<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeland Security Makes Traveling Harder . . . Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:02:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-50823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-50823</guid>
		<description>They should call the act creating the TSA, the full employment for mentally challenged law.  Gee what would it be like to have a full time job where I all do is make people take off their shoes and confiscate their toothpaste?

Its been seven years since 9/11 occurred.  Its time to give up some of the paranoia that exists.  Until Bush can prove that his actions have thwarted specific hijackings, I can&#039;t accept the blind assertion that this heightened security policy is why we haven&#039;t had any.

This business about the visas is just stupid.  These countries will all retaliate against the USA and it will interfere with trade and commerce we desperately need to prop up our dollar.

One more reason to vote against the GOP this November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should call the act creating the TSA, the full employment for mentally challenged law.  Gee what would it be like to have a full time job where I all do is make people take off their shoes and confiscate their toothpaste?</p>
<p>Its been seven years since 9/11 occurred.  Its time to give up some of the paranoia that exists.  Until Bush can prove that his actions have thwarted specific hijackings, I can&#8217;t accept the blind assertion that this heightened security policy is why we haven&#8217;t had any.</p>
<p>This business about the visas is just stupid.  These countries will all retaliate against the USA and it will interfere with trade and commerce we desperately need to prop up our dollar.</p>
<p>One more reason to vote against the GOP this November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daren S</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-50206</link>
		<dc:creator>Daren S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-50206</guid>
		<description>I agree that they are always looking out inconsistency of information when looking for those that are looking to stay on in the US and look for work illegally, but the good thing about data is that it helps establish behaviour patterns and establish likelihood of being an illegal worker.  If you have been coming and going for many years and always returned within two weeks the likelihood is that you will continue to do so.  If you are a first time visitor, young and from a less affluent country (i.e not UK) clearly the risk is higher and closer attention should be paid.  I just feel that the immigration and boarders people should focus their efforts on those people and make things easier for the frequent visitor and tourists from mostly wealthy European nations.  

RE CF&#039;s comment about form filling on the plane.  It would definitely be a plus if completing a form online replaced the tedium of ticking No to being associated with genocide or Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1945!  Unfortunately I doubt it and will have to keep having to reach for a pen in the bottom of my flight bag!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they are always looking out inconsistency of information when looking for those that are looking to stay on in the US and look for work illegally, but the good thing about data is that it helps establish behaviour patterns and establish likelihood of being an illegal worker.  If you have been coming and going for many years and always returned within two weeks the likelihood is that you will continue to do so.  If you are a first time visitor, young and from a less affluent country (i.e not UK) clearly the risk is higher and closer attention should be paid.  I just feel that the immigration and boarders people should focus their efforts on those people and make things easier for the frequent visitor and tourists from mostly wealthy European nations.  </p>
<p>RE CF&#8217;s comment about form filling on the plane.  It would definitely be a plus if completing a form online replaced the tedium of ticking No to being associated with genocide or Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1945!  Unfortunately I doubt it and will have to keep having to reach for a pen in the bottom of my flight bag!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49992</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49992</guid>
		<description>Artie - Most airlines already do that.  When you board, they usually scan your boarding pass and it will ring up an error if there are duplicates.  This isn&#039;t used everywhere on every airline, but it&#039;s very widespread at this point.  Of course, if the flight is full, then you&#039;ll have one guy looking for a seat and that will be easy to catch as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artie &#8211; Most airlines already do that.  When you board, they usually scan your boarding pass and it will ring up an error if there are duplicates.  This isn&#8217;t used everywhere on every airline, but it&#8217;s very widespread at this point.  Of course, if the flight is full, then you&#8217;ll have one guy looking for a seat and that will be easy to catch as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artie</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49947</link>
		<dc:creator>Artie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49947</guid>
		<description>Gobluetwo made an interesting point that got me thinking that there is some validity to the point that checking IDs is superfluous. His/her point about not having ID checked at the courthouse reminded me that when I served on a jury (was even Jury foreman - though it wasn&#039;t as cool as on TV...but I digress), I didn&#039;t have to show my ID to get past security. I did have to wear a generic &quot;Juror #1&quot; badge with the courtroom number on it, but I didn&#039;t have to show my own ID. And when I reflected more on my own arguments that it is OK to let somebody who forgot their ID get through with enhanced screening, it got me thinking that it is pretty easy to make a fake ID. So, I think I want to concede the point about checking IDs and perhaps refocus the debate on what to do instead?

Unlike a courthouse, if somebody gets their hand on my boarding pass after I check-in, how do we ensure they can&#039;t get past security and onto a plane with it? I&#039;m thinking the new Blackberry 3D barcodes that Continental is using. Seems to me you can implement a system similar to sporting events or the theatre where the barcode scanner will only allow that ticket to be used once. And it seems fairly easy to electronically invalidate an old barcode if by some weird reason one loses their blackberry before they get to security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gobluetwo made an interesting point that got me thinking that there is some validity to the point that checking IDs is superfluous. His/her point about not having ID checked at the courthouse reminded me that when I served on a jury (was even Jury foreman &#8211; though it wasn&#8217;t as cool as on TV&#8230;but I digress), I didn&#8217;t have to show my ID to get past security. I did have to wear a generic &#8220;Juror #1&#8243; badge with the courtroom number on it, but I didn&#8217;t have to show my own ID. And when I reflected more on my own arguments that it is OK to let somebody who forgot their ID get through with enhanced screening, it got me thinking that it is pretty easy to make a fake ID. So, I think I want to concede the point about checking IDs and perhaps refocus the debate on what to do instead?</p>
<p>Unlike a courthouse, if somebody gets their hand on my boarding pass after I check-in, how do we ensure they can&#8217;t get past security and onto a plane with it? I&#8217;m thinking the new Blackberry 3D barcodes that Continental is using. Seems to me you can implement a system similar to sporting events or the theatre where the barcode scanner will only allow that ticket to be used once. And it seems fairly easy to electronically invalidate an old barcode if by some weird reason one loses their blackberry before they get to security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49821</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49821</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting perspective, Daren S.  But I would agree with Andy that this won&#039;t change the attitude at all.  It&#039;s just going to add more burden on to you and other travelers.  I suppose the only benefit is that you won&#039;t need to shuffle for a pen to fill out the card on the flight?  Ok, that&#039;s a weak argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting perspective, Daren S.  But I would agree with Andy that this won&#8217;t change the attitude at all.  It&#8217;s just going to add more burden on to you and other travelers.  I suppose the only benefit is that you won&#8217;t need to shuffle for a pen to fill out the card on the flight?  Ok, that&#8217;s a weak argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49788</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49788</guid>
		<description>@Daren, the registration won&#039;t do any good to you.  They already know who you are but ask you nonetheless.  Registering will allow to double check, make meetings and place calls if your name, birthday and passport number etc. show up in some other list.  Chances are this is not the case with you.  The questions they ask you are the same I presume: why are you coming, for how long etc.  They all to determine that you have no immigration intent but will return soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daren, the registration won&#8217;t do any good to you.  They already know who you are but ask you nonetheless.  Registering will allow to double check, make meetings and place calls if your name, birthday and passport number etc. show up in some other list.  Chances are this is not the case with you.  The questions they ask you are the same I presume: why are you coming, for how long etc.  They all to determine that you have no immigration intent but will return soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daren S</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49758</link>
		<dc:creator>Daren S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49758</guid>
		<description>As a brit who has been flying to the US two or three times a year for the past 20 or so years I have been waiting for a scheme where all the information I provide benefits me in some way.  There seems to be nothing for the frequent visitor in the Homeland Security&#039;s policies.  The vast majority of the time I visit family who are resident in the US and yet I always get asked the same questions in the same surly manner (btw I think Homeland Security do a great job of putting off tourists). I am happy to share more personal information if it means that I get through immigration quicker and possibly with a smile from the officer.  So, overall I would be fully in favor of registering information online if I get something out of it too.  Is that too much to ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a brit who has been flying to the US two or three times a year for the past 20 or so years I have been waiting for a scheme where all the information I provide benefits me in some way.  There seems to be nothing for the frequent visitor in the Homeland Security&#8217;s policies.  The vast majority of the time I visit family who are resident in the US and yet I always get asked the same questions in the same surly manner (btw I think Homeland Security do a great job of putting off tourists). I am happy to share more personal information if it means that I get through immigration quicker and possibly with a smile from the officer.  So, overall I would be fully in favor of registering information online if I get something out of it too.  Is that too much to ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire Walter</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49739</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49739</guid>
		<description>You have a really good point about the crucial issue, security-wise, being whether a passenger is trying to bring something dangerous aboard an airplane (nail clippers, contact lens wetting solution, a toddler&#039;s sippy cup being among the examples in TSA&#039;s short history). The TSA&#039;s latest HUH? decision is dressing up its screeners in &quot;police-blue&quot; shirts and official badges -- presumbaly to give them an air of authority.  See http://travel-babel.blogspot.com/2008/06/tsa-screeners-get-new-uniforms-and.html for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a really good point about the crucial issue, security-wise, being whether a passenger is trying to bring something dangerous aboard an airplane (nail clippers, contact lens wetting solution, a toddler&#8217;s sippy cup being among the examples in TSA&#8217;s short history). The TSA&#8217;s latest HUH? decision is dressing up its screeners in &#8220;police-blue&#8221; shirts and official badges &#8212; presumbaly to give them an air of authority.  See <a href="http://travel-babel.blogspot.com/2008/06/tsa-screeners-get-new-uniforms-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://travel-babel.blogspot.com/2008/06/tsa-screeners-get-new-uniforms-and.html</a> for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gobluetwo</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49511</link>
		<dc:creator>gobluetwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49511</guid>
		<description>Artie wrote: &quot;They are not tracking where I’m going - they are only making sure that somebody with evil intentions doesn’t somehow steal my boarding pass and try to gain access to a “secured” area - granted, we all know that this is NOT 100% secure.&quot;

That&#039;s the whole problem with ID checking.  Say someone with evil intentions does, in fact, steal your BP (or, heaven forbid, print out a FAKE).  He can get in line without an ID and be screened.  TSA, of course, will know that he actually did lose his ID because the &quot;extensive&quot; search did not yield an ID on his person or in his belongings.  Of course, he also went in a different line from you, so nobody knows that the same BP was used twice by two different people.

And how do they know you don&#039;t have evil intentions just because you have an ID?  The 9/11 terrorists all had valid state ID&#039;s.  I could be a terrorist and I certainly have a valid DL.  And if they&#039;re not actually checking names against a list, then they have no way of knowing whether or not someone has evil intentions.  

Of course, said list (ie, the No Fly List) is ridiculously flawed anyway.  I just don&#039;t see how checking IDs is a security measure.  I can see how it benefits the airlines and other businesses, to extend your bar analogy.  As I recall, my ID was not checked the last time I went into a courthouse, although all my belongings were xrayed and I passed through a WTMD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artie wrote: &#8220;They are not tracking where I’m going &#8211; they are only making sure that somebody with evil intentions doesn’t somehow steal my boarding pass and try to gain access to a “secured” area &#8211; granted, we all know that this is NOT 100% secure.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the whole problem with ID checking.  Say someone with evil intentions does, in fact, steal your BP (or, heaven forbid, print out a FAKE).  He can get in line without an ID and be screened.  TSA, of course, will know that he actually did lose his ID because the &#8220;extensive&#8221; search did not yield an ID on his person or in his belongings.  Of course, he also went in a different line from you, so nobody knows that the same BP was used twice by two different people.</p>
<p>And how do they know you don&#8217;t have evil intentions just because you have an ID?  The 9/11 terrorists all had valid state ID&#8217;s.  I could be a terrorist and I certainly have a valid DL.  And if they&#8217;re not actually checking names against a list, then they have no way of knowing whether or not someone has evil intentions.  </p>
<p>Of course, said list (ie, the No Fly List) is ridiculously flawed anyway.  I just don&#8217;t see how checking IDs is a security measure.  I can see how it benefits the airlines and other businesses, to extend your bar analogy.  As I recall, my ID was not checked the last time I went into a courthouse, although all my belongings were xrayed and I passed through a WTMD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/06/16/homeland-security-makes-traveling-harder-again/comment-page-1/#comment-49479</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/?p=1058#comment-49479</guid>
		<description>CF, I&#039;m with you on the ID/no ID thing, actually.  I&#039;m sure there is some administrative reason for the policy, but it seems absurd that somebody with ill intentions would think that simply showing up without an ID would somehow aid them in carrying out their mission.  It would most certainly make it more difficult.

As for the pre-registration, I agree that we should welcome tourists and their money, and we should make it as easy as possible for them to get here.  However, I understand the basic rationale behind placing one more step between the passenger and the plane.  I would imagine that somebody with a sophisticated terror plot would find a way to pre-register without raising red flags.  Still, even if it&#039;s only in a minute percentage (or fraction thereof) of cases, wouldn&#039;t you rather a red flag go up before the passenger in question even leaves for airport, as opposed to after the plane leaves the ground (at which time, it might be too late to avoid an incident)?  Perhaps I have too much faith in the government...

This is a good debate, and it&#039;s nice to see civil, mutually respectful online political discourse for a change.  Nonetheless, I must leave now for ORD to catch my lovely 3.5-hour regional jet flight to San Antonio (think the Southwest commercial: &quot;we now invite you to sit-back, relax and enjoy your 4-hour [commuter jet] flight&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF, I&#8217;m with you on the ID/no ID thing, actually.  I&#8217;m sure there is some administrative reason for the policy, but it seems absurd that somebody with ill intentions would think that simply showing up without an ID would somehow aid them in carrying out their mission.  It would most certainly make it more difficult.</p>
<p>As for the pre-registration, I agree that we should welcome tourists and their money, and we should make it as easy as possible for them to get here.  However, I understand the basic rationale behind placing one more step between the passenger and the plane.  I would imagine that somebody with a sophisticated terror plot would find a way to pre-register without raising red flags.  Still, even if it&#8217;s only in a minute percentage (or fraction thereof) of cases, wouldn&#8217;t you rather a red flag go up before the passenger in question even leaves for airport, as opposed to after the plane leaves the ground (at which time, it might be too late to avoid an incident)?  Perhaps I have too much faith in the government&#8230;</p>
<p>This is a good debate, and it&#8217;s nice to see civil, mutually respectful online political discourse for a change.  Nonetheless, I must leave now for ORD to catch my lovely 3.5-hour regional jet flight to San Antonio (think the Southwest commercial: &#8220;we now invite you to sit-back, relax and enjoy your 4-hour [commuter jet] flight&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
