Cleveland’s Wild Airport Terminal Plan


After writing up Pittsburgh’s new terminal, I decided it would be fun to look at other former hubs to see just how they’ve been handled. None is stranger than Cleveland’s plan called CLEvolution. Many of you discussed this in the comments of that Pittsburgh post, but I couldn’t quite appreciate what was going on until I dug in further.

It would be too easy to start with just how awkward the name is. Are we supposed to call it Cl-eh-volution like revolution? But no matter, that’s just a gimmick anyway. The meat of the current plan is called Phase I, and that’s a good thing because it’s a really weird place to end up if it were to be the entire thing. The problem is, I’m not convinced there will be another phase after this nearly-10-year odyssey. This phase alone is going to cost $1.6 billion and go until 2032. It has yet to be fully funded.

Phase I has a whole lot of sub-phases, so let’s get started. Here is Cleveland Hopkins International Airport:

As you can see, there are three concourses connected to the main headhouse. That’s A up top which is also where international flights arrive, B in the middle, and Continental’s hub home in C at the bottom with the weird half-semi-circle at the end. Then, to the right of C is the remote concourse D which was built for Continental Express regional jets in 1999. It made it 15 years before being shut down, meaning it’s been gone for more than a decade.

As you can see, the terminal is fairly tightly-packed, and they don’t want to build a new one on a site elsewhere on the grounds, so they need to slowly but surely move things around in a way that keeps the place functioning. Step 1 is to move longer-term parking.

The current Orange Lot will see spots increase by 50 percent when they move to the footprint of Concourse D. They aren’t even getting rid of the concourse, but rather, they’re just striping a lot in between the piers and building a walkway across the roadways. If you’ve ever wished your car was more like a Beech 1900, here’s your chance to park like one.

Once the new Gold Lot is open, the Orange Lot will be razed, and that’s when the next step happens.

Under they Orange Lot they will relocate the transit station, and then on top they’ll build a big parking garage. That garage will replace the so-called Smart Garage which is the closest to the current terminal today. When that one opens, they can knock down the old garage and get ready for the next step where they will build the new terminal headhouse.

This new terminal will be built on top of the old garage site, but that obviously puts it pretty far from the gates, so they will build all of these connectors to get to the gates from the new building, bypassing the current headhouse. When it’s all built, they can demolish the old headhouse.

With the old headhouse gone, you would think we could finally fix the gates, right? Uh, no. Instead, the connectors will be slightly streamlined, but this is where we’ll be in 2032.

And that’s it! Seriously. What about the concourses? Well, they do say this in the press release:

Decisions will be made later regarding the extent of improvements to the airside of the terminal campus, after execution has begun on the landside phase. Phase one includes the most critical components of the project due to the strain on the Airport’s landside infrastructure and facilities.

So, after spending $1.6 billion, you’ll get longer walks and one weird layout. But there will be a more functional headhouse that can support local traffic better.

I can’t imagine all of these gates are likely to be necessary, but there is no plan to shut down one concourse or anything like that. It seems obvious that they will need to build a new, more compact airside, but it’s so far down the line that it’s hard to know for sure what gets approved, if anything.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

15 responses to “Cleveland’s Wild Airport Terminal Plan”

  1. fortescue Avatar
    fortescue

    Among CLE’s problems or challenges are its dated concourses, each with its own unique set of problems. Let’s start with C. The largest. It was expanded and designed to support a hub that has been gone for over a decade. It has low ceilings, is relatively narrow, and frankly, could house all of the airport’s flight operations singularly under its roof. It probably though holds the best bones of the 3 to be converted into something better and bring it up to date with how modern air travel runs. B is old, small, and can’t easily be expanded. A is both too large and too small to be anything more than it is today, and holds the airport’s FIS, which will never be a busy place.

    A larger, more modern head house makes sense, but the airport needs better concourses too and for an airport of its size, the rental car facility doesn’t need to be a few miles off campus.

    When you look at these designs (past, present, and now future) you can easily understand why the US has poor infrastructure, spends ridiculous sums of money on white elephant projects when it comes to making improvements, and why the country’s overall look and feel when it comes to transportation hubs and facilities gives it the look of an underdeveloped, under-invested place.

  2. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Can dont stop here though Brett, whats going on in Memphis and Covington?

    1. Jordan Avatar
      Jordan

      Yes! Please talk about Memphis. It’s status as a former Northwest hub, how they’ve gone from 3 concourses down to 1. And make sure you cover the uniquely Memphis rubber moving walkway that has a soothing bounce to it.

  3. Jason Avatar
    Jason

    That’s sure a real big Steamer of all Airport rebuilds! Good Job Cleveland living up to your expectations!

  4. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    And people get paid to design these monstrosities? Common sense would dictate one long terminal.

  5. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    While I like living in NE Ohio one of the downsides is flying in and out of CLE. It really is one of the worst airports in the country. The rental car facility is WAY off site and isn’t even that nice. They didn’t just stick it visitors renting cars though. All of the hotel and off site parking shuttles are at the far north end of the terminal making it inconvenient at best and a nightmare if you have mobility issues or kids (I don’t have either) as it is a LONG walk through baggage claim to get to the escalator that has been broken and out of service for several months. You now have to walk even further to the elevator. The one good thing in the new plan is they do plan to move the rental car facility and “transportation hub” for shuttles to the new parking garage which will improve things a little bit. The sad thing is will still have long walks to the gates so even if there are decent restaurants and amenities in the new head house most people won’t use them because they will want to be closer to their gate.

  6. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    Please please please can I be there when they destroy the rental car facility…. And that Sheraton? So horrific.

  7. Emil Avatar
    Emil

    CF, what’s going on with the STL rebuild? That whole complex should be bulldozed

  8. Jacob Avatar
    Jacob

    I really like this series. You should consider covering STL next—it’s a neat project. Parts of concourse C and D that haven’t been used since the early AA hub days are getting pressed back into (temporary) service after sitting vacant for over 20 years.

  9. Kenneth Avatar
    Kenneth

    Still pulling for Southern Airways Express Caravan service between CLE and the CLE rental car center.

    1. See_Bee Avatar
      See_Bee

      Landline perhaps??

    2. Common Sense Avatar
      Common Sense

      Never too late :)

  10. Chauncey Avatar
    Chauncey

    I would nominate PIE to the list. It needs help

  11. tb Avatar
    tb

    Maybe some day in the distant future the US aviation industry will get on board with the rest of the world and maximize common use / hardstand gates. Imagine moving all RJ traffic, regardless of carrier, to the mothballed Concourse D. Remaining “mainline” flights occupy the banjo back to the underground walkway between C and D. Now you have the entirety of Concourses A and B empty and ready to be razed and built into a truly world class facility. There is so much available ramp space that you could bus from anywhere in C or D to a fleet of hardstand gates. Go watch checkin sometime – there is no reason why Southwest, United, and American should occupy nearly so much counter space when the vast majority of their customers bypass the ticket counter entirely. Using common use “desks” you can manage the number of checkin positions to match flight volume and close off the entire northern end of the current “headhouse”. But alas, let’s just do whatever this CLEvolution plan is calling for. We’ll end up with a pretty facade welcoming you to a monument to 1980’s air travel when you finally arrive at your gate.

  12. Retired Lawyer Avatar
    Retired Lawyer

    Several reasons for not building a new airport facility elsewhere on the grounds:
    1. Much of the land on the back side of CLE is NASA Lewis Research Facility. The remainder is landlocked. I remember the Runway 23L-R expansion that leveled 20-30 blocks of houses north of Brookpark Road and the political furor that went with it.
    2. Relocating both the Rapid and the SR 237 highway connectors would be massively more expensive.

    My personal suggestion would be to do what Hong Kong did – massively expand Burke (BKL) on landfill in Lake Erie into a new commercial facility adjacent to downtown, with light rail connectors to downtown and to the Rapid, and a rebuild of the Shoreway.

Leave a Reply to See_Bee Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier