Hawaiian Leans Toward the B737 for Interisland


The Air Current reported last week after Jon Ostrower talked to new Alaska/Hawaiian President Shane Tackett that the airline is likely leaning toward the B737-800 as a replacement for the B717 for interisland flying when the time comes to replace that airplane. This has always been the most likely option, though it does create some challenges.

But first, let’s forget about those challenges and bask in the glow of AI. Gemini put this bad boy together for me.

Sure, it’s not perfect. The flower in Pualani’s hair looks rather suspect, but come on, still fun to envision this in the 1980s-era livery. Not feeling it? Ok, let’s update it with the airline’s current look.

That looks great on this airplane. But enough fluff, let’s talk about what really matters here. This is going to be a change in how Hawaiian operates.

Today, the B717 has 8 seats up front and 120 in coach. These airplanes work very hard. With a fleet of 18, Hawaiian puts together a schedule with up to about 150 daily departures within the islands. Yes, that’s more than 8 flights per aircraft per day on those peak days, and often not every airplane is flying. (Two of them haven’t flown in a couple months.)

These airplanes are uniquely good at doing this work. The old Douglas-designed airplanes are tanks that could technically fly forever, and the unique Rolls/BMW jointly-designed engines are excellent at quick turnarounds. For newer engines, that isn’t the case. They take longer to spool up and cool down, and there needs to be more time in between flights. The B717 is just the ultimate rock star in this very specific use case.

But alas, that airplane hasn’t been built in 20 years, and while they can keep these going for a few more years, the end is near. Of the 156 B717 aircraft built between 1998 and 2006, 95 are still active. Hawaiian has 18 while Delta has 77. That’s it. Now, could Hawaiian try to acquire some airframes from Delta to extend the life? Yeah, since those Delta airframes undoubtedly have fewer cycles than the Hawaiian ones do. But that would just be a bandage. The airline will need a replacement sometime, so it might as well rip that bandage off when its current fleet hits its limits.

Now, the B737-800 is a much bigger airplane. Today, Alaska has 16 seats up front, 30 in premium class, and 115 in the back for a total of 161 on its retrofitted airplanes. It has just shy of 60 airplanes in the fleet built between 2005 and 2012. These aren’t spring chickens, but they certainly do not have the huge number of cycles that the Hawaiian B717s have. This feels like it would be an interim replacement instead of a long-term solution, but maybe that’s ok. After all, Alaska already has these airplanes, and it is rapidly taking delivery of new MAX aircraft. These airplanes will be easy enough to slide into the interisland market by the time the B717s are done.

But how exactly will Alaska do this? Will it follow the Southwest model of flowing airplanes from the mainland? Or will it use a dedicated fleet as it does with the B717 today? Shane has opinions on this as well.

They’ll be branded Hawaiian, they’ll be based in the islands. It could take us five years to get there, but that would be my expectation.

Well I’m not surprised they would be branded Hawaiian, of course. And based in the islands? Yes, that makes sense as well. But this doesn’t tell us whether or not the airplanes will ever leave the islands. Several things will probably go into that decision.

Most importantly, what does Hawaiian want to do with that interior? The flights within the islands are very, very short with no flight taking more than 45 minutes in the air. They do need a small first class cabin, but they don’t need a lot of extra legroom seats. They also can go with lower pitch in regular coach. From that perspective, it would make a lot of sense to outfit these airplanes in a dense configuration that would work better in the interisland market.

On the other hand, does Hawaiian really need more than 161 seats when it has far less today? Flight frequency is really important in the islands. There might be an opportunity to trim some flying but with no other option to get between cities, frequency can’t go dramatically lower. So maybe Hawaiian would be ok keeping airplanes in a more generous configuration. If they did that, they could rotate them to mainland destinations as well.

That might be nice to have a smaller airplane then the current Hawaiian A321neo fleet going to the mainland, but there is a downside. These are older airplanes, and they don’t have the legs of the MAX fleet which can handle this with ease. Yes, the -800s fly to the islands today, but as they age even more, this is likely going to become less attractive. Maintenance will also be an issue on aging aircraft, but you’d want a small airplane like this to go to an outstation like Burbank, not a hub where maintenance is easier.

To really understand this better, I have been looking at the way Southwest routes its airplanes between the mainland and the the interisland market. I’ll look at that tomorrow. But suffice it to say that I’m skeptical these airplanes would leave the islands once they get that Hawaiian coat of paint on them.

That, of course, is if this actually comes to fruition. Shane was clear this was not a done deal.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

14 responses to “Hawaiian Leans Toward the B737 for Interisland”

  1. 1990 Avatar
    1990

    2-3 seat configuration is nice for couples and families, alike. a220 would’ve been a good replacement, had the P&W fiasco not occurred. As long as Hawaiian keeps providing those tasty little guava juices, 738 is just fine for a +1 hour island-hopper between Oahu and Maui or Kauai or Kona.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      But, but, but, do they serve steak or fish on those flights?

    2. Jeffrey Magnet Avatar
      Jeffrey Magnet

      What about the Max -7?

  2. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    CF, What about the A220. A better airplane than the antiquated 737 and a favorite of many flyers (including me).

    1. LT_DT Avatar
      LT_DT

      I was also wondering about the A220. Or maybe the E2. Although if they’re equipped with GTF engines, I think those require longer warm-up times which wouldn’t be great in this type of operation.

    2. Hov Avatar
      Hov

      I’m curious how much of the decision between 737 vs A220 is cargo capacity? Lots of cargo flying inter island?

  3. stogieinmypocket Avatar
    stogieinmypocket

    The 737 isn’t the right airplane for the high-frequency, streneous operation that inter-island flying is. Yes the 717 is ideally suited, and a workhorse, but they are aging, and their cycles are up there even with meticulous maintenance. The market needs a frame with 2-3 seating, quick boarding and deplaning. The E195 or the A220 feel like the obvious choice here, or maybe even the E-175.

  4. Jeffrey Magnet Avatar
    Jeffrey Magnet

    Have they considered the Max -7?

    1. Southside Emil Avatar
      Southside Emil

      Why consider Boeing at all? Boeing’s dug a deep self-inflicted hole. The two 737 MAX crashes in 2018–19 (346 deaths, the January 2024 Alaska Airlines door-plug blowout exposed a manufacturing culture problem, not just a one-off defect. The FAA’s audit showed that Boeing failed 33 of 89 product audits with 97 instances of alleged noncompliance. That’s a quality system that wasn’t catching its own mistakes.

      1. Big Mike Avatar
        Big Mike

        The A220 has not experienced the quality problems that affect the Boeing 737 MAX. The A220 has a strong safety record and now about 99% operational reliability.

        And the MAX 7 variant that would actually compete with the A220 isn’t even certified yet!

  5. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    Southwest is the winner in this decision. They added 737s to the intra-Hawaii market and HA had an advantage because of more frequent flights. HA/AS will have to pull back some flights which will give WN better schedule share.

    the 737 eliminates the 717 pilot category and parts supply which helps AS get costs down.

    DL is apparently moving to start retiring the 717 as frames come up for overhauls so their fleet will shrink. WIth a larger fleet and many more fleet types, they will also benefit from getting rid of the 717 and using existing types.

    The DC9 contributed much to global aviation but its family’s run is coming to an end.

    1. Bevvy Avatar
      Bevvy

      Delta’s A220 rock. Hopefully more are on their way.

    2. Jeffrey Magnet Avatar
      Jeffrey Magnet

      Well said. Delta is happy with their A220s.

  6. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Unfortunately, the 717 is an evolutionary dead-end and so a direct drop-in replacement is something that simply doesn’t exist.

    So whatever AS/HA goes with, some compromises and trade-offs are going to have to be made.

    But I concur that the A220 might be the strongest contender. The 737 MAX’s just can’t do the frequent turn-and-burns the -300 was once able to. Otherwise my vote would go for that. If the “7” ever gets certified, which I am still not holding my breath on. But as others have said, it would be introducing another type from another manufacturer. Can’t blame them for not wanting to do that if they don’t have to.

    And as an aside, I made a few “fantasy” Southwest Airlines pictures. Too bad we can’t post pics here. You might get a chuckle out of them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.