airBaltic is Shrinking Because Winter Sucks


It turns out that regional powerhouse airBaltic has been having a tough time lately. Because of that, the airline is going to shrink and shuffle its priorities. They can spin this however they’d like, but the reality is that winter is just terrible for European airlines, and that is the crux of the issue here.

AirBaltic has been a darling of Europe for many years. It’s based in Riga, Latvia, and it was one of the early operators of the A220. With this new fleet, it had big growth plans and thought it would get up to 100 A220s some day. This idea would have been miraculous considering the size of its home market and its past as an airline that flew a lot of different aircraft in a lot of different ways.

Let’s start off by taking a look at the aircraft changes over the years.

airBaltic Block Minutes by Aircraft Type

Data via Cirium

You donʻt have to go too far back to find an airline with a jumbled mess of a fleet. The backbone was the B737 Classic with -300s and -500s, but it also had a sizable turboprop operation with Fokker 50s that eventually were replaced by Q400s. On top of that, it had a couple Boeing 757s hanging around just for fun.

But in 2017, the transition began to an all-A220 fleet. This was achieved during COVID when everything else was retired, but there was a brief backtracking when the Pratt GTF issues grounded enough airplanes that airBaltic had to bring in capacity from elsewhere. That was mostly temporary, and the airline has been a growing A220 operator ever since.

The problem for airBaltic has been that its homebase in Riga is… not large. So if airBaltic really wanted to grow, it had to expand beyond its natural borders. With a whole bunch of A220s, it figured it could slot those into a lot of airlines who wanted that type of capacity and didnʻt have it on their own. Remember, itʻs a whole lot easier for European airlines to outsource capacity than in the US, so this wasnʻt necessarily a bad plan in theory. The end result was a massive expansion across the Continent.

airBaltic Block Minutes by Base

Data via Cirium

Just look at this. Twenty years ago, airBaltic was trying to be the national airline of the Baltics. It was the primary airline for its home country of Latvia and for Lithuania via Vilnius. It also had a presence in Tallin, Estonia, but it wasnʻt until Estonian Air failed in 2015 and then Nordica tanked in 2019 that airBaltic really ramped up its presence.

Starting in 2016, you can see the beginnings of a strategy to expand elsewhere. This was clearly turbocharged post-pandemic. I probably donʻt need to show you this based on the destinations shown, but letʻs just do it anyway.

airBaltic Block Minutes by Marketing Carrier

Data via Cirium

Before the pandemic, it had dipped its toes into wet leasing with some Thomas Cook/Condor work, and then right before COVID-19, it started flying for Lufthansa Group. SAS was briefly in the mix just after the pandemic, but lately itʻs been a little bit of Air Serbia and a whole lot of Lufthansa Group.

Itʻs gotten so big that this summer, airBalticʻs own flying only accounted for about 55 percent of the airlineʻs total block hours. Most of the rest were for Lufthansa Group.

But hereʻs the thing.

See those big ups and downs in all those charts? Thatʻs because Lufthansa Group wants a whole lot of help in summer, and a whole lot less in winter. For example, this May, airBaltic was scheduled to fly more than 7,300 block hours for Lufthansa. This coming November? Itʻs down to just over 1,000.

Itʻs really hard to run an airline that is supposed to be huge in summer and then tiny in winter. Weʻve seen some novel partnerships formed to try and solve this problem in the past. Smartwings in Czech Republic used to send airplanes to Canada in winter while Sunwing would send them to Europe in summer.

This works in some limited circumstances, but if youʻre airBaltic, youʻre not going to find a place to send half of your growing fleet in winter.

Of course, thatʻs not what airBaltic says is the issue. It lays the blame on both geopolitics and everybodyʻs favorite whipping boy, the enginemaker.

Demand and revenue growth have moderated, geopolitical developments in Ukraine and the Middle East have increased uncertainty and operating costs, and prolonged Pratt & Whitney engine availability constraints have affected the airline’s ability to deploy its full fleet.

I assume the focus on these issues is simply so it can blame things that have changed as ruining an otherwise perfect plan, even if it’s not the whole story. Either way, this is why the 100-airplane airline is off the table. In fact, even todayʻs 54-airplane airline isnʻt going to work. It will shrink to 36 airplanes by the end of the year and gradually climb back to 40 by 2031 which is obviously many years away to add just four airplanes.

Now, the airline is going to turn its focus to its home base of Riga. It will still have “selected point-to-point services,” but it will also scale back the work it does for other airlines. It says it will have contracts that will put capacity out there “in a more balanced way during both the summer and winter seasons supports.” And that makes a lot of sense.

But what about Riga? Letʻs take a look at how capacity share has changed there over time.

Riga Seat Capacity Share by Airline

Data via Cirium

It looks like airBaltic has held surprisingly steady for the last decade with some small gains. But look at what has happened with the other airlines. Wizz came in big and then disappeared. Letʻs not forget the Russian airlines which have not flown there since the pandemic thanks to that impacts of the Ukraine war.

Ryanair is the airline that has really taken advantage of that situation. It is the clear number two with nobody really aiming at that position, even if Norwegian is in third place. But so far, Ryanair and airBaltic haven’t really been huge competitors. And Ryanair has shrunk in Riga every year since 2022, largely because it hates Latvia’s high fees and taxes.

Looking at Cirium schedules for full-year 2026, only 12.7 percent of airBaltic seats from Riga operate on routes also flown by Ryanair. That is a little deceiving, however. Once you include secondary airports as one, like Charleroi and Brussels or Torp and Oslo, that climbs to 23.3 percent. But you never want to turn your back on Ryanair for a even a minute. This is by far airBaltic’s most important market, so it makes sense that it would finally turn a focus back to it.

This change in plans shifts the airline from one that cares most about growth to one that cares most about being a financial success. It’s the right strategy, but it does mean being a smaller airline.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox for Free

How often do you want to receive emails?
Brett Avatar

26 responses to “airBaltic is Shrinking Because Winter Sucks”

  1. airBaltic Avatar
    airBaltic

    airBaltic is shrinking because Russian and Ukrainian airspace is still closed preventing the airline from tapping into transfer markets focused on CIS-to-Europe flows

    ftfy

  2. Anon Avatar
    Anon

    I think you’re under-emphasising tye Ukraine war. Prior to 2022, airBaltic could (and did) fly to a lot of places in Belarus, Russia, Ukraine and further east, just like Finnair. Now any sort of east-west hub function is dead, and the Baltics, like Finland, becomes an edge-of-the-map location. Unlike Finnair’s long-range A350s, airBaltic’s A220s can’t just fly around the shooting area.

    1. 1990 Avatar
      1990

      Agreed. Quite the ‘hot take’ for Brett to downplay the war and engine issues. The Eastern airspace closure wrecked their year-round transit flows through Riga that used to cushion off-peak traffic. P&W engine issues grounded their brand-new A220s while airBaltic paid top dollar to sub-charter older replacements. Yikes. Flying for Lufthansa was a lifeline to monetize stranded assets. I’ve flown Finnair since 2022, and can attest that at least their widebodies allowed them to pivot routes elsewhere; haven’t tried airBaltic, personally, but they’re basically trapped with narrowbodies in a compromised geography. Little of this has to do with winter, which existed before all this. Besides, how much smaller can they get? 54 down to 36. Yeesh. Maybe sell some to Breeze (they seem to still want/use them.)

      1. SEAN Avatar
        SEAN

        Surprise cranky missed the obvious, war is bad for an airline’s bottom line. This is especially true when three of the world’s most insane mad men are behind two of them.

        1. 1990 Avatar
          1990

          *sigh* Yup. And, ironically, Xi might cement China’s dominance this century by showing *checks notes* “restraint” … by NOT attacking Taiwan militarily (learning from Putin and Trump’s mistakes). Of course, if he goes for it anyway, then all bets are off (WWIII, E. Asia off-limits for a while; bad news bears for basically everyone and everything nearly everywhere. Meh.)

          1. SEAN Avatar
            SEAN

            In some ways Xi has already done that including the BRICS alliance, the belt & road program as well as selling more advanced electric cars than Tesla from BYD & other companies. How long will that last, we’ll see as their population pyramid is close to the point of no return thanks to the misguided one child policy.

            1. 1990 Avatar
              1990

              Well, one thing’s for sure, they don’t manufacture wide-body aircraft. That little 717 look-alike, Comac C919, ain’t gonna cross big oceans. Still relying on Airbus and Boeing. (Vaguely recalls the C929…) I don’t think Brett has even done much of an update on that topic since like 2015.

            2. Brett Avatar

              1990 – No, there’s not much to update that I know off. But look, China will get there. It’s just a matter of when.

            3. 1990 Avatar
              1990

              Yeah, they probably will. It’s like with EVs; they were dormant for a while, then BYD! (and 20 other brands, overnight). ‘Yikes’ for the day that the Chinese want to do actual widebodies.

            4. David M Avatar

              1990 – The C919 is the A320-lookalike. The 717-lookalike is the C909, originally called the ARJ21. Though the C909 is a bit smaller than the 717.

            5. 1990 Avatar
              1990

              David M, thank you for that clarification! Yes, I meant C909 (Saw some in Asia, Air China. Gave me an ‘Uncanny Valley’ feeling.)

    2. JT8D Avatar
      JT8D

      That damage preceded the Ukraine war. The key event was the forced diversion of that Ryanair flight to remove Belarus dissidents, after which there was a ban on Belarus carriers in the EU and v.v. – that was pre-war. The bloom was off the rose at that point.

      So far as I can tell, passenger traffic, notwithstanding the war, is at record or near-record levels at the main Baltic airports – Tallinn, Kaunas, Vilnius and Riga. But with more of it O&D, more of it is subject to competition from the likes of Ryanair and Wizz.

      1. John G Avatar
        John G

        I mean yes, but what was right before that war?

        Did you forget the whole pandemic thing?

        Side note: Ryanair seems to be about the only airline that has really been able to get past the national airline limitations.

        Almost all of the other airlines work from a base in a single country (or at least adjacent ones).

        Lufthansa flights always touch Germany. Norwegian to Norway or at least Scandinavia. But Ryanair serves everywhere, more like an airline here. Just a quick check from Vilnius on Sept 3, they have flights to London, Oslo, Malta, and Athens. On an Irish airline.

        Wizz Air is really the only other airline that comes close, they are primarily just focused on Eastern Europe routes.

        1. Eric R Avatar
          Eric R

          I wouldn’t say Ryanair is the only airline to get past the national airline limitations. It’s not like it’s some difficult barrier to overcome or major accomplishment.

          I would say they are one of the few European airlines with that type of business model.

          1. John G Avatar
            John G

            You say that, but the vast majority of European airlines are based in one country and serve it.

            You are flying British Airways through…the UK. Air France isn’t flying people from Dublin to Lisbon…and TAP isn’t flying people London to Paris.

            But Ryanair flies markets like that.

        2. JT8D Avatar
          JT8D

          Obviously the pandemic affected Air Baltic, but the issue at hand are things that affected Air Baltic differentially relative to other carriers. Do you wish to make the case that the pandemic hurt Air Baltic more than other carriers?

  3. Larry Avatar
    Larry

    Hi Brett,
    Great to see you doing analysis of airlines outside of the US. Keep up the good work!
    Larry (first time poster)

  4. O'Hare Is My Second Home Avatar
    O’Hare Is My Second Home

    That’s what they get for buying Franco-Canadian Spaghetti-Os instead of the much better and cheaper E195-E2.

    1. Stormcrash Avatar
      Stormcrash

      What a dumb take given that the E2 uses the same geared turbo fan engines from the same engine manufacturer, and has worse unit economics and a worse passenger experience. Take your hate someplace else

      1. Patrick Avatar
        Patrick

        I have yet to fly on an A220 but I can say this….the experience on an E175 is way better than on any Boeing 737

  5. Brett Avatar

    All you people saying it’s all about Ukraine/Russia and that I missed it are clearly not reading the post. I didn’t miss it. I talked about it. It undoubtedly has an impact, but that in no way explains the ability to leap to 100 aircraft. So let’s pull some more data.

    In 2019, Russia/Ukraine/Belarus accounted for a little over 13% of airBaltic’s block hours. But, not all of that is in markets that would work for connections, because remember, Riga is very far north. I can’t imagine anyone from Sochi or Odesa down on the Black Sea is connecting through Riga. And frankly, it’s highly unlikely that someone would do that from Kiev or Lviv either. The geography just doesn’t help the airline at all.

    So if we just get rid of that, all airBaltic was doing from Riga with connecting possibilities is Kaliningrad, Kazan, Minsk, Moscow, and St Petersburg. That flying was less than 5% of total block hours. And let’s also be honest that Moscow and St Petersburg have ample service from multiple airlines, so there’s not really much need for a Riga hub. It doesn’t add much value.

    The real opportunity would be from smaller Russian and Belarussian cities that don’t have great access into Europe, but how many of those are there anyway? Maybe Yekaterinburg, Novosibirsk is technically possible, Ufa, Mineralnye Vody, Samara? How small can you go before this stops making sense?

    I’m certainly not saying that there isn’t demand being cutoff by this war, but the idea that you can be at 36 airplanes now but somehow without the war 100 airplanes made sense? Impossible.

  6. 1990 Avatar
    1990

    Brett, so, what you’re saying is… the current outlook for airBaltic is… ‘not great, not terrible.’

    Yeah, 100 seemed like a pipe dream. Ironically, 3.6 Roentgen, (I mean, 36 aircraft) seems far better for them.

    I must say, I’m enjoying the geography lesson, at least. Who wouldn’t want a winter-stopover in Novosibirsk? How delightful!

    1. Brett Avatar

      1990 – I think the current outlook is vastly improved by having this new Riga-focused strategy with only 36 airplanes. I don’t think the other strategy would have worked at all, even at the time they announced it.

      As for Novosibirsk, I don’t think anybody ever wants a stopover there! This would be more about bringing people from there to Europe.

  7. Narita Kuko Express Avatar
    Narita Kuko Express

    I flew Air Baltic A-220’s from LHR to DUS which was a Lufthansa flight, and DUS-ZRH which was a Swiss International flight. Everything was pure Air Baltic including all flight crew based in Latvia, but flight announcements were German and English. Great airline

  8. Exit Row Seat Avatar
    Exit Row Seat

    As noted in the above string, AirBaltic took three direct hits:
    – the Russian sanctions wiped out its eastern service area & revenue
    – the GTF engine issue grounded a good percentage of its fleet
    – the Iranian war doubled its fuel bill

    It’s hanging on a tread via the investment of Der Kaiser. Might as well call it Luft-Baltic.
    Better to open crew bases in Munich & Frankfort and act as its regional partner.
    Should a settlement be reached with Ukraine & Putin, the ruble will flow again and Comrades will buy tickets.

    1. 1990 Avatar
      1990

      ‘Luft-Baltic’ …now, that’s a good one!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.