The Incredible Shrinking MEM


Memphis has always been an airport that punched above its weight, but that all fell apart when Delta shut down the hub, and the airport has been left to pick up the pieces. Its solution has been to shrink and shrink again, demolishing much of what made it work as a hub in the first place. What’s left is a small but nicely-renovated facility.

We can, of course, set aside the massive FedEx facility that lies at the north end of the field and has made Memphis into one of the most important cargo airports in the world. That is obviously key for the airport, but we’re here to talk about commercial service. That is where the problem lies.

Memphis was at one time the home of Chicago & Southern, the airline that was bought by Delta in the 1950s. Post-deregulation, Memphis became Republic’s southern hub. And when Republic was merged into Northwest, that status stayed. The twin mega-hubs of Minneapolis/St Paul and Detroit needed a southern counterpart. Memphis filled that role up until the bitter end when Delta took over Northwest, the second Delta acquistion to hurt the airport.

At the time of that merger, the airport had three concourses with more than 60 gates. The A gates were on the left side in the image below with the C gates on the right. And the Y at the bottom was all called concourse B.

In 2005, Memphis had more than 275 daily departures on average and 7.7 million departing seats, easily surpassing Nashville which didn’t even top 200 daily. It held fairly firm until 2010 when the wheels fell off. The hub was shuttered. By 2014, it was down to fewer than 75 daily flights with just over 2.2 million seats. Things have not improved.

By 2024, Memphis was down to about 65 daily departures while Nashville had surged above 280. The glory days were over, and they weren’t coming back. So what else could Memphis do but shrink?

It had massive infrastructure designed for a huge hub, and it didn’t think it was necessary to build a completely new facility. So the airport just started closing things off. Here is what ended up happening:

Efforts were poured into improving the B concourse. The connector from the headhouse and the southeast concourse were expanded and fully renovated to create a much better experience (in blue). The lonely southwest part of the concourse, however, is now only used for customs on international arrivals. Best I can tell, that only serves infrequent and seasonal flights to Cancún on Viva.

Meanwhile, the southern ends of both the A and C concourses were demolished while the rest of those concourses held all the traffic during the Concourse B renovation. When the renovated Concourse B opened in 2022, the rest of A and C were closed off to the public. The remaining A gates (in red) are currently being demolished with work done early next year. The C gates (in orange) are shut to the public, awaiting a decision on their final fate.

Memphis is now down to a lonely 25 gates, including the two on the international concourse. I haven’t been, but I hear it’s a pretty nice experience with the wider concourses and all that. It’ll be even better when the work is done on the headhouse to improve passenger flow.

It’s hard to believe that there was so much more to this airport back in the hub heyday, but now it’s just a minor airport with fewer departures than Louisville but just a little more than Norfolk. That’s quite the fall.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

77 responses to “The Incredible Shrinking MEM”

  1. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Loving this introspection Brett, hoping/assuming we get CVG next with some Lambert and MKE love and then maybe talk about some of the airports in the Midwest who have managed to survive or thrive? (The alluded to Nashville, Detroit, MCI/KCI (although that last one has been covered here)

    Anyways I always thought Memphis would, based on location, be a good hub for an ULCC, but I guess the city and metro area arent really big enough outside of location to support that…

    1. Mr Eric Avatar
      Mr Eric

      Everything goes in cycles. To believe the smaller, former Midwest hubs will never see any of the old glory days could be short sided – time will tell.

      That’s why I believe some of these new “renovations” should be planned with opportunities to expand in the future.

      With the coasts being ultra expensive and building space at a premium (if it even exists at all), it means the heartland may be the only viable space to expand from an economic standpoint. People will move to where the jobs are located.

      1. Jim S Avatar
        Jim S

        It’s doubtful that there is any cycle here. The industry is getting more and more consolidated. Hubs are giving way to megahubs. That trend is unlikely to reverse.

        1. Mr Eric Avatar
          Mr Eric

          Think AUS and RDU as examples. I’m not trying suggest a new 500 flight per day hub by one singular airline.

    2. Memphian Avatar
      Memphian

      MEM would be a great ULCC connecting hub geographically, but there’s not enough of a local traffic draw for that really. We’re not that big a tourist hub and we’re not that big a business hub, so even a ULCC would struggle to get enough yield to make it work.

      1. Mac Avatar
        Mac

        The problem is ULCCs won’t have “hubs” in the way you’re speaking of. It’s a higher cost model to operate banks at an airport. You need more gates, you have more down time for the airplanes, more staff, etc. All of that jacks up costs. There are some exceptions like Spirit at FLL but the banks at minimal and very in and out on routes that can demand a higher premium vs mid-continent routes. The low cost stands for low operating cost, not necessarily low fares.

        1. Mike Avatar
          Mike

          Thats a great point although I was thinking more like Frontier in Denver or Sun Country in MSP, which were more hub dominated when MEM was becoming freed in the early 2010s. Although those do have “other hub” infrastructure ton rely on at those airports

          1. Memphian Avatar
            Memphian

            Plus, those are much bigger markets to be able to support something like that.

            And Mac, agreed that it doesn’t fit the ULCC model. MEM, STL and a few other former mid-country hubs are well-positioned for both east-west and north-south (there’s a reason MEM and SDF are such giant cargo hubs), but there’s more to it than geography.

  2. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    The fall of MEM as a hub not once but twice shows the realignment of Tennessee’s major metro areas.

    Nashville’s GDP is now twice that of Memphis; Nashville is similarly sized in GDP for its metro to CVG, PIT and IND and just under the Orlando MSA.

    Salt Lake City is the smallest metro area by GDP that has a major legacy hub but, unlike MEM, CVG, or PIT, SLC has a much more unique geographic position which DL has used to connect the west to the Midwest and East. Memphis served a region where NW was not strong but that doesn’t exist just an hour’s flight from ATL just as CVG has little value alongside a larger and more globally connected Detroit metro area.

    Some airports have come to grips with the reality that the consolidation of the US airline industry has left and will leave a number of airports that were hubs as just spokes. MEM, like SDF and IND to the north, is very fortunate to get enormous air traffic from cargo to offset lower passenger volumes.

    1. Mike Avatar
      Mike

      Sometimes I wonder how much the prospect of the Olympics returning to SLC, factors into Deltas decision to keep SLC as a hub. Prolly not much but it surely must be a consideration

      1. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        I don’t think much, if at all. SLC is the perfect east-west connector hub that is boosted by seasonal tourism. If DL doesn’t have SLC, there’s a large, middle part of the country that DL isn’t able to provide service effectively

        I look at SLC the same as DEN, just on a smaller scale. Instead of 3 airlines with hubs in DEN (UA, WN, F9), SLC can only support 1 given the city is smaller. But its geographic location and outdoor tourism allows it to outperform peer cities

        1. UnclePinkeye Avatar
          UnclePinkeye

          And SLC is unique because you can’t just look at traditional Hub metrics like GDP, population, and corporate contracts. Delta also has a secret weapon with the billion dollar non-profit LDS church. They train thousands of young missionaries each year, at their training facility in Provo, and then ship them all over the world. It helps support a number of international flights, that a city that size shouldn’t have.

          1. Joseph Smith Avatar
            Joseph Smith

            “Non-prophet” might be more accurate. My understanding is the LDS Church is extremely wealthy.

        2. southbay flier Avatar
          southbay flier

          SLC is a great connecting airport especially for those going between the west coast and the inter mountain west because Denver requires some backtracking. It’s what made Delta’s purchase of Western a good move.

      2. Jim S Avatar
        Jim S

        Absolutely none. Airlines don’t think past the next quarter, let alone the next year. They definitely aren’t keeping a hub open based on the possibility of a weeklong event returning to Salt Lake City in 2060.

        1. Seanny Avatar
          Seanny

          Utah is scheduled for the Olympics for two weeks in 2034, not 2060 ;-)

  3. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    Is there a reason that the answer to traffic downturns is demolition?

    I get the whole ‘upkeep’ and ‘utilities’ aspect of it all. But why not just consolidate everything down into one or two areas and mothball the rest until a future need arises? Better to spruce up a building that’s been out of use for awhile than to (re)build from scratch.

    Always cracks me up how long term [business] decisions are almost always made, reactively, based on short term circumstances.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      “Always cracks me up how long term [business] decisions are almost always made, reactively, based on short term circumstances.”

      So true. It’s always based on next quarter results & never long-term planning of future needs.

      Brett, do you know why Delta didn’t keep the Memphis hub as a reliever for Atlanta?

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        I’m not Brett but my thought it it’s more efficient to have 900 flights a day at ATL than 700 there and 200 at MEM.

        The bigger problem is a job needs to have its own O&D traffic. MEM doesn’t really have much. 65 flights a day is light.

        Of course that still leaves Delta with a big hole in the south central part of the country. American takes some here for their connect ELP to DSM strategy, but they have well located hubs with no real holes. Both United and Delta have areas they can’t cover really efficiently.

      2. See_Bee Avatar
        See_Bee

        ATL didn’t need a reliever. Consider this was 15 years ago when average gauge was a lot lower. There were A LOT more RJs in ATL than today. By consolidating the hubs, DL could upgauge away from RJs to lower unit cost mainline aircraft

        If a storm hits ATL, they can re-route connecting traffic through DTW & MSP. MEM (and CVG) were too much redundancy

      3. Bob V Avatar
        Bob V

        Delta outright lied to the public when they acquired Northwest. They publicly stated “The Memphis hub compliments the Atlanta hub. We foresee no reductions”. I know because I live in Memphis and was there for all of that. Then, the Amsterdam flight going “seasonal” then being moved completely to Atlanta. And the airport authority still treats Delta like they owe them a favor.

        1. Kevin Avatar
          Kevin

          Yep. I remember. Lots of of glad handing and empty promises to quiet the masses.

        2. Matt D Avatar
          Matt D

          When a dog bites a man, that’s not news. When a man bites a dog, it is.

          A business lying to get what it wants should surprise: no one.

          What SHOULD be a surprise is that everyone fell for it. As conditions of the merger (and really for any merger), those promises should be made binding. Under promise of very severe (as in seven or even eight digit) fines and penalties if there’s any breach of any kind within a specified time frame. And in the case of a merger the size of DL/NW, those strings should’ve been attached for a minimum of a decade.

          If they aren’t or willing to abide by it, then, they really aren’t/weren’t in distress to begin with. And thus. No need to merge. And it should’ve been denied.

          1. Tim Dunn Avatar
            Tim Dunn

            it is most notable that DL, as the first mover in the megamerger merger era, did not have any preconditions or divestiture requirements. whether companies lie to regulators or not, AA and UA did have to give up things…. but DL/NW was far more of an end on end merger than AA/US or UA/CO so divestitures may not have been necessary anyway.

            and it should also be accurately noted that DL ended up closing CVG and MEM as hubs – so one from each side. Both were very heavily reliant on 50 seat RJs and both were not only geographically close to each other but smaller local markets than the merger partner hubs they competed against.

          2. Jim S Avatar
            Jim S

            There are usually such agreements, although it’s easy for companies to wrangle their way out of them. Delta agreed to certain service levels at MSP but then backed out. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna28864064

            1. Tim Dunn Avatar
              Tim Dunn

              I believe those were related to maintenance and other support jobs that NW had in MN and largely outside of MSP, not related to core flying activity.

              DL continues to grow Tech Ops at MSP and the rumored 787 order may provide even more work up there – likely by moving other engine overhaul work from ATL to MSP.

      4. Brett Avatar

        SEAN – Because Atlanta doesn’t need a reliever. This is not a constrained airport in the traditional NYC sense. This is a big airport that benefits hugely from economies of scale. A tiny hub in Memphis with no local traffic just doesn’t make sense.

        1. Davey Avatar
          Davey

          Cranky, perhaps one of the questions not raised about Memphis is, had Northwest not merged with Delta, how long would Memphis remained a hub? I get its strategic importance as a transfer point, but the market isn’t there. Period.

          I wonder if American ever regrets closing its former Nashville hub?

          1. tb Avatar
            tb

            Great comment Davey. Legacy AA was waaay ahead of the times with both the BNA and RDU hubs. Traffic in the early 90’s was not there to support long term (especially when the 1st Gulf War spiked oil) but look at them both today. Problem is AA could not affort to sustain losses for 25+ years just to keep them running. BNA has exploded in the past 10 years, and I believe every carrier at RDU is printing money hand over fist today. Shows how the right idea is sometimes not visible for years (or even decades).

          2. Brett Avatar

            Davey – Well, if Northwest could have found a better way to serve the southern half of the country, it very well might have tried something different. But I tend to think there would have been a place for something in the south for an independent Northwest.

    2. tb Avatar
      tb

      @Matt D in the specific case of MEM, demolition was definitely the way to go. The terminal and concourses looked like something straight outta the Elvis heyday (and the front of the terminal still does). I was in MEM earlier this year and was blown away by how nicely they did the “new” concourse upgrade. And the reality is that hub- or even focus-city level traffic is never returning to MEM. So cut your losses, demo out the completely outdated “middle school hallway” concourses, and focus on the current and future, which MEM is doing quite nicely. Next step of the Reno is to upgrade the ticket lobby and curbside to match the beautiful new concourse design, which will give MEM a great base for the next 30-50 years.

      In terms of traffic, I really think their future lies in attracting more ULCC carriers like Breeze and Frontier. There is a pretty large catchment area into Arkansas, North Mississippi, and even far Western Alabama who will make that drive for cheap fares and nonstop flights. And they have an opportunity right now as Nashville has completely outgrown their airport footprint and has a long and expensive solution in front of them to solve terminal roadway issues that have people literally abandoning their cars on the road during peak traffic times.

    3. Alex B. Avatar
      Alex B.

      “Is there a reason that the answer to traffic downturns is demolition?”

      MEM is not going through a ‘traffic downturn,’ the airport is something fundamentally different now. It was a hub (the smallest hub) in an era of more network airlines. It’s no longer a hub, and isn’t going to be a hub in any reasonable future (that includes the lifespan of these facilities).

      “Better to spruce up a building that’s been out of use for awhile than to (re)build from scratch.”

      This is one of those things that sounds good but isn’t likely to be actually true.

    4. Brett Avatar

      Matt D – Demolition was the right thing to do here. Others have already covered this well in previous comments, but there is no world where Memphis gets a hub back. There is plenty of room for growth in the existing structure on the other side of the “Y,” but also, they haven’t even decided officially to get rid of the old C gates just in case. Still, those are old and would require a ton of work to make them truly useful again. There’s no reason to hold on to hope when it shouldn’t exist.

    5. Memphian Avatar
      Memphian

      For MEM specifically, they mothballed the northern half of A and C until the current headhouse project is demolishing them altogether. They demolished the southern gates of A and C to allow planes to taxi in and out without having to go around unused buildings and creating a bit of a bottleneck in an otherwise uncongested airport (during the day at least!).

  4. Howard Avatar
    Howard

    Though you mentioned Chicago & Southern as well as Republic, there was no mention of Southern Airways and their Memphis hub. As I’m sure everyone here know, Southern Airways and North Central Airlines merged to become said Republic in 1979 (Hughes Air West was added in 1980.)

    This Southern Airways commercial is probably one of the most famous airline commercials and just in general a very famous and incredibly well-done commercial.

    https://youtu.be/yulxnzAsWEM?si=RpW14MNODUkgNj0n

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Reminds me of an ad for Midway before it went out of business. When the captain announces that they will be delayed, all the passengers started cheering.

  5. John G Avatar
    John G

    The new concourse is actually pretty nice. It feels spacious and has nice amenities.

    Far better than the claustrophobic brick walled dungeon it was during the Northwest days.

  6. HT Avatar
    HT

    As someone from the area, and recently there a few weekends ago, it is both sad to see it shrink, while also very nice to see the new terminal, which is gorgeous.

    One thing I will also put out there from a customer experience perspective – they put a lot of thought into what amenities to add. Huge bathrooms, a business center (with a boardroom), and even a St. Jude lounge for St. Jude patients and their families.

    It is easily one of the easiest experiences to get into an out of an airport. The renovation should hold up well for a few decades as well (assuming maintenance is done correctly).

    1. NedsKid Avatar
      NedsKid

      Agreed… I really like what they’ve done, and there are plenty of nice areas to sit. Business center is great. And yes, it’s very easy to get in/out of, even for rental cars.

  7. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    Chicago & Southern had a hub at ORD before being acquired. Delta maintained some type of hub at ORD until the 80’s or early 90’s.

  8. Emil D Avatar
    Emil D

    Why isn’t AUS a hub for anyone (I know DFW is too close for AA)?

    1. MarylandDavid Avatar
      MarylandDavid

      I think AUS is becoming a hub for Delta, or at the very least, a prime focus city.

      1. Roberto Ortiz-Puig Avatar
        Roberto Ortiz-Puig

        AUS is destined to become a hub for Detla. They have publicly stated they plan on growing to over 150 daily flights as soon as the new concourse opens.

    2. John G Avatar
      John G

      The problem with AUS is competition. Southwest already operates 120 flights a day there, operating as a mini-hub/large focus city. American is entrenched, even if they pulled back their hub activities.

      Plus you are very close to American’s giant hub at DFW as well as United’s hub at IAH. Plus WN has medium hubs at DAL and HOU also.

      DL has shown they don’t mind a fight (see SEA), but that’s a lot to overcome.

      1. Ian L Avatar
        Ian L

        American is *not* entrenched here. They have dropped to serving hubs only, plus maybe Cancun, and I think they’re in their third year of 20% YoY passenger traffic drops. DL passed them as 2nd largest carrier earlier this year, so I believe the rumors that they’ll be adding AUS as a hub once they have the gate space to do so (and giving the airport the top tier focus city treatment until then).

        1. John G Avatar
          John G

          AA still has around 50 daily departures from AUS, despite the fact that Austin is similar sized market in population to St Louis, Portland, San Antonio, or Sacramento.

          American has a strong local presence and won’t give up easily.

          1. Anthony Avatar
            Anthony

            50 flights just makes it a large outstation, not a hub. It’s easy to see how they can get there especially since they fly 15x to DFW in the summer. AA is doing almost exclusively hub flying from AUS with a few exceptions for seasonal Mexico.

            1. John G Avatar
              John G

              What other midsize hub has that kind of completion? Between AA and WN they run 170 flights a day out of AUS. That is considerably more just between those two than the entire airport in San Antonio for example.

              That’s more than AA has in Atlanta, and more than DL has in DFW for example.

              That’s a ton of competition for O&D.

  9. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    The new terminal is really nice. I also love that the SkyClub hasn’t been renovated since pre-merger days. It has that cozy heavy wood vibe from the ~90s

    The only drawback (for a small/mid airport) is that the walk from gates at the tip of the Y to the rental car is a bit of a hike and outdoors, which isn’t great when you’re wearing a suit in the middle of the summer

  10. Bob V Avatar
    Bob V

    The (new) Memphis terminal may look nice but it is full of maintenance issues. Once of the elevators in the parking garage was broken for almost two years. The moving walkways from the parking garage usually always have a section not working. I was through there a month ago and they were still working on the same walkway from that summer. Moving walkways in the terminal are often inoperative. The airport puts signs up stating “supply chain issues” for the broken equipment.

  11. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Lot of talk about AUS on here. Feels like the rapid investment in AUS is just a harbinger setting the airport for the failure that all these other airports we are chronicling have. Seems like Austin’s growth (as a city) was somewhat artificially inflated earlier this decade when these airlines were all supercharging their commitments to the region

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      While I don’t disagree with the AUS population bubble, I think AUS can grow as a connecting hub, so independent of the local traffic/population. Texas/SW US is a glaring gap in DL’s network. There’s a real scenario where they can grow through more connecting pax. WN probably also sees a similar strategy where they are tapped out in DAL, etc. and want to continue to be a dominant player across TX

      1. fly18725 Avatar
        fly18725

        The days of needing connecting hubs that serve all geographies died with retirement of turboprops and pull down of RJs. Current regional equipment can serve any CONUS destination from a current DL hub. If DL is chasing intraregional connecting flows, they will directly compete with AA hubs in DFW and PHX, UA hubs in DEN and IAH, and WN with substantial operations in all population centers.

        The lesson of MEM also applies to other DL aspirations: you need to have a dominant share of solid O&D and little to no competition in key connecting flows (e.g. N-S over SLC) to make a viable hub. Otherwise you can only have a local market focused focus city, which is effectively what SEA is.

        1. See_Bee Avatar
          See_Bee

          Yes it can be an uphill battle for some local traffic, but I’ll give 2 examples to the contrary:

          -If I’m DL and want to make a corporate contracting play at a mid-continent company like Wal-Mart based in XNA, I can’t compete for their traffic to MS, LA, TX, NM, etc. because I have to route them circuitously through ATL while AA & UA have options via TX. An AUS hub unlocks regional markets, which is still very important

          -The US military has a ton of traffic out of GRK. Again, DL is a circuitous option unless going to the east coast. An AUS hub provides DL with a better connecting opportunity

          Having a foothold in these regional markets unlocks larger corporate and government contracting opportunities

  12. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    Interesting synapsis. I didn’t realize how small the Memphis area is having only 1.381 million people estimated in its entire CSA. Not quite 5 million O&D passengers per year seems pretty good for an area with that small of a population.

    1. Memphian Avatar
      Memphian

      O&D is higher now than it ever was when it was a hub.

      I think our O&D numbers would be even better if we didn’t have a bunch of EAS markets in or along the edge of what would otherwise be the catchment area – Jonesboro, Jackson and Tupelo are barely a hour drive each, Greenville MS, Paducah KY and Cape Girardeau are more than that but not by much.

    2. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      It’s very good – I just compared it to a few other airports serving CSAs in the same population league and the only one that outdoes MEM is MSY, which of course blows it out of the water (over 13 million) but that isn’t really surprising considering what a large tourist market New Orleans is.

      A few others in comparable CSAs league: GRR on ~4 million, BHM with a little over 3, and FAT on ~2.6.

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        I’m stunned that Memphis and Grand Rapids are similarly sized metro areas!

  13. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    Keeping/improving “the Y” was absolutely the right move here. MEM was the textbook example of a banked hub, and absent that, there’s no reason to keep A & C. That volume of traffic isn’t coming back any time soon, and the SW wing of the Y can handle any incremental increase.

  14. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    Keeping/improving “the Y” was absolutely the right move here. MEM was the textbook example of a banked hub, and absent that, there’s no reason to keep A & C. That volume of traffic isn’t coming back any time soon, and the SW wing of the Y can handle any incremental increase.

  15. MEM flyer Avatar
    MEM flyer

    A couple of things to add to this.

    First, while flights have dropped, gauge has soared. Obviously nobody’s really flying many 50-seaters anywhere these days, but MEM gets mainline service, at least seasonally, to every major hub except LGA, PHL, DCA, BOS, JFK. MEM is setting records for O&D every year now. Obviously, no hub of any kind is coming back in any reasonable-to-assume future (it would take a long period of BNA/AUS style metropolitan growth to even be able to think about it and…um…there’s no reason to think that’s imminent), but the flights situation has improved dramatically over the last few years. At this point our biggest unserved markets by PDEW are on the west coast, just a little too far for an RJ and too thin for airlines to gamble a mainline plane – I think a 221 could probably work for them, but I think it would take somebody like Breeze succeeding on a route before the bigger airlines would try it (and obviously only Delta has the 220’s). MEM-SLC took forever to be re-added after the dehub, they launched it as a 50-seater and it’s grown to fill a 738.

    Second, the new MEM B concourse is as nice as any you’d ever fly through these days. They only built out one side of the Y for now, leaving the international gate that hardly ever gets used on the old side. Building out the other side of the Y would bring capacity in line with what Nashville has right now. In addition to all the other issues with the old concourses being dark, dingy and cramped, they were nowhere near seismic code, and that’s the biggest driving factor for the headhouse renovation.

    And third, the future plan is a little more than just the headhouse, though that’s the main thing. They’ve knocked down what’s left of the former A and will build a new parking garage there to serve as the rental car facility – the current rental car floors of the economy garage will become regular parking. They’re going to knock down what’s left of C and eventually build a hotel. They’re planning to eventually leave a small corner of – I believe C but it could have been A – to have a 2-3 gate FIS facility so international arrivals don’t have to clear TSA to leave the airport anymore, and one of the bag belts in the renovation will be able to alternate between international and domestic use. Additionally, while bringing the headhouse up to code, they’re going to make it feel less like three separate headhouses for the three old concourses and more like one big headhouse, and they’re extending it out over the current entrance drive.

    The old facilities had reached end of realistic service life, so probably better to just build new rather than try to keep space available. If somebody ever decided to try to put a hub here again (which, again, no), the old concourses would have needed to be built from scratch anyway. And even if there was somehow a hub here again, it’s hard to imagine they’d come anywhere near needing the number of gates the old hub did.

  16. Bravenav Avatar
    Bravenav

    The demise of MEM as a hub reflects the changing demographics of the Southeast over the last 70 years.
    In 1949, when Southern Airways was launched and Chicago & Southern was HQ’d there, Memphis was one of the largest Southern cities along with New Orleans, Birmingham, Atlanta, and Houston, making it an ideal hub location. In the ensuing years, Atlanta, Florida, NC, & Nashville have mushroomed, while the Mississippi River cities have stagnated. MEM as a hub no longer makes sense.

  17. Another Eric Avatar
    Another Eric

    I have a soft spot in my heart for MEM. I grew up flying Southern and as a kiddie AvGeek dragged my poor parents around the terminal so I could see everything one could see on a 60-minute layover. 25 years later I started my career at NWA in MEM and ended it there before moving to another airline. The traffic catchment that kept Memphis from bleeding to death was oil rig workers and Consultants coming from the Gulf. The AMS flight was 75% Royal Shell and BP. The coast from the Panhandle to New Orleans was well served by NWA main line DC9s and Mesaba Avros.

    I agree that the decades gave dungeon vibes and that Las Vegas casino Darkness at noon effect. The original A&C concourses were like a time capsule to 1970. I believe the delta mini Hub operation was out of C. The C&S merger gave Delta a midcon footprint with anchors at ORD, MEM & MSY plus it’s First International route authorities to the Caribbean and Venezuela.

    IF….big IF it work to become a hub again it’s going to be along the lines of a 15 to 20 flight a day Breeze operation. Frontier attempted a mini hub shortly after Delta left and that only lasted a year.

  18. MNG Avatar
    MNG

    Then again, they still have FedEx…

  19. Skycajun Avatar
    Skycajun

    If you go back and read news accounts of when Northwest, and then followed by Delta, had hubs in Memphis, the local authorities complained vehemently about their high fares and was doing everything it could to bring in lower fare service, even surmising they would be better off without being a fortress hub. When Delta decided to de-hub, there was little opposition from Memphis officials or attempts to stop it.

    1. Mike Avatar
      Mike

      That matches my recollections of the big issues at the time. Southwest hadn’t really penetrated hub airports at all so there was little competition at the hubs which people hated. Every once in a while a flight by night airline (rip independence air) would come and temporarily lower prices, but prices were what everyone objected to with the mega hubs

    2. Memphian Avatar
      Memphian

      I think some of it was that Memphis leaders knew they couldn’t stop it, but yeah, we went from the most expensive airfares in the country to lower than average in a few years after dehubbing.

      I remember driving to Nashville to fly BNA-MEM-??? because the fares were hundreds of dollars cheaper to connect from BNA through MEM than they were to just get on the same plane at MEM. There were even bus companies that only served roundtrips between Memphis and LIT/BNA because their fares were both so much cheaper.

      The worst example of that I had was actually after the dehub ($500 a ticket for a travel party of 25 to fly from STL instead of MEM), but that got a lot more rare after we dehubbed.

    3. Other Mike Avatar
      Other Mike

      Same thing at CVG. Be careful what you wish for.

  20. Blaine Avatar
    Blaine

    I spent the summer of 2001 doing an internship at the University of Memphis. I was supposed to fly home to Seattle on NW on September 12th or 13th, but obviously that didn’t happen.

    One of my most vivid aviation memories was departing MEM on September 14th or 15th – I don’t recall which – and seeing soldiers in camo with rifles stationed post-security. Still can see it in my mind nearly a quarter-century later.

  21. Nick Avatar
    Nick

    I used to connect often in MEM doing domestic business travel and loved it. At the airport the ground staff were kind, food was delicious and the airport was easy. It is too bad Delta couldn’t find a solution to make it profitable.

  22. Will Avatar
    Will

    I would love to get a final piece from these series on why these hubs died. I think the main lesson is that hubs with a lot of O&D traffic just are fundamentally economically advantaged over those without it (Detroit and MSP barely pass the test, Cleveland doesn’t) but not sure.

    1. MarylandDavid Avatar
      MarylandDavid

      I would think that a big reason is airline consolidation.

    2. Brett Avatar

      Will – As MarylandDavid says, it’s all about consolidation. You don’t need as many hubs when you have fewer airlines, and the weaker ones go away. O&D traffic is really important, but there also has to be geographic value. Memphis provided that for Northwest and Cincinnati provided that for Delta… until the two merged.

  23. David P. Jordan Avatar
    David P. Jordan

    I seem to recall MEM also serving briefly as mini-hubs for Braniff International Airways (very brief) and United Air Lines (1979-1981ish).

    DAY (James M. Cox – Dayton International Airport) in Ohio may symbolize post-hub decline as much as or more than MEM. With the Piedmont/Piedmont Commuter hub they peaked at some 186 daily departures in 1986. Now, they have just under 30. Metro area is a little more than 800,000 but proximity to Springfield, Ohio and northern Cincinnati suburbs offers a larger catchment area than it would first appear.

  24. Cale R Avatar
    Cale R

    I just loved the NW MEM hub when living in MCO.

    Flying west, it was the best kept secret!

    The 06:30 from MCO that connected to LAX, SFO, PHX, DEN, SEA. As a then Platinum Elite and Million Miler and loyal to NW, it was such a great shortcut from crossing through DTW or MSP. And never more than a 10 minute walk from the WorldClub to the gate.

  25. Patrica Lesterson Avatar
    Patrica Lesterson

    WN is on the upswing in Memphis. Increasing passenger counts about 4% year over year. WN is now the number 2 mainline carrier overtaking American in 2025.

    I think the market is pretty well served but we lack enough West Coast flights.

    1. Memphian Avatar
      Memphian

      If an ERJ/CRJ could reach from MEM to the west coast, I’m certain we’d have those flights, and based on what happened with our SLC flight being rebuilt, I believe it would build up to mainline eventually.

Leave a Reply to MNG Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier