<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Southwest to Get More Gates in Los Angeles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travel News: Week of January 30th, 2013 - Johnny Jet</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-584359</link>
		<dc:creator>Travel News: Week of January 30th, 2013 - Johnny Jet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-584359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Southwest to get more gates in Los Angeles [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Southwest to get more gates in Los Angeles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packers and Movers in Gurgaon</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-580921</link>
		<dc:creator>Packers and Movers in Gurgaon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-580921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They could actually do the connection or reserve the space and create a stub corridor that can then be used once they decide to connect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could actually do the connection or reserve the space and create a stub corridor that can then be used once they decide to connect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEAN</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579797</link>
		<dc:creator>SEAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US did use gate 12 at one time for it&#039;s CLT &amp; PHL flights as well as 4B as that was a HP gate along with 9, 11&amp; 13, now WN will have the whole terminal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US did use gate 12 at one time for it&#8217;s CLT &amp; PHL flights as well as 4B as that was a HP gate along with 9, 11&amp; 13, now WN will have the whole terminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579751</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s so strange, Nick.  I did write that, but I can&#039;t find it.  How weird.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so strange, Nick.  I did write that, but I can&#8217;t find it.  How weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Trinkle</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579711</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Trinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USAir built the club just after the PSA merger, taking a chunk of Gate 2 for it. PSA originally had the entire west side of T1 (even numbered gates) so it was fine for that.

After the cutbacks, USAir ended up at gates at the end but kept the club. The club was closed for a short period (April 2005 through 2006-ish) but reopened after the AWA merger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USAir built the club just after the PSA merger, taking a chunk of Gate 2 for it. PSA originally had the entire west side of T1 (even numbered gates) so it was fine for that.</p>
<p>After the cutbacks, USAir ended up at gates at the end but kept the club. The club was closed for a short period (April 2005 through 2006-ish) but reopened after the AWA merger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579697</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s really not that far...maybe three or four minutes to the US gates from the club.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really not that far&#8230;maybe three or four minutes to the US gates from the club.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Barnard</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579550</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay two questions:
1. WTF was US Airways thinking not keeping their gates near their club?

2. Wasn&#039;t there a fancy pansy CF designed rearrangement of all the airlines at LAX so all of the alliances would share terminals.. I can&#039;t seem to find it for the life of me..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay two questions:<br />
1. WTF was US Airways thinking not keeping their gates near their club?</p>
<p>2. Wasn&#8217;t there a fancy pansy CF designed rearrangement of all the airlines at LAX so all of the alliances would share terminals.. I can&#8217;t seem to find it for the life of me..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579466</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see any US Airways airplanes using gate 12 now and I really don&#039;t see 4B either.  There really are so few flights these days.  There are no more than 6 a day to Phoenix, 5 to Charlotte, and 5 to Philly.  Three gates works for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any US Airways airplanes using gate 12 now and I really don&#8217;t see 4B either.  There really are so few flights these days.  There are no more than 6 a day to Phoenix, 5 to Charlotte, and 5 to Philly.  Three gates works for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579465</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Todd is right - it&#039;s all common use stuff in T6 (except for the neck which United controls) but Alaska has preferential use.  I believe T2 and T3 are mostly common use as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd is right &#8211; it&#8217;s all common use stuff in T6 (except for the neck which United controls) but Alaska has preferential use.  I believe T2 and T3 are mostly common use as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2013/01/22/southwest-to-get-more-gates-in-los-angeles/comment-page-1/#comment-579464</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=11055#comment-579464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MeanMeosh - There are two lines that can snake outside.  The first is the security line, and if they add more lanes or create more inside waiting areas, then that will stop snaking.  The second is the baggage check line.  If they take over more counter space as part of this deal, then that could go away as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MeanMeosh &#8211; There are two lines that can snake outside.  The first is the security line, and if they add more lanes or create more inside waiting areas, then that will stop snaking.  The second is the baggage check line.  If they take over more counter space as part of this deal, then that could go away as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
