Why Does My Connecting Flight Cost Less Than a Nonstop? (Ask Cranky)

It’s time for another Ask Cranky question. This is one that has been asked in various forms over the years. In fact, I hope I haven’t already written about this before. But it’s a great question and it doesn’t make sense to a lot of people why this happens.

A little bit ago I was looking for a flight from Los Angeles to Hawaii on one of the random cheap flight websites. When I put in the search requirements, it came up with the cheapest flights having a layover in San Francisco. Figuring it wasn’t that far just to drive to san francisco, I picked there as my originating airport. I even chose to leave right before the layover flight would have normally taken off. The site then told me that I had to take a layover in Los Angeles to continue to Honolulu. Is this really all based on economics or just a sneaky way of the airlines getting a little bit more of your money? It’s obvious they have non stop flights from both Los Angeles and San francisco. Why the layovers? I would think it would cost more over all for fuel, and using terminals.

Michael

The first thing to keep in mind with something like this is that airlines don’t price based on costs. They price based on demand. When schedules are set at least a couple months in advance, predictions about revenues have been made and the hope is that the flight will be profitable, but airlines never know for sure. Once the schedule is set in stone, costs aren’t going to change, so it’s up to Ask Crankythe revenue management team to simply maximize the amount of revenue that gets onboard that airplane.

One thing that we know without question is that a lot of people will pay more to fly nonstop, so even if a connecting itinerary may cost an airline more to fly, the airline doesn’t care about that. It only cares about getting as much revenue as it can on each flight, and that might mean pricing connecting itineraries less than nonstop.

This one looks like it’s probably on United from the routes involved, so let’s just pretend that’s the story. Here’s what I think is happening. United thinks that it can sell a lot of seats on those flights to passengers wanting to fly nonstop. But it doesn’t expect that it’s actually going to fill up every seat with those higher fares. It could reduce prices on the nonstop to increase demand, but then it dilutes the fares that all those other people would have paid and that could result in less revenue even if it puts more people on the airplane. So it tries to find another way to fill up those seats.

There is a segment of the population that will be willing to make a connection if it means cheaper flights. Those people might be considering flying a different airline like American or Delta or not traveling at all with the current nonstop fares being charged by United. So how can United find a way to keep those passengers without diluting the existing fares? It can route them over a connection. That means those who want to pay more for the nonstop will still pay more, but United can fill up empty seats with that connecting traffic from the truly price-sensitive traveler.

In the end, United fills more seats and makes more money, even though it may seem counter-intuitive at first glance.

(Visited 9,513 times, 9 visits today)

Get Posts via Email When They Go Live or in a Weekly Digest

Leave a Reply

37 Comments on "Why Does My Connecting Flight Cost Less Than a Nonstop? (Ask Cranky)"

avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Rohit Rao
Guest

Before I read it, I’m going to make an educated guess that you made a mistake and the title should be “Why Does a Nonstop Flight Cost More Than a Connecting Flight”

XJT DX
Guest

I see nothing wrong with the title…

Nonstop Flight Cost More Than a Connecting Flight = Connecting Flight Cost Less Than a Nonstop

Rohit Rao
Guest

Finished reading now, and I was right about the error… Connections are generally less expensive than nonstops, not more expensive…

As for your explanation, you pretty much nailed it. A tangent that you could have gone on would be to talk about hidden city ticketing. A lot of people seem to be mentally incapable of understanding that they are stealing, not “saving the airline money.”

Maybe I’ll write a post on the topic…

Cooper
Guest

Fare Jumpers!!! Rest assured, astute (and in some cases vindictive) ticket agents make sure to enforce the proper fare structure with pax when confronted with this. For instance, a passenger ticketed from XXX to ZZZ thru YYY who decides to skip the first leg and check in at YYY. The next thing they know, their reservation has been cancelled since they no-showed in XXX. Then, they’re slapped with a change fee, plus the difference in fare. Puts a damper on that whole scam.

trackback

[…] Reading Brett Snyder’s blog post this evening inspired me to write on this topic… […]

Neil S
Guest

Another question: Why did my Christmas trip (LGA – DEN – PSP) cost 100 more on united.com than on continental.com, even though all four of the legs were on UA flights?

Jim
Guest

I have noticed this on several flights as well. My guess is that United’s frequent flyers are wealthier than Continental’s :P

DAB
Guest

I have seen this a lot the other way (United flight # on CO metal cheaper). My theory is that the airlines are selling little on each other’s metal, and so the cheaper fare classes simply last longer for the UA # on the CO Plane and vice versa.

Fred
Guest

Actually, although airlines mostly care about demand when setting prices, costs can change with fuel cost. If fuel prices go up, costs go up, and flights that are longer and on less efficient aircraft cost proportionately more than others.

This doesn’t seem to be what’s going on here and this probably doesn’t make a huge difference when airlines set prices for the immediate future though, especially if they hedge fuel costs.

trackback

[…] link: Why Does My Connecting Flight Cost Less Than a Nonstop? (Ask … Segnala presso: This entry was posted in travel and tagged angeles, cheapest flights, hawaii, […]

David SF eastbay
Member

People will never understand airline pricing since on the surface it may not make sense.

After all these years people still can’t understand how they can fly for $200 between LA and NY but pay $400 to fly half the distance like LA-OMA (as an example).

Airlines will use price to drive people to or away from certain flights which can depend on the market or time of day.

Wayne Rutman
Guest
Cranky’s above discussion of this issue is a great explanation of demand-based pricing airline pricing. There is little doubt that, on a monopoly or near monopoly nonstop route, the profit-maximizing strategy might be to discourage many (most?) travellers from flying. The classic example of this could be US Airways’ PHL-BOS fares. Before Southwest entered the market, US drove prices up to more than $600 roundtrip — with almost no discounts available! This essentially meant that US would carry almost zero nonstop leisure travellers on the route, since there are many good alternatives for this less-than-300-mile nonstop flight (car, train, bus.… Read more »
Sanjeev M
Guest

I guess in the same way, the example shows that United has very little cost in routing people on LAX-SFO cause they have gazillion dailies between the two.

An empty seat is the airlines’ worst nightmare.

Evan
Guest

Actually, worse than that, I fear that the empty planes LAX-SFO encourage UA to offer cheaper connecting fares to Hawaii than is rational. The low bookings on those flights (especially far in advance) might be partially to blame, as revenue management systems try to fill those seats with connecting passengers even if at lower overall revenue than a non-stop that doesn’t fill one of those seats.

jaybru
Member
A great question and I can’t say what you said is incorrect. Airlines can find justifcation in any pricing system they want, but I ask: “How’s it all been working out for you?’ Airlines seem to think they have us all figured out…”All you want is the cheapest price.” Like we can figure out any other bases for our purchase decisions? Help us out. Simplify and market. We seem to be able to work with other industry pricing sysytems, but when it comes to the airlines, we’re mystified. We feel everything about airline pricing is manipulation. And Cranky, what a… Read more »
robby
Guest

Look at JetBlue…..non-stops are cheaper by far….connections are more expensive…….
I’m just saying.

mandel.jerry1
Member

Connecting flights cost the travellers more because the extra segment and airport facility charges add to the fliers’ costs but don’t show up in the quoted fares.

Nick Barnard
Member

AFAIK there was a recent rule change that requires airlines to advertise prices on the “final screen” cost, eliminating surprises such as this.

BJ
Guest
Doesn’t this method of pricing create artificial demand? Using LAX-SFO as an example, you now have a whole heap of people flying the route who don’t actually want to go between the two cities. This would be OK if you’re only taking up a couple of spare seats on each flight but it can horribly wrong when flights are added on a route to match this ‘demand’. This results in flights which are not actually generating any revenue. United, as we all know, has not been very good at making profits in the past. Maybe they should stop undercutting their… Read more »
John
Guest
Begging to differ a bit. The reason that connecting flights can be less has more to do with who competes on a route than demand. The legacy carriers (American, United, etc.) always price their flights based upon who they compete with. If there is an LCC (discount carrier like Southwest or Jetblue), they meet that airline’s price, but if there is not, the legacy carrier prices it much higher. Example: DFW to New York or Newark. AA, CO, and DL all fly nonstop…no LCCs do. Nonstop round trip 1 week advance is $1500. But Southwest and Airtran fly the route… Read more »
Nick Barnard
Member

This reminds me of when I live in Cincinnatti, I know folks who’d say were going to DEN, instead of taking the CVG-DEN flight they’d book DAY-CVG-DEN because it was cheaper even after driving an hour to get to Dayton’s airport. Although often on the return they’d be routed DEN-ATL-DAY.

Kilroy
Guest
Don’t know if you’ve been to CVG recently, but it looks (and feels) like a ghost town. It looks like (not sure if true or not) that one whole terminal is essentially shut down, and CVG is a bit of a pain to get to (not very convenient to downtown, river crossings can get backed up, and a good hour away from the wealthier burbs in the north). Many people I work with in the Cinci metro area, especially those who live north of the I-275 loop, prefer DAY even for price-insensitive business travel. Even with construction on I-75 around… Read more »
Dan
Guest

I had a potential employer pay $1600 for a CVG-IAD r/t with 6 days notice. Ouch.

Kilroy
Guest
Nothing like paying over $3/mile for a 500-mile trip, not terribly atypical out of CVG though. Even NYC can get over $1k+ on relatively short notice, and goes up from there. Yeah, CVG’s pretty insanely priced these days as a dying former hub/focus city. I can’t imagine that the fees CVG charges the airlines (really THE airline, but I digress) are much cheaper relatively speaking. On the bright side, at least it’s not Bentonville/Rogers/NW Arkansas. My understanding is that 80+% of the pax there are visitors working for Walmart either directly or indirectly (suppliers), and I’ve heard (can’t cite) that… Read more »
Kilroy
Guest
To save money and have a bit of fun, last time I went to NW Arkansas I flew in via SeaPort Air’s EAS service from Dallas Love Field to Boone County (a good 90 drive east of Bville/Rogers/U-Ark, more if you get stock behind slow drivers), via Little Rock, on a 9-seater. Absolute best experience I’ve ever had flying, from when I called the airline for more info (when’s the last time you called an airline and a real person from the US picked up on the second ring, with no voice menus or wait?) to the time I stepped… Read more »
A
Guest

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Madidi
Guest

Two connecting flights are often cheaper then one direct. I travel this way almost every time because:
1 – it saves money 2 – what if you stop for a couple of days in that connecting city? That´s a bonus destination to visit on your trip :) That´s why we created http://questorganizer.com/ to make all that accessible for everyone!

BRE
Guest

not true, Delta 1stop flights are more.

wpDiscuz