Browsing Posts in Star Alliance

Ok, maybe in this case, the correct term is “overweight,” but either way you look at it, you’ll have to leave those heavy bags at home from now on if you fly Continental.

Recently, most US airlines standardized their baggage rules to allow bags up to 50 lbs for free, bags 51 to 70 lbs for a fee, and bags 70 to 100 lbs for a bigger fee. Now, Continental has stopped allowing any bags over 70 lbs.

Really, if you can’t fit everything you need in a couple of 70 pound bags, there’s something wrong. Continental’s website does note, however, that you still check electric wheelchairs and other assistive devices free of charge.

Here are the weight restrictions for a few select airlines on domestic routes:

American – up to 50 lbs free, $25 per bag from 51 to 70 lbs, $50 per bag from 71 to 100 lbs
Continental – up to 50 lbs free, $25 per bag from 51 to 70 lbs
JetBlue – up to 50 lbs free, $20 per bag from 51 to 70 lbs, $50 per bag from 71 to 100 lbs
Northwest – up to 50 lbs free, $25 per bag from 51 to 70 lbs, $50 per bag from 71 to 100 lbs
Southwest – up to 50 lbs free, $25 per bag from 51 to 70 lbs, $50 per bag from 71 to 100 lbs
United – up to 50 lbs free, $50 per bag from 51 to 100 lbs
US Airways – up to 50 lbs free, $50 per bag from 51 to 70 lbs, $80 per bag from 71 to 100 lbs

A lot of people don’t know about the Guaranteed Airfare Rule. Many airlines have it, and it basically says that if the fare goes down after you purchase the ticket, you are entitled to receive the difference. Most airlines will charge you $100 to reissue the ticket, so it only makes sense if the price went down A LOT, but some airlines, like US Airways, will actually let you receive the difference in the form of a voucher without any service charge.

So a few days ago when I realized that the fare on a trip to Puerto Vallarta had dropped by $80, I thought I’d try to get a refund in the form of a voucher.

I called reservations and they told me that since the new lower fare was an internet-only fare, I had to call the internet desk to get it done. Sure enough, when I called them, they said there was nothing they could do about it since it was an internet only fare. I was stuck.

At this point, I decided to write in to customer relations and see what happened. They wrote back only a couple days later with this text:

The Guaranteed Air Fare Rule applies to tickets purchased through US
Airways Reservations or through
www.usairways.com. As with
most fare rules, certain restrictions and exceptions apply.

The original ticket must be fully unused and the reissued ticket (to the
decreased or new fare) must reflect the exact itinerary with no changes made to
dates, times, cities or passenger name. Additionally, all conditions ofthe new
fare must be met, including booking code, advance reservations andticketing
requirements. If the decreased or new fare is a fare for sale for a limited
period of time only, this rule does not apply. If the fare is limited to
Internet booking only, the rule does not apply, as this type of fare is not a
filed/published fare with industry reservation systems. In other words, a
Reservations agent must be able to view the decreased fare or new fare in our
booking system.

When a fare qualifies for the Guaranteed Air Fare Rule, the customer may
request a refund of the fare difference. A $100 change fee per ticket will be
assessed; however, a customer may choose to receive the difference in fares in
voucher form. In that instance, the change fee would be waived. Should you still
have questions regarding the Guaranteed Air Fare Rule please contact our
Reservations Department at 1-800-428-4322 for assistance.

I’m lucky that I actually handled the domestic contract of carriage for America West while I was there, so I knew exactly where to look to see if this was true or not. Go to this page to see all the US Airways/America West contracts of carriage. Since I’m flying on America West to Mexico, I had to take a look at the ridiculously long international contract for America West.

Sure enough, upon further review, here is the text:

(D) EFFECTIVE RULES, FARES AND CHARGES ALL CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS
AND/OR BAGGAGE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE CARRIER’S RULES,
REGULATIONS AND TARIFFS IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT
OF CARRIAGE COVERED BY THE FIRST FLIGHT COUPON ON THE TICKET.

(1) WHEN THE FARES OR CHARGES COLLECTED ARE NOT THE APPLICABLE FARES
OR CHARGES, THE DIFFERENCE WILL BE REFUNDED TO OR COLLECTED FROM
THE PASSENGER AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE.
(2) IF AFTER A TICKET HAS BEEN ISSUED AND BEFORE ANY PORTION THEREOF
HAS BEEN USED, AN INCREASE OR DECREASE IN THE FARES OR CHARGES APPLICABLE
TO THE TRANSPORTATION COVERED BY THE TICKETS BECOMES EFFECTIVE, THE FULL
AMOUNT OF SUCH INCREASE OR DECREASE WILL BE COLLECTED FROM, OR REFUNDED TO
THE PASSENGER, AS THE CASE MAY BE. EXCEPTION: (APPLICABLE FOR LOCAL IN
THE U.S.A. AND A POINT OUTSIDE THE U.S.A.) NO INCREASES WILL BE COLLECTED IN
CASES WHERE THE TICKET HAS BEEN ISSUED PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF A
TARIFF CONTAINING AN INCREASE IN THE APPLICABLE LOCAL OR JOINT FARE, (SEE
NOTE BELOW) PROVIDED:

(A) THE ORIGINATING FLIGHT COUPON OF THE TICKET WAS ISSUED FOR
A SPECIFIC FLIGHT AT THE FARE CONTAINED IN A TARIFF LAWFULLY IN EFFECT ON
THE DATE OF TICKET ISSUANCE DETERMINED BY THE VALIDATION STAMPED OR IMPRINTED ON THE TICKET;

(B) THE ORIGINATING FLIGHT SHOWN ON THE TICKET IS NOT
VOLUNTARILY CHANGED AT THE PASSENGER\’S REQUEST SUBSEQUENT TO
THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANY INCREASE IN THE APPLICABLE FARE;

(C) THIS PROVISION SHALL APPLY ONLY TO THE PASSENGER TO WHOM THE TICKET WAS
ORIGINALLY ISSUED. NOTE: PURCHASE OF A PREPAID TICKET ADVICE (PTA) WILL
CONSTITUTE PURCHASE AND ISSUANCE OF A TICKET FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS RULE. THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE OR OF THIS TARIFF MAY BE ALTERED,
MODIFIED OR WAIVED ONLY IN WRITING BY AN AGENT, SERVANT OR REPRESENTATIVE OF
HP.

I told you this thing was wordy. You don’t even need to bother reading it, because what would matter isn’t in there. There is nothing saying that certain types of fares are excluded from the Guaranteed Airfare Rule. This means that they should owe me the difference. I sent that back today and I eagerly await their response. I’m fairly sure this will not be easy to get a hold of, but I’m persistent. I’ll keep you updated here.

The key takeaway from this is that you should always check the contract of carriage. For domestic flights, for example, they have a blanket statement saying that certain types of fares can be excluded from the Guaranteed Airfare Rule. (That seems completely unfair to me, but that’s a whole different story.) Since I’m flying internationally, I’m going to keep fighting for this.

Air Canada announced some time ago that they’d be installing in-seat audio/video on demand on all their aircraft (even the small 70 seaters), and it’s now coming to fruition.

The Toronto Sun has a “review” of the new system on its website. I put “review” in quotes because they don’t actually have much to say about it other than this gem of a quote:

“I don’t find that the navigation is very good at all when you get into watching the video programming,” says MacArthur, who tried out the system during a recent flight to New York.

Yeah, that’s helpful.

What we do find out is that the new system has “16 to 24 movies, various TV shows and 50 music CDs. Later this summer it will include up to 10 interactive games and an interactive moving map with flight-path information.” Sounds to me to be a little light on the number of movies when compared to other airlines, but really, how many do you need?

Oh, and this is cool. “A USB port next to the monitor will allow passengers to upload games, while each seat will be equipped with a power outlet, says McKenven.” Can’t say I’ve ever seen that before.

Unfortunately, it’s only on 27 planes right now, but it should be done sometime next year fleetwide. This will help it compete internationally with just about every non-North American airline and domestically with WestJet. That airline currently offers Live TV.

This will try to answer the age old question of whether or not people are willing to pay for this. I know that I personally am happy to shell out a few bucks for that kind of entertainment and even more than that if it’s a really long flight. On the long hauls, this is becoming standard issue. (Yes, United, that means your 747s with big projector screens need to be updated.) But on the short hauls, this is still a rarity. I do hope it becomes the new standard.

Airlines have relied on international routes recently to be their big money makers and none have been more sought after than flights to China. In the last few years, the US and China came to agreement to slowly phase in more flights between the two countries. Before that agreement, the only two US carriers flying to China were United and Northwest.

The party got started this year when Continental started Newark to Beijing and American started Chicago/O’Hare to Shanghai. For 2007, only incumbent airlines will be able to bid for new flights, and today United surprised everyone by applying for Washington/Dulles to Beijing.

The reason it was surprising is that United has had a long-standing desire to fly from San Francisco to Guangzhou (CAN). So when they came out with this request today, it was surprising. This may simply have been the realization that United wouldn’t win the new route out of SFO. It could be clear pandering to the politicians in DC with the tempting promise of nonstop flights.

American has applied for Dallas to Beijing while Continental has asked for Newark to Shanghai. Both of those applications are strong, but Continental’s seems like it should be the front runner. This new United service, however, is really an interesting twist. It opens up nonstop flights in an important market politically and that could help sway the vote.


About | Directory | Shop | Credit Cards | Awards | In the News | Ethics | Cranky Concierge
Powered by WordPress | SRS Solutions | © 2006-2012 Brett Snyder All Rights Reserved | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy