<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cranky Flier &#187; AirTran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyflier.com/category/airline/airtran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyflier.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Was There a Terrorist Dry Run on an AirTran Plane? (I Think Not)</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/12/07/was-there-a-terrorist-dry-run-on-an-airtran-plane-i-think-not/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/12/07/was-there-a-terrorist-dry-run-on-an-airtran-plane-i-think-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=4041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you guys see this really odd story about some problem passengers on an AirTran flight last month?  I can&#8217;t quite figure out how this thing blew up to the point where people were thinking it was a terrorist dry run, but it looks like the reports were embellished by someone claiming to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys see this really odd story about some problem passengers on an AirTran flight last month?  I can&#8217;t quite figure out how this thing blew up to the point where people were thinking it was a terrorist dry run, but it looks like the reports were embellished by someone claiming to be on the airplane.  (He wasn&#8217;t.)  The email started shooting through cyberspace at lightning speed.  It&#8217;s amazing how false rumors get spread and taken as truth so quickly.  (Just ask Fox News.)</p>
<p>On November 17, AirTran flight 297 was supposed to leave Atlanta at 440p for a flight to Houston.  There <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/4164832784/" title="AirTran Terrorist Dry Run?  I Think Not by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img style="margin: 5px 5px 5px; float:left;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2683/4164832784_652f58fe58_o.jpg" width="214" height="203" alt="AirTran Terrorist Dry Run?  I Think Not" /></a>were some issues on the plane, they pulled some people off to question them, and eventually they let them back on.  According to FlightAware, <a href="http://flightaware.com/live/flight/TRS297/history/20091117/2202Z/KATL/KHOU">AirTran 297 lifted off at 745p</a>.  Seems pretty routine, but then Tedd Petruna stepped in.</p>
<p>Tedd says he was a passenger on that flight, and it was a much more dramatic than what was initially reported.  In <a href="http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/12/so-was-this-a-language-misunde.html">his email regarding the flight</a> (thanks, Airline Biz), Tedd says he was up in first class (AirTran actually has business class, not first, but ok) and he got involved.  </p>
<p>Eleven &#8220;muslim men&#8221; got onboard (how he knew that, I couldn&#8217;t tell you) and scattered throughout the plane.  Apparently one guy up front called to another guy in the back (again, how he knew he called a guy in the back, we&#8217;ll never know) and started speaking loudly in Arabic.  The flight attendants repeatedly told him to turn the cell phone off, but he wouldn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>Then, in the back of the plane, two younger Muslims started watching porn (how the hell did a guy in the front of the plane see this?) and in his eyes, that&#8217;s only allowed right before Jihad (<a href="http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/Muslims-Watch-Porn-Masturbation-sex-toys.htm">apparently not true</a>).</p>
<p>This crap goes on and on until our hero Tedd apparently wrestles the guys to the ground until the TSA and police stormed the airplane.  They took the 11 guys off the plane and removed their bags.  We&#8217;re done, right?  Nope.</p>
<p>The 11 get back on the plane and the crew decided to walk off instead of fly with these guys.  Tedd got up and stormed off the plane as well.  Apparently so many people stormed off the plane that they canceled the flight (we obviously know isn&#8217;t true) and he eventually landed at 1230a (they have no flight that late.)</p>
<p>So without even doing any additional fact-checking, this thing seems highly suspicious.  But it gets even more hi-lariously wrong.  AirTran told the Atlanta Journal Constitution that <a href="http://www.ajc.com/business/airtran-hero-wasn-t-226517.html">Tedd Petruna wasn&#8217;t even on the plane</a> in the first place!  Oh sure, he was supposed to be on it, but he missed his first flight from Akron/Canton to Atlanta, so he ended up not making it to Atlanta until about a half an hour after 297 first tried to leave.</p>
<p>According to AirTran, <a href="http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/12/we-have-two-updates-on.html">it&#8217;s a very different story</a>.  It sounds like these guys weren&#8217;t dressed in any particularly memorable way, and there wasn&#8217;t any sort of fight on the airplane.  No TSA or police officer ever came on the airplane either.  So really, it sounds like a rowdy group of guys who wouldn&#8217;t turn their cell phones off so they pulled them off the plane to check it out.  After they talked to them and checked to make sure they weren&#8217;t a security threat, they let them back on and that was that.</p>
<p>Twelve passengers opted not to travel on that flight, and the crews were swapped (probably because they didn&#8217;t want to fly with these guys), but that was it.</p>
<p>I just wonder why AirTran isn&#8217;t really being more proactive here.  They posted a refutation on their &#8220;internal website&#8221; of each point made by Tedd in his email and they sent it to the media.  I&#8217;m not sure how long of a list that was, but I never saw anything.  I&#8217;d think they would want to get the truth out there, because it sounds like they handled the situation just fine.  As for our hero Tedd, I really have to wonder what the heck he was thinking.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F12%2F07%2Fwas-there-a-terrorist-dry-run-on-an-airtran-plane-i-think-not%2F&amp;linkname=Was%20There%20a%20Terrorist%20Dry%20Run%20on%20an%20AirTran%20Plane%3F%20%28I%20Think%20Not%29"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/12/07/was-there-a-terrorist-dry-run-on-an-airtran-plane-i-think-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allegiant Fights AirTran, Enters Orlando</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/12/02/allegiant-fights-airtran-enters-orlando/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/12/02/allegiant-fights-airtran-enters-orlando/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allegiant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCO - Orlando]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=4016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years we&#8217;ve heard Allegiant proclaim that they don&#8217;t really like competition.  They&#8217;ve often boasted about how few of their routes have competitors, and they&#8217;ve had no qualms about walking away from a route that suddenly performs poorly thanks to new entrants (Greensboro comes to mind).  Now, Allegiant has had enough.  They&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years we&#8217;ve heard Allegiant proclaim that they don&#8217;t really like competition.  They&#8217;ve often boasted about how few of their routes have competitors, and they&#8217;ve had no qualms about walking away from a route that suddenly performs poorly thanks to new entrants (<a href="http://www.digtriad.com/news/local_state/article.aspx?storyid=101521&#038;catid=14">Greensboro comes to mind</a>).  Now, Allegiant has had enough.  They&#8217;ve found some competition from AirTran that they aren&#8217;t willing to shy away from.  They&#8217;re moving some <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Allegiant-Air-Announces-New-prnews-394306967.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">flights from Orlando/Sanford to Orlando International next year</a>.  It&#8217;s war.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/4153510292/" title="Allegiant Starts Orlando Flights by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2519/4153510292_55bf06bba9.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Allegiant Starts Orlando Flights" /></a></div>
<p>Allegiant has a substantial base in Orlando, but the flights go from little-used Sanford Airport on the northeast side of town.  The airport is a really cheap place to operate, and that&#8217;s always good, but there&#8217;s a problem.  The tourist attractions are southwest of town, much closer to the main Orlando International airport.  Now you can understand why Sanford is cheap.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s 50 miles right through downtown Orlando and at least an hour from Sanford to Disney World.  It&#8217;s 25 miles from Orlando International to Disney World and that avoids downtown entirely.  When you have 4 screaming kids in the back wanting to meet Mickey, every few minutes helps.</p>
<p>So now, beginning on Feb 1, they will move flights to 10 of their 31 destinations from Sanford over to Orlando International Airport.  The cities that will be moving?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Knoxville</strong></li>
<li><strong>Lexington</strong></li>
<li><strong>Allentown (Feb 8)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Greenville/Spartanburg (Feb 8)</strong></li>
<li>Grand Rapids (Feb 12)</li>
<li><strong>Springfield, Missouri (Feb 15)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Tri-Cities, Tennessee/Virginia (Feb 15)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Huntington, West Virginia (Feb 16)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Youngstown, Ohio (Mar 4)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Des Moines, Iowa (Mar 5)</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>So how did they pick these markets?  Well, see those lines in bold?  Those are markets where AirTran flies nonstop from Orlando.  I took a couple liberties.  AirTran flies to Branson, not Springfield.  They also fly to Charleston, not Huntington; Akron/Canton, not Youngstown; and Asheville, not Tri-Cities or Greenville/Spartanburg.  But those are all within 100 miles of each other so they are certainly competitive when it comes to leisure travel.</p>
<p>Oh, and that Des Moines flight?  <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-11-30-airtran-des-moines-orlando_N.htm">AirTran just announced it would begin March 6</a>.  Allegiant now starts one day earlier.</p>
<p>Still need more proof that this is a fight against AirTran?  How about this quote from a message sent to the Allegiant employees the night before the public announcement?  (MCO is Orlando International&#8217;s code.)</p>
<blockquote><p>This project has been underway for several months, driven by the activity of a competitor which as you know began serving a number of our Orlando markets to and from MCO.  We believe they view their MCO service provides them with a competitive advantage.  Our MCO offering will level the playing field.  We have developed our Orlando routes over the past five years and as such will react appropriately to provide our customers a service equal to or better than the competitor’s proposed offering.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, we don&#8217;t hear things like this from Allegiant, but I like it.  It&#8217;s one thing to pull out of routes here and there if competition is around, but AirTran is effectively trying to tackle Allegiant&#8217;s routes out of Orlando on the whole.  Allegiant has better flexibility with its airplanes than AirTran thanks to low fixed costs, and it has a strong network of packaging options available to help it get the advantage.  There&#8217;s no reason they shouldn&#8217;t be defending this.</p>
<p>And really, this move to the main airport in Orlando isn&#8217;t out of character.  They already fly to the main airport in Vegas, Ft Lauderdale, and LA.  Yes, Sanford is a cheaper place to operate, but when that family of four wants to go to Disney, that extra drive may be enough to help AirTran succeed.  Allegiant is going to fight that and try to prevent that from happening.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F12%2F02%2Fallegiant-fights-airtran-enters-orlando%2F&amp;linkname=Allegiant%20Fights%20AirTran%2C%20Enters%20Orlando"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/12/02/allegiant-fights-airtran-enters-orlando/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SkyWest to Start Flying for AirTran in Milwaukee</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/11/05/skywest-to-start-selling-flights-under-its-own-name/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/11/05/skywest-to-start-selling-flights-under-its-own-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MKE - Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midwest Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SkyWest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=3872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You cheeseheads may still be hurting from your second Favre-related beatdown this year, but you can rejoice that you now have yet another airline coming to town.  SkyWest (yes, the regional airline) will begin flying for AirTran in Milwaukee.
It&#8217;s very clear that this is happening because of the AirTran deal, but it&#8217;s not your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cheeseheads may still be hurting from your second Favre-related beatdown this year, but you can rejoice that you now have yet another airline coming to town.  <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/SkyWest-Airlines-and-AirTran-prnews-1073468401.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">SkyWest (yes, the regional airline) will begin flying for AirTran</a> in Milwaukee.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very clear that this is happening because of the AirTran deal, but it&#8217;s not your traditional regional contract.  Then again, it&#8217;s not exactly the &#8220;innovative&#8221; and &#8220;groundbreaking&#8221; contract that these guys are proclaiming it is.  This has been done before many times.  The airplanes will say SkyWest on them, but you&#8217;ll have to go to AirTran to book.  It&#8217;s a lot like the deal they had with Delta back in the day.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/4076175351/" title="AirTran and SkyWest Deal in Milwaukee by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2460/4076175351_eb3cedf902_o.jpg" width="500" height="211" alt="AirTran and SkyWest Deal in Milwaukee" /></a></div>
<p>You may remember that SkyWest was flying as Midwest Connect until Republic came in and booted them out.  Like most airlines, SkyWest has more 50 seat jets lying around than they need, so they figured they could just put them back into use on routes they know and love.  Only now, they&#8217;ll get passengers from AirTran instead of Midwest.  </p>
<p>The 50 seaters will fly from Milwaukee to Akron/Canton (Jan 5), Des Moines (Feb 11), Indianapolis (Jan 5), Omaha (Feb 11), Pittsburgh (Dec 4), and St Louis (Dec 4).  All of those are Midwest markets except for Akron/Canton, which is a big airport for AirTran.  Nice.</p>
<p>Some of you may remember AirTran&#8217;s last effort to use 50 seat jets.  Back in 2002, they signed a deal with Air Wisconsin to fly as AirTran Jet Connect.  That ended in 2004 when the airline realized 50 seat jets didn&#8217;t make much money.  Some are already saying that this won&#8217;t work this time around, but this is a totally different model.  This will work out just fine for AirTran, though SkyWest might not be as thrilled.</p>
<p>Before, it was a capacity purchase agreement which meant that AirTran bought the seats to resell under their own name and Air Wisconsin received a guaranteed profit.  Now, it&#8217;s a prorate agreement.  SkyWest is flying these routes at its own risk and AirTran gets to share in the revenue.  So SkyWest has a big burden here while AirTran has none.</p>
<p>If you listen to the AirTran pilots, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AirTran-Pilots-Outsourcing-bw-2972123343.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">this is the end of the world</a>.  Their press release says &#8220;Outsourcing: Bad for Business.&#8221;  Hmm, not so sure about that.  They do say that AirTran passengers expect to be flown on AirTran planes and that means XM Radio, wireless internet, and business class.  Hmm, maybe, but they aren&#8217;t going to get that from Milwaukee to these cities.  </p>
<p>Granted, Pittsburgh, Indy, and St Louis have mainline service from AirTran right now, so this tells me that those flights are really weak.  It&#8217;s either a 50 seater that has a shot at making money or no service at all.  I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s good for business with that perspective.</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s AirTran&#8217;s fault that the pilots are responding this way.  Back when they discontinued JetConnect, AirTran said they &#8220;<a href="http://pressroom.airtran.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=201565&#038;p=irol-newsArticle_print&#038;ID=886265&#038;highlight=">could operate the Boeing 717 more efficiently</a> than the Canadair regional jets in short-haul markets.&#8221;  They may have thought that sounded good at the time, but now the AirTran pilots want them to stand by that statement.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for the pilots, that&#8217;s just not true.  When <a href="http://pressroom.airtran.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=201565&#038;p=irol-newsArticle_Print&#038;ID=886460&#038;highlight=">AirTran started JetConnect, they served three cities</a> &#8211; Pensacola, Greensboro, and Savannah.  Only Pensacola is still served by AirTran today.  I guess those 717s didn&#8217;t work out as well as they hoped on those lighter routes.</p>
<p>In my mind, this comes down to just a couple of things.  SkyWest has a bunch of 50 seaters lying around and is desperate to find a home for them.  AirTran wants to continue to put the squeeze on Midwest in Milwaukee.  Combine the two and, voila, you have a plan.</p>
<p>Will this work?  If I had to place bets, I&#8217;d guess no, but hey, I&#8217;ve been wrong before.  If I&#8217;m AirTran, I love this deal since I have absolutely no risk and I get to strengthen my network out of Milwaukee.  If I&#8217;m SkyWest, well, it&#8217;s the best I can get right now, and that&#8217;s scary.</p>
<p>[Updated 11/5 @ 809s to clarify that this won't be sold under the SkyWest code]</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F11%2F05%2Fskywest-to-start-selling-flights-under-its-own-name%2F&amp;linkname=SkyWest%20to%20Start%20Flying%20for%20AirTran%20in%20Milwaukee"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/11/05/skywest-to-start-selling-flights-under-its-own-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Want to Try Wifi Onboard, You&#8217;ll Have Plenty of Free Chances</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/11/03/if-you-want-to-try-wifi-onboard-youll-have-plenty-of-free-chances/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/11/03/if-you-want-to-try-wifi-onboard-youll-have-plenty-of-free-chances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflight Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=3851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s no surprise that when you make something completely free, people use it a lot more often than if you make them pay.  Duh.  And that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s not surprising to see airlines scrambling to find a way to offer wireless internet for free.  Just in the last few days, we&#8217;ve seen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no surprise that when you make something completely free, people use it a lot more often than if you make them pay.  Duh.  And that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s not surprising to see airlines scrambling to find a way to offer wireless internet for free.  Just in the last few days, we&#8217;ve seen three promotions that will let anyone log on from 30,000 feet without paying a dime.</p>
<p>First up was Virgin America.  They teamed up with Google to offer the most robust opportunity so far.  <a href="http://google.virginamerica.com/">Wireless connectivity will be free</a> for anyone traveling between November 10 and January 15.  Just turn on your computer and follow the instructions.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://news.cheapflights.com/airlines/2009/10/american-airlines-and-lexus-offer-free-inflight-wireless.html">American has joined with Lexus to offer free wireless</a> as well . . . but only for a week.  Lexus is promoting a new line of cars with free wifi from now through November 7.  Remember, American has wifi on a lot more aircraft than Virgin America, so this is still a sizable promotion.  It&#8217;s just a lot shorter.  And on this one, it&#8217;s not automatically free.  You have to enter code 2010LEXUSLS.</p>
<p>The last one I&#8217;ve seen is from AirTran.  They are being a little more conservative still.  The deal on AirTran is that if you <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AirTran-Airways-Introduces-prnews-3909867285.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">pay for wifi on one flight, you&#8217;ll get a second one fre</a>e.  That&#8217;s probably the least attractive of the three opportunities here, but the end goal is the same.</p>
<p>Airlines are trying to stimulate wifi use, and really they should.  Remember, once an airline hits on a great idea, the others will jump in and copy.  So those airlines that have wifi now will have a limited opportunity to showcase their differentation.  Eventually, everyone will have this.  </p>
<p>Getting people to try onboard wifi is something that the airlines hope can attract people to their airline.  If they&#8217;re going to do it, now is the time.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fif-you-want-to-try-wifi-onboard-youll-have-plenty-of-free-chances%2F&amp;linkname=If%20You%20Want%20to%20Try%20Wifi%20Onboard%2C%20You%26%238217%3Bll%20Have%20Plenty%20of%20Free%20Chances"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/11/03/if-you-want-to-try-wifi-onboard-youll-have-plenty-of-free-chances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JetBlue Tweaks Its Colors While AirTran Unveils a Beauty (Airplane P*rn)</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/10/14/jetblue-tweaks-its-colors-while-airtran-unveils-a-beauty-airplane-porn/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/10/14/jetblue-tweaks-its-colors-while-airtran-unveils-a-beauty-airplane-porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airplane Porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JetBlue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=3746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess what time it is, kids?  It&#8217;s airplane p*rn time!  (Yes, that&#8217;s now with an asterisk to try to circumvent corporate filters.)  You know how much I love airplane p*rn, and we&#8217;ve got two good ones this week with JetBlue and AirTran.  Let&#8217;s start with JetBlue.
The buzz started last week that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what time it is, kids?  It&#8217;s airplane p*rn time!  (Yes, that&#8217;s now with an asterisk to try to circumvent corporate filters.)  You know how much I love airplane p*rn, and we&#8217;ve got two good ones this week with JetBlue and AirTran.  Let&#8217;s start with JetBlue.</p>
<p>The buzz started last week that JetBlue would be rolling out a brand new livery for its whole fleet in celebration of the airline&#8217;s upcoming 10th anniversary.  It turns out the hype was a little too much for what it actually was, and in my mind that&#8217;s a good thing.  It wasn&#8217;t so much a new livery as it is a tweak on the old one.  And really, what was wrong with the old one?  Not much.  But they made some good improvements.  Take a look.  First, they rolled out a new tail to add to their family of tails.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jetblue/4009269277/" title="JetBlue livery reveal in Orlando by jetblueflickr, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3066/4009269277_74bd73e710.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="JetBlue livery reveal in Orlando" /></a></div>
<p>I like this one.  The white on the tail makes it stand out, and it fits the brand very well.  This will just be a new tail to add to the stable, so it will go on some airplanes, just like all the existing tails.  But they also made changes to the rest of the airplane.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jetblue/4010185864/" title="IMG_0409 by jetblueflickr, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2653/4010185864_e95a47d1a6.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="JetBlue new livery" /></a></div>
<p>Can&#8217;t tell the difference?  Let me refresh your memory.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jetblue/695964379/" title="JetBlue's first Boston to Aruba flight touches down! by jetblueflickr, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1247/695964379_04b57c723c.jpg" width="500" height="393" alt="JetBlue's first Boston to Aruba flight touches down!" /></a></div>
<p>The changes are small.  The little Jetblue titles are now much bigger and visible.  Also, the two tone gray/blue title is now all blue.  I think it makes the name more recognizable, and that&#8217;s good.  Also, you&#8217;ll notice that the website on the engines has morphed from www.jetblue.com to jetblue.com and it&#8217;s bigger as well.  So, not really any huge changes but they didn&#8217;t need them.</p>
<p>This is a good change.  It will be rolled out very slowly.  When planes go into the paint shop, they&#8217;ll get the tweaks (not necessarily the tail), so it will take awhile.  And there will be more tails coming.  An employee contest will be held to design a new one.  Let&#8217;s just hope they do better than when America West let a kid <a href="http://travel.webshots.com/photo/1131834037043463641IZagVg">design the Teamwork plane</a>.  That was awful.  </p>
<p>But if you want to see a truly spectacular new livery, look no further than AirTran which has painted a 717 in the colors of the Atlanta Falcons.  This thing looks like a rocket, and the new black fuselage is just awesome.  It&#8217;s too bad this is only on a 717.  That means we won&#8217;t see it out here in LA.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/4009895581/" title="AirTran Sponsors Falcons (Nose) by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3496/4009895581_84d3403de9.jpg" width="500" height="281" alt="AirTran Sponsors Falcons (Nose)" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/4010662830/" title="AirTrans Sponsors Falcons (Tail) by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2492/4010662830_5ee53032d2.jpg" width="500" height="281" alt="AirTrans Sponsors Falcons (Tail)" /></a></div>
<p>AirTran sent me these pictures, but I have no idea why they didn&#8217;t send one of a full body shot.  Click here to see a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ord2sxm/4007305122/">great shot from Mario Rodriguez</a> of the airplane taking off (or should I say, launching).</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F10%2F14%2Fjetblue-tweaks-its-colors-while-airtran-unveils-a-beauty-airplane-porn%2F&amp;linkname=JetBlue%20Tweaks%20Its%20Colors%20While%20AirTran%20Unveils%20a%20Beauty%20%28Airplane%20P%2Arn%29"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/10/14/jetblue-tweaks-its-colors-while-airtran-unveils-a-beauty-airplane-porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Onboard Wifi Update</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/08/25/an-onboard-wifi-update/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/08/25/an-onboard-wifi-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JetBlue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=3415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m at the National Business Travel Association (NBTA) conference this week, and I spent awhile chatting with the folks at AirCell (provider of wifi fun) yesterday.  That made me think it was a good time for a wifi update, especially since there has been so much news lately.
Delta and American continue to make progress [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m at the National Business Travel Association (NBTA) conference this week, and I spent awhile chatting with the folks at AirCell (provider of wifi fun) yesterday.  That made me think it was a good time for a wifi update, especially since there has been so much news lately.</p>
<p>Delta and American continue to make progress while Southwest has announced it&#8217;s outfitting the full fleet.  But the fleet coverage numbers that airlines throw out can be misleading, so I thought I&#8217;d break it down further.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with this chart showing what percent of the fleet currently has wifi installed by airline.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/3843288056/" title="Onboard Wifi as of Aug 09 (including Express) by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2475/3843288056_91b5c9bbdc_o.jpg" width="500" height="226" alt="Onboard Wifi as of Aug 09 (including Express)" /></a></div>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice that these numbers look WAY different from what the airlines tell you.  For example, Delta just announced that it was north of 70% but I&#8217;m showing 16%.  What gives?  Well, Delta has it installed on 70% of the pre-merger mainline fleet.  In this number, I&#8217;ve included the Northwest fleet and the vast fleet of Delta Connection regional jets and props that have no wifi at all.  While the regional fleet probably won&#8217;t see wifi, the <a href="http://blog.delta.com/2009/08/20/the-latest-wings-with-wi-fi-anniversary-edition/">first Northwest aircraft goes in for modification on 10/1</a>.</p>
<p>AirTran and Virgin America remain the only airlines with 100% completion, though it was a lot easier for Virgin America with only 28 planes than it was for AirTran with 136 planes.  Oh, and remember, Virgin America has power outlets so they already have a leg up.</p>
<p>American has just passed <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/American-Airlines-Continues-prnews-3330764959.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">100 MD-80s with the system</a> along with the 15 767-200s flying across the country.  talking to AirCell today, I was told that they&#8217;re doing 1 or 2 a day, so they keep marching quickly.  They will have 150 MD-80s, and I believe that&#8217;s the only plan so far.</p>
<p>Alaska is still just in test mode, but they have indicated that they want to go fleetwide eventually.  </p>
<p>Southwest is also still in test mode, but they just announced that they would be <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Southwest-Airlines-Takes-Next-prnews-3259320761.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">rolling this out fleetwide beginning in 2010</a>.  There is no timeline for completion, but hopefully they can install this quicker than they can paint airplanes in their new colors.</p>
<p>Continental and JetBlue are in the same boat.  They are both tied to the LiveTV inflight entertainment system, and that can include narrow-band access for free onboard.  That means you can check email, use IM, and visit a couple websites but that&#8217;s about it.  JetBlue still only has it on one airplane but they&#8217;ll begin rolling it out soon throughout the fleet.  I know Continental has LiveTV on most of its 737-900s now, but they don&#8217;t have wifi of any kind yet.</p>
<p>United had announced that its flights from <a href="http://www.united.com/press/detail/0,6862,60184,00.html">New York to LA and San Francisco will have internet</a> but that hasn&#8217;t happened yet.  US Airways will put it on their A321 fleet as well, but that hasn&#8217;t begun either.</p>
<p>So if you want wifi, AirTran and Virgin America are your best bet with Delta and American following.  Of course, it remains to be seen how many people want wifi and more importantly, are willing to pay for it.  I asked AirCell for usage numbers, but of course, they couldn&#8217;t provide that.  Bummer.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F08%2F25%2Fan-onboard-wifi-update%2F&amp;linkname=An%20Onboard%20Wifi%20Update"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/08/25/an-onboard-wifi-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delta, US Airways, Continental, and AirTran Swap DC and NY Slots</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/08/13/delta-us-airways-continental-and-airtran-swap-dc-and-ny-slots/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/08/13/delta-us-airways-continental-and-airtran-swap-dc-and-ny-slots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCA - Washington/National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGA - New York/La Guardia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Airways]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=3363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#8217;t August supposed to be a pretty light month for airline news?  This week has been absolutely packed with headlines, and I&#8217;m getting tired.  Today I&#8217;m rolling a couple stories together that involve slot swaps.  One (between US Airways and Delta) is huge while the other (between Continental and AirTran) is more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t August supposed to be a pretty light month for airline news?  This week has been absolutely packed with headlines, and I&#8217;m getting tired.  Today I&#8217;m rolling a couple stories together that involve slot swaps.  One (between US Airways and Delta) is huge while the other (between Continental and AirTran) is more of a minor thing.  But one thing is clear &#8211; things are really moving these days.</p>
<p>The big news is the Delta/US Airways slot swap.  Remember the good old days when US Airways was the &#8220;big bad predator&#8221; and Delta employees wanted to &#8220;Keep Delta My Delta&#8221;?  Apparently those wounds have healed and now they&#8217;re playing nice with each other.  The basic plan is this &#8211; Delta gives its Washington/National (DCA) operation to US Airways and US Airways gives its New York/LaGuardia (LGA) operation to Delta.  Delta also had to throw in route authorities for Tokyo and Sao Paulo and they wanted a Pete Rose rookie card to even things out.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/3815683687/" title="Delta US Airways Bargain by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3492/3815683687_a8c6cb22a9_o.jpg" width="500" height="351" alt="Delta US Airways Bargain" /></a></div>
<p>Why are they doing this?  Well, Delta wants to &#8220;win&#8221; New York (if there is such a thing).  US Airways, meanwhile, thinks the DCA slots can make them a lot more money.  Ok, fine.  It&#8217;s probably a smart move for both considering their strategies.  I <a href="http://industry.bnet.com/travel/10003125/what-us-airways-stands-to-gain-from-its-slot-swap-with-delta/">talk about that more over on BNET</a> today.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/US-Airways-Announces-Slot-bw-1499882459.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">US Airways will give up 125 slot pairs</a> (one pair = one takeoff and one landing) at LaGuardia along with its terminal.  Those slots are currently used for US Airways Express flights that buzz around the Northeast, primarily in turboprops.  Here is what stays and what goes:</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/3816335958/" title="US Airways Changes at LaGuardia by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2664/3816335958_af7860162a_o.jpg" width="499" height="141" alt="US Airways Changes at LaGuardia" /></a></div>
<p>Everything else will go to Delta, and it remains to be seen how exactly they&#8217;ll use them.  They do say, however, that they&#8217;ll add or preserve service to 30 smaller cities, including a dozen cities not currently served by US Airways from LaGuardia.  They also say they&#8217;ll upgrade the props to jets and end up squeezing more than 2 million additional people a year through the airport without increasing flights.  Hmm.</p>
<p>So Delta will set up what they&#8217;re <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Delta-Reinforces-New-York-prnews-1641366915.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">calling a domestic hub at LGA</a> with an international one at JFK.   That&#8217;s, uh, not ideal, especially when compared to Continental&#8217;s single facility at Newark.  But JFK will apparently continue as is for now and LGA will just see more flying to smaller cities.  Delta really thinks they can make a go of it.  </p>
<p>In terms of facilities, US Airways Shuttle will use the Marine Air Terminal (where Delta currently flies its Shuttle) and the other flights will go into Terminal D gates 7, 8, and 9.  Delta will take over US Airways&#8217; current terminal and pour some money into it to fix it up.  (Hey, maybe you guys should pour money into that dump over at JFK instead.)</p>
<p>Down at DCA, it&#8217;s a different story.  US Airways will pick up 42 slot pairs to add to the 175ish that they currently have.  Here&#8217;s what they&#8217;ll add:</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/3816367368/" title="US Airways New Cities from Washington/National by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2541/3816367368_9490ec35c0_o.jpg" width="454" height="173" alt="US Airways New Cities from Washington/National" /></a></div>
<p>They will operate these with Embraer 190s or A319s, so it&#8217;s going to involve bigger aircraft than what Delta is using today.  As far as facilities go, they need to ask the airport for facilities &#8211; Delta doesn&#8217;t own anything to give to US airways there, but this shouldn&#8217;t be a problem.  US Airways is currently profitable at National and they expect this move to add to the bottom line to the tune of $75 million.  </p>
<p>Delta will keep flying to its hubs and &#8220;select small communities.&#8221;  Man, Delta is really being cryptic here, and it&#8217;s a pretty stark contrast to US Airways.  I wish Delta was nearly as open as US Airways has been, but until then we&#8217;ll have to just keep guessing at exactly what they&#8217;re going to do.</p>
<p>But this slot swap wasn&#8217;t quite even, so US Airways has also received a route authority to fly to Sao Paulo.  (They&#8217;ll go from Charlotte.)  They also get slots to fly into Tokyo/Narita which they&#8217;ll run from Phoenix . . . eventually.  The plan for Tokyo is to start in 2012.  Until then, the slot will be subleased back to Delta.  They can really start whenever they want, but they figured that it will be 2012 before air travel to Asia has recovered.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s it.  No cash changed hands or anything else.  It&#8217;s just a swap that works for both airlines.  This is subject to government approval, and it likely won&#8217;t happen until 2010, so transition plans aren&#8217;t known just yet.</p>
<p>We also have to talk about <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AirTran-Airways-Announces-New-prnews-1958440914.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">Continental and AirTran</a>.  AirTran will be pulling out of Newark completely.  Its 10 slots will go to Continental.  In exchange, AirTran will get what looks to be 6 slots at LaGuardia (for flights to Indy and Orlando) as well as six slots at National (to be used for Orlando and Atlanta).  This one makes perfect sense as they play to their strengths.  Continental fortifies Newark while AirTran builds in LGA and DCA.  AirTran&#8217;s service in Newark ends on 10/25 and picks up in DCA/LGA on 11/4.</p>
<p>What a week &#8211; my head is spinning.</p>
<p><em>[Original photos: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tiagochediak/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tiagochediak/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">CC BY 2.0</a> and <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/can10kon10/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/can10kon10/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/">CC BY-SA 2.0</a>]</em></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F08%2F13%2Fdelta-us-airways-continental-and-airtran-swap-dc-and-ny-slots%2F&amp;linkname=Delta%2C%20US%20Airways%2C%20Continental%2C%20and%20AirTran%20Swap%20DC%20and%20NY%20Slots"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/08/13/delta-us-airways-continental-and-airtran-swap-dc-and-ny-slots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airplane Porn: Mark Literally on AirTran</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/07/03/airplane-porn-mark-literally-on-airtran/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/07/03/airplane-porn-mark-literally-on-airtran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airplane Porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=3051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going light on my post today since it&#8217;s officially a holiday here in the US.  What better way to kick off the holiday weekend than with a little airplane porn?
This time, there actually is a person involved, but fortunately, he is fully clothed.  Apparently, AirTran is really happy that Mark Malkoff made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going light on my post today since it&#8217;s officially a holiday here in the US.  What better way to kick off the holiday weekend than with a little airplane porn?</p>
<p>This time, there actually is a person involved, but fortunately, he is fully clothed.  Apparently, AirTran is really happy that <a href="http://markonairtran.com/">Mark Malkoff made it through June</a> without a hitch.  This has been great publicity for the airline and its wifi efforts, and they&#8217;ve decided to commemorate the event with a giant picture of Mark, <em>literally</em> on AirTran.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/crankyflier/3679440957/" title="Mark Literally on AirTran by brettsnyder, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3626/3679440957_132e7af5a6.jpg" width="500" height="400" alt="Mark Literally on AirTran" /></a></div>
<p>That&#8217;s Mark&#8217;s wife, who appears to be rather happy to have her husband back despite the fact that he hasn&#8217;t seen a shower since May.  </p>
<p>I hope everyone enjoys their 4th here in the US.  (And for my British readers, I hope you aren&#8217;t still too bitter &#8211; it has, after all, been more than 230 years.  You know we still love you.)</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F07%2F03%2Fairplane-porn-mark-literally-on-airtran%2F&amp;linkname=Airplane%20Porn%3A%20Mark%20Literally%20on%20AirTran"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/07/03/airplane-porn-mark-literally-on-airtran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Cranky Podcast &#8211; Mark Malkoff Calls From an AirTran Lav</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/06/24/first-cranky-podcast-mark-malkoff-calls-from-an-airtran-lav/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/06/24/first-cranky-podcast-mark-malkoff-calls-from-an-airtran-lav/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=3002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It turns out that my challenge to meet with Mark Malkoff, the man spending a month straight on AirTran airplanes, has paid off . . . sort of.  It wasn&#8217;t in person, so I couldn&#8217;t bring him any food, but he did call me from an AirTran lav Tuesday afternoon and we spoke for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out that <a href="http://crankyflier.com/2009/06/22/a-challenge-for-mark-malkoff-airtran-passenger-extraordinaire/">my challenge to meet with Mark Malkoff</a>, the man spending a month straight on AirTran airplanes, has paid off . . . sort of.  It wasn&#8217;t in person, so I couldn&#8217;t bring him any food, but he did call me from an AirTran lav Tuesday afternoon and we spoke for just shy of 20 minutes.  Once we finished, I realized that it was basically a podcast.  So, I slapped some music on there, recorded an intro, and here it is in all its glory:</p>
<div align="center"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.google.com/reader/ui/3247397568-audio-player.swf?audioUrl=http://crankyflier.com/files/Mark%20Malkoff%20Interview.mp3" width="400" height="27" allowscriptaccess="never" quality="best" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="window" flashvars="playerMode=embedded" /></p>
<div style="font-size:small;">If you can&#8217;t see it, go to the post directly or <a href="http://crankyflier.com/files/Mark%20Malkoff%20Interview.mp3">click here for a direct link</a></div>
</div>
<p><BR></p>
<p>Shortly after I put my post up, I received an email back from the PR team apologizing that they couldn&#8217;t make it happen.  They could, however, get me on the phone with him that afternoon during a layover at LaGuardia.  Perfect.  Not having any fancy recording equipment, I simply put my speakerphone next to my computer and recorded the whole thing.  I know, I&#8217;m so technologically advanced.  But it worked.</p>
<p>We talked about his fear of flying (&#8220;I&#8217;d say my anxiety is dwindling by the day&#8221;), the pain of being alone at night (&#8220;I feel like Jack Nicholson in The Shining&#8221;), and yes even whether he prefers the 717 or the 737 (&#8220;What is it?  7 what?&#8221;).  Ok, so maybe he doesn&#8217;t quite have the dork gene himself, but it&#8217;s an entertaining conversation.</p>
<p>Mark did mention that wifi is the only thing keeping him sane.  (Considering the number of times wifi came up in the conversation, I&#8217;ll assume AirTran must give him food only when he mentions it.)  If you&#8217;d like to help keep him busy up there, you can hop on Twitter and start bugging him at <a href="http://twitter.com/mmalkoff">@mmalkoff</a>.  You can follow him online at <a href="http://markonairtran.com/">http://markonairtran.com/</a>.</p>
<p>And let me know your thoughts on the first podcast.  I know it&#8217;s long, so if you do get all the way through, send me a note and tell me what you think.  Not sure I&#8217;ll be doing this often, but it could be kind of fun.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F06%2F24%2Ffirst-cranky-podcast-mark-malkoff-calls-from-an-airtran-lav%2F&amp;linkname=First%20Cranky%20Podcast%20%26%238211%3B%20Mark%20Malkoff%20Calls%20From%20an%20AirTran%20Lav"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/06/24/first-cranky-podcast-mark-malkoff-calls-from-an-airtran-lav/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://crankyflier.com/files/Mark%20Malkoff%20Interview.mp3" length="18537825" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Challenge For Mark Malkoff, AirTran Passenger Extraordinaire</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/06/22/a-challenge-for-mark-malkoff-airtran-passenger-extraordinaire/</link>
		<comments>http://crankyflier.com/2009/06/22/a-challenge-for-mark-malkoff-airtran-passenger-extraordinaire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirTran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=2914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever heard of comedian Mark Malkoff?  Neither have I, and I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s why he was willing to subject himself to some of the worst torture ever invented.  Waterboarding?  Nay.  He&#8217;s spending 30 days on an airplane.  And this isn&#8217;t on some fancy corporate jet.  It&#8217;s on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever heard of comedian Mark Malkoff?  Neither have I, and I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s why he was willing to subject himself to some of the worst torture ever invented.  Waterboarding?  Nay.  He&#8217;s spending <a href="http://www.markonairtran.com/">30 days on an airplane</a>.  And this isn&#8217;t on some fancy corporate jet.  It&#8217;s on AirTran.  And now I&#8217;ve got a challenge for him.</p>
<p>This is actually a great promotion.  AirTran wants to promote their new plan to outfit their entire fleet with wifi by the summer, and Mark, well, he gets to be the guinea pig.  He&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.markonairtran.com/">posting videos from the plane</a> (many of which are actually funny), sending tweets, blogging, and more.  It&#8217;s actually pretty clever.</p>
<p>Now, why Mark would subject himself to this, I have no idea.  He says he&#8217;s afraid to fly and this will help him get over it, but I wouldn&#8217;t be so sure about that.  If he&#8217;s spending 30 days in coach, that might send him into the fetal position for life.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it works.  He&#8217;s not sticking with one single airplane but rather moving around from plane to plane in order to keep himself flying.  Sometimes he flies on redeyes, but on other days, he sleeps in an airplane in the hangar at night.  Either way, he&#8217;s not leaving an airplane for longer than it takes to walk to another one.  He did, however, get himself a shower the other day . . . from the fire department at Flint Airport.</p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZyXvAMblCCw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZyXvAMblCCw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
<p>Some of the other videos show him washing his hair with a bottle of water over the toilet in the lav.  He borrows shaving cream from a passenger in another clip.  I personally liked the video clip where they presented him with elite status after only three days in the air.  Pretty impressive, and hopefully that means he gets free upgrades.</p>
<p>The only thing that makes me bitter?  I was contacted about the promotion by a PR agency for AirTran trying to get me to write about it, so I asked if he would be coming to LA.  He was, but after I asked for a short interview while he was there <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laughingsquid/562411329/" title="Double-Double Animal Style + Fries by laughingsquid, on Flickr"><img style="margin: 5px 5px 5px; float:left;" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1055/562411329_ccfb14c6fe_m.jpg" width="240" height="180" alt="Double-Double Animal Style + Fries" /></a>they said they&#8217;d look into it and I never heard another peep.  According to his blog, he was busy <a href="http://markmalkoff.com/blog/?p=31">hanging out with Lisa Loeb</a>.  Booo on you.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not above resorting to bribery.  Mark &#8211; If you come back to LA again on this trip, I&#8217;ll bring you an In &#8216;n Out Burger, no, make it a Double Double.  Look at that burger.  You know you want one.  I&#8217;m out of town June 24 &#8211; 28, so you don&#8217;t have many days left to take me up on this offer.</p>
<p><em>[Update 6/22 @ 9a:  Hmm, so I understand he's a vegetarian.  This Double Double bribe clearly won't work.  Fortunately, In 'n Out makes a mean Grilled Cheese that is loved by vegetarians the world over.  How 'bout that, Mark?]</em></p>
<p>[Photo courtesy of <a href="http://laughingsquid.com/">Scott Beale / Laughing Squid</a> via Flickr]</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrankyflier.com%2F2009%2F06%2F22%2Fa-challenge-for-mark-malkoff-airtran-passenger-extraordinaire%2F&amp;linkname=A%20Challenge%20For%20Mark%20Malkoff%2C%20AirTran%20Passenger%20Extraordinaire"><img src="http://crankyflier.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crankyflier.com/2009/06/22/a-challenge-for-mark-malkoff-airtran-passenger-extraordinaire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
