Allegiant Leaves LAX And Barely Tries to Replace It


The stage was set back in March when Allegiant decided to close its crew base at LAX. The airline had kept some flying from LAX to other bases for a time, but that plan is now gone; the last flights leave for Bellingham and Cincinnati at the end of the holidays. Unlike when Frontier abandoned LAX, Allegiant hasn’t really done much to replace it in the region. It appears to be thinking about things quite differently.

Allegiant first began service to Los Angeles (LAX) in May of 2009. It did not dip its toes in. Instead, it announced LAX would become the airline’s sixth base right off the bat. Don’t get me wrong. This is still Allegiant we’re talking about, so it wasn’t that big. In May 2009 it peaked on Saturdays with five flights. Bellingham and Monterrey were the biggest of the 13 destinations with three weekly.

From there, Allegiant, well, it didn’t really do much for some time. In 2010, it took a swing at Long Beach, but that didn’t last. It wasn’t until the summer of 2014 that Allegiant finally tried to grow LAX, but it kept it a largely summer seasonal base. And there it remained until COVID.

Then, well, take a look.

Allegiant Departures and Destinations from the LA Area

Data via Cirium

LAX had its biggest summer ever for Allegiant in 2021, but those weren’t the airline’s only moves. Allegiant entered Orange County when demand dropped at other airlines during COVID. That opened up slot opportunities. From Orange County, Allegiant has had varied success, but the big winner has been Provo which has daily service in winter and up to 10x weekly in summer. That kind of frequency is a rarity in Allegiant’s world.

While this was going on, things got uglier at LAX. Costs continued to rise and Allegiant was pushed out to the remote midfield concourse. Travelers had to check in at Terminal 1.5 and then be bused out to the far western concourse. In the end, Allegiant said that when it had a base, costs were upwards of $50 per passenger. Even without a base, LAX says its costs per enplanement are over $32 per passenger. That doesn’t work for a low-cost operator even if the experience isn’t as bad as that midfield concourse requires.

So, Allegiant has taken its Bellingham flight which attracts Canadians and moved the destination from LAX to Burbank. It has also added a new Provo flight, hoping to capitalize on that route the way that it has done in Orange County. It is clearly not thrilled that Breeze is entering that market, so it is going on the offensive. You don’t see Allegiant picking a fight every day, that’s for sure.

But for the rest of Allegiant’s destinations in the LA area, it’s perfectly fine just walking away. At least, that’s the case for now.

This is very different than what Frontier has done. Frontier, you’ll recall, left LAX during COVID, fed up with the high costs. It decided to be true to its low-cost roots, and it also walked away from Newark.

Frontier Departures and Destinations from the LA Area

Data via Cirium

At the time, Frontier at least had a solid presence in Ontario that it grew quickly, so this wasn’t quite the same level of abandonment as Allegiant. But it was still a big change. At the time, Frontier thought it could use Burbank to replace LAX. It had already shrunk LAX to a much smaller level by the summer of 2021 with service only to Atlanta, Denver, Las Vegas, and Phoenix. All but Atlanta moved over to Burbank, but Denver and Phoenix didn’t even last a year. By early 2023, Frontier went back to LAX, and it went back in a big way, as you can see in the chart above.

Burbank came back as well, but after another quick fail in Phoenix and, this time, San Francisco, it is down to only Denver.

Does this mean that Allegiant is destined to meet the same fate? Will it come crawling back to LAX? I don’t think so. Allegiant is more focused on costs, and they just aren’t sustainable at LAX for an airline like this. (Apparently Frontier has yet to realize that this time around.) Plus, the Burbank routes appear to be far more carefully chosen than Frontier’s plan to just serve the biggest nearby cities in its network.

It seems to me that if these Burbank routes work, Allegiant may grow there. If not, it will most likely just walk away. It doesn’t feel the need to serve the LA area like Frontier does, and it certainly won’t operate in extremely high-cost airports except in very rare circumstances (Newark).

To me, this just looks like a low-cost operator making the right move to focus on low-cost facilities to serve a region. If that doesn’t work, well, that’s ok. There’s no need to force it.. That is likely to be more of a winning strategy than what Frontier is attempting to do in LA.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

27 responses to “Allegiant Leaves LAX And Barely Tries to Replace It”

  1. Bill from DC Avatar
    Bill from DC

    The little guys are getting the Burbank airport a lot of attention lately! With the new $1.3 billion terminal opening in 2026, it looks like there will be a ton of competition for those 14 gates.

    Does anybody know what the BUR CPE is or will be with the new terminal?

    Since the G4 routes will come from the hinterlands and will be filled primarily with tourists coming to the LA area, BUR makes a ton of sense for G4 because it’s actually closer to the major LA tourist attractions than LAX. This is also why LGB, ONT and SBD are not a very good fit for G4 but SNA works because Disneyland.

    Brett, is G4 being opportunistic based on Avelo’s withdrawal or is this something they would have done in BUR anyway?

    I still hope to never fly G4 but always appreciate an airline that handles its business smartly.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Bill – The CPE is going up a lot, probably to around $22 up from something like $2.

      I wouldn’t be so bullish on Burbank though. The problem is when you focus on inbound, people don’t think about Burbank. It doesn’t matter how far it is from different places. LGB, for example, is ideal for Disneyland, but most people don’t think of it. I have no problem with Allegiant running two routes that likely have decent demand, but I can’t imagine it getting to be much bigger.

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        The CPE increasing literally exponentially is a disappointment. Wonder how that compares to the other LA basin airports?

        Two things re Allegiant and Burbank.

        1) BUR is listed as Hollywood / Burbank airport. Technically It’s North Hollywood but who’s paying attention anyway? The G4 system takes quite a few liberties with airport names, it’s already listed as Burbank / Hollywood, Burbank / Los Angeles and Hollywood / Burbank.

        2) Along these lines I tend to think the folks in a typical G4 station are pretty savvy about alternate airports, having already been educated that SFB = Orlando, AZA = Phoenix, PIE = Tampa Bay and PGD = somewhere in SW Florida.

  2. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    After listening to the Air Show for as long as I have now, I read these posts with Brett’s voice in my head. I can’t be the only one that has this happening

    1. SEAN Avatar
      SEAN

      Not me personally, but I can understand why you & others might sense that as you listen to the podcast & then read his words. The real difference is Brett’s amazing snark on the podcast is a little harder to detect in his postings at times. And let’s be honest, we all love that snark… don’t we?

      1. Bill from DC Avatar
        Bill from DC

        I’m here for the snark and whatever airline information happens to be around it

  3. CraigTPA Avatar
    CraigTPA

    Allegiant’s Los Angeles strategy makes good sense – it is, at its heart, an airline that takes people from various places to leisure centers, then takes them home again. (Bellingham and Plattsburgh are reversed because of the Canadian aspect.)

    It doesn’t want to be a “network”, whereas Frontier, deep in its heart, still seems to carry a bit of that mentality from its pre-ULCC identity. (I suspect a lot of Breeze’s recent success also comes from not having that “gotta be a ‘network’” idea.)

    You’d think that LA would be a major destination for them, but it’s hard to get their model to work with LAX’s costs, their target market rejecting LGB, and ONT just being too damn far away (timewise, at least) to play the SFB/PIE/AZA role. They have the same problem in San Francisco.

    If they can get BUR to work, I can see them expanding it, but if not I suspect they’ll just keep taking the Disney business they get at SNA and look for other opportunities. But Breeze is also barging in to take Avelo’s place on a lot of G4ish routes, so this should be interesting.

    I’d love a little more insight into their Portland (OR) strategy – I’ve just never thought of Portland as a huge tourist draw. Particularly interesting is FAT-PDX – as a former Fresnan, I don’t remember the people of the Big Raisin wanting to flock to Portland for holidays. But it’s been a while, so who knows?

  4. Jason Thompson Avatar
    Jason Thompson

    One has to wonder with the LGB rumours of a New Airline coming in 2026 if it’s the return of Allegiant. 5 supplemental Slots and 4 permanent slots being awarded. Delta losing 2 slots and WN losing 5 supplemental and 2 permanent slots. Both WN & DL failed to meet the minimum requirements in 2025. With WN putting LGB on the national radar since its growth in the market. This time around Allegiant could easily market this has “LA” to keep those South Bay customers who will not drive to either BUR or SNA for a cheaper flight. Allegiant did LGB many moons ago with flights to LAS then came back in 2000’s. But this time around they have a much broader market appeal around the USA so 9 slots out of LGB could easily add a lot of Low frequency Dots to feed the masses who want to vacation in SoCal.

  5. Anthony Avatar
    Anthony

    “From Orange County, Allegiant has had varied success, but the big winner has been Provo which has daily service in winter and up to 10x weekly in summer”

    The Mormons do love their Disney!

    1. dfw88 Avatar
      dfw88

      This is a true statement and definitely part of it, but I would guess most of the demand is the massive number of kids from SoCal who attend BYU. Southern Californians make up a massive percentage of the student body there.

  6. Nicolas N Avatar
    Nicolas N

    Cranky – How hard/pricey would it be for an airline nerd like me to use Cirium? I checked their website, and it seems like they tailor their offerings to big organizations as opposed to individuals.

    1. Brett Avatar

      Nicolas – Probably really pricey. They offered it to me years ago without charge, but they are not set up for individual use outside of consultants and the like who have hefty budgets. It’s a shame, really.

  7. emac Avatar
    emac

    Bussing to the G4 gates at LAX… a lot of passengers probably noticed that the bus was more comfortable than the plane!

  8. Chicago Chris Avatar
    Chicago Chris

    I recall Allegiant saying when it first went into LAX that it found many customers were going using them to fly to LAS and then driving to LA, which is what inspired the initial push.

    G4 may well be reevaluating its entire SoCal network. It also left San Diego this month (the website claims it still flies to Provo, but there aren’t any flights for sale and their signage is nearly all gone)

  9. jfruh Avatar

    Something I always wondered: Do airlines pay variable amounts in fees to airports based on how good their locations are? Like are the LCCs exiled to the West Gates at LAX because they pay less?

    1. Brett Avatar

      jfruh – I don’t think so. I’m sure there are airports that charge that way, but I don’t know the details. In the US, in general, it’s not the norm.

    2. tb Avatar
      tb

      @jfruh Answer is yes, but in reverse. The big guys (UA, AA, DL, etc.) lease physical assigned gates as “signatory lease” carriers. So only they have the rights to park at those assigned gates. The rest of the non-signatory gates are “common use” meaning you get what you get when you show up (though for ease of wayfinding most airports try to keep the regular but non-signatory folks using the same general areas every time they fly in). With the large amount of gates that the legacy carriers are tied to via the signatory route, I’m guessing their cost/gate is less than the non-signatory who just take potluck when they fly. But the issue with signatory is it’s truly a lease of space, so they lock you in for a term of years. Big outlay up front but reduces costs over the life of the lease. ULCC’s especially don’t go for this sort of arrangement because they literally may pack up shop and head out at any time.

  10. David F Avatar
    David F

    Just flew Frontier out of LAX and man that’s a bad experience. T 1.5 is a nightmare, security lines packed and moving at a crawl, I had precheck with 5 people in front of me and still took 20 min. Then busses weren’t even waiting there, took another 15 min to get crammed on a bus. People missing flights right and left, Never again. Assuming not checking a bag much better to just go through TBIT security and skip T1.5 altogether. I get why Frontier pulled out originally, flights seemed full though.

    1. Sauce Avatar
      Sauce

      It’s much, much nicer to go through TBIT and walk out to the MSC, but that assumes no bag to check.

  11. Danh Pham Avatar
    Danh Pham

    I and too many other passengers really need nonstop flights from LA to Springfield- Branson with Allegiant air,a reliable airline with reasonable rates…I used to be a loyal customer. I wish Allegiant reschedule its flights in another airport as Burbank in near future.

  12. Danh Pham Avatar
    Danh Pham

    Please set up nonstop flights from Burbank to Springfield-Branson and vice versa…I really need it as too many customers

    1. ChuckMO Avatar
      ChuckMO

      I’m sure Cranky will get right on that.

  13. CallScheduling Avatar
    CallScheduling

    Maybe it’s just me but it feels like the West Coast is a much tougher market for any airline to make money in than the East Coast. Seems like a lot of LCC/ULCC airlines have reduced their presence recently but are growing in the middle of the US/East Coast. Any idea why that might be? I know the West is competitive but it’s not like the East isnt.

    1. CraigTPA Avatar
      CraigTPA

      I don’t think it’s as big of a difference as it first appears – while there have been two major LCC/ULCC cutbacks in the west (Avelo and Spirit), Frontier has continued to expand and Breeze has pretty much backfilled Avelo. Southwest’s dominance in so much of the West, and the solidification of Alaska’s position as the #2 airline in most of those markets, is also a major factor, and so much of the lower end of the Las Vegas market is hoovered up by Allegiant.

      And a lot of it is that the East just has more mid-sized cities than the West does, and a few of the West’s cities in that size category that would seem ripe for market stimulation (especially in the Central Valley) at first glance have lower than average per capita income. And there aren’t a lot of places that have airports that have no commercial service, or only small-jet service to Big 4 hubs, that could attract a new entrant. Vero Beach, FL is an example of what I mean here – Breeze went into an airport that had no commercial service and set up shop there, and has really grown rapidly. (JetBlue and Amer. Eagle are now coming in as well.) NIMBY movements in Californian counterparts to Vero Beach would put up much more of a fight.

    2. Bill from DC Avatar
      Bill from DC

      Quite simply, cities in the east are much closer to each other than cities in the west. LA to Vegas is 275 miles.

      From Washington DC, the following cities with airports are less than 275 miles away: Philadelphia (140), Pittsburgh (250), Harrisburg (120), Allentown (187), Scranton Wilkes Barre (240), Richmond (110), Norfolk / Virginia Beach (190-210), Raleigh (195), New York City area (225), Wilmington (110). Granted you wouldn’t fly to all 15 of these airports but just making a point.

      Shorter distance = less fuel = quicker turns. All of which are music to the ears of a ULCC.

      1. CraigTPA Avatar
        CraigTPA

        And even for longer flights, all those smaller cities create opportunities for the new-breed ULCCs to offer LTD (for the most part) service that allows passengers to avoid the major airports and still save money.

        Breeze flies to four of the cities on that list from Tampa: Scranton/Wilkes Barre, Richmond, Norfolk, and seasonal to Pittsburgh. And Avelo flies to Wilmington (both Wilmingtons, I did not know that until now.)

        I just took a closer look at Pittsburgh, and was surprised to see Breeze flying PIT-LAX..but it makes sense. AA is the only other carrier on that route non-stop, so there’s opportunity there. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them look for more opportunities at PIT, it seems underserved for a city its size.

  14. Jason Avatar
    Jason

    Anyone know How many gates each airline will be assigned at the new BUR terminal? Will they all be Common use Gates? At WN biggest flight schedule they occupied 7 and a half gates sharing with JetBlue. But on historical averages WN had a minimum of 6 permanent gates. With everyone else adding capacity to BUR one has to wonder how will BUR workout
    the Gate allocation in the new terminal ? Will WN be grandfathered in to keep a minimum of 6 gates or will it be reduced down to 5 or 4 permanent gates allowing the other airlines equal usage?

Leave a Reply to jfruh Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier