TAP Air Portugal CEO Luís Rodrigues on Needing a Partner, Not Wanting XLRs (Across the Aisle)

Across the Aisle Interviews, TAP Air Portugal

We’re going to go old-school today with an Across the Aisle transcript of an interview I did with TAP Air Portugal’s CEO Luís Rodrigues. I was supposed to do this in person on the day of TAP’s inaugural LAX flight, but Luís was held up in customs, and I had to leave before he was able to get to the gate. So, we made up for it a few days later with a phone interview that I think you’ll enjoy.

Brett Snyder, Cranky Flier: I’m always really curious about TAP just because you’re a very unique airline right now. You have a big transatlantic presence and no joint venture, which is rare. I know there’s a lot of discussion about how much will the government sell to possibly a different airline. It could change things, but right now how do you look at your position in the transatlantic market?

Luís Rodrigues, CEO TAP Air Portugal: The airline has been under a tough situation over the last few years. Even before COVID, there was a shareholder fight which eventually led to the airline being reacquired again by the government, and becoming a state-owned company again. And then if that was not enough in itself, we were hit by COVID at a time when TAP was in a bad financial situation and poor organizational situation. So the effort to settle things down has been significant. I think we were probably the airline in the worst condition just before COVID, given the previous circumstances.

Now, the effort has been done by a lot of people, and I think we’re now starting to look again into the future. There was a cost to that while we were focusing on internal peacemaking, if you will, and calming things down and getting the right focus of people and so on and so forth. We were probably not looking at the market as much as we should. And that meant that together with the situation of the Lisbon airport, we have been under pressure from our routes to the South Atlantic and North Atlantic as well. But having done all that, I think we’re still coming up very strong.

We are now flying to 13 destinations in Brazil. 9 of them, we are the only European airline flying there. We’re flying to 10 routes in North America, so that’s a good base to start from. And we’re now in a condition to start looking ahead again at the time when the privatization process is supposed to reignite. So that’s gonna be our main focus from now on. We’ve been under pressure, but we’re still market leaders to the South American continent,

Cranky: I was gonna say… Brazil, you have a very impressive franchise. Obviously Portugal and Brazil, the historical connection there makes that an easier opportunity plus the distance makes it an easier opportunity. But when it comes to North America, how do you find a way to compete with the three large joint ventures for traffic? You’re expanding into some pretty long-haul routes, including the Los Angeles one you just started. So how are you able to compete?

Luís: I don’t even think I would call it competing. We’re such a small airline in the North Atlantic. Moving from 0.1% market share to 0.2% market share is great for us and nobody notices. So we’re taking an opportunistic approach to the North Atlantic. We know we’re not gonna compete with the joint ventures.

Cranky: Well, you’re you’re still competing for customers though. The customers have to choose you, so how do you compete for them? How do you convince the customers to fly with you?

Luís: First, we have an attractive geographical position. We are the closest to the North Atlantic anyway, so the shortest flight. We have the most modern, efficient aircraft in all of Europe right now which also plays a role. We have a strong on-board culture with people and gastronomy and so on, and we have a stopover program with which you can leverage. If Lisbon or Portugal is not your final destination, you still can spend 10 days there at no extra cost, and then take your flight to Paris or Rome or Frankfurt. The combination of that plus being a small player, taking opportunistic opportunities it’s enough for us.

Then don’t forget, we’re starting, for instance, the LA route. And Porto – Boston. These are places where we have very strong Portuguese-origin communities. They are quite large and they are very loyal to their country’s airline, which is great…. I know the headlines saying that it’s difficult to get into the US right now at the border and so on and so forth, but the bookings we’re looking at over the near future, for 6 months ahead, they say, keep doing what you’re doing.

Cranky: What percentage of your North Atlantic traffic goes beyond Portugal?

Luís: Most of it goes beyond Portugal from the North Atlantic. I remember looking at those numbers about a year ago. It’s 75% to 80% right now. We’re a very small country, right? So people stop there, they take advantage of being there, but then they move into the bigger cities. So it’s ok as long as they fly with us, it’s fine.

Cranky: Is it mostly around the Mediterranean or do you see people going back to Northern Europe as well?

Luís: Both, both. There is no clear pattern.

Cranky: How much of your traffic is European origin versus American origin?

Luís: Most of it is still European-origin because we are relatively known in Europe, not in North America. Only with the Portuguese communities [in the US]. Other than that, we start being noticeable little by little, but that’s enough.

Luís: Let’s not forget that until the end of this calendar year, we’re still under a restructuring plan that the Portuguese government had to sign up with Brussels a few years ago because of COVID survival. So even if we wanted to have more aircraft right now, we could not, because we are committed to that deal with the European Union. And then you have unfortunately the situation of the Lisbon airport, which is totally constrained. There are no more slots for people to fly into. It’s a double edged sword. It protects us, but at the same time stops us from growing.

Cranky: Is Porto something that you think can really grow much? Obviously you have the Boston flight starting, but do you think there’s a lot of opportunity there, or is it really Lisbon is your best?

Luís: I think it can, although the airport doesn’t have that much capacity that people claim that it has. You start to see time slots where it’s already full. There is a bigger content story up north there than in Lisbon. Lisbon is Lisbon in itself. It’s the capital, but, in Porto, the whole area is, it’s in itself, a lot of history, very nice to see a lot of culture, and then you have the Douro River valley and the vineyards to look into and then you have Northern Spain. So the thing with Porto is that you have to assume or to make sure you’re there for the long term. It’s not gonna happen overnight. It’s a market right now very much dominated by low-cost airlines, but we are little-by-little moving up the ladder and reclaiming that traffic back. So I think there are opportunities there as well.

Cranky: So if Lisbon is full, effectively, where can you grow when the restructuring agreement ends? Where do you see the opportunity?

Luís: Well, we can upgauge in Lisbon. That’s not gonna bring much, but it’s still it’s significant. We can grow in Porto and we can grow in Faro and the Atlantic islands, Madeira and Azores. It’s not gonna be that efficient growth, but it’s the one that you have available, so you do that.

Cranky: Obviously there’s been a lot of talk about airline groups in Europe that might be interested in buying some or all of the airline at some point, Air France or who knows. What is your opinion on that? Is that a good thing for the airline? Do you think it would create more opportunity?

Luís: I think we all agree that this is a business of scale, and we don’t have it. We’re a small airline. We need to get into a bigger group to make sure we benefit from all the advantages that has. If that doesn’t happen, you may hold on to having a business, but it’s gonna be increasingly difficult. And at some point in time, I’m not sure it’s gonna be possible anymore. So I think the privatization process is helpful for everybody. It’s helpful for the airline to benefit from the synergies. It’s helpful for the current shareholders — make sure they have a sustainable business going forward — and the future shareholders as well.

Cranky: So which one is your favorite? *laughs* Which one would you like to purchase you?

Luís: No, I have no… none of them has had the opportunity to submit their ideas and plans, so there’s nothing I can say.

Cranky: Does Star Alliance add much value, or if you’re not a part of the [Atlantic++] joint venture is it not that helpful?

Luís: No, it has. I think the alliances have been sleeping a little bit over the last few years for many reasons, but I think they’re picking up again and it’s a good way to deal with the regulatory constraints that are the cost of doing business that you see coming more and more. So I think we’re very excited with the opportunities with Star. We’re working on very interesting projects, so we get along very well. I think it adds significant value. It’s not as much value as a shareholder, but it’s still worth keep doing that.

Cranky: So it’s not like you’re looking at leaving. You, you’ll want to be in an alliance, right?

Luís: Right, absolutely.

Cranky: I’m curious a little bit about the fleet strategy. You have the A330s, the neos and the ceos, and then you have the 321LRs, not XLRs, right?

Luís: Right.

Cranky: Do you see an opportunity for the XLRs or not really?

Luís: Oh, that’s a good question. We are now looking into the plans beyond 2026 and if you ask me right now, I would rather move even further, 330s and 350s, if anything is available, rather than XLRs. I think the LRs are are doing fine and but the XLR… I’m personally, I still have to be convinced, and I don’t think as an organization we’ve looked enough into the whole thing.

Cranky: Yeah, it has become a much more different aircraft than the LR, so is that really the concern? There’s just not enough need for the range?

Luís: Yeah, and I think from the passenger perspective, sitting for too long on that aircraft, well, it’s not easy. I think, across the Atlantic, Porto to Boston is a good example. It’s OK, fine, but if you start to think beyond that, any more miles to the journey sitting in… it’s not easy. So, but again, this is a personal thing that I cannot give too much consideration for because I’m not representative.

Cranky: But you are interested in the 350? What would you want to do with that? It seems like the 330neo has almost everything you need, no?

Luís: Yeah, but the 350 it’s an even more comfortable aircraft, and I think we can use it to compete in South America, mostly. And in some of the longer North American routes. I think it would be preferable to sit on a 350 doing LA than anything else.

Cranky: Oh interesting.

Luís: But we still have to run the economics properly.

Cranky: Are there other geographies that you’re interested in? I know it’s the Americas, some Africa, but is there much beyond that? And of course within Europe…

Luís: That’s a discussion I think I will leave to the new shareholder, whoever they are. We need to be focused on what we’re doing properly and engaging new adventures.

Cranky: And what about the onboard products? You have flat beds in business, of course, but what are your thoughts on a true premium economy product?

Luís: Premium economy is something that we don’t have yet, but we’re looking into it carefully. There are good experiences and poor experiences and you need to understand what went well and what went wrong in both cases, and once we execute it, we need to execute it properly. I cannot forget that we are operating in a very limited environment as far as airports are concerned, so more than quantity, we need to have quality. And that means we need to offer an increasingly better product to our customers and that probably means taking a very close look into premium economy and things that we need to re-imagine.

Cranky: I’ll just ask one more question. What do you think in Lisbon? Do you think there will be some relief on capacity constraint? Or is Lisbon just not interested in really adding much capacity?

Luís: Well, they would like to, but it’s a physical infrastructure thing. They don’t have the capacity. There’s no physical infrastructure, there’s no runway, there’s no terminal that they can build on to have more capacity. So it is what it is. They have to build a new totally new infrastructure, and that’s something that is just starting. It’s gonna take 10 years.

Cranky: That’s what you think? There’s interest though in trying to do it on the government side? They want more capacity; it’s just not gonna be for a long time?

Luís: Yes.

Cranky: Alright. Well, I appreciate your time. Thank you so much.

Luís: Thank you and thanks for the conversation and I’ll look forward to keep following you.

So, what do you think?

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

23 comments on “TAP Air Portugal CEO Luís Rodrigues on Needing a Partner, Not Wanting XLRs (Across the Aisle)

  1. Surprised that TAP doesn’t serve Bakersfield (BFL) and/or Fresno (FAT). There is a huge Basque/Portuguese population in the Central Valley.

    1. BFL only has AA and UA (Express) to four hubs right now. It can’t even support Delta Connection service, much less any international service. The International terminal was shuttered back in 2008 when Mexicana pulled out, and they’d have a hard time getting CBP to agree to staff it for a once-a-week flight.

      Fresno is perhaps more of a possibility, it has working CBP, although it might need an expansion if TAP’s fleet plans required use of a widebody. (I don’t think the A321LR has the legs to make the run, and they’re not interested in the XLR per the interview.) Mrketed right, FAT could even draw from the Bakersfield area – it’s a little closer than LAX and much less of a driving hassle (and there’s even an Amtrak option.)

      Also, TAP might not be the first choice for travel to the Basque country – there are more frequent choices with more competition to Bilbao from Spain, and train options to Madrid too.

      It’s a fun thought, but I can’t see TAP using a valuable Lisbon slot for this. Poop. As a former Fresnan, I root for the Big Raisin to get more air service, but the Portuguese/Basque community isn’t in the same league as the VFR destinations FAT has to Mexico right now.

      1. Bakersfield, it seems, has always been unable to attract or keep anything but a few “Express” flights. And even those apparently aren’t doing too well. Which surprises me considering how large a city they are. Fresno suffered something similar for many years starting in about the 90’s. For over two decades, they languished with very minimal service. Now a lot of flights have been added in recent years and they seem to be doing well. I doubt B6 will ever come to town, but maybe there’s room for another and/or the existing airlines to expand and add service. But don’t get me started on VIS, just ten miles from me. Now THAT is a pipe dream wish….

    2. That’s a lot of ASMs on a WB for VFR-type traffic. LAX can work by mixing in some business traffic and higher yielding leisure, but I doubt there’s enough revenue in the central valley to justify regular service

  2. Brett, nothing on TAP looking to play up connections over BOS with codeshare partner JetBlue? (Especially with B6 looking like it’s going to play snugglebunnies with UA and – possibly, eventually, by extension – Star?)

  3. “Yeah, but the 350 it’s an even more comfortable aircraft [than the A330].”

    Whew. Not often an airline CEO makes an argument like that, but also 1. the A330 with 2-4-2 is more comfortable in the back, and 2. cheaper to acquire and operate.

    Lot of talk about capacity, anything on the proposed new Lisbon Luís de Camões Airport?

    1. emac – I’m glad you saw that because I had the same reaction.

      The only talk about the Lisbon airport was at the very end when he sort of shrugged it off since it is so many years away.

  4. Interesting that in Brazil they’re serving 9 airports without any other Euro service, but in North America the growth they’re looking for is big cities (LA, etc.). I realize they’re probably chasing the Portugese-diaspora in both places, but might be interesting if they tried being the only Euro Airline (or one of the only Euro Airlines) in some US East Coast mid-sized markets like JAX, CHS, RDU, PIT, BDL, etc. Gotta think some of those markets could fill up a 321 a few times a week if its the only – or one of the only – direct services to Europe.

    1. If Lisbon isn’t the final destination, then it’s not really a differentiated offering vs. all of the one-stop itineraries that are already available.

      A passenger flying from JAX to CDG probably doesn’t care much whether their connection is in LIS vs. ATL, PHL, or EWR (okay, they might be aware enough to care about that last one). If anything, they likely prefer a connection in the US, with an airport and airline they are likely familiar with.

      LIS is actually much further outside the great circle path, so TAP doesn’t even get an easy win on trip duration.

    2. A fair point, but he mentions that Lisbon has capacity issues. And some of those cities already have service to Europe – RDU has AF, LH, and Icelandair, BDL has Aer Lingus, PIT has Icelandair and BA to LHR.

      And if you look at those and other second-tier cities, Icelandair (and to a lesser extent Aer Lingus) have already picked several off. Possible that the good targets have already been taken, at least those than can be serviced with the A321LR. And both of those have XLRs on order.

    3. Yes, I could see an opening for Star Alliance’s answer to Aer Lingus. And TAP could fit that bill. The geographic location of Portugal does open the possibilities. True, Ireland and Iceland are a little bit better for North America thanks to the curvature of the Earth, but…….Latin America is closer to LIS and Brazil (in particular) is surprisingly closer than you’d think. If there was infrastructure for them to grow, TAP could really take off – no pun intended.

  5. I’m not sure that this is factually correct: ”
    Luís: First, we have an attractive geographical position. We are the closest to the North Atlantic anyway, so the shortest flight. We have the most modern, efficient aircraft in all of Europe right now which also plays a role”
    All airlines fly great circle routes across the Atlantic, and Ireland is the closest to N America. I believe the shortest scheduled route is BOS – SNN.
    I would have thought that Luis could do better……??

    1. BOS-SNN would be shorter than BOS-LIS. I interpreted what he said as shortest to the mainland of Europe.

  6. TAP is a nice niche airline but that is likely all they will ever be. It’s a small country, a bit out of the way from much of the bigger tourist draws in Europe, and their main hub has only one runway.

    Elliot should probably stay away. Ain’t much growth opportunity here.

  7. Kind of weird responses on some of these. Not looking at the XLR in particular, but I guess that is the constraints of the LIS airport.

    I took the 321 LR in TAP business earlier this year, when TP was significantly cheaper than the JV alliances, but had to connect instead of fly nonstop. (I had been to LIS multiple times before but never connected) Even when it is OPM can’t justify an extra $4-5k. Seat on the 321 was perfectly fine; I declined all service in order to sleep on the short eastbound. Connecting at Lisbon can be something, with planes parked all over the place. Taking a bus from the plane to the terminal, and then back to the next flight, adds so much time in total transit. It’s a long ride around the taxiways (former runway) to get to the plane. With a 3 hour connection it’s fine (and my shorthaul flight going on was then delayed), again the savings are justified, and the crowded lounge is what it is, but when it came time to go back to Europe again this year, and the TP options coming home in business had a 1:05 connection, no chance I was giving them the business despite being 1-2k cheaper.

    Geographically and economically LIS is built to have 321s (LR and XLR) going to all US/CA secondary gateways, basically the same as the EI strategy, but that airport truly cannot handle it.

    RE alliances, as a customer it made the decision much easier to proceed with TP, since I knew I’d get a Star lounge for departure and ofc UA miles and credit towards status.

  8. I thought the response about the A350 vs A339 was a bit odd. They want to buy an aircraft based on comfort? The A339 is a great, modern aircraft and probably works better for that market. The A350 would be a lot of airplane for a pretty small city/country that could only be deployed on a small number of markets. It seems like a vanity project rather than smart business.

  9. Which of IAG/AFKL/LHG do you think would benefit the most from TAP? Which would benefit TAP the most?

    1. Angetenar – I tend to think that AFKL would benefit the most since they don’t have a southern European partner at all. IAG has Iberia, of course, and LHG now has ITA in the fold. They would all benefit from having TAP to be sure, but if we’re talking about new connectivity, then I think AFKL would make the most sense. TAP would benefit from any of them.

Leave a Reply to Alex Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier