<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fly.com is a New Travel Search Engine Without Much Differentiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyflier.com/2009/02/17/flycom-is-a-new-travel-search-engine-without-much-differentiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/02/17/flycom-is-a-new-travel-search-engine-without-much-differentiation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:59:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Travel</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/02/17/flycom-is-a-new-travel-search-engine-without-much-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-70954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=2078#comment-70954</guid>
		<description>Arg, fantastic comparison.

Fly.com has a LOT of balls for actually releasing such a site to the public. Either they think we are all morons, or the company is ran by morons.

Absurd.

When I first went to fly.com, I immediately took a screen shot. If you opace the fly.com site with sidestep.com, it is almost identical. They hardly even moved anything, let alone changed functionality.

I am still in disbelief at the lack of innovation at TravelZoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arg, fantastic comparison.</p>
<p>Fly.com has a LOT of balls for actually releasing such a site to the public. Either they think we are all morons, or the company is ran by morons.</p>
<p>Absurd.</p>
<p>When I first went to fly.com, I immediately took a screen shot. If you opace the fly.com site with sidestep.com, it is almost identical. They hardly even moved anything, let alone changed functionality.</p>
<p>I am still in disbelief at the lack of innovation at TravelZoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perr</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/02/17/flycom-is-a-new-travel-search-engine-without-much-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-70943</link>
		<dc:creator>Perr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=2078#comment-70943</guid>
		<description>Funny one, I guess I have to do some travel then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny one, I guess I have to do some travel then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/02/17/flycom-is-a-new-travel-search-engine-without-much-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-70645</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=2078#comment-70645</guid>
		<description>check it out....looks like kayak.com is down.  I wonder if this is purely coincidental...
Kayak.com is temporarily unavailable

Our engineers are upgrading our website to add some exciting new product features and improvements. Please grab a cup of coffee and come back to try us again in a few minutes.

Or, you can search hundreds of travel sites the old way, by visiting each one, one at a time. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check it out&#8230;.looks like kayak.com is down.  I wonder if this is purely coincidental&#8230;<br />
Kayak.com is temporarily unavailable</p>
<p>Our engineers are upgrading our website to add some exciting new product features and improvements. Please grab a cup of coffee and come back to try us again in a few minutes.</p>
<p>Or, you can search hundreds of travel sites the old way, by visiting each one, one at a time. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/02/17/flycom-is-a-new-travel-search-engine-without-much-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-70644</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=2078#comment-70644</guid>
		<description>I usually travel mostly for pleasure, so I follow the &quot;go where it&#039;s cheap&quot; line of thinking.

Kayak is a great tool for that.  Two things I love about are the fare alerts - which emails you when fares drop below a set price, and the &quot;buzz&quot; feature, which lets you drill down the fares that others have found to various regions.

Don&#039;t see either of those on fly.com.  - so why would I even bother when Kayak has been my &quot;starter search too&quot; for years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually travel mostly for pleasure, so I follow the &#8220;go where it&#8217;s cheap&#8221; line of thinking.</p>
<p>Kayak is a great tool for that.  Two things I love about are the fare alerts &#8211; which emails you when fares drop below a set price, and the &#8220;buzz&#8221; feature, which lets you drill down the fares that others have found to various regions.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t see either of those on fly.com.  &#8211; so why would I even bother when Kayak has been my &#8220;starter search too&#8221; for years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2009/02/17/flycom-is-a-new-travel-search-engine-without-much-differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-70642</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=2078#comment-70642</guid>
		<description>Luv your blog, CF (in SouthWest speak).
It seems like a decent price to acquire the unique name (fly.com) and the kayak-like interface.  I don&#039;t know the details, but it&#039;s possible that the Kayak owners licensed their site to fly.com, or even were the owners of that site.  Either way, it&#039;s cool to own the fly.com name.  Domain name trivia:

World&#039;s most expensive domain names
1. Sex.com, $12m - purchased in 2005
2. Porn.com, $9.5m - purchased in 2007
3. Business.com, $7.5m - purchased in 1999
4. Diamond.com, $7.5m - purchased in 2006
5. Beer.com, $7m - purchased in 1999 
source: http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/02/07/domain-name-fetches-record-price</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luv your blog, CF (in SouthWest speak).<br />
It seems like a decent price to acquire the unique name (fly.com) and the kayak-like interface.  I don&#8217;t know the details, but it&#8217;s possible that the Kayak owners licensed their site to fly.com, or even were the owners of that site.  Either way, it&#8217;s cool to own the fly.com name.  Domain name trivia:</p>
<p>World&#8217;s most expensive domain names<br />
1. Sex.com, $12m &#8211; purchased in 2005<br />
2. Porn.com, $9.5m &#8211; purchased in 2007<br />
3. Business.com, $7.5m &#8211; purchased in 1999<br />
4. Diamond.com, $7.5m &#8211; purchased in 2006<br />
5. Beer.com, $7m &#8211; purchased in 1999<br />
source: <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/02/07/domain-name-fetches-record-price" rel="nofollow">http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/02/07/domain-name-fetches-record-price</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

