<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Across the Aisle from British Airways on London/City Flights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:04:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Van Wyck</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/comment-page-1/#comment-69362</link>
		<dc:creator>Van Wyck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/#comment-69362</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that BA is so stuck on EWR / JFK for this side of the pond. If this journey is all about saving time on the ground, and reducing the unpredictable nature of getting to / from the airport - then neither JFK or EWR are good options. 

Yes, they make a good point about the heavy frequencies in case of mechanical disruption as to keeping the flights at either EWR or JFK. But I&#039;m not sold on it. Having done the PrivatAir flight from EWR to FRA, I&#039;m not going to go out of my way to fly a &quot;domestic&quot; aircraft across the Atlantic again without some sort of real benefit. I fail to see that benefit (time, convenience, service) with this a318 option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that BA is so stuck on EWR / JFK for this side of the pond. If this journey is all about saving time on the ground, and reducing the unpredictable nature of getting to / from the airport &#8211; then neither JFK or EWR are good options. </p>
<p>Yes, they make a good point about the heavy frequencies in case of mechanical disruption as to keeping the flights at either EWR or JFK. But I&#8217;m not sold on it. Having done the PrivatAir flight from EWR to FRA, I&#8217;m not going to go out of my way to fly a &#8220;domestic&#8221; aircraft across the Atlantic again without some sort of real benefit. I fail to see that benefit (time, convenience, service) with this a318 option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cranky Flier &#187; British Airways Stops in Shannon for London/City Flights</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/comment-page-1/#comment-61903</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cranky Flier &#187; British Airways Stops in Shannon for London/City Flights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/#comment-61903</guid>
		<description>[...] passengers to be pre-cleared through immigration before arriving in the US? And remember when, in my interview, SVP of Commercial in North America Woody Harford said &#8220;[I read your earlier post.] You have a very interesting point in terms of Ireland [and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] passengers to be pre-cleared through immigration before arriving in the US? And remember when, in my interview, SVP of Commercial in North America Woody Harford said &#8220;[I read your earlier post.] You have a very interesting point in terms of Ireland [and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aircraft parts</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/comment-page-1/#comment-53882</link>
		<dc:creator>aircraft parts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/#comment-53882</guid>
		<description>it would have been more better to stay at Halifax where they could do full preclearance. after the preclearence they could go else where.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would have been more better to stay at Halifax where they could do full preclearance. after the preclearence they could go else where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan B Zhabin</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/comment-page-1/#comment-24176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan B Zhabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/#comment-24176</guid>
		<description>Halifax is still pretty far ~2900 miles. (i.e., requires a lot of fuel making the aircraft quite heavy--doubtful the A318 can take off from LCY). I would imagine that making the first westbound hop is a short one to Ireland is the best option... hey, if there&#039;s not much benefit from preclearance, it may even be something like Cardiff for that matter (do not need to get up too high to get there, and a runway will not have any limitations).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halifax is still pretty far ~2900 miles. (i.e., requires a lot of fuel making the aircraft quite heavy&#8211;doubtful the A318 can take off from LCY). I would imagine that making the first westbound hop is a short one to Ireland is the best option&#8230; hey, if there&#8217;s not much benefit from preclearance, it may even be something like Cardiff for that matter (do not need to get up too high to get there, and a runway will not have any limitations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John L</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/comment-page-1/#comment-24040</link>
		<dc:creator>John L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2008/02/02/more-british-airways-london-city-transatlantic/#comment-24040</guid>
		<description>If they have to stop westbound, it&#039;d make far more sense to stop in Halifax where they could do full preclearance. Then they could go to any of JFK, LGA, or EWR.

BA doesn&#039;t have any other operations at YHZ that I can see, but their pals at AA do, so there&#039;d be some alternatives to get people to and from NYC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they have to stop westbound, it&#8217;d make far more sense to stop in Halifax where they could do full preclearance. Then they could go to any of JFK, LGA, or EWR.</p>
<p>BA doesn&#8217;t have any other operations at YHZ that I can see, but their pals at AA do, so there&#8217;d be some alternatives to get people to and from NYC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
