American Reverses Some Share Decline in 2025 (as FAA Sets Chicago Limits)


After the look at United’s local hub share recently, you asked to see American and Delta. I am happy to oblige, and today we’ll start with American. American had been shedding share in several markets, but it has reversed that, at least in some of them. The first reversal we’ll look at is a familiar chart: Chicago. But first, a reminder:

To do this work, I pulled annual passenger share for United and the next largest airlines using the Department of Transportation’s Origin & Destination Survey data (DB1B/C) via Cirium. This looked only for passengers that weren’t connecting through the hub. The problem with this, however, is that the data that’s public is only domestic. So, I’ll present that here and then talk how international would likely change the results.

And now, back to American’s hubs. I already had this chart in the United post, but it becomes more important now that the FAA has ruled on how it will allow O’Hare to run this summer.

Chicagoland Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

Post-pandemic, United really took advantage of American’s market neglect, and it grew its share significantly. American realized this in 2024, and it started pouring capacity back in for future schedules. In 2025, you can see the change in local share which is a direct result of American just having a lot more seats in the market.

But now, O’Hare is overscheduled as American continues to try to grow more and United matches the airline. The FAA has now stepped in, set a cap, and said that this summer’s capacity will be proportional to what flew last summer (2025). Overall, airlines will have to drop 150 to 200 daily operations in total compared to what’s filed, but the real fight was over how those cuts would be divvied up.

Using 2025 is good news for American in that if 2023 or 2024 had been chosen, it would have been forced to cancel so many more flights. But it’s better for United than if 2019 had been chosen. So, expect 2025’s share in this chart to carry forward, barring a shift in local vs flow strategy.

Next up is American’s favorite, Charlotte. I say it’s American’s favorite, because there is no real competition there.

Charlotte Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

Sure enough, American did see a little erosion post-pandemic as low-cost operators tried to make a small dent, but 2025 was a bounce-back kind of year for American here as well.

Moving on to American’s biggest and most important hub, say hello to the Dallas Metroplex.

Dallas Metroplex Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

This actually looks a lot like the Charlotte one, to the point where I had to double-check the data. But sure enough, once again, after seeing the ULCCs make some inroads in post-pandemic years, American rebounded in 2025. And Southwest fell off. I imagine that will change as Southwest has finished implementing its big product changes, and that may draw people back in the fold. But nobody is ever challenging American for supremacy in this market.

Now it’s time for another familiar chart, the Los Angeles Basin. We saw this in the United post, and here it is again.

Los Angeles Basin Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

From an American perspective, LA is all about the shrinking. The Pacific hub went away (not reflected here since this is domestic) and then the rest of the network shrunk accordingly. But unlike in some of the other markets, American has not regained any ground in the LA area. It remains below Delta, and United keeps creeping ever closer. One thing of note is that American’s operation at LAX has seen much more construction than any other airline, so it could reconsider in a couple years when all its gates are open again.

And while we’re on duplication, let’s look at New York again.

New York City Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

American has seen something of a rebound, but these numbers are wonky. After all, it was in the prior few years that American entered in the Northeast Alliance with JetBlue. With that, JetBlue started operating a lot of LaGuardia flights that American had run previously. One thing to keep in mind is that in 2025, American shifted its strategy in NYC to start flying more to big markets, like Orlando, Tampa, etc. So that will also be a factor in the 2025 rebound, but … if we just compare to 2019, the airline is flat.

A little further south, we have Philadelphia.

Philadelphia Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

American has been pretty steady here in general, but it does look like some 2023 ULCC growth had a noticeable impact. That’s gone, however, and American is back to where it was in Philly as of 2025, if not a little higher.

Now let’s move on to Phoenix and the Valley of the Sun.

Phoenix Valley of the Sun Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

It’s been down for both American and Southwest, though American did pop back up in 2025 a little. There’s been growth from pretty much every airline in the area over the last few years, so it’s not a surprise to see this come back down a bit. With international flying, the gap vs Southwest is certainly smaller than it shows here. But Southwest is still the clear leader in the market.

How about South Florida? On this one I did combine Miami with Fort Lauderdale and, unimportantly, West Palm Beach. Because of course in Miami alone, it’s all American, all the time.

South Florida Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

American actually has seen its share decline in South Florida since before the pandemic as other airlines have made moves. But JetBlue interestingly hasn’t been one of those airlines. It did put a lot of growth in the market later in 2025 and into this year, so we can probably expect to see that change. Spirit has dropped, of course, but it’s really Delta that has come on pretty strong in the last couple of years.

And finally, we look at DC… again.

Washington/Baltimore Local Passenger Share by Year

Data via Cirium

As we talked about in the United post, American is now behind United and Southwest (assuming we include BWI). Operational restrictions at National certainly hurt, but American could still increase gauge and focus more on local traffic than connecting if it wanted to do so.


Overall, American did turn around some of that share decline in post-pandemic years in quite a number of its hubs. That’s the good news. The bad news is that it still has several hubs where it is not the leader or likely very close to it. There’s certainly a lot for American’s new Chief Commercial Officer Nat Pieper to think through.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

34 responses to “American Reverses Some Share Decline in 2025 (as FAA Sets Chicago Limits)”

  1. aisleoriwndow Avatar
    aisleoriwndow

    This article illustrates one of American’s deepest and most fundamental problems that make sustained profitability elusive. It simply does not have a yield advantage in the majority of its hub markets. DFW and CLT are exceptions, to some extent, given their size, scale, and the limits to competitive pressures there, but neither are as consistently premium-heavy O&D markets the way NYC, LA, and Chicago are. American’s hubs, at least a lot of them, are among its biggest problems.

    PHL, while benefitting from a large catchment area, competes with EWR and IAD, both of which have a far more robust network and sit in or in close proximity to some of the wealthiest zip codes in the country. American leverages PHL as its primary TATL gateway because it has little to no competition and flies mostly its smallest wide body, the 787-8, which has just 20 Business Class seats.

    PHX is too far southwest to be an efficient and high performing connecting hub and the market there is fairly limited. It doesn’t seem to do much for AA, and the competition from WN and other airlines hamper its growth.

    DCA has lost a lot of traffic from government cuts under Trump. It is the more convenient and preferred airport in the region, but it is a domestic operation and a short-haul one for the most part. Valuable, yes but very dependent on government traffic.

    JFK and LGA exist simply because AA can’t walk away from them, but DL and UA are so far ahead of AA and dominate the NY area to the point that American will never catch up, unless it can pull off an acquisition of B6 and do something transformational there.

    American cut so much from ORD during the pandemic (and previously and clearly can’t make long haul international work year round). The city has changed and the airport simply can’t be a dual hub for two large carriers on the scale of AA and UA the way it used to be. Flooding the zone with flights to minor midwest cities was a losing strategy and the decision to reduce operations there by the FAA actually makes sense. The airport can’t handle that kind of traffic.

    LAX is where AA should shine, and it doesn’t. It takes LAWA forever to complete projects. The AA refurbs are 75% done, but the facility is still atrocious compared to what DL and UA have. If ever there was a premium market where credit card and airline should be in lockstep apart from NY it is LA and AA doesn’t seem to get it.

    1. Guy Avatar
      Guy

      You listed a lot of things that everyone already knows but you’re wrong on a couple of them. Of course AA has a revenue problem but yield advantage in a few of their smaller hubs is not the “deepest and most fundamental problem” to AA’s profitability. The deepest problem of AA’s profitability is labor costs relative to their revenue. AA’s labor force demands DL wages but AA simply can’t afford it.

      Regarding DCA, some stats would be helpful because I doubt your claim that “Trump’s cuts” alone have degraded AA’s DCA hub profitability.

      1. JT8D Avatar
        JT8D

        ? American simply can’t afford it because it’s doing a poor job generating revenue. Sure, that means it can’t afford labor at DL costs, but presumably equally means it can’t afford everything else at DL costs, whether airport costs, fuel, aircraft capital/lease costs, etc. So why single out labor?

  2. kishoreajoshi Avatar
    kishoreajoshi

    PHL seems to be made hand-in-glove for the A321XLR; the more you can flow connecting traffic there, the more you can get narrow bodies to flood the secondary markets in Europe.

  3. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    IMO AA should have moved quicker to consolidate an overlapping hub or two, but either they were 1) too scared to do that or 2) thought they could make everything work (and it didn’t)

    The most glaring IMO is LAX/PHX – they are right next door to each other in a less densely populated part of the country (compared to the NE). What strategic importance does PHX have? The market has little long-haul or corporate demand and is mostly seasonal leisure. What might have been better:
    -Take the PHX-based mainline NB planes and move them to LAX (heck use MSC if there isn’t gate space). Lock down LAX with gauge, frequency, destinations, etc. before DL swooped in
    -Scatter most of the remaining PHX planes throughout the hub system to increase frequency
    -String PHX along as a “hub” like DL did with CVG to outperform your fair share for a while

    1. mike Avatar
      mike

      Lol, “build up LAX” they tried that already and failed miserably, lost massive amounts of $$$.

      1. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        Right, but did they give it the best chance to succeed? More mainline NB aircraft lowers the unit costs and creates more connecting opportunities across the hub (and feeds those expensive international trunks)

    2. Brett Avatar

      See_Bee – Why would you give up on Phoenix when it’s a good place to have a hub operation? It’s not a good Pacific hub, but then again, neither was LAX. But PHX is a great operation with rising demand, and I don’t know why you would walk away from that. Further, you can’t just grow and take gates at LAX. The airport doesn’t want anyone to dominate, so it will also tilt the playing field.

      1. Yo Avatar
        Yo

        Exactly, the PHX naysayers have been consistently wrong for the last 30 years. But they keep repeating the same old tired stuff.

    3. Tory Avatar

      PHX is the secret to AA’s competitiveness in CA, esp at secondary airports like SNA. The alliance with Alaska plus the nearby PHX hub gives them a loyalty advantage for both north-south and east-west flights everywhere in CA except SFO.

  4. SandyCreek Avatar
    SandyCreek

    How does Boston look like? AA maintains some ambiguous focus-city-esque thing there since they clearly don’t only do hub flying.

    1. Kilroy Avatar
      Kilroy

      Good call out. Boston would be interesting to see.

      Between DL, B6, and AA all having at least somewhat significant operations at BOS, plus a reasonable smattering of WN+(U)LCC flights (it wasn’t THAT long ago when people in the area had relatively few non-legacy options out of BOS, and had to drive to PVD or MHT for cheaper leisure flights), even if DL dominates I’d still argue that BOS area travelers have it reasonably good in terms of competition for domestic flights.

      1. southbay flier Avatar
        southbay flier

        I think AA pales In comparison to DL and B6.

    2. Brett Avatar

      I look at Boston in the Delta one, but I don’t even put American in there. It doesn’t matter there really.

  5. Pfluger Bob Avatar
    Pfluger Bob

    Why did they down gauge AUS? Moving flights back to DFW doesn’t make me (or probably others) happy/ With WN and UA moving to the new terminal in 2 years what are the chances of AA ramping up again?

    1. shoeguy Avatar
      shoeguy

      The AUS build up was funded by planes and crews from ORD and PHL and for some flights, violated the ALPA scope clause. The operation at AUS lost money. Plenty of AAdvantage members who take a quick hop to DFW but the O&D demand wasn’t there and the costs were high. Also, AA really didn’t need a focus city so close to its largest hub. Little to no chance of AA ramping back up. DL has made it clear, AUS will be its Texas hub and the competition between it and WN will not give AA much room to grow.

      1. SandyCreek Avatar
        SandyCreek

        Delta is taking a more measured approach to growth in AUS – however, I am curious if 15 full-time gates and however many more shared gates that Delta can use is sufficient for hub operations. Even at 20 gates, I suspect this will only provide some level of connectivity for non-OD traffic, since that gate count is at par with BOS (21) and significantly below SLC (56, going to 66) and MSP (75). It seems like AUS will more be somewhere between a mini hub and a focus city on steroids – a bit like AA at BOS, if DL start flying to CDG.

      2. Pfluger Bob Avatar
        Pfluger Bob

        Under the new Jan 2026 terminal lease agreements, American Airlines will have 9 gates at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS) in Concourse A, more than doubling their previous count. These gates are part of the airport’s expansion to accommodate growing demand, with all American operations located in the Barbara Jordan Terminal

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      An AUS operation is always going to cannibalize DFW to a degree. You’re always going to be tugged in two different directions.

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        Americans goal in Austin was always to block Delta from getting a major hub in the area.

        But it was expensive, and now WN is building up there, so they could ease back without worrying that Delta would get a foothold.

        Southwest operates just over 100 flights and 16,000 seats a day out of AUS. AA doesn’t need to block DL there…Wn will do it for them.

  6. 1990 Avatar
    1990

    Good things: 789, XLR with new Flagship Suites (eventually 777s); New Flagship lounges (like PHL), updated Admirals Clubs. However, it’s the Citi-American partnership ($6.2 billion in 2025) that has become the most critical to its airline’s survival, as the credit card revenue now represents a significantly larger multiple of American’s actual flying profits. That said, Amex-Delta is still the industry powerhouse ($8.2 billion in 2025).

    Oh, Charlotte… “no real competition there” (yeah, yeah, fortress hub, but… they do got those nifty rocking chairs!) In all seriousness, if AAL is going to have a few TATL long-haul routes, it should have a Flagship lounge by now (in-the-works, but seems like it’ll take a while); that new-ish “Provisions by Admirals Club” isn’t cutting it.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      I don’t understand why/how AA doesn’t turn CLT into an ATL 2.0. CLT is less circuitous as a N-S connector between the NE and FL than ATL

      Is it a lack of higher gauge NB? I know the CLT terminals aren’t laid out as efficiently and have a lot of regional gates, so that might drive some of it

      1. Kilroy Avatar
        Kilroy

        WN does that some with BWI, offering connections between the Northeast and Florida.

        I have nothing against CLT (though the walk from the far end of the RJ gates can be a haul) and have connected through there many times, but I’m not so sure. I think the challenge with CLT vs ATL is that CLT is much smaller in terms of metro area and O&D traffic, especially the higher yielding business traffic (yes, I know there are banks and corporate HQs in CLT area, but ATL is still king of the southeast).

        CLT is in a decent spot for a north/south hub on the East Coast, but the local traffic still matters. Also, NE to FL is popular enough that there are nonstop options on many routes, with the ULCCs nibbling on routes from tertiary airports like PSM. I’d be curious to see the nonstop vs connecting % breakdown for pax flying from the Northeast to FL.

        1. 1990 Avatar
          1990

          That ‘haul’ between both ends of the CLT terminals (B to E) can be incredibly stressful, especially when AA often sells single-tickets with connections basically at the MCT (30 minutes). Experienced that a while back (never again), literally running, even if both flights are timely. Basically the airport design is a bit flawed. Kinda reminds me of PHL’s layout, actually.

          1. Kilroy Avatar
            Kilroy

            Agreed; I’ve done that Home Alone style dash at CLT more than once. 30 minute connection time is tight for almost any airport with more than a handful of gates, IMHO, but especially for CLT. I wouldn’t touch CLT with a layover under 60 minutes, and I’d prefer a bit more, especially if I were going between RJ and mainline flights.

            I believe it may be better now, but I still remember the 30+ minute walk (with several up and down escalators) from gate to rental car counter at MSP that I did 15 years ago.

            In my opinion, ATL’s design is tough to beat when it comes to efficient terminal/gate arrangements for ultra large hub airports, and still offers somewhat reasonable (not ideal) curb to gate times for an airport that large. For pax getting dropped off or picked up at the curb, DFW has a convenient setup.

      2. John g Avatar
        John g

        CLT is already the fourth largest hub in the country, behind only ATL, DFW, and United at ORD.

        It’s larger, for example, than UA at IAH or DL at MSP or DTW.

      3. Brett Avatar

        CLT simply doesn’t have the demand of Atlanta. You just can’t turn it into an Atlanta 2.0. DFW you can, but not Charlotte.

  7. Jeremy Avatar
    Jeremy

    To me it seems like a lot of the status quo for AA, but no clear strategic direction.

    They lost share at ORD and LAX, but ORD appears to be recovering, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see it return to pre-COVID levels (though with a bigger gap vs UA as UA will have grown). Given the LAX renovations, I would not be surprised to see a similar situation play out at LAX.

    DCA, CLT, PHL, NYC (LGA + JFK), and DFW look flatish vs pre-COVID.

    PHX and MIA are down, but as you mention there was an influx of new carriers. AA mentioned wanting to recapture some O&D in MIA, PHX, and PHL as key priorities in 2026 in their Q4 2025 earnings call. The expansion in MIA for AA I’m sure will bolster that as well in the future.

    At the same time, the question holds: where is AA winning vs pre-COVID?

    What sticks out to me there is that I don’t see an answer. They are stuck and looking for direction – not falling too far behind to make the detractors actually get a potential bankruptcy or merger, but also not closing the gap meaningfully.

    1. John G Avatar
      John G

      Dfw American pax July 2018: 5.2 million

      July 2025: 6.7 million

      That’s a 30% increase, over what was already one of the largest hubs in the world. Flat it isn’t.

  8. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    Many people understand the concept but not every airline has the same balance between market share and revenue and profit maximization. While market share equates to passenger boardings, revenue and even RPMs better correlate to revenue even if revenue, and specifically local revenue, is not given.

    WN esp. has shifted its focus from carrying large volumes of passengers to carrying fewer passengers at higher yields. Their share is necessarily going to fall.
    Even with the big 3 legacy carriers, there are different approaches to market share and profit maximization.

    and comparing the big 4, the real difference in their networks is their strength at the major coastal airports vs (or in addition to) interior US hubs as well as competitive markets.
    AA has simply sacrified a lot of coastal market strength for interior hub strength and retreated to hubs where it has a share advantage; large coastal markets as well as high market share hubs generate outsized contributions to credit card and loyalty programs.

  9. SubwayNut Avatar

    Why no love for Allegiant Airlines in any of these graphs. I’m particularly thinking about what feels like a decent focus city operation at Phoenix-Mesa, or is it actually tiny compared to Southwest and American?

    1. Brett Avatar

      Subway – Allegiant is tiny in general, surprisingly so

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      ALGT is an inch deep and a mile wide. You’ll find its largest market shares in places like Punta Gorda (if you include it together with Ft Myers, which is the right way to see it) and Ft Walton Beach + Gulf Shores (Alabama) (as a percent of the Panhandle + the part of Alabama immediately adjacent to the Panhandle – so, Gulf Shores, AL, Pensacola, Ft Walton Beach and Panama City).

      ALGT dominates many many many tiny tiny tiny city pairs.

    3. John G Avatar
      John G

      I pulled the numbers for there. For Allegiant you really need to consider a full week since almost all of their flights are sub daily.

      From April 21-27, G4 has 112 flights and 20,000 seats.

      American has 1,964 flights and 257,000 seats. Southwest has 1,410 flights and 227,000 seats. Both have more than ten times the flights and seats from Phoenix.

Leave a Reply to Yo Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.