México Starts to Crack Under US Pressure


México has long done things its own way when it comes to aviation, sometimes without rhyme or reason. That is what has gotten the country into trouble with the US recently thanks to claimed violations of aviation agreements. Now with the US ratcheting up pressure, the country appears to be backing down.

Most of this dispute centers around the highly-constrained Mexico City airport (MEX). The country was well along in building a massive new airport to relieve congestion, but when Andrés Manuel López Obrador took over as president in 2018, he ended that plan entirely. Instead, the Santa Lucia military base was turned into AIFA, a reliever airport that is increasingly dominated by Viva. MEX remained very tightly constrained.

AIFA by itself wasn’t a great plan, but it didn’t get under the US’s skin. It’s what happened afterwards to further restrict MEX that ruffled feathers.

México arbitrarily decided that all MEX cargo operations would have to move to AIFA. Airlines may have had their slots, but that didn’t matter. They all had to move. As you can imagine, some very prominent US cargo carriers were none-too-pleased.

Then in the summer of 2022, the adminstration decided that MEX’s capacity needed to be slashed. Ch-aviation notes that hourly slots went from 61 to 44 starting in the winter 2022/2023 schedule and into the next summer. It was vaguely related to some planned construction, but that never happened, and the limits were never brought back up.

These two primary issues came together to make the parties rather unhappy. In July, the US decided it was done messing around. It put out a couple of rules that just added paperwork and pain, but the biggest issue is that the country threatened to end the joint venture between the Delta and Aeromexico. Though not stated, presumably this also means that the long-proposed Allegiant/Viva joint venture would never be approved either.

You would think México wouldn’t care all that much what the US did, but clearly Aeromexico has some friends in powerful places that have convinced the country to make some changes.

Now, México is reportedly going to restore slots. Details aren’t entirely clear at this point, but of course the big beneficiaries would be the Mexican carriers that have lost far more than US carriers. But US carriers will benefit… at least three of them will.

Alaska, JetBlue, and Southwest all tried and failed to make Mexico City work. They pulled out before the pandemic, so it’s just the big three US carriers that remain.

I tried to figure out exactly how many slots went away and what might be restored, but it’s not actually that simple. Let’s take a look at each of the three, in alphabetical order, starting with American which has given me the most clarity.

American Average Daily Departures to Mexico City

Data via Cirium

American has had a steady state of 14 daily in winter and 13 daily in summer. A spokesperson explained that there is a weird partial slot that operated in the first quarter of the year, but that has been handed back and LAX has been suspended during that time period.

American had to cut back two daily flights when it lost slots, though this past winter (and next winter as well) saw it add one Phoenix flight that operated late night/early morning and was unrelated to the steady-state slot count. Next winter, American is getting a slot back which it will use to start Chicago/O’Hare.

I’m told that this is just for winter at this point. The summer slot process for next year has not completed, but there is hope that American will be back up at 13 again then with the number of slots it had before being cut down. We shall see when slots get awarded.

Delta Average Daily Departures to Mexico City

Data via Cirium

This one, I don’t think really matters. Since Delta and Aeromexico are joint venture partners, it looks like Delta has been able to find a way to restore what it had before.

Delta was at 10 before the cuts, but then again, the cuts didn’t take place until after summer 2022 and Delta was already down at eight then. Then it was back at 10 again by summer 2024. And now this coming winter it has suspended LAX itself, so it’s lower again.

To me, this one is worth ignoring since I just don’t know how the Aeromexico relationship fits into all of this.

United Average Daily Departures to Mexico City

Data via Cirium

Then there’s United, and I’m completely at a loss. Maybe it lost one slot? But it has been back up, reaching new heights in winter. Perhaps there are fewer slots being used in winter, so United can temporarily get them. Or it’s possible that United is doing that late night/early morning flying like American to skirt around slots. Regardless, it seems like United has been the least impacted based purely on frequency.

United did just recently file plans to fly from Denver next winter as a new route, apparently replacing one of the O’Hare frequencies. But maybe it won’t have to cut O’Hare if it gets a slot or two back.


I’ll be honest, I don’t really get this fight. Sure, México is absolutely playing weird games. There are shenanigans here, but this isn’t targeting the US directly. It’s a broader move… a dumb one, yes, but not one targeting the US. Still, the US is unhappy, and it likely does count as a violation of the open skies agreement, so it will continue to push. And México appears to be bending.

Get Cranky in Your Inbox!

The airline industry moves fast. Sign up and get every Cranky post in your inbox for free.

Brett Avatar

9 responses to “México Starts to Crack Under US Pressure”

  1. Kenneth Avatar
    Kenneth

    I was given a tour of the old “new” MEX airport when it was being built – spent some time with the Dutch firm had been brought in to create the bed for the runways and taxiways to ensure that they were properly engineered. At that point, they were pretty far along and beginning the vertical construction. The fact that it was just ended a year later still blows my mind.

  2. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    Maybe Cargo slots explain all the US airlines losses ?

  3. See_Bee Avatar
    See_Bee

    Does the graphic need to indicate where the Chupacabra lives similar to NRT/Godzilla? That could be why airlines don’t want to fly out of TLC

  4. MNG Avatar
    MNG

    Your charts prove what I’ve suspected this dispute is really about. It’s not about the actual number of MEX slots held by U.S. carriers. It’s primarily about the U.S. Government being pissed that Mexico, under AMLO’s presidency, made changes without first consulting the U.S. under the open skies agreement. Yes, that was a bad move by Mexico, but the U.S. overreacted under Biden/Buttigieg and has continued to do so under the current administration. Which frankly is ironic given Trump’s international shenanigans.

  5. haolenate Avatar
    haolenate

    I thought everything the US did was wrong, horrible, and aweful. And that the Trump administration didn’t know what they were doing.

  6. Ben Avatar
    Ben

    I’m glad US administrations are getting wise to this nonsense from other countries. The Biden administration clamped down on the Dutch doing this with AMS (for different reasons but I don’t care: the result is the same) and this is a good follow-up.

    1. Luuk van Erp Avatar
      Luuk van Erp

      As one of the foremost experts on US/Dutch air travel and the accompanying politics, I find this comment to be comically off-base and inaccurate. I once set the record for most flights in one month between the mainland U.S. and the Netherlands and never once heard anything like this discussed. The Biden administration supported a growing air community between the two countries, and the current administration has continued that policy.

      I’m not mad, I’m dissapointed.

  7. Tim Dunn Avatar
    Tim Dunn

    The US is putting a lot of pressure on Mexico for alot of reasons. They have seen a whipsaw of change in a number of policy areas so reducing the tension regarding aviation and MEX might be a relatively easy “win” compared to some of the issues the country faces in dealing with the US.

    The real question is where this all goes and if it does allow for joint ventures between Mexican and US carriers. I suspect that Mexico realized its carriers would face bigger hurdles in doing business in the US including having to get routine schedule changes approved by the DOT.

    Trade tensions, regardless of the industry, are damaging for aviation but even more so when it involves aviation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cranky Flier