Indianapolis Built Its Terminal Further Away, but Columbus is Getting Closer


And now for the next installment of my look at former hubs around the country, I’m combining two into one today. In a sense, they are similar, but in another, they are complete opposites. I’m talking about the main airports for two cities connected by I-70, only about a 3-hour drive apart. That’s right, it’s Indianapolis and Columbus, two former, minor hubs that have built or are building new terminals 20 years apart.

Indianapolis was a small hub for USAir until the 1990s. When that ended, ATA built up a hub in its hometown. ATA killed its hub shortly before the airline died in the mid-2000s, and then Northwest had something of a focus city as part of its Heartland strategy for a time. It may not have grown to the heights of other Midwestern hubs, but it still had its zeniths and nadirs.

Traffic at IND peaked in 2005 with more than 180 daily departures and more than 6 million annual departing seats. They probably thought the sky was the limit. In fact, the airport’s gleaming new terminal opened in between the two primary runways way back in 2008, but this was right before the fall. By 2014, traffic was down to about 125 daily flights and just under 4.5 million departing seats. Here is IND in all its glory today:

That massive facility along the bottom of the image is FedEx’s hub facility. If you look closely, you can see the old terminal on the right side of the airport. The large concrete ramp still has the ghosts of the terminal and concourses shadowed. Only the parking garage still stands.

As someone who spent plenty of time visiting my soon-to-be in-laws flying through that old terminal, I can certainly attest that it desperately needed to be replaced. The concourses were awkward, small, and had independent security checkpoints which did not help traffic flow well. The new terminal was a huge improvement in every way but one. It added a whole lot of drive time to get to the airport.

I rotated this map a little so it would be easier to read, but that green dotted line that connects with the yellow one is following I-465. That segment of the road runs true north-south. I-465 is the beltway around the city that made it very easy to get into the old terminal. Now, it requires going on I-70 west for awhile before circling back on the airport access road around the end of the runways.

There are time savings in other ways, however. If the airport was departing from the southwest, it was one long taxi from the old terminal. It’s much easier now. Then again, it has increased the taxi time when the winds are blowing the other direction.

The reality is that there really wasn’t a better option unless they wanted to decommission the crosswind runway or pay a ton to tunnel the road under it, and what’s done is done. This is old news, but I bring it up to contrast it with what Columbus is facing as it works to build its new terminal right now.

Here is the current CMH:

The old Port Columbus — I loved that name, but it was changed to John Glenn Columbus International nearly a decade ago — lies to the northeast of downtown Columbus, the opposite of the situation in Indianapolis.

Port Columbus was the smallest hub for America West from 1992 until it started shrinking in 1999. This was another airport I knew well since I would shuttle back and forth to school in DC as an intern at America West in the 1990s. The hub was gone by 2003, but there really was no letup in demand as other airlines moved in. It actually saw its peak in 2007 with about 170 daily departures and annual departing seats topping 5 million for the only time until 2023. That year benefited from the short-lived introduction of Skybus using the ULCC model.

With traffic growing and the terminal rapidly aging, it was time for Columbus to do something. As in Indianapolis, the terminal sits toward one end of the airport, but unlike Indianapolis, it lies far away from the main airport entrance. So when it was time to create a new terminal? They looked at the easiest opportunity… the sea of parking lots in between.

The new plan is called CMH Next. It started with relocating the rental cars into a new structure outside the current parking garage. It ends in 2029 with a brand new terminal. Here is the plan:

The rental car center is already up and running, and if you’ve flown to CMH that probably annoys you. After all, it requires a shuttle from the current terminal. But it will be just a short walk from the new terminal, connected to the new parking garage as well.

The new terminal will actually have more gates than the current one, up to 36 from 29. The whole project is set to cost $2 billion while the terminal itself will be $1.6 billion. That’s a whole lot more bang for your buck than what Cleveland is getting with its $1.6 billion plan. As an added bonus, the terminal will be closer to the airport entrance off I-670.

Both Columbus and Indianapolis came to similar conclusions twenty years apart. The difference is that Columbus’s path of least resistance actually results in a better terminal placement whereas the opposite was true in Indy. For Columbus, that means there really weren’t any big trade-offs to consider. Now if only they’d change it back to Port Columbus….

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

50 responses to “Indianapolis Built Its Terminal Further Away, but Columbus is Getting Closer”

  1. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    A point of contestation and a question

    1) contestation- I love the name John Glenn international. So few airports are actually named after people who are deeply rooted in the history of aviation, don’t knock one of the better people who was.

    2) Question: can you or someone explain to me why Columbus had and still has two large (footprint wise) airports not very far apart that are still used for commercial aviation and have regular commercial flights? Ive been there, the city isnt that big…

    1. Grichard Avatar
      Grichard

      Not the stature of John Glenn, but: Albert B. Lambert, for whom Lambert St Louis International Airport was named, took flying lessons from the Wright Brothers, held the first pilot’s license in Missouri, and was one of the financial backers of Lindbergh’s flight.

    2. Kenneth Avatar
      Kenneth

      I’m never a fan of naming airports after people, as you never know how kind the future is going to be to them. John Wayne is awkward, and naming SDF after Muhammad Ali seems a bit tone deaf for a variety of reasons. Even if you give him a pass on draft dodging (which I can do, somewhat), you would think impregnating a 16-year old while in his 30s would have done him in, let alone the allegations he was involved sexually with a 12-year old. Somehow that town loves him enough to give him a pass on all of that for the same reason we’ll probably see a Panama City-Matt Gaetz International in our future.

      1. stogieguy7 Avatar
        stogieguy7

        Now do Harry Reid……

      2. Luuk van Erp Avatar
        Luuk van Erp

        This is why we in Amsterdam will always be proud to have named our airport after Dr. Leopold Schiphol, noted Dutch humanitarian and academic from the 17th century.

        Dr. Schiphol is credited with starting the first orphanage in the Netherlands and for inventing the stroopwafel.

        1. Brian Avatar
          Brian

          He should have an entire universe named after him for inventing the stroopwafel.

      3. JB14-Hrbek Avatar
        JB14-Hrbek

        My friends and I refer to SNA as “Rodney Cline Carew International Airport.”

    3. tb Avatar
      tb

      @Mike Rickenbacker is a converted Army Air Field that is still home to multiple Ohio National Guard units. It’s also a powerhouse cargo hub for the entire midwest, with several International carriers operating cargo flights there. And then there’s Allegiant – of course they could fit at CMH no problem, but their model is always whatever is most confusing for passengers and cheapest for them. So LCK it is. Basically a full-cargo operation with military Ops, and then whatever Allegiant decides to throw at it.

      1. Potcake Avatar
        Potcake

        Damn— beat me by sixty seconds.

      2. Mike Avatar
        Mike

        Interesting. Seems expensive for whomever runs rickenbacker (if they are run by the same people as glenn) to maintain a TSA presence for just one airline that could just as easily to to Glenn

        1. Freightdog Avatar
          Freightdog

          The TSA isn’t there for just passengers.

          Freight has to be screened by the TSA.

          International pilots need to be screened.

          There’s more to it than what you know.

        2. JT8D Avatar
          JT8D

          The US has a surplus of airfields because they’re subsidized – runways and taxiway programs are often covered by federal dollars.

          It’s like subsidizing corn – you subsidize it, you get too much of it.

          And just like having too much corn, you then get additional govt programs to fix the fact that you have too much of it. In the case of corn, ethanol subsidies. In the case of airfields, you get programs like SCASDP – subsidies to encourage air service at the many airports that don’t have it.

      3. EnzyteBob Avatar
        EnzyteBob

        Also, it gets the letters LCK because it was formerly known as the Lockbourne Air Force Base because it was located outside of Lockbourne, Ohio. It was renamed after flying ace and Eastern Airlines executive Eddie Rickenbacker, a Columbus native.

    4. Potcake Avatar
      Potcake

      I assume the second large airport you’re referring to is Rickenbacker International (another airport named after a famous aviator). That airport started as an army airfield during WWII and morphed into Lockbourne (later Rickenbacker) AFB during the Cold War. The base was later closed and became a National Guard base, a commercial freight center, and a ULCC airport. A number of passenger carriers have attempted to fly from there, but I think Allegiant is the only one still left.

      1. JB14-Hrbek Avatar
        JB14-Hrbek

        I assumed it was Dayton?

        1. Potcake Avatar
          Potcake

          DAY is a long, long way from Columbus. Its catchment is different from CMH, attracting passengers mostly from western Ohio and northern Cincinnati. It’s no cheaper to fly from DAY than CMH, CMH has more destinations, and (I think) the only carrier that flies from DAY and not CMH is Allegiant.

          1. stogieguy7 Avatar
            stogieguy7

            Last year, my Friday afternoon RJ from DAY-ORD was cancelled (sadly, not a rare event in my experience). Options out of DAY were few, but CMH was a better bet. CVG is actually a little farther and the flight options were inferior to CMH as well. Flying across the Ohio countryside in a rented car, I drove from DAY to CMH in about 1:15. Results not typical.

            But I can assure you that they aren’t in the same ‘area’ and National Car rental saw it that way as well, hitting me with a nice, big one-way rental fee.

            1. EnzyteBob Avatar
              EnzyteBob

              I used Avis once after my brother screwed up booking our flights to the Sugar Bowl the year Ohio State was playing. They did not charge anything extra.

              I flew to Sioux Falls through Chicago one time from the Dayton airport. It was one of those quirks where it was significantly cheaper from there and I don’t mind the extra drive. They screwed up my bag and they actually had a courier drive it out from Dayton to the east side of Columbus to deliver it to me.

              I told them, can’t you just send it to the Columbus airport? I don’t live too far from there. Nope. This is their way of doing things. I guess they’re not flexible enough to change the destination of a bag.

    5. Mr Eric Avatar
      Mr Eric

      Question 2 – Most cities the size of Columbus have viable secondary airports that can be used for commercial service should a carrier such as Allegiant choose to fly there and save money on airport costs.

      It’s less about the city and more about a carrier’s choice / preference.

      1. Mike Avatar
        Mike

        I dunno. I feel its rare for small cities (like Pittsburgh Cleveland or Indianapolis) to have second airports set up for commercial aviation and TSA etc.

        1. Mr Eric Avatar
          Mr Eric

          I’m not trying to imply it’s common, but it exists more than it may first appear, and easy for new secondary airports to initiate service if a carrier expresses interest and their is common interest from the city/county.

          Other examples besides just LCK are Belleville right outside of STL and Latrobe outside PIT, SFB outside Orlando.

    6. James Cencer Avatar
      James Cencer

      Columbus is the 13th largest city in the US, 2.1M in the metropolitan area. Not that big, LOL

        1. TempoNick Avatar
          TempoNick

          27th by CSA and the airport does draw from a wider region which includes places like Zanesville, Marion and Chillicothe that are part of the CSA, and Findlay, Lima, Parkersburg and Huntington-Ashland, which are not. If you are departing from Findlay, your choices are basically Columbus, Detroit and Dayton.

    7. EnzyteBob Avatar
      EnzyteBob

      Columbus has the 27th largest CSA according to the census bureau. (Combined Statistical Area.) It’s not New York, but it’s not exactly small, either. The airport draws not only from all over Mid-Ohio, but also gets passengers from West Virginia and Kentucky.

      The second airport is a vestige of the former Rickenbacker Air Force Base. It was decommissioned in the 1980s and has been very successful as a cargo airport. Columbus is within a day’s drive of half of the US and Canadian population so a lot of distribution happens from the area.

      I don’t know what the thinking was in adding very limited passenger service from that airport. I suspect it has to do with being eligible for grants from the government.

    8. Cat Food Flambe' Avatar
      Cat Food Flambe’

      The “second airport” (Rickenbacker International Airport) was the old Lockbourne AFB, which was decommissioned in the 1980’s. It continued to operate as an Air National Guard base, housing what is today the 121st Air Refueling Wing of the Ohio ANG, which focused around KC135 tankers and its ilk – the base featured a 10,000 ft runway and extensive supporting aprons. It’s also remarkably close to downtown Columbus for a facility of its size”

      Port Columbus (now John Glenn International) was even then “land-locked”. As air passenger traffic began to increase in the 1980 at the same time air courier/cargo operations began to build, space at Port Columbus began to present a problem. The Columbus Regional Airport Authority saw the obvious – Columbus was becoming a major logistics center, and as such a dedicated cargo airport could become a significant asset. While air cargo operations come and go with the economy, it’s now the hub of a number of large logistics parks and a major rail intermodal facility. Fedex and UPS operate out of Rickenbacker, as do several small niche freight carriers.

      Several years ago, the CRAA cut a deal with Allegiant to establish KLCK as their Columbus facility. My unlearned understanding is that doing so made the airport eligible for a lot of Federal Transportation funding programs to maintain the airfield facilities. A passenger terminal was built and conducts a fair amount of business.

      All told, what would have been a major white elephant has been turned into a significant asset, and serves as a sort of an “ace in the hold” for the future.

  2. stogieguy7 Avatar
    stogieguy7

    IND’s terminal is one of the nicest in the USA. And the extra drive is not really that bad. I’d say that was a very successful project. CMH, as it stands right now, is functional and there are many worse facilities out there. But, it could use a refresh for sure. In theory, this looks like a good plan, though it will take a lot of work and I wouldn’t be shocked if that proposed schedule slips somewhat.

    Still, both projects represent much better value than what CLE is doing. Which seems stupidly phased to me.

    1. Paul Avatar
      Paul

      Do you have a better idea for the phasing of CLE given its much more limited footprint?

      1. stogieguy7 Avatar
        stogieguy7

        Renovating the airside areas concurrently with the new headhouse. It can be done in phases and juggled. But the way it’s planned now, this thing will take until 2040 to finish. Which is ridiculous.

        But these plans come from the same great minds that put the rental car center into a lonely industrial park in a neighboring town. And set up the shuttle routing to stretch that ride into 20 minutes.

        1. Paul Avatar
          Paul

          Actually, there is a totally new management team in place at CLE, and the plan is for the rental cars to return to the airport campus eventually. Also, try to convince the airlines to spend more money sooner than they have to to pay for a sped-up construction process. The concourses are not pretty but functional and paid for. Finally, much more space will be freed up to redo concourses after the old headhouse is demolished. All in due time…

          1. stogieguy7 Avatar
            stogieguy7

            All in due time will take a decade or more. Which is absurd.

            Just get it done. Less time in transition is better for business than an extended period of inconvenience.

            And yes, I read the part in the article about the rental cars moving back to the airport. But the thought processes that led to the cluster that they have now for a RCC is worthy of as much ridicule as possible.

      2. haolenate Avatar
        haolenate

        wrecking ball, bulldozer, trailers….

        bussing people to PIT….

        I mean, even MKE did a good job of upgrading their facility without spending $2 billion

        1. stogieguy7 Avatar
          stogieguy7

          Yes, MKE did a fine job of it. With minimal pain and suffering.

    2. EnzyteBob Avatar
      EnzyteBob

      They just spent 80 some million dollars maybe five or so years ago updating the terminal. I still scratch my head about that. I guess it must have been “use it or lose it” money from the government because I don’t buy that there was a functional reason they had to gut an entire terminal that they knew was going to be torn down.

  3. Jason Avatar
    Jason

    Should be farther, not further.

    Here’s a summary of the differences between the two:
    Use farther for literal, physical distances (like miles or feet) and further for metaphorical, figurative distances or for “additional/more” (like more research or to advance a career). Remember “farther” has “far” in it for physical distance; “further” covers almost everything else, including advancing ideas or helping things progress.

    1. ejwpj Avatar
      ejwpj

      I love this! In an aviation forum at that! Lovely! Great fun! Thanks!

  4. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    I remember when America West had it’s hub at CMH & most of the flights were oriented north/ south Vs east/ west for PHX & LAS.

    As for IND, they do whatever SIMON says.

    1. haolenate Avatar
      haolenate

      I thought the OLD USAir used to have a “hub” of sorts in CMH — didn’t the 737 that landed on the Skywest Metroliner in LAX come from CMH?

      1. Brett Avatar

        haolenate – That flight did indeed, flight 1493. I don’t think I’d call it a hub really, but it looks like it peaked around spring of 1994. During May of that year, it operated on peak days to non-hubs (except some of these may have been quasi-hubs):

        Boston (2x daily)
        Chicago/Midway (4x daily)
        Dayton (1x daily)
        Las Vegas (1x daily)
        Los Angeles (1x daily)
        Newark (2x daily)
        Orlando (1x daily)
        Phoenix (1x daily)
        Tampa (1x daily)

        I just don’t think there’s enough there to call it a hub, maybe an accidental hub just thanks to the way the old network built.

  5. Eric Avatar
    Eric

    Speaking of awkward terminal relocation; talk about the MesSY situation in NOLA. Do you still have to navigate the side streets of Kenner to access the new terminal?

    1. dfw88 Avatar
      dfw88

      No, they finally fixed that. There’s a dedicated freeway exit onto Terminal Drive that goes straight into the terminal. That said, last time I was there the rental car facility was still at the old terminal, which was incredibly annoying.

      1. Kevin Avatar
        Kevin

        Was still that way as of August ’24. Maybe it’s been fixed?

  6. John g Avatar
    John g

    Hey Brett… I am very much enjoying this series on terminal construction. Very interesting.

    PS New Orleans fixed the terminal asset for locals, but it is still a giant pain in the butt to get to the rental car facility.

    The bus sits there for 15 to 20 minutes, then it takes 20 or 30 minutes to drive through a bunch of sad face to get over it annoys me so much but I will sometimes just fly through Baton Rouge just not to have to deal with it.

    1. Brad Avatar
      Brad

      The saddest face is at the end of the drive when reaching the old rental terminal which exudes the creepy, abandoned, horror film vibe.

  7. SubwayNut Avatar

    At least the new Indianapolis Terminal is closer to regional destinations on I-70 like Terre Haute.

    A city that has lacked commercial air service since 1999!

  8. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    The indy airport is truly really great – one of the nicest in the US and is easy to use. The KIND ICAO code represents the midwest sentiment perfectly.

  9. Wany Avatar
    Wany

    My conspiracy theory is there are local taxi mafia behind the decision. Extra time on the road, extra taxi cost. LAS is similar that you kinda have to loop around a lot to get to the strip

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      That is unless you are specific with the taxi driver on witch route you want to take when leaving LAS as some hacks are known to intentionally take the long way to get a higher fare.

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      You’d probably do better to look at who owns the land near the western end of the airport, land that got a lot more valuable when the airport exit moved to that end.

  10. Root69 Avatar
    Root69

    IND named best midsize airport in America 11 years in a row, or something like that. It’s a pleasure to fly through. I understand your point about longer drive time from downtown Indy, but all the positives overwhelm the extra 5-10 minutes it takes to get there.
    I enjoy your articles. Keep up the good work.

Leave a Reply to stogieguy7 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier