I just found out that my fiancĂ©e and I will be heading down to Peru in the Spring. Of course, I’m excited about the chance to see Machu Picchu, but I’m also excited about getting to try a new airline.
Looking at my options, I see all kinds of exciting possibilities. Though I’ll wait to see what airfares do over the next couple of months, I’m eager to find out which option you all would recommend.
So, forget about mileage opportunities, because that’s not important. In terms of onboard experience, which airline would you choose?
Update 10/26 @ 1124a: An excellent point was raised in the comments that I didn’t mention what class I’d be flying. I’ll be in coach.
-
Written by Will on October 26, 2007. Reply
My colleague flew non-stop on LAN from JFK to Lima about a year and a half ago and had a great trip. Red eyes are never fun but I would choose this flight over changing somewhere in Latin America in the middle of the night
-
Written by Zach on October 26, 2007. Reply
This should be an easy decision. I would always choose the widebody, and nonstop is a plus.
Sounds like a fun trip!
-
-
Written by CF on October 26, 2007. Reply
Ah yes, that would make a huge difference. I’ll be flying in coach. I’ve updated the post to include that info.
-
Written by L1011 on October 26, 2007. Reply
I would agree with Zach 100%. Widebody, even though a 767, and nonstop, sounds like the perfect combo.
CF, really enjoy the blog!
-
Written by Rick on October 26, 2007. Reply
I admire your spirit, but this one’s a no-brainer. Gotta go with the nonstop.
great blog, btw!
-
Written by DT on October 26, 2007. Reply
Well, its a toss up. I do Latin America all the time and LAN will probably give you the best service. However, living in Colombia as I do, I’d have to say try Avianca, they are constantly renewing and it will give you a chance to see the third busiest airport in South America (BOG, 3rd after only GRU and GIG!!) and number 1 cargo airport as well.
-
Written by Brian Lusk on October 26, 2007. Reply
Wow, this poses a dilemma. Do you connect through some exotic airport like Bogota, knowing that the ramp is probably filled with unusual aircraft, or do you go on a nonstop to avoid the potential hassle and delay in connections? Those considerations don’t even take in the onboard service. In all honesty, I would pick the routing with either a new aircraft type, and if there weren’t any new types, I’d go with the best service.
Brian -
Written by Alex on October 26, 2007. Reply
is cost a consideration? if that’s the case, then I would not necessarily fly a non-stop flight….LAN CHILE has a nice monopoly on the LAX/LIM or JFK/LIM route (zero competitors, they are the only airline offering non-stop flights) and therefore they charge premium fares. Try a connection and save money!
-
Written by Alex on October 26, 2007. Reply
OH ONE MORE THING……LEG ROOM IN COACH ON THOSE LAN 767′S IS THE ABSOLUTE PITS, IF YOU ARE 5′8″ OR TALLER YOU WILL REGRET IT!!!
-
Written by CF on October 26, 2007. Reply
Thanks for all this great feedback. Cost is somewhat of a consideration, but I have flexibility. Right now, fares were running about $835 on the cheapest connection and $899 on the nonstop, so in that case it wouldn’t matter.
AV and BOG are definitely the most interesting option of all of these, but there are long layovers each way so I’m not sure I want to do it.
-
Written by Steve Dorman on October 26, 2007. Reply
Any flight that gets you there safely NONSTOP is my preference. Also the 767 has the most comfortable coach seats in the sky, thanks to 2×3x2 seating. If you luck out with an exit row, its even better. I would never ever consider a 3×4x3 airplane for a long flight.
-
-
Written by Tom S on October 26, 2007. Reply
You are kidding right? Who in their right mind would want to go to South America? I am writing this from my hotel room overlooking Copacabana Beach in Rio de Janeiro. Even I don’t want to be here.
I voted for you to take the non-stop, but my second choice would be a boring American carrier. You can always ship your AA miles to me. :-)
-
Written by Nicholas Barnard on October 26, 2007. Reply
Not knowing service on the airlines I voted for COPA because the E190 is a sweet plane. I’m odd and I’ll chose to fly on a smaller plane, trying to remember the days of airliners with less than 15 seats. Plus connecting in another country sounds like an experience. But if the layover is long I’d go for the nonstop… (I voted before reading comments.)
-
Written by SeaFlyer on October 26, 2007. Reply
Fly COPA and try to figure out how they are the most profitable carrier in the Americas (by margin).
-
Written by BAP on October 27, 2007. Reply
I would go for Avianca! For me it is all about logging new airports as well as new airlines.
-
Written by BJW on October 28, 2007. Reply
I would not fly an American carrier and I would avoid small jets. You get both plenty of times when flying in the US.
That basically leaves LAN and Avianca as the only 2 choices.
Unless I had a very long (>4 hour) layover in Bogota I would take Avianca. LAN is a very good airline and the nonstop is enticing but flying via Bogota would allow you to take a break in the flights and also do some spotting in an exotic location you may never visit again.
-
Written by Linguist-in-Waiting on October 28, 2007. Reply
I’d say Avianca. The chance to spot in El Dorado International Airport is probably worth it.
Coincidentally, I am planning a trip myself to the Sacred Valley, from May 10-20, 2008. Since I will be coming from Buffalo, my choices are limited, but if my friend who resides in New York City chooses to join me, then I might hop over to New York City and take Avianca instead of going on a US carrier straight from Buffalo. AV’s schedules from JFK to LIM via BOG provides a 9-hour lay-over (there is a shorter one, but is way too short for comfort, which is 30 minutes), so I might as well get out of the airport and do some sight-seeing in La Candelaria and visit the Museo del Oro in Bogota. Besides, I would have to stay overnight in Lima anyways since all flights to Cusco leave only in the mornings, so there’s no point in rushing to Lima.
-
Written by Lima_Visitor on October 31, 2007. Reply
How about TACA? I flew them last december, via El Salvador. The aircraft was pretty new, but it is no-frills carrier, and I got a good price. I actually bought a ticket to Sao Paulo, and got a free layover for 3 days in Lima, for around $800 with taxes.
-
Written by Holly on October 31, 2007. Reply
I flew Taca a few years ago…I would definitely recommend them…flights were on time, staff was friendly, smooth/no hassel/no wait connections, clean planes, etc.
-
-
Written by The Cranky Flier » Hitting the Road on April 25, 2008. Reply
[...] of you who have been reading Cranky for awhile will remember back in October I asked which airline I should fly to Peru for a trip in the seemingly distant future. Well guess what? It’s time for that trip. A [...]
-
Written by The Cranky Flier » Trip Report: Inca-redible Peru on May 12, 2008. Reply
[...] of this post. That piece of cheesiness was the Disney theme for one of the days of the trip.) I asked you guys to recommend how you would go about getting there, and the LAN nonstop won out. I’m certainly [...]
-
Written by Pedro on December 13, 2008. Reply
I fly to Peru two or three times a year, I flight from SLC each time. I have to make at least one stop because there is no NON STOP flights to Lima from SLC. So where are you flying from?
-If you flight from ATL then your best option is a non stop flight with Delta.
-If you flight from Texas then probably your best option is a non stop flight with Continental
- If you flight from LAX then LAN is problably your best option with a non stop flight to Lima… but this flight could be a little too long… it’s about 9 hours long..(that’s TOO much for me)
If you flight from MIA then you may want to flight with AA or there is a new airline that files from FLL to LIMA for cheap, it is called SPIRIT AIRLINES, (not the most comfortable one but definitely the best price) or LAN (which gives one of the best services to Latin America) has a non stop flight to Lima too
If you flight from JFK I would definitely NOT take a non stop flight to lima…. i did it once… and i will never do it again… 11and a half hours in a plane is just TOO MUCH for me… i was going NUTS!
Non stop flights from MIA, ATL AND TEXAS take about 6 hours and i strongly recommend them.
LAN gives the best service to South America, Spirit Airlines is the cheapest one to lima from FLL. Delta has good deals from ATL, so it’s up to you! -
-
-
Leave a Comment
Subscribe for Free
Cranky Concierge Has Been Helping
Cranky Also Writes
Happening Now
Archives
Air Blogs/Forums
- Airline Reporter
- Bangalore Aviation
- BNET Travel
- BoardingArea
- Business Travel Guru
- Delta Airlines Blog
- Evan Sparks Av Policy
- Flight Level 390
- Frugal Travel Guy
- Jetwhine
- JohnnyJet.com
- LateDeparture.com
- LGB Spotting/News
- Middle Seat Terminal
- One Mile at a Time
- Online Travel Review
- Perrin Post
- PlaneBuzz
- Points Wizard
- RickSeaney.com
- SimpliFlying
- Southwest Airlines Blog
- The Airline Blog
- Things in the Sky
- Things with Wings
- Thirty Thousand Feet
- Travel Babel
- TSA Blog
- Upgrade: Travel Better
Air Websites
Other Sites of Note
Advertisement
Advertisement
Top Travel Deals
Destinations
Hot Topics
787 A380 Accidents/Incidents Across the Aisle Interviews Admin Advertising Airbus Air Canada Air France Air New Zealand Airplane Porn Airport Experience AirTran Alaska Airlines Alitalia Allegiant Alliances Aloha American Ask Cranky Baggage BNET Boeing British Airways Continental Cranky Jackass Customer Service Delays/Cancellations Delta Distribution Emirates Environment ExpressJet Fares Frequent Flier Programs Frontier Fuel Go! Government Regulation Guest Posts Hawaiian Inflight Entertainment JetBlue JFK - New York/JFK Labor Relations LAX - Los Angeles LGA - New York/La Guardia LHR - London/Heathrow Lufthansa Meals Mergers/Finance Mesa Airlines Midwest Airlines Miscellaneous Northwest Operations Republic Ryanair Safety/Security Schedule Changes Seats SkyTeam Southwest Spirit Star Alliance Technology Trip Reports United US Airways Virgin America
Bad Behavior has blocked 15144 access attempts in the last 7 days.







Comments
Leave a comment Trackback