United Continues to Gain Local Traffic in Its Hubs (Even Without Buying American)


I know you want to hear about a United/American mega-merger, but it’s not going to happen… other than that little teaser I stuck in the post title. Still, we talked about this on The Air Show this week, so you can absolutely get your fill. I don’t think this is trolling — though that’s certainly a nice side-benefit. There’s always a reason for things like this to reach the light of day, so come listen to our theories this week.


At United’s media day last month, the airline proudly put forth a slide noting that back in the day, it only had the largest local passenger share in one of its hubs: Houston. Today, it says it is number one in all of them except for Los Angeles. That is a big shift, but is it true? I pulled the numbers to find out, and regardless of the answer, it is clear that United is significantly growing its share in every one of its hubs with one notable exception.

To do this work, I pulled annual passenger share for United and the next largest airlines using the Department of Transportation’s Origin & Destination Survey data (DB1B/C) via Cirium. This looked only for passengers that weren’t connecting through the hub. The problem with this, however, is that the data that’s public is only domestic. So, I’ll present that here and then talk how international would likely change the results.

Let’s just do this in alphabetical order, shall we? That means we start in Chicago. The airline’s growth there will be no surprise to anyone since United has been crowing loudly to everyone who will listen about just how much local share the airline has gained. And the numbers certainly show that.

Chicagoland Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

It wasn’t that long before the pandemic that American was number one in Chicago, but now it’s no contest. American in fact had slipped below Southwest and its Midway operation. Of course, 2025 was the year American realized it was going to lose a lot of gates if it didn’t snap to it, so it started pouring capacity into the market. That raised its local share but it looks like it largely took it at the expense of Southwest. United just keeps growing.

If we were to include international, United’s lead would only grow. In full year 2025, United more than doubles the number of international seats that American has in the market. If we include joint venture partners, it’s only slightly less than double. So if anything, this is understating United’s gains.

Now let’s move on to Denver where international flying is more of a rounding error.

Denver Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

This has been a fight between United and Southwest, but United has certainly taken a much greater share of the pie in the last few years. It is now the clear number one in the market. This was such a hot topic in previous years, but now it’s not even worth discussing further.

What if we head down to Houston? Remember, this is the one market where United was in first place before already.

Houston Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

And it’s still in first place. What’s interesting here is that United hasn’t changed all that much since 2019, but Southwest has fallen off more there. We are talking different airports here, of course, but Southwest has been losing share to ULCCs Spirit and Frontier and also Delta while United keeps growing. Oh, and once you consider United’s robust Latin flying from here, there isn’t a contest.

But if you want a contest, we can look at my homebase, the Los Angeles Basin. This is by design a market that can’t be dominated by any one airline, and that shows itself in the data.

Los Angeles Basin Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

You might be surprised to see that Southwest is so much bigger than the rest, but remember, we are talking about the metro area. Southwest may not be as important at LAX but it dominates all the other local airports. Number two was American before the pandemic, but once it shut off its Pacific hub, that changed quickly. Delta is number one now. If you were to add in international, I’d assume it might help Delta pad its lead on second place a little. But to win the metro area, you still have to beat Southwest and that won’t be easy to do for United.

And then there’s New York. New York’s results may look somewhat shocking at first glance.

New York City Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

Look at Delta pulling away from United to dominate New York over the last couple of years. This fits with what we saw at LaGuardia where Delta really boosted local traffic, enough to win it a Cranky Network Award this year. But do keep in mind that capacity was reduced significantly in Newark thanks to ATC issues leading to gridlock. So that had to hurt United.

But again, this is missing international. Yes, both airlines have huge international operations in New York, but United actually skews more toward international than Delta. Delta and joint venture partners have a total of 27 percent of their seats going outside the US while United and partners are north of 35 percent. When we adjust for that, it ends up being neck and neck even after Newark reductions.

I’m sure there’s some way for United to cherry-pick the numbers that help the claim it is number one, but unlike in other markets, this is no runaway. Delta and United are still both locked in a dead heat.

What about San Francisco? Oh that one is like watching a hockey stick.

San Francisco Bay Area Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

Alaska has turned away from more traditional markets from San Francisco since the Virgin America merger. It’s no surprise it keeps losing share, but what about Southwest? Southwest has its massive Oakland hub along with a substantial San Jose operation, but it has been pulling down Oakland in favor of Sacramento as of late. That may very well change, but in 2025 United and Southwest were neck-and-neck domestically. That means with international baked in, it’s no contest.

And finally, we look at DC. Was United including Baltimore or not? It’s hard to say for sure, but it’s certainly much easier without it.

Washington/Baltimore Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

I think the key finding here for United is that its Dulles operation has now surpassed American’s National operation in terms of local passengers carried. That is quite the milestone. Southwest is still far ahead, but again, remember, we are talking domestic market only. A quarter of United’s seats in DC fly internationally whereas for Southwest it’s less than three percent.

The reality here is similar to New York where overall it’s going to be very close between the two airlines. That’s a substantial change from pre-pandemic when it wasn’t even a contest, but whether United is truly the king… that’s debatable. Then again, if United isn’t counting Baltimore, well, then that’s an easy victory to claim.


I think it’s important to note that just because you have higher local share doesn’t mean that you can declare sunshine-and-rainbows. After all, what if connecting traffic were to carry a much greater premium? Is it worth buying local share by becoming more competitive? I’m not saying that’s what is happening here, because I’m not going down the revenue road today. But United’s financial results do speak for themselves.

One thing that has changed is the importance of the credit card. And to get more credit card sign-ups, you want to be as useful as possible to the local market in the hub. United certainly gets that and has made strides in improving relevance in every part of its network.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

25 responses to “United Continues to Gain Local Traffic in Its Hubs (Even Without Buying American)”

  1. Bravenav Avatar
    Bravenav

    Brett, Do you have the FMtraffic data on your Cirium subscription? That incorporates international traffic as well.

    The New York data shows that the AA/B6 Northeast alliance actually did make the market more competitive. Add those two together and they’d be right in the mix with UA and DL.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Bravenav – Yes, but I’ve found it is highly unreliable. When we were doing some work validating awards for the CNAs this year, we confirmed with airlines and they had wildly different results. It actually made us change some awards. I struggle to trust it these days!

      1. Bravenav Avatar
        Bravenav

        Interesting to hear!

  2. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    In some metrics Baltimore is considered part of the DC metropolitan area, but in some others it is not. The reverse is not the case on any metric.

  3. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
    Mike (dontflymuch)

    I know this is a “pile on American” blog, and I dont really mind that, but it doesnt feel like as much an achievement (or a fair fight) in DC when your American Airlines opponent is restricted in its growth by law. So all you’ve got is an in the margins opponent whose based out of an Airport that is severely limited and been in the news for wrong reasons this past year…

    1. Eric R Avatar
      Eric R

      I think the larger story is that UA has been able to build up local share out at Dulles to pull ahead of AA after all these years. While AA is somewhat constrained, it does show a willingness by some to shift from DCA (AA) to IAD (UA).

      On the other hand one could argue that any type of incremental growth in DC comes on the fringes due to available space therefore making IAD the more convenient option.

      1. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
        Mike (dontflymuch)

        I mean that chart isnt a very substantial one, its just united tooting their own horn. And if there has been growth at IAD recently its almost certainly due to the Silver Line, not anything United did, unless United somehow wants to take credit for the Silver Line… which would be a very Scott Kibry-esc thing to do…

        1. Eric R Avatar
          Eric R

          So let’s say it is partially due to Silver Line. The fact that people are opting to take Silver Line to fly UA over AA would suggest a preference.

        2. SubwayNut Avatar

          I have only flown into IAD post Silver Line opening (my hometown airport at the end of 2024 got non-stop flights first on Breeze and then on United to IAD, I’ve gone to DC for two weekends really only because of cheap Breeze Airfares with the non-stops, the longish Silver Line ride I’ll take over having to make a connection, just more time to read).

          I still remember friends who got married in DC (in the District itself) in 2022 (pre-the Silver line opening) and posting on their wedding website to Fly into National if you can and ideally, BWI as an okay backup since it has the MARC train connection, but to avoid flying into Dulles at all costs with a funny note about expensive uber rides or very long bus rides to get out there. I joked with them (we both work in the mass transit field) about “What if the silver line opens before your wedding?”

    2. Jason H Avatar
      Jason H

      Also in New York to a lesser extent, where both LGA and JFK slots aren’t so easy to come by.

    3. Brett Avatar

      Mike – That is a very strange way to categorize this blog, but you do you… anyway, giving all the credit to the silver line is pretty absurd. Just look at the numbers, and that tells the story.

      Between 2019 and 2025, United grew seats in the DC area by nearly 20% while American grew by 7.5%. Average seats per departure on American grew 5% but United increased by 15%. Most notably, American started using DCA as much more of a connecting hub, seeing its connecting percentage on those flights increase by about 8 points while United held relatively steady.

      So, American is prioritizing connections while United is just growing faster. Yes, American is hamstrung by DCA restrictions, but it could certainly upgauge and reallocate slots if it really wanted to grow.

      1. Aer Dingus Avatar
        Aer Dingus

        I think this is correct. As a local UA flyer, it’s a nice option but it’s not driving substantial growth to the airport. It’s just providing an alternate transportation method to IAD. I use it occasionally, but not always, and it’s never crowded at the IAD station.

        I would think UA has been expanding at IAD due to a growing (and affluent) NoVA customer base (including corporate) and that IAD has substantial room to expand, be it a 5th runway or additional terminals and gates.

        Now, the current UA terminal experience (C/D) is the worst of their hubs…hopefully that begins to improve starting this fall with the opening of Concourse E. IMO they should’ve done the full expansion and not just 14 gates. Oh well.

  4. Paper Boarding Pass Avatar
    Paper Boarding Pass

    The issue with JetBlue in the NYC area is most of its customers are origination and destination. It lacks the hub centric arrangement like Delta at Atlanta which builds volume.

    Also, Southwest has withdrawn from Washington Dulles (IAD) and Chicago O’hare (ORD) and relying on Washington National (DCA) and Midway (MDW) for coverage. Is LAX next since WN controls Long Beach (LGB) and Hollywood Burbank (BUR) and Ontario International (ONT)?
    LAX is a cat fight with fragmented percentages that rewards only the top two or three.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Paper – I don’t think we will see Southwest leave LAX. It’s an important part of the airline’s strategy in the LA area, but it’s just not the most important piece as is the case for every other airline. It has stayed lower post-pandemic… low enough that JetBlue was able to move into its terminal while Terminal 5 is being rebuilt. But it still is an important airport for the airline to serve.

  5. John G Avatar
    John G

    Nothing to do with UA hub traffic, just publicly measuring the odds that the Monday post will be about a certain cheapo yellow airline joining the list of Airlines We Lost 2026? Lot of smoke all of a sudden.

  6. Wany Avatar
    Wany

    What about GUM? That gotta put IAH to shame, no? I am guessing only HNL-GUM counts as domestic?

    1. SandyCreek Avatar
      SandyCreek

      The overall volume of GUM is in the magnitude of ~3 million. United enjoys undisputed, overwhelming advantage there, but it’s just so small of a market.

  7. Jeff G Avatar
    Jeff G

    Would love to see a post analyzing DL and AA at their respective hubs.

    1. emac Avatar
      emac

      We have most of it here.

      AA is declining in NYC, CHI and LAX (and BOS if you include that), should be solid in PHL, CLT and DAL. MIA and PHX would be kind of interesting.

      DL is here in NYC and LAX, on top in DTW, ATL, MSP, SLC. Fighting for BOS and SEA.

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        Per info from The Schedule Guy, I pulled next Friday April 24.

        At PHX, AA has scheduled 292 flights total (including Eagle), with 38,205 seats. WN has 217 departures and 34,735 seats.

        At MIA, AA has 360 flights and 56,000 seats, so even if you included FLL you would not be over that.

  8. Tom Gold Avatar
    Tom Gold

    Two comments.

    First, how much are the comparative numbers for the different airlines in NYC affected by which airports are serviced. Especially, I would think that UA has been negatively impacted by the various problems at EWR.

    Second, with the focus on hubs, UA has semi abandoned airports like BOS, where I hail from, for which it used to provide much better service. I am so close to MMer status. But if I am not going to a hub or Asia, its hard to book UA.

    1. Kilroy Avatar
      Kilroy

      Agreed.

      This may be an overstatement or an overgeneralization, but I’d go so far as to say that for pax who live in the Northeast (CT, ME, VT, NH, RI, MA), United is basically out of their consideration unless the pax is flying to a UA hub. Even then, many of the United hubs are also served with decent frequency by other airlines in the Northeast with bigger operations than UA at the airports in the Northeast, such as AA from BOS to ORD and Frontier for flights to Denver, and thus likely to attract people who are already loyal to non-UA airlines.

      United also doesn’t have many nonstop flights from the Northeast down the East Coast (to FL & the Caribbean) relative to other airlines, on what is a major corridor for leisure travel from the Northeast (even with connections, in my anecdotal experience it’s rare to see UA as a viable option when looking at itineraries from the Northeast to FL). That combined with the fact that UA is the only non-ULCC airline whose basic economy fare does not include a carryon means that a leisure traveler would really have to have a good reason (or a very specific destination) to fly United from the Northeast.

      I’m not trying to knock UA, just pointing out that UA is very weak east of Newark, and that shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone.

      That said, between DL, AA, B6, and a much stronger ULCC presence than in the past, people flying from BOS aren’t exactly hurting for options for other airlines.

      1. Tom Gold Avatar
        Tom Gold

        I was whining but that was not the thrust of my post. Why does United focus on its hubs to the exclusion of other cities they used to better serve? Is this true of all airlines or is United particularly hub-centric ( is that a double positive)?

    2. Mark Avatar
      Mark

      I think UA has overcome a lot of the EWR issues from last year. The airport is much more reliable, and, though UA is in the 400 daily flight count range (still a very healthy number), pax volumes are up significantly, thanks to all the upgauging they’ve done.

      During the months with last year’s EWR issues, DL was biggest in the NYC region, but UA is back to being several percentage points larger, and that’s before the return to JFK next year.

  9. Mike (theotherone) Avatar
    Mike (theotherone)

    Interesting. I guess also need to consider revenue share. Unit share can be bought. My recent trip JFK-CDG–Delta has 2 flights/day, AF has 5-6. I guess Delta could take more of that traffic/drive unit share, but it’s probably lower yield/margin eroding. Ugh, I sound like TD.

    Can’t resist on the merger talk – listened to the podcast. UA/AA not happening. It’s about establishing bargaining zone to pave the way for JBLU. Delta will then pursue Alaska – solves many strategic opportunities for Delta and provides good succession plan at DL.

Leave a Reply to emac Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier