STL Tries to Finally Get Beyond TWA


Behold, the mighty St Louis Lambert International Airport!

It’s a massive complex with four runways, more than 80 gates, a Boeing (formerly McDonnell Douglas) manufacturing complex, and a national guard base. Or at least, it was at its peak. But St Louis, like many mid-size cities in the middle, has seen its shine tarnish, and the airport has suffered. To bastardize an old saying, they built the church for what they thought was a Wednesday, but it turns out it was built for far more than even Easter Sunday needed.

When the terminal complex was first built in the 1950s, it was a modest affair with three concourses. You’ll see the basic original footprint in black below.

Those concourses were renovated and/or rebuilt in the 1970s/80s when TWA and Ozark really focused on growing their operations at the airport. Concourse A on the upper left was extended while Concourse C on the upper right grew even more. And then Concourse D at the bottom was built. That yellow and black outline was the steady state during the heyday of the airport. TWA bought Ozark in 1986, and the airline kept growing St Louis as its main domestic hub.

But it wasn’t just domestic, TWA grew into a global carrier from St Louis with B747s to multiple cities in Europe. The hub was buzzing, and St Louis became the airline’s headquarters in the early 1990s. This was a red airport through and through… until the change.

In the 1990s, another airline started to grow in St Louis: Southwest. By 1998, the East Terminal was opened in St Louis off the end of Concourse D, creating a home for that airlne with its own check-in and parking areas away from the main terminal. The airport was bursting at the seams.

And then, it all fell apart.

TWA had been wobbly during the 1990s, but the airport somehow didn’t see it. It commissioned a third runway, 11/29, to be built at the northwest part of the airport. That didn’t open until 2006 when it was clear it would never be needed.

By then, TWA had been taken over by American (in 2001) and despite an early effort to keep the hub going, it only shrank from that point. The hub officially closed in 2009, the same year the Air National Guard unit left the airport as well. Suddenly, St Louis was a much quieter airport.

As with other mid-size airports, local flying did pick up to backfill the vacuum left by American when it closed up shop. But the airport had far too much terminal real estate, so it started shutting things down. Today, it looks like this:

Concourses B and D are shut down completely, though Southwest did extend its terminal into the end of the old D a little to make sure it had enough gates for its growing operation.

Meanwhile, the airport’s infrastructure is old and in desperate need of updating. Enter the airport’s modernization plan.

So far, STL has focused on fixing some of its issues around the airfield. It has moved its airfield maintenance and is building a new deicing pad on the west side. There are a variety of other fixes that will help to operate like a smaller airport would.

But it’s the terminal complex itself that needs the most work. The airport entrance off I-70 will be moved a little further west, and the current garage will be replaced with a bigger one alongside a new ground transportation center.

The headhouse itself has to stick around. Unlike other cities, St Louis has a deep love for its headhouse because of its four iconic domes:

This will continue to be where passenger processing is done, but they will be completely remaking the inside of the space. The concourses, however, well… nobody has any love for those. So the new plan is to build a single replacement concourse with 62 gates that will look like this:

The new concourse will be directly connected to the headhouse via a single TSA checkpoint, and it will sit on the footprint of the original 1950s-era concourses, simply spreading further west and east.

When this is done sometime next decade, the East Terminal (now called Terminal 2) will close, and it will be a much more compact design, all this for a $3 billion price tag.

I’m not sure how the phasing will be done here, but it shouldn’t be all that hard. With so much unused space, they can presumably knock down the A gates and rebuild that half of the concourse while relocating the airlines temporarily. That’s the easy part at an airport like this one which grew far too big for even its wildest dreams.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

71 responses to “STL Tries to Finally Get Beyond TWA”

  1. Anon Avatar
    Anon

    Why is there a need to demolish terminal space and then build afresh ? Airplanes still look and function pretty much the same way they did in 1986 as in 2026. Passengers still do what they used to do. Traffic volumes in 2025 are half what they were just before AA bought TW – that says to me plenty of flexibility to refurbish instead of huge capital expenditure for a new build

    1. Emil D Avatar
      Emil D

      The concourses are falling apart. Years ago one was even hit head-on by a tornado.

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      Things get old and a lot of what is there was not built to last.

      The layout makes little sense. Two headhouses is idiotic. Removing one will reduce complexity, operating costs, etc.

    3. Jacob Avatar
      Jacob

      The current configuration is all wrong. Most traffic is crammed in the smaller of the 2 terminals (Southwest has over 60% market share). It’s not easy to shuffle airlines around because T2 was basically built for 1-2 tenants, and the lobby is quite small. Customs is in a bad place and can’t be expanded, the roads are congested and there’s no room to reconfigure them… could go on and on. Basically the complex needs a major renovation and reconfiguration, and most of the infrastructure is so outdated that it makes more sense to largely start fresh.

    4. Eric R Avatar
      Eric R

      I am impressed by the use of the word “afresh”

  2. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Spending all that time and money to build an entirely new SMALLER terminal?

    Make it make sense.

    1. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      I remember flying there in 2012 and the airport was in terrible shape. There were lots of missing windows filled with plywood. This in an airport that needs to see the wrecking ball.

      1. TWA302 Avatar
        TWA302

        Those boards were due to the tornado that hit the airport.

    2. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      The current airport is too big for the city’s needs, even factoring in reasonable growth, and the concourses are just really, really old. There’s no sense in making it bigger than it needs to be. STL is never going to be a connecting hub again.

      (Well, barring some insane centre-of-the-country hub resulting from a hypothetical AS/B6 merger, but I’d put the odds of that as being even less non-existant than Spirit’s survival.)

      This is a chance to competely remake the airside with state-of-the-art gate spaces and consolidate to a single headhouse.

      Makes perfect sense to me.

      1. Partrick Avatar
        Partrick

        Jet Blew York could really use a mid-continent base….too bad they’re letting STL go to waste

  3. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
    Mike (dontflymuch)

    62 gates still seems like a lot, especially with Southwest focusing more and more on MCI/KCI.

    As far as why do this, every bureau of tourism wants their airport to be sparkling new, i mean its the first thing a traveler experiences when they go to a city.

    Loving this series Brett cant wait for MKE and RDU next!

    1. Gregg Wiggins Avatar
      Gregg Wiggins

      MCO (in Orlando they say that stands for “Mickey’s Corporate Office”) would be a good choice for a future post as well.

      1. MetroCity Avatar
        MetroCity

        Nobody in Orlando says that. I lived there for a long time and heard that reference exactly zero times. MCO refers to the old McCoy Air Force Base that once stood where MCO is now.

        That said, Orlando was designed to not easily be expanded. It is attractive enough and modern enough, but it is hell to fly out of. Anybody who has dealt with the mind numbing traffic getting into MCO and the interminable TSA lines can tell you that the Orlando airport is the worst part of any central Florida trip. Even if you’re a local.

        1. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
          Mike (dontflymuch)

          Part of it too must be the people who travel to Orlando are going to be less likely the Precheck + Clear pack efficiently business travelers and more likely the travel with the kids, occasional travelers who dont have a routine down or people who need extra assistance at security. I feel the same was traveling through MCO and LAS in this regard

        2. Gregg Wiggins Avatar
          Gregg Wiggins

          I live just outside Orlando, I fly through MCO on a regular basis, and it’s a common nickname for the airport, at least among the people I know and sometimes travel with.

          That said, the (often derogatory) monikers people expand IATA codes into might be an interesting post in and of itself.

          1. Matt D Avatar
            Matt D

            Charlotte, NC is just an “I” away from infamy.

            And NOBODY who is a true California native calls the state “Cali.” That is 100% a product of out of state people trying to sound cool and trendy (they sound like douches to us natives when they refer to the state that way).

        3. Brian Gasser Avatar
          Brian Gasser

          I find MCO to not be a bad airport to fly through based on the volume of pax it carries. The traffic in front of LAX is significantly worse, TSA lines at DEN are worse, and SLC takes forever to walk through. I also like having the rental cars on site than needing a shuttle bus like LGA or CMH.

    2. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      As dollars become more difficult to come by for huge projects like these, airport authorities need to design with future proofing in mind.

      MCO is a hubless airport that functions as if it had one. Then again Southwest & JetBlue both have a decent size operation there.

      As for MKE, it may have lost it’s hub carrier Midwest Express, but it still functions well as another airport for Chicago’s northern suburbs.

      RDU is in a thriving metro area with all those universities & the triangle research park, so there’s nothing to be concerned about there.

      1. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
        Mike (dontflymuch)

        I dont think you understand. As Brett as doing a really good series on former Midwest hubs and how they have pivoted, MKE and to a certain extent RDU would naturally be the next entries in this series

        1. SEAN Avatar
          SEAN

          Oh, I love this series as well. Just adding my thoughts, but of course I want to know Brett’s thoughts too.

        2. Brett Avatar

          Mike – MKE is too boring. They just closed one concourse and are building a new customs facility there. There’s not much to talk about. And actually, same for RDU. They knocked down the old AA hub years ago and built a new building on top of it. Not really anything in progress that I know about.

          1. Alex B. Avatar
            Alex B.

            Are there any other big former hubs that are reinventing themselves? You’ve now covered the big ones: CLE, PIT, STL, MCI, CVG…

            Always interested in seeing more about airports; there’s the obvious big investments at the big airports (LAX, JFK, ORD, etc) but seeing more on existing hubs that are in the process of reinventing themselves would be cool (SLC, IAD, ORD… maybe IAH?).

            I’m also struck in reading about STL and how the airport itself had bad luck with the health of it’s main airline tenant, but it’s also an older airfield that struggled to modernize over the years. Would be curious for more deep dives on airports that have successfully done so.

            1. Brett Avatar

              Alex B – Not really any more huge ones, though I might do a couple more down the road. This was the last of the big ones though.

            2. Dan d Avatar
              Dan d

              How about BNA? How does Southwest’s current operation compare to American’s hub in 90s?

            3. Brett Avatar

              Ok fair, BNA might be worth doing. I’ll need to dig into that one.

          2. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
            Mike (dontflymuch)

            Ahh bummer

    3. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      What airport is KCI? KCI is IATA code for Koolan Island.

      1. Gregg Wiggins Avatar
        Gregg Wiggins

        “MCI” is the IATA code “KCI” is the acronym for “Kansas City International”.

      2. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
        Mike (dontflymuch)

        KCI is what locals in Kansas City (and the signage there) call MCI, which interestingly I just learned you cant have an IATA code start with W or K in the us because of radio stations

        1. JB14-Hrbek Avatar
          JB14-Hrbek

          KOA Kona would like a word. Interestingly enough, KOA is also a radio station.

          1. southbay flier Avatar
            southbay flier

            Hawaii and Alaska are exceptions.

            Also, the IACO airport codes for the mainland US all start with K. The codes for Alaska are PA and Hawaii are PH.

        2. Iowa Airspace Avatar
          Iowa Airspace

          Yes it’s like Denver locals referring to their airport as DIA instead of DEN.

          1. jd Avatar
            jd

            I used to find the DIA acronym so annoying. It makes sense though, considering that when it was built DEN could have referred to either it or the old Stapleton airport.

            Same thing happened in Austin. Locals call AUS ”ABIA” (which still sounds gross) after the current airport replaced Mueller.

            Speaking of, the Mexico City practice of using four letter airport names (AICM and AIFA in place of MEX and NLU) really befuddles me. Is this done in the rest of Mexico/Latam?

    4. SJ Avatar
      SJ

      The tourism board has/had no influence on whether or not the terminal needed redesigned. It’s paid for by the airlines through their landing fees, so it had to make business sense.

      1. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
        Mike (dontflymuch)

        This is a weird, easily disprovable take, of course Chambers and tourism boards play an active role in any decision pertaining to an airport renovation.

        https://greaterstlinc.com/newsroom/transform-the-airport-gsl-champions-support-for-vital-regional-growth-project/

    5. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      STL has does have more traffic than MCI. IIRC, St. Louis is a bigger metro area than Kansas City as well.

  4. Eric_L Avatar
    Eric_L

    Does anyone know whether or not they will assign gates based on the CUTE model or the traditional?
    WN has given STL a few haircuts recently and dropping routes flown for decades with no competition.
    Not screaming doom but it’s worth mentioning. Also STLs growing ULCC footprint is on shakey leg carriers .

  5. Dan d Avatar
    Dan d

    This doesn’t even get into the second airport they built to relieve the traffic that’s been mostly empty.

    1. Matt Avatar
      Matt

      They (STL) didn’t build it. Illinois built it on land adjacent to Scott Air Force Base. You could also argue that Illinois officials also didn’t predict the future correctly either.

      1. SEAN Avatar
        SEAN

        “You could also argue that Illinois officials also didn’t predict the future correctly either.”

        For that they needed a psychic on the states payroll.

      2. Dan D Avatar
        Dan D

        I thought congestion at Lambert was the reason Mid America received federal funding

  6. Gregg Wiggins Avatar
    Gregg Wiggins

    The 2009 movie “Up in the Air” with George Clooney as a 10-million-mile frequent flyer was largely filmed at one of STL’s closed-off concourses. The set designers “dressed” the gates for shooting purposes to look like the gates at different airports. So LGA would be next door to ORD would be next door to LAS and so forth. The “magic of the movies.”

  7. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    This goes to show that the era of rebuilding airports is well underway. There are and will be very few low cost airports from a cost per passenger enplaned standpoint.
    Airports that expanded and updated pre-covid have far lower costs than those that are being built now.
    WN used a lot of lower cost airports which partially expands their inability to continue to carry high volumes of low fare traffic

  8. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    Overall, this is a much better option than the prior proposals which involved building a new terminal on the other side of the runways to the northeast.

    I grew up traversing STL. Let’s be honest – it was crowded then, the FIS sucked (and still does) both on C and E, and these days Southwest has crammed as many jetways as physically possible into the East Terminal and now there is expansion down the D direction. The head house on East is also at capacity with tiny screening checkpoints.

    Maybe it is too many gates for the moment… but it’s probably cheaper to built a bit over needed capacity than to have to come back and add on. Certainly $3 billion seems like a lot but for an airport re-work, it’s damn cheap. I mean, JFK is spending nearly $10 billion for a new Terminal 1 with not even 25 gates. MCI was cheaper, but smaller than this proposal.

  9. sunviking82 Avatar
    sunviking82

    This was my home airport and airline during the 1990’s when I traveled TWA almost weekly. It was a great set up especially if you lived in STL. I moved to MSP and now PHX since, but those early work years traveling on TWA (or as some would call it “Try Walking Again” or “Twenty Wobbly Aircraft” LOL) was a great experience. I do miss automatically getting booked into First class as a 20 something and honestly, they took great care of me over the years.

    Lambert was always mess, but much better if you lived in STL then had to transfer flights. I go back now and again for work or to see friends/family and it’s a sad reminder of better days. Miss the “red” and the people at check in (yes we had to do it in person) and the many Ambassador clubs plus the ease of getting any where from Lincoln to London without a stop.

    I do like this plan however, it will right size the airport for the first time in 25 years and make the “front door” to STL something to be proud of.

    1. JB14-Hrbek Avatar
      JB14-Hrbek

      Teeny Weenie Airline is another one I heard.

    2. OriginalPatsFan Avatar
      OriginalPatsFan

      I also heard Travel With Angels

  10. grichard Avatar
    grichard

    For those who are skeptical about the need to rebuild: the place is falling apart. All of the main terminal is decaying. The Southwest gates are marginally okay, but the Southwest headhouse is grossly inadequate.

    I am usually skeptical of big civic vanity projects, but it doesn’t surprise me at all that it makes more sense to rebuild, even into a smaller footprint.

  11. Emil D Avatar
    Emil D

    Brett, can you lump Rockford and Belleville into one article?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Emil – There is nothing to say about those airports even lumped together!

  12. Patrick Hynde Avatar
    Patrick Hynde

    Is this short bus day at Cranky Flier?

  13. TomS Avatar
    TomS

    As a lifelong resident the new terminal is long long overdue. As mentioned before, if you are in the A gates, it is turn the lights out at 7 PM. On the E gates (Southwest), it is so crowded at times at 10 PM that you have to wait in line at the restrooms. WN definitely needs more gates at STL, even with the elimination of some small close-in Midwest routes they dropped. Its operation is between 110-120 flights per day to 50 + nonstop destinations, and while that is not even close to BWI, MDW, LAS and other massive WN operations, it is still impressive for a city this size. In fact, most Midwest cities would die for this type operation. WN has asked for more gates in the new terminal as well, so contrary to what some have posted, it is not diminishing its operations. (At least that is the current focus – you never really know with Elliott in charge). What is known it that the current terminal it is very outdated, roof leaks, and is in need of a complete new terminal. By the way, Boeing (mentioned only in the beginning paragraph) is building a 1.8 B new hanger/development on the north side of the airport for the future fighter jets of the AF.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Do to the smaller footprints at both MDW & MCI, Southwest can use STL for additional passenger flows. Sure that 62 gates will be well used as currently there are only 54 gates.

      Just to compare…

      MCI 40 gates
      MKE 38 gates
      MDW 43 gates
      RDU 45 gates
      MCO 129 gates
      ATL 193 gates

    2. Brian Gasser Avatar
      Brian Gasser

      No terminal should decay like LGA before it gets a major overhaul.

  14. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    I miss the old TWA.

    1. Patrick Avatar
      Patrick

      Likewise..

  15. David C Avatar
    David C

    That seems like a LOT of gates. If we pretended that WN wasn’t there as a hub of sorts, how many gates would really be needed?

    1. TWA302 Avatar
      TWA302

      You can’t pretend WN is not here when they have 60%+ market share. But to answer your question, 28 gates is what A and C have for other airlines. You can also add one more that is where LH/BA and other Intl. arrivals use in T2

      1. David C Avatar
        David C

        You didn’t read what I asked…if WN HUB wasn’t there.

        And I can and will make that assumption if I like to get an idea of true local demand.

        1. TWA302 Avatar
          TWA302

          I read it accurately. The local demand IS there; that is why WN is the number one carrier. This also allows for growth past what we have now, and the airlines have worked with the airport/city to approve the plan so that more gates don’t have to be added 10 years later. It makes sense.

  16. TWA302 Avatar
    TWA302

    Brett- Tell everyone in the room why STL grew far too big for even its wildest dreams. In the TW era every gate was rammed, hence the reason why WN wanted their own terminal. Expansion was needed badly. 30.6 million passengers peaked in 2000. Look forward to the reply to back up your statement.

    1. Brett Avatar

      TWA302 – That runway was never needed, and it never will be.

      1. TWA302 Avatar
        TWA302

        You NEVER mentioned W1W, and the planning started in the 1990s. If you do a little reading, you will find that the amount of congestion that was created due to poor weather reduced the airport from three runways to one. When 9/11 happened and TW collapsed (not anything that was predicted when W1W was planned), the project was already too far to be reversed. The runway is used today more than you would think.

        Also, there is a full plan on how the consolidated terminal will be built, including how the demo of terminals will happen and how airlines will be moved to C/D as they build out the new terminal.

  17. stogieguy7 Avatar
    stogieguy7

    Connected through STL many times on TWA back in the 1980s and 1990s. It was truly a mega-hub….at this point, TWA’s service had been changed into: major cities coast to coast, Europe (mainly via JFK) and everything else connecting via STL. So, STL had a ton of flights and was crowded as hell. As airports went in, say, 1991 – it was average at best. “Planes, Trains & Automobiles” did capture some of the feel of the place back then.

    Within a decade, TWA would be swallowed up by AA and I immediately predicted that STL’s days as a hub were numbered. After all, STL and ORD were simply too close together to make sense. But AA tried to tell locals that everything was awesome – which they soon could see was BS. And now here we are. Great write up on his very interesting slice of commercial aviation history.

  18. John G Avatar
    John G

    The problem for STL has not changed. Just as they were too close to ORD for AA, as WN morphs into a more typical job and spoke carrier, they are still surrounded by other better hubs.

    MDW, MCI, and BNA are all quite close. Thinking that WN will add significant flights at STL is a pipe dream. Especially when they can easily add at MCI and BNA.

    And by the time STL finishes this project any hope of building a hub will be done.

    They should follow the lead of MEM and make the airport as nice as they can for local fliers.

    1. Jacob Avatar
      Jacob

      MCI is a smaller market. MDW is pretty much capped out on space. The real factor here is BNA. For many years STL and BNA were around the same size in WN’s operation. Now BNA is exploding and STL has seen some minor cuts. I suspect as time goes on, WN will maintain a large presence at STL, but it will be geared more at local traffic and below the peak of 130 departures per day that we saw a few years ago. I could see a stable operation around 80-110 departures per day for the foreseeable future with little growth.

  19. Jp Avatar
    Jp

    As a Former TSA Officer, I really hated this place. Oily dust everywhere. Asbestos in the “A” Concourse flooring. And the setup for the garage and commuting really sucks. The garage is one minor tremor from collapsing, it’s so old and rusted out.

    The thing that bothers me… well TWO things. Is that Southwest wants to expand its number of gates and has been limited by AA because they have a lease on the closed “D” Concourse. They need to give these companies room to expand, not limit them.

    And why would you possibly want your car rental companies on the other side of the highway from the terminal?! You’re just adding unnecessary traffic with the various shuttles always cruising through.

  20. RKC Avatar

    Brett, I suggest a review of BNA. Clearly SWA wants to make this a strong multi-directional hub. Having just flown through there, they need more gates (because they aren’t going to use the island terminal and have passengers bused over) and AA isn’t going to give up their gates next door to SWA. The taxi-ways are interesting??? as we taxied out we went straight, then left turn onto a runway, then right turn down the runway , at the end we made a 60 degree angle turn back to our left to take a taxi-way way out to the active. It might be interesting to see BNA’s future plan. This may partially explain why SWA has a mini east-west hub at STL.

    Keep up the good work

  21. mmdolphin Avatar
    mmdolphin

    Brett, On a different note, why are American & WN asleep as Avelo launches from McKinney Airport (TKI) in the Dallas area

    1. Brett Avatar

      mmdolphin – Yeah, there’s a lot to unpack on this one. So the current arrangement is ending which prohibited American and Southwest from using another airport in the metroplex unless they wanted to give up gates at their primary. But that has certainly held the back until now. I don’t imagine TKI is going to be a good option for Southwest anyway. Love is too close. Perhaps American would think about it, but it’s not really going to add much value for them. Their goal is to push as much as they can through the hub.

  22. Mike (dontflymuch) Avatar
    Mike (dontflymuch)

    I feel like there was a thread about this a few weeks back, and I recall someone saying part of it has to do with agreements AA and WN have with DFW and DAL accordingly

Leave a Reply to John G Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier