The Airlines See Only Sunshine and Rainbows


The JP Morgan Industrials Conference was held this week, and that’s the place to watch for airlines to lay out how the business is trending as Q1 comes to a close. With the war continuing in Iran, and oil prices spiking, you’d think the airlines would be preparing to batten down the hatches, but you’d be wrong. Airline after airline kept mentioning just how great everything is.

What it comes down to is this… demand is through the roof. Every single airline that took the stage was beaming that the numbers are much better than expected. Just look at some examples:

  • Delta had 8 of its 10 highest sales days in Q1
  • American had 8 of its 10 highest sales weeks in Q1
  • United’s first 10 weeks of 2026 were also its 10 highest sales weeks

This isn’t just at the top of the chain either. JetBlue raised its revenue guidance for Q1 from being flat to up 4 percent all the way up to now being up 5 to 7 percent. Frontier expected stage length-adjusted unit revenue to be up 10 percent. It’s now going to be up in the mid-teens.

Though Delta CEO Ed Bastian said Delta is in good shape because it serves the high-end traveler who is less impacted by economic pressure — it’s that K-shaped economy which apparently doesn’t bother him — Southwest CEO Bob Jordan confirmed that this trend isn’t just limited to a specific part of the business.

That strength is in all geographies. It’s across all fare structures, it’s across business, it’s leisure, and as far as we have visibility, that demand strength is across all forward months

Andrew Watterson, COO of Southwest, dropped this stunning number. If Southwest didn’t receive another dollar of corporate bookings after last Friday, March would still be its biggest corporate month ever. That’s only halfway through the month!

It’s the 1920s all over again. Times are good, what could possibly go wrong?

Undoubtedly the airlines are all preparing for what could happen, but I often look to United to tell the real story here. As was the case during COVID, United has generally been more conservative (and right) in where it thinks the business could go. Of course it hopes for the best, but as the saying goes, it plans for the worst.

So, when United CEO Scott Kirby took to the stage toward the end of the day, I was listening closely. Is he concerned that oil is running up toward $100 a barrel so quickly? It’s even more pronounced for the airlines since jet fuel itself has spiked even more.

As usual, Scott turned to numbers to help explain his airline’s view of the world.

Yes, higher oil isn’t ideal, but United — and it seems much of the industry — is on its way to being able to recoup that extra cost thanks to strong demand. In other words, fares are going up, and people are still buying tickets.

At United, Scott said the oil price run-up has added about $4.6 billion in cost. This number can change if prices fluctuate, but for United to cover that, it needs to increase its unit revenue by 8.5 points. That’s a hefty increase. But Scott points to more numbers to show that it is happening. In the last week before he spoke, booked yields are up 15 to 20 percent. Fares are climbing very quickly to offset the cost increase. Now, that doesn’t mean it gets to an 8.5 point increase in the end once all is said and done, but it is a very realistic possibility.

The way Scott sees it, this is just delayed inflation finally reaching airfare, and that’s why it’s being accepted by the public. He points out that while inflation in the US was up by about 25 percent from 2019 to 2025, fares were down 2 percent. So there is room for airfare to catch up without pushing people away in droves as would normally be the case.

Still, Scott says United is being conservative, and it has already cut capacity by about one percent in May and June. This is off-peak flying that performs the weakest, but by cutting supply, it can help bolster fares. Other airlines are wavering on making cuts until there’s more data on what’s happening. Even United doesn’t think it needs to do this now, but it wants to be conservative in case things do turn worse. As United sees it, it’s worth the minor loss of revenue on those flights if things don’t get much worse in order to prevent a bigger loss if things go in the opposite direction.

Fortunes, of course, change dramatically if oil continues to shoot up and prices stay high for a long time. This looks increasingly likely as the war drags on. But Scott says that they’ve even run up scenarios where oil hits $175 a barrel, and United can still grow its profit margins. It’s far from a guarantee, but the idea that this is even a possibility shows how much the industry has structurally changed.

I suppose I should narrow that to say that “part” of the industry has changed. You still have the ultra low-cost operators trying to find a strategy that works. Frontier will lose money in Q1 and it will be at the lower end of its previous guidance even with the strong revenue guidance. American is losing money in Q1 as well as it continues to try to become like Delta and United despite being well behind. It isn’t cutting capacity, which may seem like an odd choice. I guess it’s easy to play to the upside with all the euphoria that’s sweeping the industry right now.

There is a lot of uncertainty right now, but somehow the airlines aren’t feeling it nearly as much as they have in previous times of crisis. It’s all sunshine and rainbows… until it’s not. It’s just a matter of time.


Want to hear more about the JP Morgan conference? Brian, Jon, and I spent this week’s episode talking about the big picture but also some other bits and pieces which caught our eyes. This should be live before this post goes out, but if it’s not, check again later today.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

16 responses to “The Airlines See Only Sunshine and Rainbows”

  1. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    In their reporting, did any of the carriers entertain the possibility that this exceptional demand is largely driven by travelers rushing to buy now in anticipation that airfares will increase due to fuel prices, so in effect, it’s an artificial bubble that will result in a significant drop in advanced bookings the the next quarter or two? It would also be interesting to know if they saw a change in the percentage of traveler’s purchasing fares either fully refundable to form of payment, or refundable to travel credit, which provides the flexibility to cancel and repurchase if fares come down.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      I feel like there’s some truth to this… I did this exact thing for a trip in August where I pulled the trigger on airfare before waiting to coordinate with others on the trip

      Some other things to consider too:
      -Crude derivatives (and nat gas derivatives where alternatives exist in the value chain), will spike in price as well. All sorts of plastic materials in cars, utensils, etc. will all see price rise. This will pressure the consumer in their everyday life (and could impact travel spending)
      -The negative wealth effect of the stock market being down will force consumers to pause on pulling the trigger on big expenses, like expensive vacations. Maybe that just means long haul demand softens and people fly (or drive) to Florida instead

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        That negative wealth effect will also disproportionately hit the “premium leisure” market every airline except Allegiant and Avelo seems to be emphasizing in their planning. (Although let’s be honest, Frontier’s euro-business “Up Front Plus” is a spectacularly crappy attempt at it.)

        Even most of the relatively bullish analysts are expecting another 2-4k drop in the Dow, and the bears are projecting even more. And not all of that is war-related, and may not fully price in a potential bubble deflation in AI stocks.

  2. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    It is not surprising that the universal chorus is that demand has not been impacted in the US given how far along airlines were in the Spring Break booking period when the latest Iran conflict began.

    All of the big 3 acknowledged that fuel prices would increase by about $400 million for the quarter even though the conflict began with just one month remaining.
    UA acknowledged that it will be impacted more than other airlines because of its greater amount of fuel purchases on the west coast where fuel prices were already higher and have only increased more than the national average; AS said the same thing and both AS and UA said they are working to optimize fuel purchases elswhere with AS saying they are working on shipping jet fuel from SIN but, right now, SIN jet fuel is more costly than on the west coast since E. Asia is heavily dependent on crude that passes through the Strait.

    In contrast, DL said that it would begin to see benefits from its refinery in the second quarter given that the refinery works best for DL in a rapidly rising fuel situation and with high crack spreads for diesel and/or jet fuel; we are in that type of situation now. The refinery saved DL $777 million in airline fuel costs in 2022 when the Russia/Ukraine war broke out.

    Given that there are a growing number of Gulf country oil facilities that are being damaged, fuel prices will not come back down quickly even if the Strait is reopened tomorrow.

    The real question is what airlines have to do with capacity after the 2nd quarter.

    UA is in the unique position of facing rising labor costs above industry average rates on top of all of this; they and the AFA had just said they were close to an agreement before the war broke out.

  3. JT8D Avatar
    JT8D

    I dunno. I’m reminded of Doug Parker musing whether the airlines would ever make another loss… and then the pandemic. Seems to me that it ought to be part of the airline CEO handbook that you can only get into trouble by making blithely optimistic statements.

    They’re just asking for the discovery of a new fast-spreading fungus that eats carbon fiber or whatnot.

    Certainly they’re giving the unions every reason to press for every last dollar.

  4. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Haven’t you said or at least implied that most (if not all) of the airlines revenue and profit comes not from flying passengers on airplanes, but from advertising and credit card partnerships?

    Had the airlines figured out 30 and 40 years ago that that’s where the treasure is buried, some names might still be around today.

    People seem to be whipping out the plastic to cover day to day expenses, thanks to both inflation and the (lack of a) job market. So someone making a Target run and United gets a piece of it and otherwise had no expenses.

    Obviously not sustainable. But that’s another discussion for another day.

  5. CraigTPA Avatar
    CraigTPA

    It’s not uncommon for executives (in any industry) to be overly optimistic – to the point of, let’s be honest, flat-out exaggerating – at these sell-side events, where the usual caveats on forward-looking projections aren’t as strict.

    (Sure, Scott may have “scenairos” where United can increase profits in a $175/bbl-oil world, but I suspect those scenarios are wildly unrealistic to the point of fantasy, involving a perfect storm of reduced competition, demand somehow holding steady, and so on.)

    The economic news of the last week or so has been almost uniformly bad – even before the war begins to have an effect, inflation remains above the Fed’s target rate, so no rate cut in the near future. Job growth has effectively been zero the last six months, so we are now into “stagflation” territory.

    There is definitely room for fare increases, but there are limits, and I suspect the limits will be hit sooner than many of these projections take into account, especially if we start to see people on the good side of the K-shaped economy start to fall behind inflation or lose jobs.

  6. Emil D Avatar
    Emil D

    Was Spirit there?

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      The ghost of Spirit might have been.

  7. SEAN Avatar
    SEAN

    It appears these CEO’s drank the cool-aid & believe “it’s different this time.” There’s a reason why presidents were warned NOT to start a war with Iran as what we are all witnessing was a likely outcome. And now there’s no “offramp” as no matter what the US or Israel do the knock-on effects will keep cascading. Israel yesterday bombed a natural gas field & we all know what the outcome will be.

    1. Common Sense Avatar
      Common Sense

      Kicking the can down the road until it’s too late is a convenient choice for those leading now, but very painful for the future. I prefer to stop them before it’s too late.

  8. Eric R Avatar
    Eric R

    For those watching the oil markets closely, there is currently a big disconnect between the paper price of oil and the physical market by some $50+ dollars.

    When the markets finally acknowledge this is a longer term issue, oil prices will leap significantly higher. As of yesterday oil prices 6 months out were only priced in the $70’s. There is still belief / hope in the markets that this is a temporary issue.

    I don’t see it as short term given the amount of structural damage around the gulf, but this could be creating an arbitrage opportunity in oil right now.

  9. MNG Avatar
    MNG

    Who’s the artist? (that did the crayon drawing — nice!)

    1. Eric R Avatar
      Eric R

      Vincent van Gogh.

      Check out his Instagram and TikTok for more art work.

  10. Claire Avatar
    Claire

    I never understood why airlines raised their fares right away when the price of oil goes up. The airline didn’t pay a higher price for oil that day–why should the consumer pay a higher price?

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      When oil goes up gas goes up in tandem, but when oil goes down gas goes down some time later.

Leave a Reply to Eric R Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier