL hasn’t invested a Flagship lounge at CLT (oh, sorry, they’ve ‘announced’ one, but no ETA…), but CLT isn’t their headquarters…

  2. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    I am a FORMER Diamond. From 2009 until last year. Ed’s shenanigans pushed me to find an alternative main airline. I live in a Delta hub. But FU Ed. I switched to Alaska and I have never regretted it. I read that Delta’s approach of freezing MQD thresholds for 2026 and 2027 suggests the airline recognizes erosion in elite satisfaction and is trying to prevent mass program exits. Too late for me and any other intelligent flier. The frozen thresholds can’t compensate for the real-world problem that the value of what you get for those dollars has declined significantly.

    Ed took a loyalty program built on the trust of road warriors who chose Delta through rain delays, middle seats, and missed connections and restructured it to primarily reward American Express cardholders. We, the business traveler who actually needed the airline, who built Delta’s hub dominance through years of captive patronage, got the worst of all worlds: higher fares, harder status to maintain, and an upgrade pool that has largely been sold out from under them.

    Delta broke the implicit contract. Status used to signal “I chose you when I didn’t have to.” Now it signals “I have a high credit limit.” Those are fundamentally different relationships, and conflating them destroyed the meaning of the tier system for the people who built it.
    The upgrade erosion is the sharpest wound. Complimentary upgrades were the psychological payoff for years of middle seats and 6am departures. Selling that inventory to AMEX Platinum holders and via upsell auctions wasn’t just a revenue decision; it was a statement about whose loyalty Delta actually values.

    The irony: By optimizing for AMEX revenue, Delta may be accelerating the very churn they should fear. A road warrior who defects to United or American takes years of hub captivity and corporate contract influence with them. An AMEX cardholder just gets a different card. So I see Delta’s hubs shrinking. Thanks to Ed.

    1. Bobber Avatar
      Bobber

      It sucks, but I’m pretty sure this is standard behavior now. I’m 1K with United, and don’t qualify for credit cards as I still do not have enough credit history in the US, so all my status is earned by flight miles. Delta are just doing what all the others have done to make sure that their main business (as a credit card provider) remains ridiculously profitable.

  3. Greg E Avatar
    Greg E

    Before COVID I spent a lot of time on Delta flying to Asia through SEA. It always felt like Delta’s SEA presence was more substantial — which likely was reflective of me as a connecting passenger vs an O/D passenger. Always interesting to see Cranky’s data.

  4. Southside Emil Avatar
    Southside Emil

    Great article. In my opinion, there’s actually something to be said for avoiding mega-hubs in general. My misery index at ATL, ORD, and LAX is just higher across the board. and after Delta screwed my loyalty my mindset (and my company’s).

    In my opinion routing through CLT, DFW, or SEA tends to mean calmer gate agents, shorter lines, and people who still have some energy left in their day.

    Alaska consistently ranks at or near the top for customer service, their employees genuinely seem to like working there. The culture is noticeably different, friendlier, more helpful.

    American is more mixed depending on the station, but DFW-based crews tend to be solid, and the premium cabin/Flagship experience staff are generally quite good

    I haven’t flown UA in years so I cannot comment on that.

  5. Bevvy Avatar
    Bevvy

    Cranky, if a competitor to Delta wants to expand in ATL, MSP, etc are there available gates? Can Delta squat on gates to stop a competitor’s expansion?

  6. morselsofgoodness Avatar
    morselsofgoodness

    Delta doesn’t come close to AS at SEA. Never has, and never will. DL’s TPAC network out of SEA is quite weak, and some routes have multiple competitors. DL doesn’t have a whole lot of the local corporate wallet, and local traffic skews heavily AS. So long has DL prints money, the rest of its hubs will subsidize SEA but at some point, I suspect DL will pull the plug on SEA entirely. The A35K and the A359 can allow it to bypass West Coast hubs to Asia, and frankly, DL is pretty weak across the Pacific anyway.

    1. JTBV Avatar
      JTBV

      The same with their product over the Atlantic. Most of their planes are old and shoddy. I switched to Lufthansa and I have never looked back. What Delta doesn’t realize is that when you screw your most loyal fliers no matter what you do you have lost their loyalty and they won’t be coming back.

  7. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    This is a very helpful perspective.

    No one likes to be the one that makes any company successfuil but your data shows that DL has managed to create a network that is strong in so many parts of the country that a whole lot of people contribute to DL’s success.

    Yes, DL says that it is premium – which may or may not be the case in service, but DL dominates its markets in ways that no other airline does except perhaps WN which does not carry the longhaul domestic traffic that DL does…. which is partly why Kirby keeps talking about taking out competition to achieve financially what DL does.

    While you didn’t include average fares, a contrast of average fares – even domestically – shows that DL’s financial success is driven by its strength in its strenght markets but also by its willingness not to be the largest in many competitive connecting markets where it does not enjoy that level of dominance. Instead of competing for lower value connecting traffic, DL tacks on higher margin non-transportation revenue which more than offsets the extra revenue and profits that other carriers get from direct passenger and cargo carriage.

    1. JT Bledsoe Avatar
      JT Bledsoe

      Tim, that network is eroding. Their most loyal fliers (like me) got hosed by the changes a few years back. We asked for what we were promised. We routed inconvenient connections, paid premium fares, co-branded their credit cards, and anchored our travel lives to a single airline -all based on a loyalty framework that Delta designed, marketed, and then dismantled when it became too expensive to honor. What we received in return was a restructured program that rewards spending power, restricts lounge access, and caps the very benefits that defined the relationship.

      Loyalty, to mean anything, must be reciprocal. Delta broke that contract and no amount of “modifications” restores the trust that was lost when a company tells its most devoted customers that their years of flying simply no longer count.

  8. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    Remember, in the case of NYC Delta split the hub between JFK & LGA. If it were a single operation, well then that would be even larger than EWR & JetBlue wouldn’t have the ability to survive.

    1. SandyCreek Avatar
      SandyCreek

      NYC and its 3 airport system makes for an awfully tricky and expensive environment to operate and concentrate passengers in. I sometimes contemplate a PKX-scaled airport placed mid-LI with high speed rail service in favor of LGA and JFK, then I realized what I was thinking…

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        There’s an even better location for a mega-airport to replace all three main NYC airports, but for some reason people won’t buy into my idea that we really don’t need what exists today as “Staten Island”… :-)

        1. Allison Avatar
          Allison

          Fresh Kills International Airport & Toxic Dump

        2. 1990 Avatar
          1990

          Bahaha! Please, take it! ;-)

  9. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    Delta certainly scores points for consistency, at least in the air and in their network strategy.

    Unfortunately their financial success and consistent dominance of those markets has led to a surprisingly short-sighted arrogance with their recent treatment of their most loyal flyers. The notion seems to be, “where else are they gonna go?”

    My two biggest takeaways are (1) JetBlue’s nonsensical abdication of its #1 position in Boston and (2) Delta’s position in Seattle being far more irrelevant than I knew. I thought they were much closer to Alaska. Instead the market share makes them the MSP equivalent of Sun Country to Alaska’s Delta which is borderline shocking.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      I actually thought DL was closer to AS in SEA as well. As for BOS, I think JetBlue can gradually recover there, and a strong #2 is a decent place to be.

  10. Eric R Avatar
    Eric R

    AUS will be an interesting one to watch. Once the new concourse opens and provides more gate space to DL, the dynamic between WN and DL could get interesting. With both DAL and HOU offering connection opportunities nearby, I could see how this could tip in DL’s favor, especially with premium travel.

  11. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    IMO, the most damning thing in these charts is JetBlue – yikes! Super inept commercial leadership to let your core, strength markets get taken over. Commercial 101: always protect your cash cows

Leave a Reply to morselsofgoodness Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.