Airplane Porn: United’s Paint Problem

It’s Labor Day here in the US, so I wasn’t planning on posting anything today. But after I saw this shot of a United 747 with some serious paint problems, I figured I’d put up a little airplane porn for you during the holiday.

Pretty nasty, huh? I wonder if something happened to this particular aircraft or whether this is a problem with United’s new paint in general.

Thank you, Tim Bowrey for the permission to post your fine work. You can see more of Tim’s photos on JetPhotos.net.

(Visited 362 times, 1 visits today)

Get Posts via Email When They Go Live or in a Weekly Digest

Leave a Reply

13 Comments on "Airplane Porn: United’s Paint Problem"

avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
EcoPainter
Guest

Less paint means less weight which means less fuel. Obviously a deliberate attempt by United to cut costs. :-)

Bobber
Guest

Aircraft vitiligo?? Perhaps it’s United’s stealth mechanism for making it easier to spot structural faults in the airframe, somewhat akin to American’s approach of not painting their fleet. Or, conversely, they cleaned it a bit thoroughly.

The Traveling Optimist
Guest
The Traveling Optimist

The results of using too much Comet (or was it Ajax) instead of scrubbing bubbles.

ATLTPA
Guest

This is what happens when you outsource aircraft painting to Earl Scheib.

They’ll paint any 747 for $999.95!

c
Guest

clearly unknowing pax don’t wonder loudly enough at the terminal if “that old plane is safe” for united to notice.

these sort of comments are usually highly effective when it comes to restaurant bathrooms, so why shouldn’t they work for airlines? ;- )

Yo
Guest

Just tell the pax, that if they help paint it, they will get free water and sodas.

How old can that paint job be? Its the new livery…

robert
Guest

Speaking of paint jobs, you’ve changed your photo. No more shades.

Brandon
Guest

I saw a united 737 at LGA on Friday with flaking and or scraped paint just above the midline on the forward left portion of the fusalage.

HB
Guest

Passengers voted not to pay the $9 primer fee.

Ryan
Guest

And the paint job is not that old either… As Eco Painter put it, just another way for United to cut costs.

Cheers!

Ryan

Steve
Guest

Several years ago, some Fed Agency was requiring additives in Aircraft Paint …

Turns out the stuff was crap, and it gave results like you see here . . .

It wasn’t just UA that had this issue . . .
.

Brendan
Guest

I think when they were painting the plane that the painters did not put stripper on some of the spots you see on the aircraft.

wpDiscuz