Browsing Posts in V Australia

Australian travelers know Virgin Blue as the number two competitor to Qantas, but within a couple of days, the name will be gone. Ok, so I’m just being dramatic. The airline is simply changing its name to Virgin Australia (or so it’s expected). That, of course, begs the question . . . why didn’t it get that name Virgin Australia Logoin the first place?

We don’t know for sure that Virgin Australia will be the name announced this Wednesday (Tuesday for us here in the US), but all signs point that way. Trademarks have been registered, the web domain has been secured, and there were even a couple of slip ups on the current website that showed the airline’s hand. This is all part of Virgin Blue’s new strategy under former Qantas exec John Borghetti to become a viable competitor against Qantas when it comes to the business traveler.

How did the airline get the name Virgin Blue in the first place? It all came as part of a contest the airline held to name the airline when it launched in 2000. In Australia, a “Bluey” is apparently slang for a red-headed person. With its red-bodied airplanes, the name seemed to fit, and it added a little fun. This may have sounded fun, but it seems out of place today among Virgin airlines.

Most Virgin airlines (except for the now-defunct Virgin Express) have geography in the title. Virgin Atlantic flies over the Atlantic (primarily). Virgin America? I think we know how that works. And Virgin Nigeria may be gone, but in its day, it was clear where it flew. So now Virgin Australia will join that family.

The bigger problem, however, is around the Virgin name itself. The name was originally licensed solely for flights within Australia. That meant that when Virgin Blue started expanding, it couldn’t take the Virgin name with it. That’s how we ended up with Pacific Blue in New Zealand and the South Pacific, Polynesian Blue in Samoa, and of course, V Australia for long-haul intercontinental flights. The brand confusion is just nuts.

My understanding is that this insanity was courtesy of Singapore Airlines. Singapore bought 49 percent of Virgin Atlantic back in 1999. Concerned about protecting its turf in its sphere of influence, it pushed for the restrictions on Virgin Blue’s use of the Virgin name outside of Australia. We’re in a different world today, however. There is plenty of low cost carrier competition around Southeast Asia and Singapore is pondering a sale of its Virgin Atlantic stake anyway. I assume that Virgin Australia had to pay up in order to be able to use the Virgin name in a greater geography, but it’s worth it to have a unified brand.

Now we’ll see all the Virgin Blue brands united under the name Virgin Australia. It’s now my understanding that only Virgin Blue will become Virgin Australia with Pacific Blue being folded in to V Australia. So, man, did I get this one wrong. With this new brand, the airline will be gunning for Qantas and a larger share of the business travel market. The name and paint job aren’t the only things changing. We’ve already seen the airline put widebodies on flights between Sydney and Perth with longer-haul configurations that appeal to business travelers. We’re also going to see new interiors and changes to the frequent flier program, undoubtedly in ways to make it more attractive to the frequent Qantas traveler.

Remember, Virgin Blue also has a fairly new partnership with Air New Zealand across the Tasman, so I would assume we’ll see further integration between the two so that the new Virgin Australia can provide better offerings to the business travelers on both sides of the Ditch.

If I’m Qantas, I’m certainly concerned about this. The Virgin effort is being spearheaded by someone who knows Qantas well from the inside. And while its Jetstar subsidiary did a good job of holding ground against low cost carriers, it does nothing against an airline targeting the business traveler. This should be fun to watch.

[Updated 5/2 @ 812a to reflect the fact that only Virgin Blue will be changing its name to Virgin Australia]

[Updated on 5/4 @ 918a - it appears that Pacific Blue and V Australia will become Virgin Australia, so the initial post was right.]

July Premium Traffic Shows GainsBNET
It’s premium traffic monitor time again, and traffic is still in the tank. But it’s not quite as bad, so that’s good.

Delta’s SkyClub Promotion Slightly Misses the MarkBNET
Delta offered club access to some elite members for a day. Good idea, not great execution.

Guest Posts From My Favourite Bloggers : Brett Snyder – The Cranky FlierFlying with Fish blog
I wrote a guest post for Fish about the recently announced V Australia/Emirates codeshare.

US Airways and Delta Raise More MoneyBNET
Airlines are raising money left and right these days. Might as well do it while they can.

United Goes Back Into Mini-Expansion Mode DomesticallyBNET
Don’t look now, but United has started adding new flights and new cities once again. That’s always encouraging, though I do wonder about some of these.

Virgin America’s Improved Second Quarter Performance DetailsBNET
Now that the government data is out, we can take a look at Virgin America’s performance in greater detail. Not too bad, but there’s still work to do.

You know all those low fares we’ve seen on US to Australia routes lately? That’s because with two new entrants, there’s way too much capacity out there and everyone involved is bleeding as they fight for traffic. Now, those two new entrants, Delta and V Australia/Virgin Blue have decided to get together a form a joint venture. Smart move.

I actually touched on this possibility when I interviewed Virgin Blue CEO Brett Godfrey in February. When talking about Delta, he alluded to this . . .

You might say, well, does Delta want to put their traffic on Qantas in Australia? A lot of the market flies beyond Sydney, so maybe that’s an opportunity for us to say, well, quid pro quo . . . . There’s some opportunity there. No discussions held in that regard . . . but that’s an opportunity.

And here we are five months later with a deal in hand. This partnership will have frequent flier reciprocity, codesharing, and it will ask for antitrust immunity so they can discuss routes and fares. This seems like it should be an easy one for the DOT to approve, because up until this year, only 2 airlines flew the route. If this doesn’t get approved, my bet is that Delta’s days to Sydney are numbered, so there is a clear benefit to consumers to approving this deal.

It also allows Delta to feed people into Los Angeles from around the US and Virgin Blue to feed people into Sydney (and other gateways) from around Australia. I would hope that we’ll see some serious frequency cuts in order to try to get back to a more normal level of capacity on the route.

I was emailing with Dan Webb over at Things in the Sky last night about this, and he was very interested in what this means for Virgin America. This type of joint venture certainly diminishes Virgin America’s importance to V Australia. If it weren’t for space constraints, I wonder if V Australia would even rather move over to Delta’s terminal at LAX and leave Virgin America behind.

This also raises the question about what happens to the Virgin Blue/United partnership. Right now, Virgin Blue shares United’s code on flights beyond Sydney in Australia. I can’t imagine Virgin Blue would cancel this deal, but I wonder how United will feel about it. They may very well need the traffic, so it’s possible it could stay, but that would make for an odd arrangement.

I also find myself wondering if eventually Air France could join this agreement with its LAX to Tahiti flight. Virgin Blue subsidiary Pacific Blue doesn’t fly to Tahiti yet, but this could be another interesting twist.

I like this move. It should help to stabilize the routes between the US and Australia, though it should mean fares will rise for consumers. Considering that fares are too low to be sustainable right now, that’s a good thing.

The long awaited day is here. Virgin America and V Australia have finally entered into an interline agreement. It’s a V Australia and Virgin America Start Interliningfairly limited set-up right now thanks to technical limitations, but eventually it will become a full-fledged interline and codeshare agreement.

So what do I mean when I say it’s fairly limited? Well, as of now, it can only be booked via V Australia’s call center or a travel agent. Starting June 8, you can also book on on the V Australia website. But nothing can be handled from the Virgin America side of the house.

There is also no frequent flier reciprocity at this point. You can only earn frequent flier points in the program of the operating carrier. That means Velocity points for the Transpacific flight and eleVAte points for the domestic US run.

So why is this so limited? It’s the same thing that prevented this whole thing from getting off the ground until now . . . technical issues on Virgin America’s side. According to Virgin America spokesperson Abby Lunardini, Virgin America and V Australia are “working towards reciprocal interline and codesharing agreements ultimately. We hope to have that functionality in our VX systems sometime in 2010.” The timeline is similar for reciprocal frequent flier earning, though that should be in early 2010.

Until then, at least you’ll be able to transfer your bags directly.

Should Continental Continue to Host Events for Its Best Fliers?
Continental just finished up its annual FlyerTalk event. It’s not cheap, but should they continue to spend this money on their best customers?

V Australia’s Decision on Which Business Class Seat to Use
You would have thought that V Australia would choose the seat Virgin Atlantic pioneered, but they didn’t, and there had to be good reason.

US Airways’ Strong December On-Time Performance
December was a miserable month for just about everyone thanks to awful weather, but US Airways ended up outperforming.

AirTran Adds Flights in Milwaukee
Midwest keeps shrinking but AirTran is jumping in to pick up the slack. The airline announced a slew of new flights.

LAX and United Agree to Free Up Gates
United and LAX have finally settled their long running dispute over gates and more. This can only improve things for passengers at the airport.

Finding Good Usage Numbers for Onboard Wireless Internet
Airlines are cautiously rolling out tests of onboard wireless, but when will we see reliable usage numbers so they can make decisions? Soon.

Is Southwest’s SI Swimsuit Model Airplane Backfiring?
If you see a half-naked woman on a Southwest airplane, it’s not an illusion. It’s an SI swimsuit model, but was it a good idea?

Virgin America Should Be Considered “American” for Now
Alaska is questioning Virgin America’s “American-ness” but I find myself defending the airline. This is just an attempt to push them out of business.


About | Directory | Shop | Credit Cards | Awards | In the News | Ethics | Cranky Concierge
Powered by WordPress | SRS Solutions
 | © 2006-2012 Brett Snyder All Rights Reserved | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy