United’s Atlantic Joint Venture Guides How United Grows

United

I’m well aware that I’ve written a lot about United’s recent network announcement, but there’s still more to be said. Today, I want to talk about the airline’s Atlantic Plus-Plus (A++) joint venture and why it has created some really unique opportunities that American and Delta can’t as easily access.

In its current form, the A++ joint venture includes United and Air Canada on this side of the Pond along with Lufthansa Group airlines on the other side. That’s Lufthansa, SWISS, Austrian, Brussels, Eurowings, and whatever new, unnecessary airline Lufthansa decides to invent this week. This is a revenue sharing agreement similar to what Delta has with Air France-KLM and Virgin Atlantic as well as what American has with IAG (British Airways, Iberia, Aer Lingus) and Finnair.

Since they share revenue, there is obviously some real territoriality here. The airlines need to keep a balance of capacity, and they naturally wouldn’t like it much when another partner overflies a hub, taking away potential connectivity that they could have put on their own airplanes.

All of that is just standard for all the joint ventures, but the hub geographies really differ between the three.

United (dark blue), American (light blue), Delta (red) partner hub locations with smaller circles being less important

As the map above shows, American’s partners by far have the westernmost hubs in Europe, and that is great for connectivity. But it also means that for American to overfly a hub with its own nonstop from the US, it needs to have a big market or one with a very good reason. Delta’s hubs are somewhat further east (London barely counts as a connecting hub since Virgin Atlantic has nothing into Europe), but they’re still very well-connected to places like Spain. Then there’s United which is much further east.

For United, the primary connecting hubs from the US are Frankfurt, Munich, and Zurich. Austrian has some flights to Vienna, which is even further east, while Brussels Airlines is nearly useless with flights from only New York/JFK and Washington/Dulles. United adds Chicago/O’Hare and Newark to Brussels, but connections from those cities are generally better through other hubs. Brussels is most useful as a connecting point for African travel.

What this means is that it’s a lot harder for United to get Americans to places like Spain and Portugal on its partner without serious backtracking. Just take a look at New York to Bilbao, one of the new United cities, for example.

% of Miles Over Nonstop from New York to Bilbao via Connecting Hubs

Unsurprisingly, American’s hubs are best, followed by Delta’s, and then United’s are far behind.

What’s interesting about this is that United and Lufthansa Group still take some share of passengers. Whether that’s due to loyalty or availability, I don’t know. But with such a large backtrack, United and partners must be leaving something on the table.

Exactly what are they leaving? Well, we can look at Mallorca as an example. United entered the market in summer 2022, so let’s compare how 2024 looks compared to 2019.

July 2024 vs July 2019 US – Mallorca Daily Passengers Each Way

ARC/BSP data via Cirium

United not only grew its share from about a third to about half, but it did so by massively growing the market and cutting into American’s share as a nice added bonus.

This dynamic explains a lot of United’s growth since the pandemic. Take a look at this:

If we look at how Europeans markets have changed since 2018 for United, you can see it’s the southwest where the real growth has been. And which markets have gone or stayed steady? It’s those which are north and east.

United really doesn’t try much to the east of Lufthansa Group hubs, but in 2019 it did try Prague. That lasted one season and has not made a return. With frequent and good connections via all of Lufthansa’s hubs, United doesn’t need to serve those places. It has a lot more to gain in the south and southwest.

I know what you’re thinking. Going to the Iberian Peninsula may be out of the way, but the same can’t be said for Italy and southeast, right? That is true if you look at the map, but flight times are an issue.

If we look at July 2024 departures on the joint venture partners from Dubrovnik to Lufthansa Group hubs, there was a once weekly Eurowings flight to Frankfurt that arrived at 9:55am along with a once weekly Austrian flight to Vienna that arrived at 11am. Nothing else on a joint venture partner arrived before noon, and that makes it really hard to get back to the US.

Sure, cities like Athens and Rome have plentiful flights all day, but those are really big markets where nonstops to the US make sense. Naples and Palermo have ok connectivity, so those may be more questionable in the eyes of the joint venture, but the bulk of the new flying is further west anyway, and that’s where United hopes it and its partners can keep striking gold.


Did you miss last week’s The Air Show podcast? If so and you found this article of interest, then you’ll want to go back and have a listen. Brian and I talked about United’s big network announcement… both in detail and from a high level. Subscribe now to learn when new episodes are published.

Subscribe on SpotifyApple PodcastsAmazonPocket Casts

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

14 comments on “United’s Atlantic Joint Venture Guides How United Grows

  1. Why isn’t DUB shown as a hub for OneWorld/AA on the first graphic? Isn’t like the third or fourth biggest hub in the EU for flights to the US? A lot of connecting traffic, particularly to/from the UK regions.

    1. Cranky probably didn’t include them because Aer Lingus isn’t actually a Oneworld member, despite being owned by IAG. At the same time, they are in the Atlantic Joint Business JV with American, British, Finnair, and Iberia, so it probably makes sense to include them. The JV is arguably more important than the alliance.

  2. Lufthansa have really struggled in recent years, so I imagine they’ve asked UA to minimise any sort of economic damage to their hubs.

    This also has a strategic benefit for them, ESPECIALLY if Lufthansa Group can win the fight for Tap Air Portugal.

    If this all works out, the network and schedule created would be an absolute monster to compete with.

    1. What nonsense. They have a JV. It’s metal neutral. Doesn’t matter who flies it and TP will end up in the arms of AF/KL, not LH.

      1. Oh please you read the post so you know exactly what I’m talking about. We all know it’s NOT the Lufthansa Group airlines flying EWR-PMI

        I’m also talking hypotheticals here. The Portuguese government could very well sell it to AF-KLM, just as they can to LHG or IAG. But if they do get it, they *could create something very valuable.

      2. TP to AF/KL doesn’t seem all that likely to me. Delta and LA are pretty clearly deep in bed together and it only seems a matter of time before AF/KL starts partnering with LA TATL. A TP/LA tie up would seem to have a LOT of antitrust concerns since the two carriers would control such a huge amount of the Portugal>Brazil market.

        Frankly, OneWorld/IAG seems a more likely partner now that IB couldn’t get Aer Europa. Aside from sharing a peninsula, the overlap between TP and IB is absolutely zero unless you’re talking about connecting itineraries.

        But LH Group is an obvious takeover partner as well. A lot would seem to depend more on who Gol/Azul ultimately partner with (along with AV) in the US if that merger happens. If Gol remained independent as a domestic-only airline, having AA in the US and TP in Europe would be an amazing outcome for them.

    2. FRA is an absolutely horrific connecting hub, and it only seems to get worse rather than better. I couldn’t believe the minimum connect times they publish considering the distance and poorly designed schengen check stations.

  3. United resumed EWR-PRG for a season, post-pandemic in 2022 but then did not return it since. The riverboat cruise market has shifted to other places like Portugal and France.

    1. Interestingly enough Air Canada is taking over NA to Prague in 2025, but I believe it makes sense. As the cranky flyer already stated their cabins are denser with more economy passengers than United, best served on a Prague route. There’s also clearly a market out of Toronto as Air Transat upped their frequency on the Prague route before AC announced they were returning to the route.

  4. I find Naples quite interesting because Air Canada is joining united in operating out of there. I’m guessing that has less to do with connectivity and more to do with taking advantage of secondary cities’ lack of direct routing to NA.

  5. Really? – I think you’ll find that everything going across the pond (including the beyonds) is in the JV’s not just the Hub to Hub flying – all the revenue is pooled, all the costs are pooled and the proceeds or split by whose metal flew – the goal of the JV is to maximize proceeds but the challenge is not all routes are made equal and an airline could fly a less profitable route but get paid out at the higher average route profitability and visa versa. Like all JV”s it takes a mature approach to make them work, that said there is no doubt that this is way better than the alternative. You can thank NWA/KLM for cracking the code on this, two relatively small airlines in TATL terms punched well above their weight with the first real JV.

  6. Isn’t there also a difference between the DL and UA/AA JVs on profit vs revenue sharing that creates slightly different incentives as well? (DL JVs generally set up with profit sharing vs revenue only for A++)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier