United Puts the MAX to Work on New Europe Flying


Remember when the idea of seeing a B737 from a US airline in Europe seemed impossible? Well, that is changing as United has now announced its first route to mainland Europe with a B737-8 MAX to a city you’ve probably never heard of. This is part of a broader summer announcement that has some very smart and measured growth.

United has spent many years making flashier and flashier summer route adds. It’s hard to top last year’s Greenland adventure, but that shouldn’t be the goal anyway. With figurative walls being thrown up by the US government and the economy slowing down, international expansion becomes less and less of a sure thing.

The question then remained, would United go big or would it go more conservative next year? I think it’s done the latter, but it can still get headlines by putting those MAXs to good use. Here are the four new cities, all are being flown from Newark:

  • Bari (Italy) 4x weekly on a business-heavy B767-300ER from May 1
  • Glasgow 1x daily on a B737-8 MAX from May 8
  • Santiago de Compostela (Spain) 3x weekly on a B737-8 MAX from May 22
  • Split (Croatia) 3x weekly on a business-heavy B767-300ER from April 30

The airline is also increasing frequency and connecting dots on three other routes, though only one is in Europe:

  • Reykjavik/Keflavik 1x daily from Washington/Dulles on a B757-200 from May 21
  • Seoul/Incheon 1x daily from Newark on a B787-9 from September 4
  • Tel Aviv increases from 2x daily to 18x weekly from Newark, new 4x weekly flights on the B787-9 from March 28

Overall, this is still an impressive list of new flights for a relatively uncertain time. But when you look at this under a microscope, it’s not really as dramatic as it may seem at first blush.

The B767 Looks for Gold on the Med

There is one B767 dedicated to Split some days and Bari the others. This airplane is being pulled off of Newark to Athens (3x weekly) and Frankfurt (4x weekly). Those each still have 1x daily, and we don’t know if Lufthansa might backfill and increase Frankfurt anyway. I like this bet.

This just follows the maxim that if your city touches the Mediterranean, it can support a flight to the US in summer. Nobody flies from the US to Split, and only Neos flies to JFK from Bari. Neos carries primarily Italian origin traffic, so this is a wide open opportunity for United.

These are operated by the “high-J” B767 with a lot of premium seats. This will cater to the cruisers and tours that stop or end in one of these points. Today, they are not easy to access since most of the flights that could connect back to the US are timed for the European traveler. They leave later in the day.

Let me put it another way. In July 2025, there were 2,625 flights from Split to other cities in Europe. Of those, only 875 departed before noon. And of those, only 138 were operated by an airline to its major European hub with connecting options to the US. (And I’m being generous by including Croatia Airlines flights here since they are closely tied with Lufthansa.) Meanwhile, in June and July of this year, there were 182 daily passengers each way between the US and Bari and 278 to Split.

Three flights a week nonstop to Newark? I like its chances.

The MAX is Going to Complement the A321XLR

I don’t think I quite appreciated what the MAX was going to be able to do for United. It is already flying to Nuuk in Greenland along with Madeira and Ponta Delgada (Azores) in Portugal. But now it’s going to stretch even further. Madeira is a mere 3,178 statute miles from Newark. Now we have Glasgow at 3,228 and Santiago de Compostela at 3,310. This shouldn’t be a problem since today United flies the MAX on Anchorage – Newark which is 3,369 miles.

I couldn’t believe that Glasgow had no real US service, but sure enough the only thing it had this past summer was a twice weekly flight to Melbourne (FL) on TUI. That hardly counts. Of course, Edinburgh is a short drive away, but for people who prefer Glasgow, this should be a welcome addition. And since it’s on a MAX, it isn’t a big risk.

As for Santiago de Compostela, well that one is fascinating. If you’ve ever wanted to go to that region in the northwest of Spain, you know it’s a real pain that this past summer only drew about 30 passengers each way per day from the US. The closest airport with Transatlantic service is Porto, a good 2.5 hour drive away, and that doesn’t have much service anyway. Madrid is a hefty six hours away by car, though you can slash it in half on a train.

On a call with the media yesterday, United’s SVP of Global Network Planning and Alliances Patrick Quayle was asked whether these MAX flights were just a placeholder until the A321XLR arrives. He was very clear in saying they were not, and for two reasons. First, the MAX is smaller, but probably more importantly, Patrick highlighted how the MAX only has coach and “premium economy” which is actually domestic first. The A321XLR will have flat beds. These are different airplanes for different markets.

Taking Advantage of Opportunities

Of the rest, Keflavik seems like an easy one to try, and more Tel Aviv service works great… barring more war-related closures. But it was Newark – Seoul/Incheon that I found particularly interesting. New York is the second biggest US market for Seoul outside of LA, but United only serves Incheon from San Francisco twice daily and nowhere else.

In the past, United could at leat rely on its Star Alliance partner Asiana for some feed, but with Korean having bought Asiana, United loses any semblance of a partner. Today, Korean and Asiana each fly 2x daily from JFK but only Air Premia has a single daily flight from Newark. This is a good move for United.


This, again, is in no way as impressive and expansive as last year’s announcement, but it’s still notable enough for me to bother writing a post. I would expect that these new destinations will get some good press for United without committing too many assets to make the routes fly. It’s a creative balance.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

46 responses to “United Puts the MAX to Work on New Europe Flying”

  1. emac Avatar
    emac

    Is United holding onto additional hub-FCO/ATH/BCN announcements or are they really not dumping more flights into those markets next summer? Are they upgauging? If so, that’s newsworthy.

    (But 15 daily flights to Italy is a fun stat.)

    Anyways, all we do now is wait for the AI bubble to burst and the YOLO disposable income wallets snap shut.

    1. Brett Avatar

      emac – I have no reason to think that there will be more frequency changes after this, but that doesn’t mean there can’t be. Gauge changes are certainly possible. But traditional Med destinations have been built out pretty well.

  2. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    While a J heavy 767 might be used for some flights, the fact that the MAX 8 with no J cabin is being used for multiple routes says volumes about UA’s “need” to grow and lack of premium configured aircraft to do it with

    seems pretty certain based on this schedule announcement and UA’s previous statements about the number of new 787s they are supposed to receive in 2026 that the widebody retirements are starting.

    1. Remote Avatar
      Remote

      DL’s growth was pretty muted as well. They also dropped two major TATL routes that United already serves well. I don’t think United dropped any routes this year.

      1. Tim Dunn Avatar
        Tim Dunn

        first, DL said that the TATL season is flattening out w/ less demand in the July and August period and more in the spring and fall – which means they will focus less on increasing the size of their peak season and more on extending the time over which flights operate.
        UA probably is seeing the same thing which is why their expansion is not large.

        and DL only dropped GVA from its network; the rest is being shifted to other hubs. NYC might be the largest market but it is far from the only place that can support profitable TATL flying.

        Let’s see how large profits for the rest of the industry are when they report but DL said it expects to generate 60% of the profits of the US airline industry with UA reporting the majority of the remainder; considering that DL flies less ASMs that AA or UA, DL has clearly perfected the art of moving routes and planes around to maximize profits. Clearly, other airlines of all stripes could stand to drop a few routes – or more.

  3. abcdefg Avatar
    abcdefg

    Surprised that IAD-KEF is not a max 8. Also surprised it took this long.

    1. Wany Avatar
      Wany

      I wonder if this is a preemptive response to the rumor of Southwest starting BWI-KEF

  4. SEASFO Avatar
    SEASFO

    I was always surprised that United wasn’t flying EWR-ICN already (even more so that Continental didn’t do it back when it was in Skyteam), but I guess US point-of-sale interest in Korea has grown over the past 10-15 years.

    EWR is a much better move for United than LAX, where UA can’t offer anything that DL/KE can’t do better.

  5. Steve Forsyth Avatar
    Steve Forsyth

    I am still surprised that no American airline flies to Vienna, the largest world city in Europe without such service. Austrian Airlines (a Lufthansa brand) flies five or six daily nonstops to North America from Vienna and is replacing daily 767’s and 777’s with 787’s.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      United codeshares with Austrian, so it’s covered there. And the other two major alliances offer easy connections over hubs, and both easy and frequently cheap connections on Air Canada over YYZ or Aer Lingus over DUB.

      As for the rest, it’s just demand. Looking at one of the commonly-used lists of “world cities” as an example (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization_and_World_Cities_Research_Network), Vienna is ranked as “Alpha-“, putting it in the same category in Europe as Berlin, Brussels, Dublin, Lisbon, Munich, and Zurich.

      Berlin, Munich, and Zurich are significantly more important to American businesses than Vienna. Berlin is also the capital of the largest economic power in Europe, and Brussels is the administrative center of the European Union.

      Dublin and Lisbon are the main cities of nations with large diasporas in the US that still have many members with strong ties to those countries, while Austria didn’t even make the lists I looked at.

      Aer Lingus has take that and the resulting tourism (which is also because Ireland is gorgeous and speaks English) and built Dublin as a major connecting hub as well, particularly for Americans who want to go to places in much of western England and Wales without dealing with Heathrow or trains.

      Lisbon has also been a growing tourist destination in recent years, as has Berlin. And while Vienna, and Austria in general, are beautiful and attract tourism from the US, Austria also suffers from a reputation as being the most virulently anti-Semitic country in the EU.

      So with Austrian and connections covering the current demand, no American airline really sees Vienna as a market they need to serve directly.

    2. Bravenav Avatar
      Bravenav

      Warsaw is slightly larger (933 PDEW), and only served by LOT.
      Large Polish Diaspora in US and Canada. With the added traffic in support of Ukraine, I’m surprised no one has added it.

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        Yeah, I’ve wondered about that too – besides the diaspora, Warsaw is one category ahead of all the cities I mentioned above in that “world cities” ranking.

        Part of it could be just less business travel, combined with being too far east for LOT to build it out as a connecting hub from North America?

        LOT still does decently, though, better than Austrian to VIE – 5 US cities and Toronto. But so many US cities have easy connections on other airlines that it makes it hard for them to offer more. And it’s possible the Polish diaspora doesn’t have as many areas with concentrations to leverage off that beyond what they serve already?

        1. Kilroy Avatar
          Kilroy

          I would be curious to understand better how well connected different immigrant/ethnic/ancestry disaspora groups are with their home areas/countries, and how many people are fairly recently removed (say, within 1 generation or 20 or 30 years) of living in the other country. It would also be worth adding in how tightly concentrated in terms of geographic location those groups are in the US.

          As an easy example, there lots of areas (and not just near the Rio Grande) with sizeable populations of immigrants from Mexico & Central America who still send money back to (and often visit, visa/immigration rules permitting) their old countries.

          As another example, Southeast New England (greater Boston area) has one of the largest populations of Portuguese speakers outside of Brasil and Portugal, as there are very sizeable populations of recent immigrants and their children from Brasil (and to a lesser extent Cape Verde and Portugal) in the area. There are also others whose ancestry dates back generations and who no longer speak the language (the Portguese and their descendants were a big part of the New England fishing industry back in the day), but who might be more inclined to visit Portugal for that reason even if they can’t trace their ancestors to a specific village. Thus, the demand for VFR flights from BOS to those areas is relatively high. It also helps that Brasil, Portugal, and even Cape Verde are all solid tourist destinations for those without familial connections to the locations.

          I’m not sure that I would say the same about Poland as a tourist destination (I’m sure it has some GREAT tourism sites, don’t get me wrong, but I doubt it would be high on the “countries I want to visit” list for most Americans).

  6. southbay flier Avatar
    southbay flier

    The problem with taking a 737 to Europe is that you are on a 737. Bleh.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      I took CO’s old EWR-BRS service on a 757 a couple of times and it was fine, even in economy. To most western European destinations from the east coast it’s not any different than an non-stop to the west coast.

      That said, I am not a big fan of the recent 737s in general and the way some airlines configure them in particular. I’m an A320 family guy now.

      1. southbay flier Avatar
        southbay flier

        I would take a 757 over a 737 any day even though they have the same tight seat width. The 757 feels roomier because of the lower floor. 737s always feel cramped and the windows are too low. Give me an A320 series plane any day.

        It’s the same with the CRJ-200 vs the CRJ-700 and -900. The lower floor makes the stretched CRJs slightly less miserable than the CRJ-200.

        1. CraigTPA Avatar
          CraigTPA

          Oh, I competely agree on the 757-vs-737. Put me in a 737 beyond two hours and if I’m not in first or the load is light and I have an empty seat next to me, I feel constrained in a way I don’t on an A320-family plane.

          But to a lot of people who just put on their eyeshades and headphones and zone out it doesn’t matter.

          My only complaint about newer A320s is that the PTUs don’t “bark” like the old ones do and I don’t get to watch people get nervous for no reason.

        2. Bobber Avatar
          Bobber

          Thanks for making the point. Having recently done the Anchorage flight on a new MAX, I can confirm that the 737 remains an unpleasant aircraft, even up front. Will sorely miss the 757s when they finally go

    2. Mark Avatar
      Mark

      Many pax will prefer the option of a nonstop to their destination, especially when other airlines don’t offer any nonstop at all.

      For those on the east coast who prefer a widebody, the same option offered by other airlines is still there. Take a relatively short redeye, where you’ll get approximately 3 hours of sleep and land in what feels like the middle of the night. Wait a few hours for your connection, then take a narrowbody flight to your destination.

      UA will offer the choice. Other airlines will only offer option B.

      1. southbay flier Avatar
        southbay flier

        If it was an A321XLR, I would feel differently. It’s really my strong dislike of 737s at play here. I will actively book away from them whenever possible.

        As someone who lives on the west coast, I would rather make my long flight from the west coast to Europe and then connect to my smaller European destination since I can get some sleep on the long flight across North America and the Atlantic.

      2. Tim Dunn Avatar
        Tim Dunn

        please let us know the percentage of local NYC passengers on these flights that are unique on UA (or DL’s) networks among US carriers. I doubt it is anywhere close to a majority.

        The number of passengers that will connect in one place or another is larger than you think.

        and, as people have noted, using MAXs on 7+ hour transatlantic flights results in an inferior product not just to what UA has on their widebodies but also what other carriers offer including AA and DL which do not fly narrowbodies further than Iceland.
        and the 321 does have a wider seat in coach but both the 320 and 737 families have lower percentages of aisle seats than just about any widebody configuration.
        Narrowbodies on longhaul international simply produces an inferior product to a widebody; the 737 is the worst option in terms of comfort between widebodies and the 320 family.

  7. Charles D Avatar
    Charles D

    EWR-ICN looks like its 7x in the press release.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Charles – Whoops, I think I cut and pasted wrong or something. Fixed now, thanks.

  8. Paper Boarding Pass Avatar
    Paper Boarding Pass

    I feel most of these markets are mature enough for lie flat seats and/or Premium Economy on narrow body flights, even if making connections for cruise lines for these are the grey hairs (like me) who appreciate extra room on 8+ hour TALT flights. The days of flip flops & backpacks and sitting on the back row reading “Europe on $20 a Day” are behind us. Travel in Europe is not cheap; even on trains. If in doubt just buy a ticket for DeutscheBahn.
    Eventually, the A320 series with lie flat seats will move into these slots. UA is just testing the waters.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Paper – I don’t know what you mean by “most of these” since there are only two that don’t have flat beds and none are over 8 hours. I do think these could be pathfinder airplanes, but also I’m not convinced there is enough premium demand on every route for the upgrade to the XLR. This may be a good airplane for some routes.

    2. Bobber Avatar
      Bobber

      Compared to here in the US, getting around Europe still IS cheap (and way more options, too). Of course, there are more comfortable footwear options other than flip-flops.

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        As long that comfortable footwear dosn’t involve Crocs…

        “The Tampa airport has extended its ban on Crocs for ten more years”
        https://www.instagram.com/p/DPMgNBxDrlE/

        (I love the way some people took this post seriously and had to comment on it!)

        TPA has an awesome social media team.

      2. Paper Boarding Pass Avatar
        Paper Boarding Pass

        @Bobber
        – Try finding Uber or Lyft in Iceland. No such thing. Very, very expensive taxis.
        – DeutscheBahn not such a bargain as once was. Sat next to a German who cussed the price and poor service.
        – We got stranded in Wolfsburg due to train system meltdown. Took 4+ hours from Wolfsburg to Berlin Hbf which is normally a one hour ride on ICE. Price of tickets were no bargain to start with.
        – Uber service we received around Berlin was awful; two drivers cancelled on us. Others wanted their tips in CASH!! May I say a rather hostile ride share environment developing in Berlin.
        – Couldn’t use Paris subway due to outbreak of gang violence during our visit. Reminded me of my Manhattan days.
        – Rental cars in Europe are way too expensive to start with, and rip you off nickeling & dimming you with imaginary scratches; I’ve been through that exercise several times. However, only way to see Wolfs Lair in Poland or to criss cross Britain (2x), Germany, France, Czech Republic, or Poland at your own pace.
        – Have taken Chunnel from France to London; sky high ticket in a FILTHY coach compartment and neglected Loo.
        – Rail service in Britain has gotten pricey compared to a few years back. Government and rail franchises got their hand out as of late.
        – Only good thing was Berlin transit system. Far superior, easy to navigate, always on time, & app worked perfectly. Let’s hope the Euro transport rot doesn’t spread to them.

        If you want to move between big cities in Europe, you can find deals via rail or air if you are patient .
        Once you get off the beaten path or set your own pace, its not cheap.

  9. Ron Avatar
    Ron

    I’m also surprised about the lack of service to Glasgow. Back in 1999 I flew EWR–GLA on Continental, I think it was a 777. Then again, at that time there was no service from the U.S. to Edinburgh (which was my destination).

    1. A Cranky Lurker Avatar
      A Cranky Lurker

      In the past, all the major US carriers had service to/from GLA. DL, UA/CO and AA all served the city from the East Coast. AA had service from ORD. Prior to covid, DL announced plans to fly there from BOS in addition to their existing 767 service from JFK. UA was flying from EWR (and IAD i believe) and AA had service from PHL. The AA ORD service had ended a number of years prior to that.

      There is a market to GLA from the US. DL upgraded to a 767 from the 757 due to overall demand including cargo.

    2. Aer Dingus Avatar
      Aer Dingus

      I’m surprised they’re going to Glasgow given that they already fly to EDI from EWR, ORD and IAD. Edinburgh is a short trip away. I would have thought maybe Manchester makes a comeback.

      Related, I’ve done the EDI-IAD route a few times and the 757s are getting a little tired.

    3. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      The one that amazes me is no service from North America to Birmingham. It’s a hundred miles to LHR and almost 90 to MAN, but you still have to go to one of those to fly to the US, other than seasonal TUI service to Melbourne/”Orlando”.

      Ridiculous.

      I keep wondering why JetBlue doesn’t try BHX-BOS instead of screwing around with Amsterdam, etc.

      1. dx Avatar
        dx

        I do think there is a chance that Virgin or more likely Delta will fly Birmingham-JFK (and/or BOS) if and when Birmingham City FC returns to the Premier League given their sponsorship of the team and the mutual ties to Tom Brady. Not hard to imagine filling one 767-300 a couple times per week during summer at worst.

  10. John g Avatar
    John g

    Since American is short of wide bodies, and they have maxes also, couldn’t they do some of this also?

    Especially out of Philly?

    Maybe they are just waiting for their 321 XLR’s… But they are supposedly putting most of those on the trans cons.

    1. Brett Avatar

      John g – Sure it could. But it doesn’t. I’m not even sure if the MAX has ETOPS over at AA but if it wanted to do this it could.

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        Hmm, yeah I don’t know if they do.

        They do Hawaii with 321 neos. Longest I found over water was CLT-Barbados, 2,000 miles, but the distance between emergency airports on that route is whole lot shorter than on Europe routes.

      2. Emilio Vigil-Vazquez Avatar
        Emilio Vigil-Vazquez

        There’s also the fact that UA’s MAX 8s have seatback TVs and AA’s don’t.

        1. John G Avatar
          John G

          I think this is a bit overrated. Why do you need a seat back screen when you can just watch your own phone?

          Americans entertainment options are actually quite a bit better than United’s.

          Plus, their connection speed is tons better. I can watch Redzone channel, for example on my phone on an American flight, and I can’t get close to fast enough speeds on United or Delta to do that.

      3. David Avatar
        David

        Summed up American again!

  11. Joe Avatar
    Joe

    So who had split on their bingo card for a premium heavy 767?! It is beautiful tho and those pdew speak for themselves. Love to see routes like this.

    Glasgow and Edinburgh compete for these routes.

    No matter how often I see it, the air Canada 73m at Heathrow always surprises me

  12. SandyCreek Avatar
    SandyCreek

    Are United 737 max 8’s configured with enough galley space for two meal services? I would like to hope so for these longer flights…

  13. Brett Avatar

    Sandy – Well, I guess that depends on how small the meal is! ;)
    https://www.aerolopa.com/ua-37e

    Probably can’t do much

  14. lollylollylollygetyouradverbshere Avatar
    lollylollylollygetyouradverbshere

    These frothy routes depend almost exclusively on US POS and wealthy Americans. The US economy is headed for a deep recession and once that happens, the always over-extended American household will certainly not be flying to Split, Bari, or for that matter, Glasgow. United’s 767-300ERs are 30+ years old, have terrible dispatch reliability. UA and DL are chasing credit card spend down of points and credits for the ever indebted American. Buena Suerte.

  15. Adam Beswick Avatar
    Adam Beswick

    It still baffles me why no US airline flies to MAN anymore. Continental used to do 2x Daily to EWR. How is Glasgow more attractive?

    1. Boberto Avatar
      Boberto

      I fly U.S. – MAN at least annually. I usually end up on Icelandair or Aer Lingus to get there. For me, a U.S. – MAN nonstop is only useful if it leaves from my U.S. city…and it wouldn’t. I much prefer to connect at KEF or DUB than JFK or ORD!

    2. dx Avatar
      dx

      No real need for American or Delta to fly to MAN when their joint venture partners Aer Lingus and Virgin Atlantic already do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier