For United, Luxury is In the Little Things


A translucent wall. A closet. A snack bar. A big TV. These aren’t things that we think of as being front and center when it comes to how people choose their airline, but when you add them up as United has done, they have the desired effect. With a little more time in between me and United’s recent media day, I’ve been able to think bigger picture about how United looks at things. And every often, that big picture… is small.

Sure, United did show off some big, new, shiny toys like its Elevated interior on the B787-9. But on the surface, anyone can outfit an airplane with flat beds. It’s the little things that make a big difference, and I found employee after employee very eager to show off those little things everywhere I turned.

An airline’s layout of passenger accommodations — LOPA for short — is like the blueprint for each aircraft. It’s the LOPA that shows where seats are as well as all the monuments that lie inside — galleys, lavs, etc. When it comes to a LOPA, there is only so much you can do. There is a finite amount of space on any given tube, but that doesn’t mean there is no wiggle room at all. And some airlines are better at maximizing their use of space than others.

Perhaps nothing has shown this off more in recent times than the United A321neo LOPA. On this airplane, United fit 20 First Class seats plus 57 Economy Plus and 123 regular Economy seats for a total of 200. Delta has 194 seats while American is at 196, so you would imagine that United’s configuration would be knee-crunching and disliked.

It’s not.

Filled with big screens full of content, wifi (faster Starlink wifi coming soon), and even a snack bar in the back, United says the A321neo has the airline’s highest customer satisfaction scores in the entire fleet. Perhaps this proves the point that while legroom matters, it’s the cumulative impact of every little thing that can make or break someone’s experience. And expertise with a LOPA can help enable those little things.

This LOPA-ninjaing was on full display at United’s media day on nearly all of its announcements.

For example, take the Relax Row which is a repurposed Air New Zealand Skycouch that will turn a set of three coach seats into a larger bed area on five rows of the airlines widebodies. This product does require adding an extra inch of legroom in those rows. That might be an issue except that in that back cabin where the seats will be, there is extra room available. I imagine the idea of wasted space gnawed at United, so it found something to do with it. This means United can take those five inches to put them to work generating revenue.

Or take the new Polaris flat beds on the transcon A321 Coastliner as well as the A321XLR. The 1-1 herringbone configuration seems to be the default way of fitting in beds on the narrowbody, but United knew that there had been concern about the claustrophobic coffin feeling onboard. It’s no wonder why:

The geometry of the airplane requires using a seat like this or forfeiting too much space, and it does look narrow here, doesn’t it?

But what did United do? It realized that if it lowered the walls a little, carved out more shoulder room, and then installed a translucent wall behind the traveler, it would create a much greater feeling of space and comfort with more light. No, it doesn’t make it so you face the window, which explains this look on my face, but it does still feel different than what others have done.

Then there’s the fancy Polaris Studio suite at the front of each cabin on the new B787-9 with the Elevated interior.

As I understand it, there is an issue with access to the crew rest area that makes it more challenging to put a big screen in those seats. But United figured it out. That new screen is a giant at 27 inches.

Contrast this with American which went with a smaller screen, because it was having trouble with certification. It just feels a whole lot different.

It’s not just up front either. When I walked to the back of the B787, one of the original project managers wanted to show off the 13 inch screens back there. This put United at the top of the class with airlines like Emirates and Japan Airlines. In the US, I don’t think anyone is above 12 inches. Is that a dealbreaker? No. But that extra inch is just part of the overall effort by United to keep improving the product throughout the airplane.

We can talk about the introduction of a closet and the elimination of overhead bins on the new CRJ450, or we can go back in time to the CRJ550 which did something similar. It’s not easy to be creative on a small, regional fleet. This is definitely creative.

To me, these small things were what United really had on display at media day. You can put the headlines in a press release, but when you step onboard and feel the difference, that’s where it will really shine. United seems to get that better than anyone these days.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

28 responses to “For United, Luxury is In the Little Things”

  1. alfajores Avatar
    alfajores

    What United does well with its premium products on long haul wide body aircraft is featuring a unified product. While it took years for the first iteration of Polaris to roll out from the time it was first unveiled in December 2016, the product ultimately became consistent and standard across the 767, 777, and 787 fleets. Yes, some initial perks like wine flights and standard cool gel pillows came and went, but overall, a consistent seat is what UA achieved and that’s something DL is a long, long way from accomplishing (which is why it makes the ground experience in the Delta One lounge look and feel more premium, because apart from the A330-900 and the A350-900, the Delta One seat on 767s and A333/A332s is old, dated and not very comfortable). American has a more consistent product, prior to the roll out of the new Flagship cabin, but still has disparate seats on half of the 77Es and the non-P 789s and the 788s have different seats. The 77W a different seat too.

    While the look and feel of United’s Polaris 2.0 is stellar, whether the on board service matches it will be an open question. US carriers do not excel in customer service at any point in the journey. United’s food and presentation remains awful and cafeteria-level at best.

    1. Eric R Avatar
      Eric R

      UA’s product won’t be unified anymore as they roll out their new product.

      It’s easier to have a unified product when you haven’t updated the product for a couple decades.

    2. GKK Avatar
      GKK

      Gel pillows are standard now, they weren’t at first. Even available on the transcons. Slightly different ones at the moment compared to the original (changed a year or two ago) but they are basically the same thing. Agreed as to the rest of your points.

  2. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
    Mike (dontflymuch)

    I have one gripe here with United, Brett, and youre included in it, and I realized it coming back from Seattle to DC with business class tickets only to be denied access to their lounge in Seattle because according to them only cross country business travelers to Newark had lounge access and not to IAD, after less than stellar international business class trips on united, but to destinations that dont get uniteds Midas touch…

    United has an amazing travel experience … but not for you… for influencers, and travel insiders (Brett) and 1k, sure. So they can go on social media and talk about how amazing United is, but for John Q. Travelers? Naww, you can read about others experiences.

    All in all you can say Im skeptical to incredulous when someone with access talks about how great United is serving them. Say what you want about Southwest or even (whispers) American, but Ive had more equitable experiences there where I feel like I’ve gotten the perks, not watched others get it when I still shell out the money.

    Sorry for the cranky response here

    1. Southside Emil Avatar
      Southside Emil

      What is the logic between the “haves” like Newark and the “have nots” like DC?

      1. SEAN Avatar
        SEAN

        DC maybe the seat of our national government, but NYC is where the real money & power is. That’s why EWR gets priority.

        1. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
          Mike (dontflymuch)

          There could be plenty of reasons, money in NYC being one of them, and while I know nothing about ewrs airport opps and I personally hate EWR, most of uniteds flights are housed in 50 year + temporary trailers in IAD and its governance cant be easy to deal with. Also United has a near monopoly on international flights out of DC except a few flights our of BWI and the rare DCA flight, so theres not incentive. And Im not saying every experience has been bad. I once got put in a new Polaris plane to Amsterdam when a volcano shut down my Icelandair flight, but idk often with United I feel like that meme where im the woman staring at the sad side of the mountain in the bus where everyone with a social media following or insider is the person smiling looking over the valley

      2. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        Corporate accounts in NYC, which are frequently financial institutions like banks and PE firms, tend to buy up in First and more last minute, meaning higher yield. UA is desperate to win/retain those pax

        IAD is a lot of government traffic, which buys more in advance and in coach, so lower yielding pax. Government pax loyalty is less sensitive as the government awards are allocated at the route level annually, so employees have to fly an airline on a certain route regardless

        1. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
          Mike (dontflymuch)

          All true. That or youre Kristi Noem, and you get your own private luxury jet

      3. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        It’s to ease the pain of making premium passengers use EWR.

      4. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        It’s always been this way, at least for the last 20 years or so.

        It’s not a NYC vs DC thing, it’s a NYC vs others thing. Transcontinental flights to BOS, PHL, MIA, ATL, etc. don’t get special treatment either on United or other airlines. However for NYC it’s a competitive necessity because they all do it.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Mike – I have no idea why you think I am somehow given a different experience. Just flew United in deep coach last week (report coming soon) with a connection in Houston. No lounge access, no nothing. But that’s not the point of this post. United is paying attention to the little things, and I’ve given the examples I’ve seen. Does that mean every single person will be happy all the time? Of course not, that would be an unachievable goal. Dulles can certainly use some attention in a lot of different ways, but it doesn’t change anything about what I’ve written.

      1. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
        Mike (dontflymuch)

        Its not a gripe at you as much as the feeling United rolls out the red carpet for influencers such as yourself. Uniteds upgrades seem awesome, but inaccessible in ways that most of the people who boast about their upgrades dont understand. Its not even based on price or class, its based on United priorities and somewhat random chance. For example, would I rather United modernize all of their domestic and international business offerings rather than offer Polaris on a few prime domestic routes ill never take? Sure, but United knows which decision is going to generate the most buzz so I’m left staring out the gloomy window knowing they’res something more equitable about how Southwest upgrades their fleet (or about how American doesn)

  3. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    Meanwhile, United is cutting 5% of flights do to the war in the ME & the surge of the price of jet fuel. Other airlines are choosing to increase baggage fees by up to $10.

    The brokered ceasefire was broken hours after being signed by both US & Israel, which should come as a shock to nobody as that is what they do.

  4. Eric R Avatar
    Eric R

    You should be happy that AA went for any type of screen.

  5. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
    Mike (dontflymuch)

    You see that’s the thing. When I sit in a crappy seat in American with no screen, I can at least think “Yep, this as good as it gets,” Yet I feel short changed when I’m sitting in a business class seat in United that hasn’t been updated since 2007, going cross country or international, reading about domestic lie flat economy seats! Or that great Polaris lounge some influencer is just gushing on United!! knowing that my business class seat (the most expensive one available on my route) wont get me access to. Makes me want to punch my 2007 Business Class seat…

  6. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    One other “little thing” United has done is to include the fancy Airbus Airspace ceiling lighting on their A321s. AA did not. Makes a huge difference in how the cabin looks and feels!

  7. Rick Avatar
    Rick

    The hard product is one thing. I’ve flown United Polaris and it’s a good product. It’s the soft product that’s sorely lacking, from catering to cabin service. A spruced up cabin means nothing if the food and service is poor and having flown United Polaris and domestic first class, United has a long way to go.

    1. BRMM Avatar
      BRMM

      Certainly the traditional argument against United, and based in truth.

      That said, I think United is investing here.

      Domestic first–meals have (in my view) substantially improved in the past 1.5 years. More pre-order options, getting more variety (vs. the same stuff presented for months on end), better tray presentation, better taste. And WAY better wines in the past year or so. My view is that they are pretty equal to AA at lunch and dinner, save for dessert, which AA does better (while UA continues with the gross, pre-processed endless variations on banana pudding), and better at breakfast. And way better than DL, which has actually cut back meals [recently, on MCO-SEA (nearly 7 hours!), DL dinner was no nuts/cocktail snack and an entree–no salad, no appetizer].

      Domestic first service–in my experience, equal to AA on a bad day and way better than AA on a good day. (For example, UA flight attendants are *way* better about asking about coffee/tea after dinner and doing another swing through the cabin for beverages, where on AA, the standard seems to be to sling out the meal and then sit.)

      Polaris–UA is winning on wine, serving way better stuff than AA and UA. Agreed Polaris meals need work, though I’ve seen some small improvements.

  8. BRMM Avatar
    BRMM

    Really appreciate this post–and have lots to say about it.

    As a person who was ExecPlat on AA for many years (and still am), but has moved enough business to UA to be 1K, and who also flies a lot of Delta and Alaska, my observations are similar to yours. Whether it be the app, with new products, or with (some aspects) of lounges, United is paying attention to the details–and, I would argue, doing so to an extent their competitors are not. As a frequent traveler, I notice it.

    I’ll give some other examples: the attention they have put into gate design at ORD’s B and C concourses. They’ve taken smaller, older gate hold areas and made them work (to an extent AA hasn’t), with clear spaces for where to stand, great signage, and variable (and comfortable) seating. And lots of plugs! Compare this to AA’s H and K concourses (much less L…), which are a furniture/layout mishmash, full of people searching for plugs, and a gamble as to how the agent will board (will they use the priority lane today, or not?). [Commentary: Now that they are flying so much mainline out of E and, now G (which boggles of the mind of this long-time ORD traveler; G is Eagle territory!), they need to bring that level of thoughtfulness to those gates, though I doubt they will do so since they’ve got new concourses opening that will eventually lead to E being demolished.]. The monitors at arrival gates showing connections (which were an innovation Delta premiered a few years ago) have been improved, with not only the flights/status/gates, but arrows showing which direction to walk and even estimated walk times. [That said, I think the new flight information boards were an attempt at thoughtfulness (they have similar information), but don’t actually work very well–too hard to see and a weird flow to the eye. I saw on another blog United has acknowledged this and is working on improvement.]

    1. BRMM Avatar
      BRMM

      Continued…

      It is also interesting to see how non-frequent travelers notice it. Watch infrequent travelers board an AA A321 vs. a UA A321. They won’t say much as they board the AA A321. On the UA A321, they will frequently exclaim as they walk through the front cabin, “wow, this plane is nice!” I would argue the same for Polaris–even though Polaris is a dense configuration, and one could argue AA’s Super Diamond seats are better (more spacious, more storage, etc.), I would submit that Polaris is very well-designed: despite the density, the seat placement is very private (once you’re in your pod, you don’t see other faces, despite the density), and the branding is on-point–the blue plastic with the globes, the grab bars on the seats, etc. All of that took a level of attention to design detail that’s missing on other U.S. carriers.

      United is also assisted here by, at least, AA’s inattention to detail. For example, the Oasis retrofit wasn’t actually tested before it was rolled-out, which led to the horrible design where the center console went all the way to the floor and totally eliminated the under-seat storage, especially on 737s. AA eventually had a retrofit of the retrofit and fixed this, but it was evident that no one at AA had initially asked, “what will a passenger actually experience when flying these seats?”

      I think the monitor in the Polaris studio vs. the is a perfect example. AA’s monitor, with its too-small-for-the-space feel and bulky box, looks like an afterthought, because it probably was. United took the time/had the care to figure it out. Visually, as your photograph shows, there’s a huge difference between the end product, when both carriers are working with the same real estate.

      1. BRMM Avatar
        BRMM

        And some more…

        To me, I also think this gets a customer-centricity. United is far from perfect, for sure. But, as a person who has a lot of experience with both carriers, it’s just evident to me that United is thinking about the customer (from the very beginning of the product’s design) in a way that American is not. There’s a sense that United is investing and getting better for the customer’s actual experience of flying that American just doesn’t care about.

        Interestingly, I would submit that an attention to design detail is actually in United’s DNA from the tulip days, though in those days it was more limited to marketing than on-board product. But even in that era, United’s “look” (ads, airport banners, etc.) had a sophistication about it others lacked. I remember, for example, that United’s kiosks would print boarding passes on gold stock for elite members and blue stock for regular members.

        One could argue that any single example doesn’t matter that much–and, when looked at through the individual traveler, that’s probably true. Some people care about TVs, some don’t. But, in the end, details stack up, and that’s what your post points out.

        1. Bill from DC Avatar
          Bill from DC

          These are all very interesting observations to this formerly elite level frequent flyer and generally jives with my experiences.

  9. Flying without a Compass Avatar
    Flying without a Compass

    The airplane seats are becoming like cars, if they break, it takes sometimes weeks for replacement parts, or the plane is scheduled for almost non stop service for a week, with overnights or days in a foreign country. So you could have 10 people plus sit in that seat. Being broken or INOP. If it locks in the upright position and the seat belt is usable it can go and be sold. Broken monitor, charging port or even a broken tray table. Here is a voucher for your troubles. We carried you from point A to B. that’s your ticket contract.
    United refuses to staff their aircraft above minimum crew. When Gordon B. launched Business First at CO a 777-200 was staffed with 14 flight attendants on IAH-NRT that same Polaris seating flight is staffed with 9 to 10 these days. Interesting how CO won 10 JD. Powers awards for service. United never has. I wonder why? SK

    1. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      Does any US airline staff above minimum required levels?

  10. Andy Avatar
    Andy

    Where’s Tim Dunn on this thread. Here are my predictions of his comments.

    1. Big screens hurt Tim’s eyes, Delta’s screen size is perfect
    2. A self service snack bar is actually United skimping out on flight attendants, Delta would never do this and will always have their non-unionized (though less happy and not supported by proper work rules) flight attendants to yell at you while they hand you biscoff cookies
    3. A321XLRs? I would never fly a narrowbody across the Atlantic – only terrible old 767s for me.
    4. New seats? Delta also has new seats – they are updating the fabric on their seats, its basically the same thing as what United is doing but better because it is Delta.

  11. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    Did anybody else notice that sad looking TV box used for AmericAAnt’s most premium of premium seats and think of Michael Scott’s flat screen TV on The Office?

    As a point of reference that episode aired in 2008. Eighteen years ago. Which seems about right considering AmericAAnt’s reticence to adapt technology.

Leave a Reply to Rick Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier