American’s Operation Had a Very Rough Summer


You’ve been waiting for part 2/x of our series at The Air Show podcast on what’s wrong with American… and now it’s here. Today we talk about the brand and product, and it’s not all bad. But also, it’s clearly not all good either. Come and have a listen as I get to serenade my co-hosts once again, this time with the song “Happiness Runs.” If you know why I sang that song, well, you have a good memory. If not, you should listen in to find out.


For many years we’ve heard American talk about how running a good operation is the most important thing it can do, and it’s how it’ll win the day. I don’t believe that personally. I think a good operation is just a basic requirement to play the game, but that’s not the point here. For an airline that has so much strategically invested in running a good operation, you would think it would always make sure that happened. This summer, however, it did not.

American ran a miserable operation this summer with fewer than 70 percent of flights arriving within 14 minutes. I took a look at Anuvu data to see exactly what was going on. This chart tells the tale pretty clearly.

American + Regionals Operations and Arrivals Within 14 Minutes

Data via Anuvu

On June 5, American’s summer schedule went into effect. It remained in place until August 5 with the only real break being on July 4. It can be very clearly seen above that on-time performance dropped dramatically when the operation was increased, and then it returned to better levels in August. That’s not a surprise. Airlines always want to push their operations when demand is highest. But the results aren’t usually this bad.

With July looking to be the depths of the poor operation, I decided to focus on that month to break this down further. July wasn’t great for anyone, but it was certainly worse for American than all but the usual basement-dwellers.

July 2025 Arrivals Within 14 Minutes

Data via Anuvu

As if this wasn’t bad enough, American also finished next to last in completion factor, just barely edging out JetBlue for worst by completing a very low 96.4 percent of flights.

Perhaps more surprising is that Spirit is number one, right? But just remember that Spirit does not have a lot of flights. It is not utilizing its airplanes, so it can run a better operation.

This wasn’t the story of bad weather in one hub or anything like that. Just look:

American July 2025 Arrivals Within 14 Minutes By Hub

Data via Anuvu

Sure, Phoenix and LA did better, but look at the bottom. Yes the Northeast was bad, but so was Chicago. And DFW was awful. You can’t blame weather everywhere… or can you? My understanding from those on the inside is that the weather was a lot worse this summer. Storms at DFW came in unexpectedly and stuck around for longer. Chicago has had its own gate construction and capacity issues. And the Northeast was the Northeast. With less slack in the system, it was harder to recover. The thing is, there are some odd indicators that make you think there’s more to this story.

For example, look at the fleet breakdown.

American July 2025 Arrivals Within 14 Minutes By Aircraft Type

Data via Anuvu

Above you can tell that regionals did not do well, but they sure did better than mainline. When weather is bad, it’s usually the regionals that get hit the hardest, so it’s quite a surprise to see the opposite here.

And in the mainline fleet, it was the B787s that were by far the worst. Widebodies usually do better than narrowbodies. As bad as that looks, it hides the fact that it was the B787-9 that was the worst fleet, not even topping 60 percent — it was at 58.7 percent — while the B787-8 was slightly better.

Remember all those stories about the airline’s newest deliveries having mechanical issues? That could not have helped, but that is a very small subfleet. The B777s look better, but that’s only because the B777-300ERs held up fairly well at 71 percent while the B777-200ER was all the way down at 63 percent. This is more than just a problem with a batch of new B787s.

For its part, American gave me this statement:

We are laser focused on further strengthening our operation for the holidays and next summer — learning from where we fell short and making continued improvements and investments to deliver for our customers. One such improvement we’ve already made was our best-ever baggage handling performance this past summer.

So the lasers are focused on the operation and not pointing at pilots’ eyes, which is a good thing. But as I understand it, American is making adjustments in the new year. It’s increasing block times, and it’s changing bank structures a little to give more breathing room. It’s also rethinking how it serves off-peak days to see if it can use those to help maintenance catch up.

It may not be sitting still, but this isn’t a new story. It feel like Groundhog Day, just the date range and the airline name change. Weather is unquestionably becoming more unpredictable and severe, but American is an airline that has staked its reputation on being reliable. It has to do better than this.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

38 responses to “American’s Operation Had a Very Rough Summer”

  1. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Cranky, I think part of the problem for American is over scheduling at hubs. In April, I flew back from Rome to Tampa via Charlotte. We arrived in CLT 45 minutes early and sat on the taxiway waiting almost 2 hours for an international gate to become available. I know anecdotes aren’t data, but from flight attendant comments, it sounds like this wasn’t an unusual occurrence. I’d be curious to know if hub gate availability is impacting OTP on the wide body fleets.

    1. Bobby Avatar
      Bobby

      It seems that AA has under invested in its hub infrastructure at CLT in particular. It’s a legacy of US’s financial problems.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        CLT is like a lot of US airports – from an efficiency standpoint, would benefit from a clean-sheet approach, but that would increase costs, so they keep trying to push ten pounds of manure into a five pound bag.

        Imagine if the concourses were rebuilt into an ATL or DEN type configuration, how much more pleasant and fast it would be. Instead you’re dealing with infrastructure that was put in place a long time ago and was never meant to cope with the kind of volumes CLT sees.

        You really have to hand it to the ATL builders back in the day for going for that from the outset.

        There’s an interesting book about how it was built (ISBN 0820311405, and it’s an inexpensive used book for those who are into that – plug it into bookfinder)

        When you think of how incompetent are most airport authorities in the US, ATL got the basics right and they did so even before the US had much experience with a deregulated industry.

    2. NedsKid Avatar
      NedsKid

      American at CLT has serious problems with gates whenever there is a weather event that throws one of the banks off…. And on Saturdays with all the extra international arrivals it is absolute chaos. Things are scheduled such that the limited international gates have to have operations run on time including either towing plane off or clean/search/depart again on a tight timeline. Anything that arrives early will wait. Anything delayed and it’s a wait. If weather has a ground stop sometime during the day? You’ll have 15-20 planes, mostly international arrivals, waiting 2-3 hours for a gate.

      The end-around taxiways built on either end of the center runway have reduced the need to cross an active runway… but planes are still backed up between runways because there is no ramp space. I’ve arrived on United at 9-10pm, especially on a Saturday, and while our arrival gate is sitting open, we have had a 60-90 minute taxi in because of the congestion of AA planes with nowhere to go. Add this to some construction on the west side of the AA ramp having a large portion closed off, so it’s one-way traffic sometimes.

      Isn’t just international arrivals or Saturdays… I landed a couple weeks ago a half hour early at 7am. We waited 45 minutes for a gate. There would never have been a gate until our arrival time (prior departure was scheduled out 7 minutes before our arrival time) but then it took a small delay. American is happy to sell you a 35 minute connection… Eagle to mainline… I mean, back out the “door closes at…” time and that’s 20 minutes, back out a few minutes to deplane assuming you arrive on time, and you’ve got 16-17 minutes to make it often from E43 to B16, which is about a 0.7 mile walk through congested hallways and non-functional moving walkways. Definitely a negative customer service impact there when you go from “look, we got you here 30 minutes early” to missing your connecting flight.

      American has locked my PNR a few times to airport supervisor check-in only when I connect through CLT (because I live here). They say I tried to evade fare rules once or twice. No, what happened was I was connecting through CLT, waited an hour for a gate, missed the connection and the next option was the following day which made the trip pointless at that point, or arrived after my return flight on another airline (which I showed). “You could have notified an agent or called us.” Yeah, stand in that 2 hour long line for the service desk (because the gate agent says “I’m not allowed to help with this, you have to go to the desk”), or when I did call it doesn’t recognize my AS status of Oneworld Emerald and wants me to wait 3-4 hours for an agent. Nope.

  2. Bobby Avatar
    Bobby

    Those who have studied Lean Manufacturing know that adding block/buffer can have downsides if not done strategically and after all other options have been addressed. Simply adding block can hide all of the embedded operational problems that may exist, which is expensive and doesn’t fix the root problem. Furthermore, adding block can produce a short-term improvement of operational performance, until new unaddressed problems arise. A root-cause analysis is the place to start – undercover the true cause of each operational disruption and fix those causes. A root-cause analysis is intellectually more difficult, which is probably why AA hasn’t attempted that first.

    Furthermore, when a thunderstorm tears DFW apart, I’m not sure that the biggest problem is that the 3-hour flight didn’t have an extra 5 minutes of buffer. Overcoming a thunderstorm is about having levers to delay out and put back together their schedule when a disruption does occur. This seems to be AA’s biggest problem as of late.

  3. Dean Avatar
    Dean

    This article feels silly. Saying its not hub specific is a little ignorant considering every hub is reliant on other hubs operating normally. It feels undisputable that DFW has had more weather than any other hub in the US this year and past. Its every freaking day that weather smacks itself over AA’s largest hub and groundstops the airport for hours. Adding in the fact ATC there has been more underfunded and unsupported compared to other mega airports in the US, thus you get this disaster. PHX and LAX consistently operate better because there isnt any weather but they will still get delayed from the domino effect DFW creates.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      It still goes back to management’s scheduling strategy – which is Brett’s point here. I’m not sure what you’re saying is true in this instance (would need data to confirm), but you can avoid the domino effect by isolating hubs with majority out and back patterns. Yes, you still need to rotate planes for maintenance, etc. periodically, but there are mitigation levers that AA could proactively implement in the schedule. Thunderstorms in DFW aren’t a new phenomenon

      For example, DL does this with their scheduling. Rotating planes between MSP/DTW via outstations is more common; however, they don’t rotate ATL tails to/from MSP/DTW at outstations for just that reason. If ATL is a mess, MSP/DTW are minimally impacted

      1. emac Avatar
        emac

        Correct, you can switch to out-back scheduling to isolate delays at a given hub. It’s less efficient for utilization.* United talks about this a lot, have increased out-back scheduling periodically over the years including at Newark.

        *Plane takes off from DFW to Seattle with a bank, waits longer on the ground to depart Seattle to arrive with the next DFW bank instead of departing sooner to hit a Chicago or Phoenix bank.

        https://jetsetterguide.com/news/united-airlines-unveils-comprehensive-strategy-improve-operations-newark-hub
        https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=51621

      2. Bobby Avatar
        Bobby

        I’d be interested, too, in the data, but I get the feeling that AA already operates most of their spoke turns as out-and-back.

        Mixing turns in the spokes can work, as long as the company has defined processes to manage it.

        1. See_Bee Avatar
          See_Bee

          Yeah, I agree; I doubt AA is doing this to any significant degree. This feels more like a system-wide ops strategy gone bad

          I seem to recall Frontier got in trouble doing this a few years ago, and Brett did a write-up on it. I realize F9 doesn’t have as many “hubs”, but LCC/ULCCs tend to do more point-to-point movement through the system instead of out and back to their focus cities

      3. Dean Avatar
        Dean

        Thats why the article feels silly. Hes just displaying that AA is behind everyone else, and we all know weather is part of that equation, but is AA’s schedule the other half truly or is it something that is impossible to mitigate? And do you know that AA isnt rotating tails for certain routes like DL does, do you have data for that?

        I genuinely feel like its hard to even compare ATL to DFW. I am on the FAA status webpage nearly everyday and I almost never see ATL listed with a groundstop but I see DFW listed constantly. Id love to see a comparison of that lol.

        I grew up in DFW and we used to get drought for months and that doesnt even happen anymore. Its just constant storms.

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      But it’s possible to schedule for resilience. That is a choice management can make.

      1. David C Avatar
        David C

        Yep
        The boarding times often start at the scheduled arrival time of the inbound aircraft on Eagle. That is absurd.

  4. David C Avatar
    David C

    Weather in DFW was definitely wetter and stormier than usual. The usual dry July and August never happened.

  5. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    There’s a reason why fliers jokes that DFW stands for “Does not Fly in Weather.”

  6. Bob Avatar
    Bob

    Part of the problem of aircraft reliability is the mechanic’s not have the time to fix issues/problems. Management has the philosophy to use temporary fixes until the aircraft has a long hub layover when maintenance can be done. The problem is these little fixes can cause major delays which snowball and the aircraft/flights are constantly delayed.

  7. tb Avatar
    tb

    When your mainline OTP is trailing your regional by 10 points that’s a Star Trek red alert level klaxon. I think they just don’t care. They continue to run the company like it’s little ole America West outta PHX. Cheaper on paper, but what’s the trailing cost of the actual poor performance day after day? In many cases, they’re using pricing power and sheer amount of lift to paper over these glaring deficiencies. Every time I fly for work I shudder to pull up the booking engine cause I know AA is gonna be cheapest and I just cannot abide their awful OTP and complete lack of service. Seems as though they are just too big to fail at this point. Scott Kirby is dead on with his assessment – UA and DL are in a class above and AA is content to just be out here picking up the crumbs.

    1. Bobby Avatar
      Bobby

      Is UA’s product really that much better than AA’s? Their OTP is only slightly better than that of AA (per the chart above). I’ll grant that UA has more Y+ seating and in-flight screens, but other than that the product seems largely the same.

      I believe that UA’s recent success is due to the backbone of their network being centered on some very wealthy places, all which have benefitted from the run-up in asset prices (except maybe IAH). Furthermore, they seem to know how to put together more competitive networks in their hubs (i.e. ORD, when comparing to AA), and they have been benefiting from profitable domestic growth made possible by United Next.

  8. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    Cranky,
    Is there any way to strip out the delays that are ATC related? I was on many flights this summer where the captain pushed back but said that there was a ATC delay so that they were going to wait in the penalty box for a new take-off time. And in my case except for ORD, I had ATC delays in a third to a half of the time in CHS, TPA, MIA and BNA.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      https://www.transtats.bts.gov/ot_delay/ot_delaycause1.asp

      I think airlines can play funny games with maintenance with this data but it’s a good enough proxy

  9. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    How were competing airlines doing at some of those hubs in the same period?

    Specifically, how did United do at ORD? And United and Delta at LAX? And maybe DL at JFK? Those would be interesting comparisons to make.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      That’s the type of analysis that really tells the story. JetBlue to this day loves to complain about the Northeast US airspace, which admittedly is crowded and challenging to operate in; however, so does DL which has hubs in the same airports, but has better OTP, etc. Seems like it’s not an airspace issue and more of a B6 scheduling and maintenance planning issue…

    2. Brett Avatar

      JT8D – Here are some numbers for comparison, all from Anuvu and using A14 (arrivals within 14 minutes of schedule)

      LAX – AA 71.53%, UA 79.94%, DL 80.69%
      ORD – AA 60.09%, UA 63.51% (note that AA canceled 3.66% of flights while UA only canceled 1.42%)
      JFK – AA 68.48%, DL 67.97% (note that AA canceled 5.5% of flights while DL canceled a whopping 6.56%)

      So , New York was trash as it always is. What a terrible place to fly. But otherwise, American was significantly worse than the competition.

      1. JT8D Avatar
  10. DesertGhost Avatar
    DesertGhost

    Having never been an airline CEO, I lack expertise in the matters of how to improve an airline or its operations. But I clearly can understand that American needs to improve its on-rime performance. To the other questions about the airline and its past decisions, I can only quote Howard Cosell, who consistently observed that hindsight is always 20/20. But is it really? Do people always draw the right conclusions from history? And is what happened in the past always a clear indicator of what will happen in the future? I know that I have no way of knowing the definitive answer to those queries, either.

  11. MaxPower Avatar
    MaxPower

    really is bonkers that a COO that could never fix the operation was then promoted to President and now CEO and there’s never been any significant change in the operational leadership despite how obvious it is they can’t fix the issue after ten years.
    The Board at AA really is just awful.

  12. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    I’m curious how much of AA’s block time is lost in the “out” time to “off” time. American like many carriers I believe (at least as far as what populates in its Flifo) is door close or brake release as the departure. I’ve had an American Airlines station manager tell me that once they see that light go off on an Airbus or see the door close on a Boeing, they move on to the next flight because no matter how long it sits there, it’s “on time.”

    One thing Spirit did some years ago to start the turnaround of operational performance is that the aircraft does not count as “out” or register a departure time until the nosewheel gets something like 3 revolutions. So the plane needs to be moving. Jetway has to be off 5 minutes before scheduled departure time. The flip side of it was that obviously potential dwell time, and that few extra minutes of shutting off boarding and closing the door has to be absorbed somewhere. Spirit ended up increasing the scheduled turn times all by something like 10 minutes. There is a definite expense to that as you can start losing time on the paper “utilization” number. But it pays off in the stats.

  13. stogieguy7 Avatar
    stogieguy7

    “American is an airline that has staked its reputation on being reliable…”

    This is unintentionally hilarious. Even 25 years ago, AA was famous for the infinite rolling delay. Departure times come and go with no fanfare before being quietly pushed back 30 minutes. Then repeat. Honestly, I used to be plat on AA back in the 1999-2010 period and they weren’t much better. Perhaps some of the KPIs are a bit worse this year but AA hasn’t been known for having a solid operation for many decades now. This is just an extension of their usual operational trajectory.

  14. mucflyer32 Avatar
    mucflyer32

    Apologies if an obvious question, but why is 14 minutes the cut-off for measuring on-time performance?

    1. NedsKid Avatar
      NedsKid

      No, it’s a great question and not one with a clearly defined answer. The best answer is just that’s what was established in the 1950s, believed to originate from IATA as a means to set a point of easy comparison between airlines that would also allow for some operational flexibility. It’s been the standard in the US since nearly then when set by the old CAB.

  15. BRMM Avatar
    BRMM

    Many thoughts as a frequent UA (PlatPro) and AA (ExecPlat) flyer. It’s definitely been a bad summer for AA; I’m amazed by the levels of ‘orange’ (delayed) on the flight information monitors, even on days without bad weather.

    AA is not as good at getting ready for departure, despite the absurd focus on “D0.”

    For example: on UA, boarding areas are clearly configured so groups 1 and 2 line-up and are ready to go when it’s time to board. AA can’t be bothered, in most instances, to even have the agent use the regular v. priority line (which aren’t set-up for people to stand in them in advance). So it’s a mad rush of people when it’s (finally) time to bard, with the agent taking (more) time to bring some semblance of order to boarding that could be achieved with clearer lines, signage, and consistency. And, much of the time, the gate agent can’t even be heard because the loudspeaker needs maintenance.

    UA’s app is sending out messages (with diagrams!) about how to put your bag in the min to maximize space. AA’s doesn’t. So more time is lost with FAs fiddling in bins trying to maximize bin space.

    I’ve had UA flights arrive late…and I note that as we exit the plane, the cleaners are on the jetbridge, and start cleaning first class, for example, right after first has deplaned and coach is still deplaning. The catering truck is ready to go, offboarding and onboarding carts as deplaning happens. Cannot say how many times on AA the inbound is late…and then sits there even longer, instead of boarding right away, because of cleaning and catering.

    There’s a bunch of other stuff like this, and it’s all operational tweaks that help the operation run better and be less prone to delays or more likely to catch-up if there’s been one.

    And then there’s the issue of how AA and UA treat customers during delays. When UA delays, it’s typically a text long before departure, typically with a reason, and a realistic departure time. A delay’s annoying, but when I know, I can stay in the club a bit longer, get some work done, etc.

    AA…it’s heading to the gate for boarding to find out that the inbound hasn’t arrived and for the first delay push (only 5-10) minutes coming only after departure time has passed. And silly things like: the inbound hasn’t arrived. We know it will take 25 minutes for the inbound to deplane. But, instead of just posting a 30 minute delay…let’s post a 5 minute delay and then update it another 5 minutes only after the new departure time has passed. It’s disrespectful to passengers and it reads as incompetent.

    1. Common Sense Avatar
      Common Sense

      This all the way! This is exactly what AA does, the last paragraph in particular.

  16. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Interesting. I recently too a flight from Fresno to Ontario via Phoenix. Don’t ask. It’s a long story.

    And we arrived into ONT something like 25 minutes early. And got right up to the gate.

    So it wasn’t as though we landed that early but then had to wait in the penalty box for that long before actually disembarking.

    Anyway. Two part question. One is about AA specifically. And the other is more in general. Not sure if you could even answer. But doesn’t hurt to ask.

    Trying to access the AA site on my iPhone through Safari and looking at some fares, couldn’t do it.

    The site kept either timing out to either a blank page or got stuck on an endless “refresh” loop, also while displaying a blank page.

    My question is this: could it be my phone and the settings or could this user unfriendliness be intentional?

    I notice this behavior on a LOT of sites, not just them. I’ve tried the usual troubleshooting: have the latest IOS, cleared cache, temporarily disabled adblocker, all of that. To no avail.

    And I’m wondering if this isn’t a passive aggressive nudge to try and get you to download and run off the apps instead of the website itself.

    For obvious reasons.

    And even though I use an iPhone 13, I have very, very few apps installed on it. I prefer it that way.

    Im not sold on the idea of having to have an app for every single business I use regularly, whether it’s the grocery store, CVS, McDonalds, AA, or whatever.

    Even though I’m sure that’s what they’d love and I’m sure a lot of people do.

    Thoughts?

    1. Mr Eric Avatar
      Mr Eric

      Matthew – Apps are designed to be used on Mobile devices and in most circumstances work better than using a web based version. So this issue is not unique to airlines, your device or you as a user.

  17. FlyOZA Avatar
    FlyOZA

    AA will have more issues with gates at ORD after the scheduled gate realignment which has already begun. As of 9/25/25 almost the entire west side of ORD G-Concourse is now;

    G2 – B6/UA
    G4 & G6 – UA
    G8, G10, G12 & G14 – NK

    AA might only have 3 or 4 gates on G-Concourse after 10/1/25 if original plans are followed. Cook County Judge has not ruled on AA’s Case as of 9/25/25 and gate moves are again already underway.

    Contour Aviation & Denver Air Connection operate on east side of G-Concourse
    Alaska relocates back to G-Concourse around 10/1/25
    There will be seven (7) City Owned Common Use Gates on G-Concourse

    1. FlyOZA Avatar
      FlyOZA

      BREAKING: 9/25/25

      Cook County Judge denies AA’s request to delay ORD Gate Realignment. AA will lose all but 4 G-Concourse Gates to other airlines and the City

      >>>>FROM CRAIN’s CHICAGO<<<<<<
      The ruling by Judge Thaddeus Wilson further tips the balance of power at O’Hare in United’s favor — at least for now. American could appeal the decision. A trial on whether the city breached its contract with American under the lease agreement signed in 2018 remains pending for next month.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        Looking forward to its coverage on Cranky complete with crappy graphics.

  18. Johan Avatar
    Johan

    Am I the only one who can’t access the podcast episode on Spotify?

Leave a Reply to mucflyer32 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier