Spirit Shrinks By More Than Half, May Have Hope of Survival


It has been a remarkably busy week in Spirit’s bankruptcy case, and the headline really is that Spirit is making big changes that could, possibly, result in an airline that could find its way out of bankruptcy protection. Until this week, I thought the chances were slim to none, but now Spirit will get rid of more than half of its airplanes. And more changes are happening.

The most pressing issue in the short-term was finding some sort of Debtor-in-Possession (DIP) financing to keep the business running while it reorganized. It had stuffed itself full of as much cash as it could before filing, but it knew it would need more. And in the last week, it got some.

The airline announced it that it had raised up to $475 million from existing bondholders. The hearing happens this Friday, October 10, and if approved, Spirit will have $200 million made available immediately. And it really needs it. After all, in this announcement it also said, “As part of its motion for the use of cash collateral, the Company obtained immediate interim access to $120 million of liquidity.” That suggests it needed money very fast.

How did Spirit get so much money? That’s a great question. I guess some of these bondholders are happy to throw good money after bad. Or maybe there’s something going on behind the scenes that really bolsters confidence.

The bulk of the infusion it’ll get this Friday is thanks to aircraft lessor AerCap. You may recall that AerCap is the one that pushed the airline into bankruptcy in the first place by claiming the airline had defaulted on the terms of the leases. And since AerCap is the airline’s largest lessor, this was no small problem.

Now, AerCap will fork over $150 million once the approval comes through. It has also agreed to let Spirit out of 27 of the 37 leases it holds. Further, it will let Spirit out of the so-called “Undelivered Leases” which were for 36 airplanes to be delivered in 2027/2028. In exchange, it will get a nice, fat, extremely-specific $635,352,298 unsecured claim in bankruptcy. It also has a new lease for 30 airplanes from Spirit, though the delivery dates aren’t clear. My guess? This will be pushed out further into the future.

From 214 to Less Than 100 Airplanes

Closing DIP financing will be a huge step for the airline, and it will make it that much easier to actually get to the other side of the reorganization process. But now, we’re in the part of the reorg where Spirit has to decide which contracts it wants to assume and which it wants to reject. When it comes to leases, it is rejecting most of them.

In addition to the 27 leases it has rejected with AerCap, it is rejecting another 87 with other lessors. Here is a visualization of what this will look like, give or take a few since interpreting who owns want is not easy when it comes to lessors.

Spirit Fleet Status Post-Bankruptcy

Data via Cirium and Bankrutpcy Filings

Today, Spirit has 214 airplanes in the fleet but 61 of them are stored/parked. I assume most of those are on the ground due to the Pratt & Whitney engine issues, but some may also be not needed or preparing to leave the fleet. Of those 214, 153 are A320ceo/neo aircraft with ~180 seats and the last 61 are A321ceo/neo aircraft with ~230 seats.

Now, the vast majority of the A320s will be gone. It is only assuming seven of the A320neo leases, though it will assume 19 of the A320ceo leases. There are an additional 24 A320ceos that are owned by Spirit with half of them in service today. In the A321 fleet, it’s not as bad. Spirit will only reject 11 of the A321 fleet, all neos. There are 24 ceos that are owned with 7 of them parked.

If this were to hold up as expected, Spirit would be down to a flat 100 airplanes, but even that seems unlikely. There is more to be done here. On the down side, it is doubtful that it will keep every aircraft that it owns flying. In fact, I think that some have already been announced as leaving the fleet, but I can’t find that right now.

On the other hand, it’s possible Spirit is trying to play hardball in bankruptcy and is hoping that someone will come back to the table with a better deal. No matter what, the fleet will be down very significantly.

This week, Spirit filed big cuts for November. It had previously said that capacity would be down 25 percent year-over-year, but it lied. It was actually cut 25 percent week-over-week. As of now, Spirit’s capacity is down a mind-numbing 36 percent vs last year. Just let that sink in.

What’s most interesting here is to see the chart. We did a feature on this in Cranky Network Weekly this week, and this is the chart we used.

As you can see, the off-peak days haven’t changed all that much compared to October, but the peak days? Those have been crushed. Why would you cut back on peak days more? Well, if you figure that airplanes are being utilized today during peak days and are sitting on off-peak, sending all of these airplanes back wwill just means fewer airplanes sit on the ground on off-peak days. But on peak days? They have to cut flights.

With big fleet cuts and DIP financing, this could be a very big week for Spirit. It certainly looks more likely to be able to exit bankruptcy protection if it can get this all approved. It’ll be much smaller, and as we can only assume management hopes, it will be attractive enough for some other airline to buy it.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

39 responses to “Spirit Shrinks By More Than Half, May Have Hope of Survival”

  1. concertinaconsidine Avatar
    concertinaconsidine

    I just don’t see NK surviving. No airline has ever shrunk itself to profitability. The ULCC model, in the United States, no longer works. The big 3 US carriers have successfully blunted the ULCC reach and there’s no compelling reason to fly an airline like Spirit unless it is the only choice between 2 points.

    1. Skiplagger Wannabe Avatar
      Skiplagger Wannabe

      If shrinking to profitability isn’t going to happen, then what is Spirit’s play? Expand? Keep doing the same thing? Shrinking at least buys time for a miracle to happen (though it very well might not happen). I just don’t see what’s the better option for Spirit right now other than shrinking.

      1. emac Avatar
        emac

        Did anybody read the last line?

        “It’ll be much smaller, and as we can only assume management hopes, it will be attractive enough for some other airline to buy it.”

        Not once does Cranky say “shrink to profitability.”

        In case you didn’t catch that: “WILL BE ATTRACTIVE ENOUGH FOR SOME OTHER AIRLINE TO BUY IT.”

        Good heavens.

        1. SEAN Avatar
          SEAN

          If having Fronteer buying Spirit was the goal all along, then just say that straight out & not go into extraneous exposition. Otherwise it looks like another failed attempt of a turnaround by Spirit despite being smaller.

          1. emac Avatar
            emac

            Because bankruptcy makes it easier to shed people/planes (maybe tear up some labor contracts) and reorganize before the white knight (fuzzy animal?) swoops in to save NK.

            From Cranky: “I guess some of these bondholders are happy to throw good money after bad. Or maybe there’s something going on behind the scenes that really bolsters confidence.”

            Angling for an acquisition is a semi-reasonable explanation for handing NK a half billion. (And I don’t know of many other explanations, but curious what there could be.)

            Buying a smaller NK with fewer monthly payments for grounded planes, fewer money-pit routes, maybe cheaper labor — F9 might be interested, maybe B6 again to grab more space at FLL,* or even SY (iykyk) or UA.

            *I can’t remember the legal ramifications of the B6-NK merger defeat, whether that could be resurrected.

        2. See_Bee Avatar
          See_Bee

          I think it’s wishful thinking they get bought. Kirby keeps hammering the point, and I agree – airline integrations are time-consuming, expensive, and most of all, distracting. It’s so much easier to just pick off the carcass the pieces you want vs. dealing with the headache of integrating cultures & seniority lists

          1. CraigTPA Avatar
            CraigTPA

            The only real reason to go through the pain of an acquisition is if you want something that you wouldn’t have a good chance of getting in the post-closure feeding frenzy.

            What does Spirit have that won’t go on the open market if they go away? The FLL gates and terminal space. The LGA slots and the EWR not-slot-slots. Perhaps some real estate at other airports.

            Then add to those things the value of getting 81-to-? A320 family planes and crews all at once instead of smaller numbers piecemeal, all the other assets (a lot of which, like the HQ, you’ll get rid of), and then you can decide how much to bid, or not to bid at all.

            Oh, and there’s paying that DIP loan off to consider too.

            Who bids, at least at the right price? Probably Frontier, possibly JetBlue. Maybe United, but I’m not entirely convinced they’re that worried about the Greater Miami area – financially they seem to do just fine without it.

            I don’t see anyone else, really. Some people will say Southwest, but I think the one-fleet-type commandment is the one line even Elliott won’t cross, at least not without it being a plane in a different size class. A220 or E-195-E2? Possibly, eventually.

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      No airline has ever shrunk to profitability? But that’s nonsense. Continental in the 1990s. Multiple airlines in bankruptcy. Northwest, Delta, etc.

      By the way, I *DO NOT* think those are models for Spirit. I do think it’s far more difficult for Spirit to shrink to bankruptcy than for a traditional network carrier.

      But this utter nonsense about airlines not being able to shrink to profitability needs to die a horrible death. It’s wrong, wrong, wrong.

  2. Matt D Avatar
    Matt D

    If the “shrink to profitability/survival” strategy works at Spirit, it would probably be a first. I can’t recall that being a success with any airline or business, anywhere. Especially cutting by that much. I’m guessing this is just buying a little time…….they should quit while they’re ahead.

    Ultimately, it didn’t work with TWA, Pan Am, USAir, Eastern, Sears, Radio Shack, etc. But I guess there’s always a first time for everything.

    I know, I know. “but but but that was so long ago and that was them and then and this is now”.

    Right?

    1. John Doeberry Avatar
      John Doeberry

      Although not an US airline, Avianca Airlines did it.

    2. Mr Eric Avatar
      Mr Eric

      It can be successful if you reinvent your business model. Those other carriers you mentioned shrunk, but didn’t drastically change their business model.

      Spirit needs to think about what it wants to be. I think it tried to do too much under the ULCC umbrella. Getting rid of most of their 320’s could be an indication of what they are attempting to do post BK.

      I think they will focus on high density leisure routes. Gone are the wild experiments like EWR or P2P non-leisure routes.

    3. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      Wrong. Multiple airlines have shrunk to profitability. See my response further up these comments.

      Note – I do NOT think those are models for Spirit. But this idea that no airline has ever shrunk to profitability is… wow. I mean, talk about an urban legend.

  3. Angry Bob Crandall Avatar
    Angry Bob Crandall

    When it can work:

    Companies with genuinely bloated operations or unsustainable overhead can become profitable by cutting costs
    Businesses in declining markets may need to rightsize to match reduced demand
    Startups that overexpanded too quickly can sometimes find a sustainable core
    Companies can buy time to restructure or pivot while stemming losses

    Why it often fails:

    Revenue tends to decline faster than costs – layoffs hurt morale, product development slows, sales suffer, and customer service degrades
    It’s usually treating symptoms rather than fixing underlying problems (poor product-market fit, weak competitive position, obsolete business model)
    Companies can enter a “death spiral” where cuts lead to revenue decline, forcing more cuts
    It rarely creates growth – you’re optimizing a shrinking base
    Market perception suffers, making it harder to attract talent and customers

    The reality:
    Most successful turnarounds involve both cost discipline and finding new sources of growth. Pure cost-cutting rarely leads to long-term health – it’s more often a prelude to acquisition, merger, or eventual failure.
    The phrase “you can’t cost-cut your way to growth” captures this well. Profitability achieved purely through shrinking tends to be fragile and temporary unless paired with a path to revenue growth.

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Was going to say more or less the same thing about shrinking to profitability, but I will concur with those who already said it & will also agree that it is doubtful that Spirit survives in the long-term.

  4. Dave Avatar
    Dave

    I’m flying Spirit for the first time, ever, next week, from DFW to FLL. The NK first class seat was about $30 cheaper than AA main cabin for flights at the same time (Friday evening) when I booked. I’m EP with AA, but who isn’t out of DFW? I thought I’d give NK a try in case they go under, but the cost was a big factor in choosing them.

    1. Want Avatar
      Want

      I am in a simialr boat. Flying NK for the first time in a few weeks, assuming the route survives. $22 for a Sunday evening one hour ride where the big 3 wants $180+. I will spend more on my rides to and from the airports on both ends. To be honest, before NK entered this route, the big 3 wanted $300+ for the same trip. For that I hope NK sticks around.
      That being said, I also have an AAward flight booked as backup in case the route gets nixed which may happen in the next minute.

      1. Oliver Avatar
        Oliver

        > $22 for a Sunday evening one hour ride where the big 3 wants $180+.
        > I will spend more on my rides to and from the airports on both ends.

        And that is probably not how Spirit survives :)

  5. NedsKid Avatar
    NedsKid

    America West shrunk itself to profitability.

    1. tb Avatar
      tb

      @NedsKid I think that’s the model here, not “shrink to profitability” but “shrink to acquisition”. Somebody, somewhere would like to have their aircraft and some routes (Frontier, JetBlue??). Or does Scott Kirby take a page out of the Delta playbook to swoop in and pick up a bunch of serviceable airframes on the cheap? I still think NK is just rearranging the deck chairs, but with this latest strategy they’re at least putting all the broken and sun-faded ones out back and lining up their most attractive assets for the right buyer.

      1. NedsKid Avatar
        NedsKid

        @tb, probably true. Though if someone wanted the routes, what would stop them from just starting those up? Other than LGA and whichever slot/not model EWR is using this week, not really a problem. AirTran did the same with Midwest…. didn’t succeed in buying them, so just set up its own MKE hub and drove them further into financial trouble.

        1. CraigTPA Avatar
          CraigTPA

          Besides the LGA and EWR slots/runway timings/whatever, the one thing a buyer would get is their gates and terminal space at FLL, which is pretty much at capacity. This is where the United speculation has come from. FLL is a unique situation compared to their other major stations, though.

          Shrinking the airline down enough to make the LGA/EWR/FLL access enticing enough to get someone to buy it and then sell off the rest of the assets is possible, and a smaller airline would be easier to digest than the Spirit of six months ago. But is it enough to attract a buyer on that alone? I’m really doubting that.

    2. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      But did it really? That medium sized carrier was swallowed up by a larger one who in turn was swallowed up by one who was even larger.

      The best thing about America West was we got Brett & “The Cranky Flier” out of it.

      1. DesertGhost Avatar
        DesertGhost

        SEAN

        Yes it did, back in the early to mid 1990s. America West emermerged from its bankruptcy in 1994. It merged with US Airways in 2005.

        1. David M Avatar

          And lets not forget, America West was the acquiring airline, swallowing up and assuming the identity of the (reportedly) days-away-from-failure US Airways.

  6. CraigTPA1 Avatar
    CraigTPA1

    This is potentially an even larger cut than I’d initially expected, most of the coverage of the CFO’s Friday statements pointed to an eventual fleet of around 100 planes, but this shows 100 as the high-end of a range, depending on what they do with the owned-but-parked planes that were on the second quarter balance sheet as “assets for sale”. (That statement said 21 planes, so it looks like they got rid of two.)

    If the planes for sale are sold, that would leave them with as few as 81 planes, unless lessors come back with more favorable rates, which I have my doubts about unless there’s been a recent drop in A320 demand they shouldn’t have that much trouble placing the planes elsewhere.

    So now the question is: what kind of network can they build with 81-100 planes and what will be the underlying business model? Because it doesn’t sound like they want to be a “true” ULCC (or as close as we get here in the US), so is the plan to be just be a smaller, crappy JetBlue with a few focus cities scattered across the country? I’m just not seeing yet what they’re bringing to the market in the post-Chapter-22 world.

  7. David C Avatar
    David C

    I don’t see how any ULCC needs more than 80 planes in 2025. Only so many routes can support that model. Just fly the ones you can profitably.

  8. Eric Avatar
    Eric

    I’m so glad I was the sixth or seventh who wanted to say “Shrink to Profitability” has never really worked.

  9. Jason Avatar
    Jason

    Barry at F9 has said publicly NK didn’t shed enough Debt in its first Bankruptcy for them to Make another offer.
    F9 held meetings with NK just a few weeks ago and immediately afterwards NK started Chopping away all the routes F9 doesn’t want or they are using bankruptcy to eliminate over lapping routes so when they Make another offer it will easily pass the mustard with the DOJ.
    F9 having NK keeping cities like SNA and BUR because those Airports are hard to get additional gate access or slots.
    Spirit will exit Bankruptcy in the shape that F9 wants to Buy it at.

    1. Anthony Avatar
      Anthony

      It’s “pass muster” not “pass the mustard.”

  10. Anthony Avatar
    Anthony

    If anyone in the comments has $475M they’d like to put into a terrible investment with a guarantee of never seeing your money back, message me for my Zelle information. I’ll happily accept any donations, and I won’t even lie to you about having a plan for what to do with it.

    1. southbay flier Avatar
      southbay flier

      I’m willing to also accept PayPal and Venmo.

  11. DesertGhost Avatar
    DesertGhost

    As NedKid pointed out above, America West shrank itself to profitability back in the 1990s. So the notion that an airline can’t ever shrink to profitability is obviously uniformed. That bankruptcy was how Bill Franke got into the airline industry. The airline didn’t become as profitable as Delta is now, but it was in good enough shape to acquire US Airways and merge with American.

    But this is a different situation in many ways, which those who read this blog know. The last sentence of the article is where I think this bankruptcy is ultimately going. Spirit is putting itself in position to be acquired – possibly by its former owner and the person who engineered America West’s emergence from bankruptcy – Bill Franke.

    1. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      And that was hardly the only situation where an airline was able to shrink to profitability.

      You wonder why this is such a troubled business and then you realize that people believe all kinds of crazy things about it.

  12. MetroCity Avatar
    MetroCity

    Just as a tangential aside, I’d love to see Brett do a post one day about where all the airplanes that are given up by Spirit (and others) eventually wind up. Leased by or sold to other airlines? Stripped for parts? Parked forever in the Arizona dessert? Just curious.

    (BTW: The Arizona airplane graveyard(s) are a fascinating thing to see.)

  13. Mr. Eric Avatar
    Mr. Eric

    Would love to know their strategy/thought process coming out of BK.

    Considering they are getting rid of a lot of their 320’s, I would assume a large part of their strategy will be focused around high density routes from the northeast / midwest to vacation destinations in the south (Florida, Caribbean, Mexico, South America). Gone are the attempts to focus on P2P non-leisure routes.

    1. NedsKid Avatar
      NedsKid

      The fact the 321 will become a higher proportion of the fleet is frightening as once again starts narrowing the possible network. The biggest mistake NK made was getting rid of the A319s and going all-in on the A321. Yeah, it lowers CASM significantly. But they’re finding out what happens when you can’t make the RASM… and start failing to cover even additional costs of those extra seats (however minimally incremental).

      1. David Avatar
        David

        The 319 is for network carriers to use on thinner routes where a couple high value connecting/routine business passengers make it worthwhile. If you want to have a low breakeven load factor with sub-$100 fares without absurd numbers of seats you need something with wildly lower operating cost like an E2 or 220. Let’s see what Avelo figures out with theirs.
        Either way the route structure is constrained by the basic economy product. The route has to be far enough outside of the Big 3’s networks to be feasible. If there is something besides leisure destinations from mid-sized cities I don’t know what it is.

  14. southbay flier Avatar
    southbay flier

    I’m kind of curious where the rejected planes are going to end up? Delta always seems keen on getting cheap used planes. And I have to imagine with the long order books, others are willing to get an earlier delivery slot too.

  15. Exit Row Seat Avatar
    Exit Row Seat

    I feel the other airlines were “Mighty Disappointed” to hear the news of the Chapter 22 (chapter 11 x 2) filing.
    Picking up an airline in Chapter 22 is costly, time consuming, and usually fails to deliver the “promised” synergies.
    If in doubt, just ask Delta about the Euro operations it obtained from Pan Am or AA obtaining TWA and its STL airport hub.

    With Chapter 7, the surviving airlines:
    – obtain pilots, FAs, and techs sans the headache of union labor agreements or seniority integration
    – encounter leasing agents more willing to wheel & deal airframes and engines
    – negotiate with airports looking to fill empty gates and/or maintenance hangers at favorable terms
    – have access to restricted slots in the NYC area

    As for shrinking to profitability, the other ULCC carriers have already backfilled the void. Does the US really need 5 ULCC carriers?
    Note, I don’t include JetBlue nor Southwest for they are morphing into the traditional trunk line format (lounges, domestic 1st class, interline agreements, pumping loyalty programs, eventual airline alliance like Star, UnoWorld, or SkyTeam).

Leave a Reply to David M Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier