<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big News . . . in the UK . . . About Carry-Ons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:24:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UK carry on rules to be relaxed &#8230; maybe &#8230; for some - Musings of The Global Traveller</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-93211</link>
		<dc:creator>UK carry on rules to be relaxed &#8230; maybe &#8230; for some - Musings of The Global Traveller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/#comment-93211</guid>
		<description>[...] Cranky Flier recently reported on the recent announcement that UK carry on rules will be allowed to be relaxed from January 7. Given the process - each airport is invited to apply to allow their passengers to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cranky Flier recently reported on the recent announcement that UK carry on rules will be allowed to be relaxed from January 7. Given the process &#8211; each airport is invited to apply to allow their passengers to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris roller</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-71011</link>
		<dc:creator>chris roller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/#comment-71011</guid>
		<description>I just found your blog on google. I really liked it and now I will share it with my friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found your blog on google. I really liked it and now I will share it with my friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cranky Flier &#187; 19 UK Airports to Allow Second Carry On</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-16892</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cranky Flier &#187; 19 UK Airports to Allow Second Carry On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/#comment-16892</guid>
		<description>[...] Mary), and hopefully I can take your mind off that pounding headache. A month and a half ago, I noted that the UK would begin allowing airports to permit two carry-on bags per person. The big question [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mary), and hopefully I can take your mind off that pounding headache. A month and a half ago, I noted that the UK would begin allowing airports to permit two carry-on bags per person. The big question [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-10525</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/#comment-10525</guid>
		<description>Sorry it took so long to get your comment up there, Gudrun.  It got stuck in the spam filter.

To answer your question, this should be an improvement now because they&#039;re going to be relaxing the one carry on rule.  I don&#039;t know of any exceptions off hand, but I can point you to the government website detailing the rules:
http://www.dft.gov.uk/transportforyou/airtravel/airportsecurity/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry it took so long to get your comment up there, Gudrun.  It got stuck in the spam filter.</p>
<p>To answer your question, this should be an improvement now because they&#8217;re going to be relaxing the one carry on rule.  I don&#8217;t know of any exceptions off hand, but I can point you to the government website detailing the rules:<br />
<a href="http://www.dft.gov.uk/transportforyou/airtravel/airportsecurity/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dft.gov.uk/transportforyou/airtravel/airportsecurity/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Global Traveller</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-9599</link>
		<dc:creator>The Global Traveller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/#comment-9599</guid>
		<description>Agree very disappointing.  Given BAA&#039;s lack of investment why should we (the customers) have any confidence they will bother applying for 2 carry-ons being allowed?  And even in the unlikely event they succumb to pressure, that they will actually pass whatever test the authorities impose?

It would have been far more customer friendly to put the onus on airports - 2 carry ons will be allowed from x date.

The longer the current nonsense is allowed to continue, the more UK misses out from aware travellers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree very disappointing.  Given BAA&#8217;s lack of investment why should we (the customers) have any confidence they will bother applying for 2 carry-ons being allowed?  And even in the unlikely event they succumb to pressure, that they will actually pass whatever test the authorities impose?</p>
<p>It would have been far more customer friendly to put the onus on airports &#8211; 2 carry ons will be allowed from x date.</p>
<p>The longer the current nonsense is allowed to continue, the more UK misses out from aware travellers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flightjunkie</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-9468</link>
		<dc:creator>flightjunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/#comment-9468</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s truly good news, but also disappointing at the same time, that each airport may be different. If they don&#039;t even AIM to be consistent, there&#039;s no hope of any clarity or ease of confusion for passengers.

But then again, we have the TSA here in the U.S., &#039;nuff said.

One-bag rule aside, I think the big reason for people not wanting to transit through UK airports is the hefty taxes that are imposed. The UK gov&#039;t has single-handedly made the likes of BA/VS/BD uncompetitive for connecting traffic, compared to other European hubs like FRA and AMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s truly good news, but also disappointing at the same time, that each airport may be different. If they don&#8217;t even AIM to be consistent, there&#8217;s no hope of any clarity or ease of confusion for passengers.</p>
<p>But then again, we have the TSA here in the U.S., &#8217;nuff said.</p>
<p>One-bag rule aside, I think the big reason for people not wanting to transit through UK airports is the hefty taxes that are imposed. The UK gov&#8217;t has single-handedly made the likes of BA/VS/BD uncompetitive for connecting traffic, compared to other European hubs like FRA and AMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gudrun at Kango</title>
		<link>http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/comment-page-1/#comment-9445</link>
		<dc:creator>Gudrun at Kango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crankyflier.com/2007/11/15/big-news-in-the-uk-about-carry-ons/#comment-9445</guid>
		<description>any ideas how this will effect parents flying with kids? I know when my kids were little, the sheer amount of stuff for them usually meant we were up to two per person, kids included. Will there be any exceptions made?

Guess I should look for a really good handbag/laptop carrier/purse/tote bag unit for my next flight....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any ideas how this will effect parents flying with kids? I know when my kids were little, the sheer amount of stuff for them usually meant we were up to two per person, kids included. Will there be any exceptions made?</p>
<p>Guess I should look for a really good handbag/laptop carrier/purse/tote bag unit for my next flight&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
