<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schneier Takes on Idiot Security Once Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/schneier-takes-on-idiot-security-once-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/schneier-takes-on-idiot-security-once-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamED</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/schneier-takes-on-idiot-security-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-12856</link>
		<dc:creator>JamED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/idiot-security-from-bruce-schneier/#comment-12856</guid>
		<description>huh weird that they would do these things individually, shoes and bag should go through the one x-ray together!
Thanks for the reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh weird that they would do these things individually, shoes and bag should go through the one x-ray together!<br />
Thanks for the reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/schneier-takes-on-idiot-security-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-12845</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/idiot-security-from-bruce-schneier/#comment-12845</guid>
		<description>Since it&#039;s a two step process, the dirty shoes would never be scanned.  Assuming they don&#039;t have metal in them, you can walk through the metal detector wearing those shoes while your bag with the clean shoes goes through the x-ray.

After that, you&#039;re supposed to take your shoes off and put them through a separate x-ray machine.  Instead, you can put those shoes into your carry on bag and then pull out the clean shoes and run those through the x-ray.  Since the bag has already gone through the x-ray before, those shoes will never get scanned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it&#8217;s a two step process, the dirty shoes would never be scanned.  Assuming they don&#8217;t have metal in them, you can walk through the metal detector wearing those shoes while your bag with the clean shoes goes through the x-ray.</p>
<p>After that, you&#8217;re supposed to take your shoes off and put them through a separate x-ray machine.  Instead, you can put those shoes into your carry on bag and then pull out the clean shoes and run those through the x-ray.  Since the bag has already gone through the x-ray before, those shoes will never get scanned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamED</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/schneier-takes-on-idiot-security-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-12834</link>
		<dc:creator>JamED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/12/18/idiot-security-from-bruce-schneier/#comment-12834</guid>
		<description>What would stop the dirty shoes being picked up on when being scanned inside the bag? Or are the bag/shoe scanners looking for different things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would stop the dirty shoes being picked up on when being scanned inside the bag? Or are the bag/shoe scanners looking for different things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

